The Rudolf Steiner Archive

[ 1 ] A saying by Goethe that delicately explains the relationship between humans and the world is this: “We actually undertake in vain to express the essence of a thing. We become aware of effects, and a complete history of these effects would probably encompass the essence of that thing. We strive in vain to describe the character of a person; on the other hand, if we put together his actions, his deeds, we will be confronted with a picture of his character. Colors are deeds of light, deeds and suffering... Colors and light are in the most exact relationship to each other, but we must think of both as belonging to the whole of nature: for it is the whole of nature that wants to reveal itself to the eye in this way. In the same way, the whole of nature reveals itself to another sense... Thus nature speaks downwards to other senses, to known, unrecognized, unknown senses; thus it speaks to itself and to us through a thousand phenomena. To the attentive, it is never dead or mute.»

[ 2 ] To fully appreciate the significance of this statement, , one need only consider how very differently the world must reveal itself to the lowest forms of life, which have only a kind of sense of touch or feeling spread over the entire surface of their bodies. Light, color and sound cannot be present for them in the same way that they are present for beings that are endowed with eyes and ears. The air vibrations that a shot from a gun causes may also have an effect on them if they are hit by them. An ear is necessary for these air vibrations to be perceived as a bang. And that certain processes, which reveal themselves in the fine substance called ether as light and color, require an eye. In this sense, the philosopher Lotze's statement applies: “Without a light-sensitive eye and a sound-sensitive ear, the whole world would be dark and silent. There would be no light or sound in it, just as a toothache would be impossible without a tooth nerve that can feel pain.»

[ 3 ] The poet Robert Hamerling says in his philosophical book («Atomistik des Willens») about this insight: «If this does not make sense to you, dear reader, and if your your mind bends before this fact like a shy horse, then do not read another line; leave this and all other books that deal with philosophical matters unread; for you lack the necessary ability to take in a fact without prejudice and to hold it in your thoughts.»

[ 4 ] But a conclusion necessarily follows from this fact. Goethe expresses it beautifully: “The eye owes its existence to light. From indifferent animal auxiliary organs, light calls forth an organ that becomes its equal; and so the eye is formed by light for light, so that the inner light may confront the outer.” This means nothing other than that the external processes that man perceives through the eye as light would be there even without the eye; this however creates the sensation of light from them. Man must never say that only that which he perceives exists; he must recognize that of all that exists, he can only perceive that for which he has organs. And with each new organ, the world must reveal new aspects of its nature. The naturalist Tyndall aptly describes this: “The effect of light in the animal kingdom seems to be only a change in chemical composition, as occurs in the leaves of plants. Gradually this effect is localized in individual pigment cells that are more sensitive to light than the surrounding tissue. The eye begins. It is initially able to reveal the differences between light and shadow that are produced by very close objects. Because the interruption of light is almost always followed by contact with the opaque nearby object, it must be concluded that seeing is a kind of anticipated feeling. The adaptation continues (in higher animals). A slight swelling of the skin forms above the pigment cells; a lens begins to form, and through an infinite number of adaptations, the sense of sight achieves a sharpness that ultimately reaches the perfection of the hawk or eagle eye. It is the same with the other senses.“

[ 5 ] How much of what is real is revealed to a being through sensation depends on the organs that have developed in it. Man must never say that only that which he can perceive is real. There may be many things that are real, but which he has no organs to perceive. And a man who declared only that which is ordinarily perceptible to the senses to be real would be like a lower animal that declared the unreality of colors and sounds, since it cannot perceive them.

[ 6 ] Now every man knows of a real world which he cannot perceive with his ordinary senses. That is his own inner world. His feelings, impulses, passions and thoughts are real. They live in him. But no ear can hear them; no eye can see them. They are “dark and silent” for another, as Lotze says in the above quotation, “without a light-sensitive eye and without a sound-sensitive ear, the whole world would be dark and silent.” And this world ceases to be “dark and silent” as soon as there are sensitive eyes and ears. Only such a being can know that the world of colors and sounds arises from this “mute and dark” world, that it experiences this latter world by means of the eye and ear. Only direct experience can decide this.

[ 7 ] Can someone who cannot perceive the real inner world of man as a sensation claim that it is impossible to perceive it? Anyone who recognizes the significance of the facts presented will do so. He will have to say to himself: whether this is possible is for those who have such a perception to decide, not for those who do not. For the eye-gifted, not the eyeless being, can give an account of the reality of the world of colors. This thought must be followed by the following, which Hamerling brilliantly summarizes in what he has to say in this direction: “Our sensory world is the world of effects. The active element in every being produces the idea in others, as a touch on the strings produces the sound. Every being is a harpist on foreign strings and, at the same time, a harp for foreign fingers.»

[ 8 ] Just as external nature transforms the “indifferent animal organs” into the eye, in the sense of Goethe, so man can develop within himself the organs through which feelings, drives, instincts, passions, thoughts, etc. become a world of senses, a world of effects, just as air vibrations become sound perception through the ear, and ether vibrations become color perception through the eye. The paths that the soul must take to develop these senses will be discussed in a later issue of this journal. Here, we will say a few words about the perceptions of these “spiritual senses” themselves.

[ 9 ] It is clear that only a part of a person is visible to the external eye. It is the part that is referred to as the physical body. This physical body consists of the same components as the external natural objects. And the physical and chemical forces that are also active in minerals are active in it. Now every thinking person will admit that the life of the soul can never be explained by these substances and their processes. The natural scientist Du Bois-Reymond expresses himself on this subject as follows: “It may seem, at a superficial glance, that by knowing the material processes in the brain, we could understand certain mental processes and dispositions. I include in this the memory, the flow and association of ideas, the consequences of practice, specific talents and the like. The slightest reflection teaches that this is an illusion. We would only be informed about certain inner conditions of the mental life, which are more or less equivalent to the outer conditions set by the sensory impressions, but not about the origin of the mental life through these conditions. What conceivable connection exists between certain movements of certain atoms in my brain on the one hand, and on the other hand the original, indefinable, undeniable facts for me: I feel pain, I feel pleasure, I taste sweetness, I smell the scent of roses, I hear the sound of an organ, I see red, and the equally immediate certainty that follows from this: So I am? It is simply inconceivable, forever and ever, that a number of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, etc. atoms should not be indifferent to how they lie and move, how they lay and moved, how they lie and will move.” – Du Bois-Reymond is certainly wrong with what he concludes from this, but not with the fact itself. (Compare my book “Welt-und Lebensanschauungen im neunzehnten Jahrhundert”, Berlin, Siegfr. Cronbach, second volume, page 78 ff.) - It must be made clear what facts underlie such a statement. The natural scientist uses the external senses for his investigations. He does indeed strengthen their power by means of instruments, and he combines the facts they supply with his understanding, and determines their proportions by calculation; but the basis for everything he determines is external, sensuous observation. Now, this can indeed determine processes in the material world; or where these are too small to be perceived directly, they can be supplemented by hypotheses: but it can never perceive anything spiritual or mental. Du Bois-Reymond is therefore saying nothing other than that where the material process passes over into the mental, external sensory observation ceases. How carbon, oxygen, etc. atoms lie and move can be imagined in such a way because it is similar to perceivable material processes. “I feel pain, I feel pleasure, etc.” can no longer be grasped by the external senses. — A higher faculty of perception must intervene, just as the higher faculty of perception of the eye must intervene when the world of tactile sensations of the lower animal is to be supplemented by the world of color. - And for such a higher faculty of perception, a transition also takes place between physical processes and the “facts that cannot be denied: I feel pain, I feel pleasure, I smell the scent of roses, etc.” as between the movement of a rolling ivory ball and the state of the other, which, as a result of the impact of the first, passes from rest into motion. For this higher perceptive faculty, the physical human body is only the middle part of a larger body, in which the former is enveloped as in a cloud. And just as the physical eye perceives the ether vibrations emitted by the physical body as the colors of this body, so the spiritual eye perceives, through a corresponding mediation, the feelings, drives, passions and ideas, which are just as “undeniable facts” as the movements of carbon, hydrogen, etc. in the brain,

[ 10 ] Through a special process of transformation, which will be described later, the inner world of causes of the human being presents itself to the “spiritual eye” as a world of effects in colors in the same way as the physical processes in the body present themselves to the external eye as color effects. The color effects that can be perceived by the “spiritual eye”, which radiate around the physical human being and envelop him like a cloud (perhaps in the shape of an egg), are called the human aura. It must be considered as much a part of the human being as the physical body. The size of this aura differs from person to person. But on average, one can imagine that the whole person is twice as long and four times as wide as the physical one.

[ 11 ] A wide range of colors now floods this aura. And this flooding is a true reflection of inner human life. The individual colors are as varied as this. But certain permanent characteristics are expressed in the basic colors: talents, habits, character traits.

[ 12 ] The aura is very different according to the various temperaments and dispositions of people; it also varies according to the degree of spiritual development. A person who gives himself completely to his animal instincts has a completely different aura than one who lives much in thought. The aura of a person with a religious disposition differs significantly from that of someone who is absorbed in the trivial events of the day. In addition, all changing moods, inclinations, joys and pains find expression in the aura.

[ 13 ] The auras of different types of people must be compared with each other in order to understand the meaning of the color tones. First, take people who have strongly developed affects. They can be divided into two different types. Those who are driven to these affects primarily by their animal nature, and those in whom the same affects take on a more refined form, where they are, so to speak, strongly influenced by reflection. In the first type of person, brown and brown-red color currents of all shades flow through the aura in certain places. In those with more refined affects, tones of lighter red and green appear in the same places. It can be observed that the green tones become more frequent with increasing intelligence. Very intelligent people who are completely absorbed in satisfying their animal instincts have a lot of green in their aura. However, this green will always have a stronger or weaker touch of brown or brown-red. Unintelligent people show a large part of the aura flooded with brown-red or even dark blood-red currents.

[ 14 ] The aura of calm, thoughtful people is very different from that of such emotional natures. The brownish and reddish tones recede; and various shades of green come to the fore. In thinkers, the aura shows a pleasant green undertone. This is how those people look who can be said to know how to find their way in every situation in life.

[ 15 ] The blue color tones appear in devoted natures. (I would like to expressly note that I am happy to be corrected by other researchers. Observations in this field are, of course, uncertain. And this uncertainty cannot be compared with that which is possible in the physical field, although this is also very great, as researchers know. For comparison with my statements, I would like to draw your attention to the book by C. W. Leadbeater: “Man visible and invisible”, which was published in London in 1902 by the Theosophical Publishing Society. The more a person places his self in the service of a cause, the more significant the blue nuances become. In this respect, too, one encounters two quite different types of people. There are natures of little mental power, passive souls, who, as it were, have nothing to throw into the stream of world events except their “good nature”. Their aura glows in a beautiful blue. This is also the case with many devotional, religious natures. Compassionate souls and those who like to live out their existence in a state of well-being have a similar aura. If such people are also intelligent, green and blue currents alternate, or the blue itself may even take on a greenish nuance. It is the peculiarity of active souls, in contrast to passive ones, that their blue is imbued with bright colors from within. Inventive natures, those who have fruitful thoughts, radiate bright colors from an inner point, as it were. In general, everything that indicates mental activity has more the form of rays that spread from within; while everything that comes from animal life has the form of irregular clouds that flood the aura.

[ 16 ] The color formations show different shades depending on whether the ideas that arise from an active soul are used to serve one's own animal instincts or ideal, objective interests. The inventive mind that uses all its thoughts to satisfy its sensual passions shows dark blue-red nuances; on the other hand, the one who selflessly puts his fertile thoughts into a factual interest shows light red-blue color tones. A life in the spirit, coupled with noble devotion and a capacity for self-sacrifice, reveal pink or light violet colors.

[ 17 ] Not only the basic state of the soul, but also temporary emotions, moods and other inner experiences show their color waves in the aura. A sudden outburst of violent anger produces red waves; offended honor, which is expressed in a sudden outburst, can be seen appearing in dark green clouds. — But the color phenomena do not only occur in irregular cloud formations, but also in certain limited, regularly shaped figures. For example, a sudden attack of fear is shown by the aura from top to bottom by wavy stripes in blue color, which have a reddish shimmer. In a person who is waiting with tension for a certain event, one can see continuous red-blue stripes radiating from the inside outwards through the aura.

[ 18 ] For an accurate spiritual perception, every sensation that a person receives from the outside must be noticed. People who are strongly stimulated by every external impression show a continuous flickering of small reddish spots and flecks in the aura. In people who do not feel vividly, these spots have an orange-yellow or even a beautiful yellow color. So-called “distracted” people show bluish spots of more or less changing shape.

[ 19 ] The following is intended to show to what extent this aura, as characterized here, is a very composite phenomenon. It should also be shown how it is the expression of the whole being of the human being. The explanations given here should be considered as an introduction.

[ 20 ] In the foregoing, the auric cloud within which the physical body of the human being is located has been described in some general terms. — For a more highly developed “spiritual vision,” three types of color phenomena can be distinguished within this “aura” that surrounds and radiates around the human being. First, there are colors that have more or less the character of opacity and dullness. However, when we compare these colors with those that our physical eye sees, they appear lively and transparent in comparison. Within the supersensible world itself, however, they make the space they fill comparatively opaque; they fill it like fog. — A second type of color is that which is, as it were, completely light. They illuminate the space they fill. This space itself becomes a space of light. The third type of colored appearance is quite different from these two. These have a radiant, sparkling, glittering character. They not only illuminate the space they fill, they also shine and radiate through it. There is something active, inherently mobile about these colors. The others have something in them that is at rest, immobile. These, on the other hand, generate themselves out of themselves, as it were, continually. - Through the first two types of color, space is filled as if with a fine liquid that remains calm in it; through the third, it is filled with a constantly fanning life, with never-resting activity.

[ 21 ] These three color types are not located next to each other in the human aura; they are not located in separate parts of space; instead, they partially penetrate each other. At one point in the aura, all three types can be seen mixed together, just as a physical body, for example a bell, can be seen and heard at the same time. This makes the aura an extraordinarily complicated phenomenon. For, as it were, one has to deal with three auras that are located within each other and interpenetrate. (Aura of a higher order is not considered here.) But one can get a clear picture by directing one's attention alternately to one of these three auras. In the supersensible world one does something similar to what one does in the sensible world, for example, when one closes one's eyes to fully enjoy the impression of a piece of music. The “seer” has three kinds of organs for the three color types. And in order to observe one undisturbed by the others, he can open one or the other type of organ to the impressions and close the others. — In the beginning, a “seer” can only have developed one type of organ, that for the first type of color. Such a person can only see one aura; the other two remain invisible to him. Likewise, someone may be able to perceive the first two types, but not the third. — The higher level of the “gift of seeing” then consists in a person being able to observe all three auras and to direct his attention alternately to one or the other for the purpose of study.

[ 22 ] The triple aura is the supersensory visible expression of the human being. For this being is composed of three members: the body, soul and spirit. The body is the transitory part of man; that which is born and dies. The spirit is the immortal part. After the death of the body, it experiences various states and conditions in realms that are not accessible to the external senses, in order to be reborn in a new body after a shorter or longer period of time. (More detailed information on the conditions between death and a new incarnation can be found in the essay “How Karma Works.”) The link between the perishable body and the imperishable spirit is the soul. One has to imagine that the impressions of the sensual external world are first received by the soul and then passed on to the spirit. The ear, for example, as a physical organ, receives an impression through an air vibration. The soul transforms this air vibration into the sensation of sound. Only through this experience does the human being inwardly — as a sensation — experience that which would otherwise be a mute process in the external air. — And within the human being, the spirit again perceives the sensation. In this way, it receives information about the sensuous, earthly world from the soul. The spirit cannot communicate directly with the sensuous world. The soul is its messenger. Through the soul, the immortal spirit of man enters into communication with the earthly world. (Those who seek more precise information about the relationship between spirit, soul and body will find it in my forthcoming book, “Theosophy.”) The soul is thus the actual bearer of what man experiences within himself between birth and death. The spirit preserves these experiences and carries them over from one embodiment to another.

[ 23 ] The soul is influenced by two sides in man. The body influences it to convey the sensual-physical impressions. The spirit influences it from the other side, in order to impress upon it the eternal laws that are its own. The soul is connected, on the one hand, with the body, and on the other with the spirit. Therefore, in the living human being, one has to distinguish between a threefold inner life. The first includes everything that continually flows from the body to the soul; the second are the processes in the soul itself. The third are the influences that the soul experiences from the spirit. A simple example can make it clear how these three forms of human inner life differ. Let us assume that a person has not eaten for a long time. As a result, certain processes take place in the body that are not beneficial to his physical life. This has an effect on the soul as a feeling of hunger.

[ 24 ] This feeling is a process in the soul; but the cause of it lies in the body. - Let us further assume that a person passes a person in need. He supports him. The cause for this lies in the realization of the spirit that man must help others. The soul carries out the action; the spirit gives the order. The soul feels compassion. This compassion is again a process in the soul. The cause for this lies in the spirit. Between these two types of soul experiences there is now a third. It is the one in which neither body nor spirit are directly involved. At first, the immediate stimulus of hunger repeatedly prompts a person to eat. But when he begins to reflect on the connection between hunger and his way of life, he regulates this way of life through thinking. He uses thinking, as it were, to take into account the needs of his sensuality. In this way, he makes his spiritual life independent of the immediate stimuli of sensual corporeality. The more undeveloped a person is, the more he will surrender to sensual stimuli. With higher development, he will increasingly place his inner life at the service of thinking, but in doing so, he will also become increasingly receptive to the influences of spirituality. An undeveloped person who must surrender to every stimulus of his body will be insensitive to the eternal laws of truth and goodness that come from the spirit. He will be completely absorbed in what his body demands of him. The more independent a person becomes of these influences, the more will that which is imperishable, eternally true and eternally good, shine forth in him. And he will ultimately recognize that he is there to place his powers, his abilities, all his actions at the service of the eternal. The first is that which is dependent on the bodily causes; the second is that part of the life of the soul which, to a certain extent, has made itself independent of every external stimulus through reflection, but which still absorbs itself in the satisfaction of the outer life; the third part, finally, is that which places its own life in the service of the eternal. In the undeveloped human being, the first part is predominant; in the more highly developed, the third comes to the fore. The average human being holds the middle between the two.

[ 25 ] These three parts of the human inner life find expression in the triple aura in a way that is visible to the supernatural. The extent to which the soul is dependent on the body, and is influenced by its processes, is expressed in the dull, opaque color phenomena. A person who lives entirely according to his physical nature has this part of the aura particularly vividly developed. — Everything that has become independent of the direct influences of the body through education, through reflection, in short, through external culture, is expressed in the colors that illuminate the space in transparent brightness. And all the true spirituality of man, the selfless devotion to the true and good, in other words the treasures that man collects for eternity, appear in the sparkling, radiant color phenomena of the aura.

[ 26 ] The first aura is a reflection of the influence that the body exerts on the soul of man; the second characterizes the soul's independent life, which has risen above the immediately sensuous, but is not yet dedicated to the service of the eternal; the third reflects the dominion that the eternal spirit has gained over the mortal human being.

[ 27 ] For the “seer”, the degree of a person's development can be judged from the nature of their aura. If he meets an undeveloped person who is completely devoted to the respective sensual impulses, desires and momentary external stimuli, he will see the first aura in the most glaring colors; the second, on the other hand, is only weakly developed. Only sparse color formations can be seen in it; the third, however, is hardly indicated. Here and there a glimmering spark of color appears, indicating that the eternal also lives in this person as a predisposition, but that it will still need a long course of development – through many embodiments – before it will gain an outstanding influence on the outer life of this bearer. The more a person strips off his instinctive nature, the less conspicuous the first part of the aura becomes. The second part grows larger and larger and fills the color body, within which the physical human being lives, more and more completely with its luminous power. And the “servants of the Eternal” show the wondrous third aura, that part which testifies to the extent to which the human being has become a citizen of the spiritual world. For the divine itself radiates through this part of the human aura into the earthly world. People in whom this aura is developed are the flames through which the deity illuminates this world. They have learned to live not for themselves but for the eternal truth and good; they have wrested it from their narrow self, sacrificing themselves on the altar of the great world work.

[ 28 ] Thus, the aura expresses what a person has made of himself in the course of his incarnations.

[ 29 ] All three parts of the aura contain colors of the most diverse nuances. However, the character of these nuances changes with the degree of development of the human being. In the first part of the aura of the undeveloped instinctive human being, one can see all the nuances from red to blue. In him, these nuances have a dull, dirty character. The obtrusive red nuances indicate sensual desires, carnal lusts, and an addiction to the pleasures of the palate and stomach. Green nuances seem to be found primarily in those of a lower nature who tend towards dullness and indifference, who greedily indulge in every pleasure, but who nevertheless shy away from the efforts that would bring them to it. It is not a pleasant sight to see the sluggish street loafers in our big cities loitering around in their dirty green clouds. Certain modern professions, however, breed this kind of aura. A personal sense of self that is rooted entirely in base inclinations, that is, the lowest level of egoism, is manifested in dirty yellow to brown tones. Now it is clear that the animalistic life of the instincts can also take on a pleasing character. There is a purely natural capacity for self-sacrifice, which is found to a high degree in the animal kingdom. In the natural love of a mother, this development of an animalistic instinct finds its most beautiful completion. These selfless natural instincts are expressed in the first aura in shades of light red to pink. Cowardly timidity, nervousness in the face of obvious stimuli is shown by brown-blue or grey-blue colors in the aura.

[ 30 ] The second aura again shows the most diverse color gradations. Brown and orange structures indicate a highly developed sense of self, pride and ambition. Bright yellow reflects clear thinking and intelligence; green is the expression of an understanding of life and the world. Children who are quick to grasp things have a lot of green in this part of their aura. Greenish yellow in the second aura seems to indicate a good memory. Rose-red indicates a benevolent, loving nature; blue is the sign of piety here. The more piety approaches religious fervor, the more the blue turns to violet. Idealism and a serious approach to life in a higher sense are seen as indigo blue.

[ 31 ] The basic colors of the third aura are yellow, green and blue. Yellow appears here when the thinking is filled with high, comprehensive ideas that grasp the individual from the whole of the divine world order. This yellow then has a golden glow when the thinking is intuitive and it is given complete purity of sensual imagining. Green indicates love for all beings; blue is the sign of selfless willingness to sacrifice oneself for all beings. If this willingness to sacrifice oneself increases to the point of strong will, which actively places itself in the service of the world, then the blue lightens to light violet. If pride and the craving for honor still exist in a highly developed person, as the last remnants of personal egoism, then shades of yellow appear alongside those that play towards orange. It should be noted, however, that in this part of the aura the colors are quite different from the shades that a person is accustomed to seeing in the world of the senses. A beauty and sublimity confront the “seer” here, with which nothing in the ordinary world can be compared.

[ 32 ] In the following, it will be shown how the various fundamental components of the human being are expressed through the auras described here.

[ 33 ] The human aura can be understood by observing the human being. As a physical body, the human being is composed of the same substances that are found in the mineral world. And the forces that are active in this world are also active in him. The oxygen that the human being acquires through the breathing process is the same as that found in the air, in the liquid and solid components of the earth. And so it is with the substances that man takes in with his food. These substances and their powers can be studied in man as they are studied in other natural bodies. If we look at man in this way, we recognize him as a member of the mineral world. Furthermore, we can look at man in so far as he is a living being. He shows how the substances and forces of the mineral world build up an organism that takes the form of limbs, that grows and reproduces, whose parts work together in common activity. This way of being has in common with everything that lives. The question arises for anyone who devotes himself to such contemplation: how does a being live? A certain school of modern natural science makes it easy to answer this question. It simply says that the action of mineral substances and forces in a living organism is exactly the same as in inorganic nature, only much more complicated. According to this school, an organism has been understood when the complicated physical and chemical processes that take place within it have been understood. This view denies that there are special causes that transform the mineral substances and forces in the organism into life processes. A lively struggle developed in the nineteenth century against the advocates of a special life force. Clear thinking should have prevented this struggle. For just as no one should dispute that one understands a clock once one has grasped the mechanism of its parts, so too a clear-thinking representative of the life force could not object to the claim that one understands the organism in this sense scientifically if one knows the effectiveness of its substances and forces. But can anyone deny that the clock, which is completely comprehensible in mechanical terms, could not come into being without the clockmaker? Anyone who can really distinguish between the comprehensibility of an organism as a physical fact and the conditions of its origin cannot be in any doubt that the above comprehensibility affects the existence of special causes of life just as little as the existence of the watchmaker is affected by the mechanical comprehensibility of the watch. And just as the mechanic who wants to make the clock understandable does not need to describe the clockmaker, so the purely physical researcher does not need to take into account the special causes of life. But for those who delve deeper into the essence of phenomena, it becomes clear that the entities that make the physical organism appear physically comprehensible are not sufficient for the realization of the physical organism. That is why the perceptive speak of special causes of life. Life is something that is added to the physical effect in the organism and that eludes the senses and the intellect, which only adheres to the sensory facts. Life is the object of a special perception, just as the watchmaker is the object of a special perception. One must observe the organism with the “eyes of the spirit”, then the special causes of life, which elude sensory observation, reveal themselves. Those who observe with the “eyes of the spirit” have therefore called the natural builder of organisms “prana” (power of life). For them, the “life force” cannot be disputed, because for them it is a perception. And everything that is said against these defenders of a life force is only a fight against windmills. It will only be said as long as one misunderstands what they mean. In their sense, prana or the life force should be attributed to man, insofar as he is an organism, as the second link of his being, next to the physical-mineral body.

[ 34 ] In sensation, one has given something that goes beyond mere life. Through life, a being builds its organism. Through sensation, it opens itself to the outside world. It is different when I say: I live, and it is different when I say: I perceive the world of colors around me. In order to become a sentient being, the organism must give its organs properties that go beyond their ability to sustain life and to reproduce life through it. What makes the living organism a sentient organism is what the researcher who sees with “spiritual eyes” calls the sentient body, or, as has become common among theosophists, the astral body. This name “astral”, which means “star-like”, comes from the fact that the supersensory image of it appears in the aura, the luminosity of which has been compared to that of the stars. Here, this part of the human being shall be called the sensory body, as the third limb of the human being. Within this sentient body, the individual life of a person appears. It expresses itself in pleasure and displeasure, joy and pain, in inclinations and aversions, etc. With a certain justification, everything that belongs to this is called the inner life of a being. The starry sky is outside in space, my living organism belongs to the same space. This organism is connected to the starry sky in its sensory organs. I experience the joy and the feeling of admiration for the starry sky within myself. I carry this within me, even when the starry sky has long since withdrawn from my sensory eye. What I confront as myself in relation to the outside world, what leads a life within itself, is the soul. And insofar as this soul appropriates the sensations, insofar as it appropriates processes that are given to it from the outside and transforms them into a life of its own, it may be called the sentient soul. This sentient soul fills the sentient body as it were; it transforms everything that it takes in from the outside into an inner experience. In this way, it forms a whole with the sentient body. This is why, in theosophical writings, it is referred to as the astral body. However, a thorough understanding will have to distinguish between the two. In the aura, the two can also be distinguished in that each color tone of the astral body is subject to two influences. One will depend on how the organs of the human being are formed, the other on how his soul, according to its inner nature, responds to external impressions. A person can have a good or bad eye. The picture he receives of an external object depends on this; he can be more or less sensitive in his soul, and this determines the feeling he experiences in his inner being through this picture.

[ 35 ] Man does not stop at the impressions he receives from the outside world and the feelings he experiences through these impressions. He connects these impressions. In this way, overall images of what he perceives are formed in his soul. A person sees a stone fall; afterwards he sees that a cavity has formed in the ground at the place where the stone fell. He connects the two impressions. He says: the stone has hollowed out the earth. In this connection, thinking is expressed. Within the sentient soul, the thinking, intellectual soul comes to life. Only through it does the soul, through the influences of the outside world, create an image of this outside world that is regulated by itself. The soul continually carries out this regulation of its external impressions. And what it thus produces is a description of what it perceives, determined by its nature. That it is determined by its nature can be seen by comparing such a description with what is described. Two people can have the same object in front of them; their descriptions will be different according to the inner nature of their souls. They combine their impressions in different ways.

[ 36 ] But descriptive thinking also leads man beyond his own life. He acquires something that extends beyond his soul. It is a matter of course for him that his descriptions of things are related to these things themselves. He orients himself in the world by thinking about it. He thereby experiences a certain correspondence between his own life and the order of the facts of the world. The rational soul thereby creates harmony between the soul and the world. In his soul, man seeks truth; and through this truth, not only does the soul express itself, but also the things of the world. What is recognized as truth through thinking has an independent significance, not merely one for the human soul. With my delight in the starry sky, I live alone in myself; the thoughts that I form about the paths of the heavenly bodies have the same significance for the thinking of every other person as for mine. It would be pointless to speak of my delight if I did not exist; but it is not pointless in the same way to speak of my thoughts even without reference to myself. For the truth that I think today was also true yesterday, and will also be true tomorrow, although I am only concerned with it today. If a realization gives me pleasure, this pleasure is only of significance as long as I experience it; the truth of this realization has its significance quite independently of this pleasure. In connection with the truth, the soul grasps something that carries its value within itself. And this value does not disappear with the soul's own experience; nor did it arise with it. There is an essential difference between descriptions in which the intellectual soul merely leaves itself to its combinations, and thoughts in which it submits to the laws of truth. A thought that acquires a significance beyond the inner life by being imbued with these laws of truth can only be regarded as knowledge. When truth shines into the intellectual soul, it becomes the conscious soul. Just as there are three parts to the body: the physical body, the life body and the sentient body, so too there are three parts to the soul: the sentient soul, the intellectual soul and the conscious soul.

[ 37 ] The threefold aura is to be understood from these three members of the soul. For through these three members it becomes understandable that the inner life of man suffers influences from two sides. As a sentient soul, this inner life is dependent on the sentient body. The interplay between the sentient soul and the sentient body is expressed in the first of the three auras described. The combining intellectual soul, which lives in itself and in its experiences is completely subject to its nature, is expressed in the second aura; and the consciousness soul receives its supersensible-visible expression in the third, brightest aura.

[ 38 ] In order to fully understand the nature of these auras, it is necessary to consider a fact that, when properly interpreted, opens up an understanding of the human being. — In the course of childhood development, a moment occurs in the life of a human being when he or she feels for the first time as an independent being in relation to the whole other world. For people with a fine sensibility, this is a significant event. The poet Jean Paul tells in his autobiography: “I will never forget the phenomenon in me, which I have never told anyone about, where I stood at the birth of my self-awareness, of which I know the place and time. One morning, as a very young child, I was standing under the front door and looking to the left at the woodpile when, suddenly, the inner vision, I am an I, came to me like a flash of lightning from heaven and has remained shining ever since: that was the first time my I had seen itself and forever. Deceptions of memory are hardly conceivable here, since no foreign narrative could mix with additions to an event that occurred only in the veiled sanctum of man, the novelty of which alone gave it permanence in such everyday circumstances.» — In his self-awareness, man has given what makes him an independent being. Self-awareness must therefore shed light on his entire being. From this starting point, one will therefore only be able to fully understand the meaning of the body and the soul. More about this at the end of this article.

[ 39 ] There is a veiled holy of holies in man, which is designated by his self-consciousness. Anyone who realizes this will see that this word actually expresses the meaning of human existence. Self-consciousness is the ability to know oneself as an “I”. The following fact seems simple, but it contains an infinitely significant meaning: “I” is the only word that anyone can say only to himself. No one else can say it to the person; and he cannot say it to anyone else. Anyone else can use any other word in the same sense as I myself. What makes a person independent, separate from everything else, and with which he can only be with himself: that is what he calls his “I”. — This fact corresponds to a very specific phenomenon in the aura: no healer can see anything in the part of the aura that corresponds to the “I”. The consciousness of the “I” is indicated in the aura by a dark oval, a completely dark area. If one could look at this oval by itself, it would appear completely black. But one cannot do that. For one sees it through what has been called the first and second aura in the two previous essays. That is why it appears blue. The “I” of the completely undeveloped human being appears as a small blue oval. As the human being develops, it grows larger and larger; and in the average person of the present day it is about the same size as the rest of the aura. Within this blue oval, a special radiation now begins to emanate. All the other parts of the aura only reflect in a certain way what comes to the human being from outside. But the radiation mentioned is the expression of what the human being makes of himself. The first aura expresses that which works in man from the animal; the second that which he experiences in himself through the impressions of the world of sense; the third is an expression of the knowledge which he acquires from this world of sense. But that which begins to shine within the dark aura of the self is that which man acquires through his work on himself. No sensory world can give him the strength to do this. It must therefore flow to him from elsewhere. It flows to him from the spirit. The more the spirit flows to the human ego, the more it shines in the aura. And in contrast to the transient phenomena of the sensory world, the spirit is eternal, immortal. That which lives out itself in the other auras is also transient in the human being; that which shines in the aura of the I is the expression of his eternal spirit. It is the permanent in him that reappears in each subsequent embodiment (incarnation). We have recognized the consciousness soul as the third part of the soul. And within the consciousness soul, the “I” awakens. In the “I”, the eternal spirit of the human being awakens again. Like the body and the soul, the spirit is also tripartite. The highest part is the actual spiritual being (called “Atma” in theosophical literature). Just as the physical body is built from the substances and forces of the external physical world, so the spiritual being is built from those of the general spiritual world. He is a part of it, just as the physical body is a part of the physical world. And just as the physical body becomes a physical living being through the physical life force, so the spiritual being becomes a life spirit through the spiritual life force (called Budhi in theosophical literature). — And just as the physical body acquires knowledge of the physical world through the senses, so the spiritual being acquires knowledge of the spiritual world through the spiritual senses, which are called intuition. The sensory body of the physical world is therefore matched by a special sensory spirit in this higher realm. Just as the lower self-life begins with sensation, so does the higher with intuition. This spiritual self-life is therefore called the spirit self (in theosophical literature it is called the “higher manas”).

[ 40 ] Man is therefore composed of the following parts: 1. The physical body, consisting of the physical body, the life body (the life force) and the sentient body; 2. < em>The soul, consisting of the sentient soul, the rational soul, and the consciousness soul, in which the “I” awakens; and 3. The spirit, consisting of the spirit self, the life spirit, and the spiritual human being. The sentient soul fills the sentient body and merges with it to form a whole. This becomes clear when one imagines the following: the fact that an impression of the external world evokes the color “red” is based on an activity of the sentient body. That the soul experiences this “red” within itself is due to the fact that the sentient soul is directly linked to the sentient body, and immediately makes the effect received from the outside its own. In the same way, the consciousness soul and the spirit self merge into a whole through the activity of the “I” itself. (Those who wish to learn more about all this will find information in my recently published book, Theosophy.) — Man's being is therefore rightly divided into the following seven parts (we have put the terms used in theosophical literature in brackets): 1. the physical body (Sthula sharira), 2. the life body (Linga sharira), 3. the sentient body connected with the sentient soul (astral body, Kama rupa), 4. the mind soul (lower Manas, Kama manas), 5. the spirit-filled consciousness soul that gives birth to the “I” (higher higher manas), 6. the life spirit (spiritual body, Budhi), 7. the spirit man (Atma).

[ 41 ] It is clear from the above that the radiant spiritual aura is only very weakly indicated in the undeveloped human being and develops more and more the more perfect the human being becomes. Just as the three auras described correspond to the bearers of the “I”, so the I-aura itself becomes the bearer of the eternal spirit. Through the “I”, the human being becomes an independent, separate being. This develops the content of the spirit within itself; it fulfills itself with it. But this means that the “I” gives itself to the eternal All-Spirit. The stages that the “I” reaches in this devotion to the All-Spirit are expressed by the color nuances of the higher spirit aura. These nuances cannot be compared to physical colors in their radiant brilliance. A description of them cannot be given here.

[ 42 ] For the sake of completeness, a part of the aura that has not yet been discussed should be mentioned. It is the part that corresponds to the life body. It fills approximately the same space as the physical body. The clairvoyant can only observe it if he has the ability to completely imagine away (suggerate away) the physical body. Then the life body (Linga sharira) appears as a complete double image of the physical body in a color that is reminiscent of that of the apricot blossoms. In this life body, a continuous inflow and outflow can be observed. The life force contained in the universe flows in, is consumed by the life process and flows out again.

[ 43 ] This concludes the preliminary indications that can be given here about the human aura. Should anyone take offense at the fact that some of what has been said here seems to be at odds with what is otherwise expressed in theosophical literature, I would ask him to take a closer look. Behind the apparent differences, he will find a deeper harmony. However, it is better if each person describes exactly what he has to say. In this area, only good can come from weighing the statements of the individual observers against each other and mutually supplementing each other. We will not get anywhere by merely repeating the theosophical dogmas. However, the individual must be aware of his great responsibility with regard to his statements. On the other hand, it must be noted that at these heights of observation, errors in the details are quite possible; indeed, they are certainly much more likely here than in scientific observations in the sensory world. The writer of these remarks therefore asks for the appropriate indulgence from all those who have something to say in this field.

The German Section of the Theosophical Society was responsible for organizing this year's congress of the “Federation of European Sections”. It is therefore more fitting that here, from within the circle of the organizers, there is less talk of what has been achieved than of what has been intended and striven for. For the organizers know only too well how little of what can be set as a goal on such an occasion has been achieved. Therefore, the following should be taken with a grain of salt, as a mere description of the underlying ideas.

Munich was chosen as the venue; the time was the days of Pentecost, May 18, 19, 20 and 21, 1907. The questions that the organizers asked themselves in preparing for the event were: How can such a congress express the task of the Theosophical movement in the present spiritual life? How can it present a picture of the ideals and aims of the theosophical work? Since the event is, of course, limited by the circumstances, it can only provide a limited actual answer to these questions. It now seems particularly important that the comprehensive character of the theosophical movement be emphasized on such occasions. The central point of this movement is the cultivation of a world view based on knowledge of the supersensible. And at such a congress, people come together who, in the spirit of such a world view, work across all national and other human boundaries on spiritual ideals that are common to all of humanity. Mutual inspiration in the best sense will be the most beautiful fruit of such events. In addition, it will be shown how the theosophical work should really be integrated into the whole of life in our time. For the spiritual basis of this movement cannot be called upon to express itself only in thoughts and ideas, in theories, etc.; rather, as a content of the soul that has emerged in our time, it can have a fruitful effect on all branches of human activity. Theosophy can only be properly understood if we set it the ideal of stimulating not only the imagination and the human soul, but the whole human being. If we wish to interpret its mission in this way, we may recall how, for example, the world view of the time found expression in the buildings and sculptures (such as the Sphinx) of the Egyptians. The ideas of the Egyptian worldview were not only thought by the souls; they were made visible to the eye in the environment of the human being. And consider how everything known of Greek sculpture and drama is the worldview of the Greek soul, shaped in stone and depicted in poetry. Consider how medieval painting presented Christian ideas and feelings to the eye, how Gothic art gave form and shape to Christian devotion. True harmony of the soul can only be experienced where the human senses are reflected in form, shape and color, etc., as the environment that the soul knows as its most valuable thoughts, feelings and impulses.

From such thoughts arises the intention to also give a picture of the theosophical striving in the external form of the event at a congress. The Rauzz, where the gathering takes place, can reflect the theosophical feeling and thinking around the visitor. According to our circumstances, we could not do more than sketch out what could be an ideal in this direction. We had decorated the assembly hall in such a way that a fresh, stimulating red formed the basic color of all the walls. This color was intended to express the basic mood of the celebration in an external view. It stands to reason that many will object to the use of “red” for this purpose. These objections are justified as long as one relies on an esoteric judgment and experience. They are well known to the esotericist, who nevertheless must use the color red for the purpose in question, in accordance with all occult symbolism. For him, it does not depend on what the part of his being feels that is devoted to the immediate sensory environment, but on what the higher self experiences in secret while creating in the spiritual, while the external environment is seen physically in red. And that is the exact opposite of what the ordinary sensation about “red” says. Esoteric knowledge says: “If you want to attune yourself in your innermost being as the gods were attuned when they gave the world the green plant cover, learn to bear ‘red’ in your environment as they had to.” This indicates a connection between the higher human nature and the color red, which the genuine esoteric has in mind when he represents the two opposing entities of the creative world-ground in occult symbolism in such a way that downward the green as a sign of the earthly, upward the “red” as a sign of the heavenly (elohistic) creative powers. Much more could be said about the reasons for opposing this color red, and much more could be said in refutation. However, it may suffice here to note that this color was chosen in accordance with occultism.

On the walls (on both sides and at the back wall) were placed the so-called seven apocalyptic seals in a size corresponding to the room. They represent certain experiences of the astral world in pictures. There is a reason for this. At first, some viewers may think that such pictorial representations are ordinary symbols. But they are much more than that. Anyone who simply wants to interpret what is depicted in them symbolically with the mind has not penetrated the spirit of the matter. One should experience the content of these seven pictures with one's whole soul, with one's undivided mind; one should shape it inwardly in one's soul according to form, color and content, so that it lives inwardly in the imagination. For this content corresponds to very specific astral experiences of the clairvoyant. What he wants to express in such pictures is not at all an arbitrary symbol, or even a straw-thin allegory, but something that is best illustrated by way of comparison. Take a person in a room illuminated by a light in such a way that his shadow is visible on a wall. The shadow is in some respects similar to the person casting the shadow. But it is a two-dimensional image of a three-dimensional being. Just as the shadow relates to the person, so what is depicted in the apocalyptic seals relates to certain experiences of the clairvoyant in the astral world. The seals are silhouettes of astral processes, of course in a figurative sense. Therefore, they are not arbitrary representations of a single person, but anyone who is familiar with the corresponding supersensible processes will find their silhouettes in the physical world. Such things cannot be invented in their essential content, but are taken from the existing teachings of the secret scientists. A student of these matters may have noticed that some of our seals correspond with what he finds in this or that work, but not others. The reason for this is that some of the imaginations of occult science have already been communicated in books; but the most important part, and the true part, may only now, in our time, be made public. And part of the theosophical work must consist in handing over to the public much that has hitherto been kept strictly secret by the appointed custodians. This is demanded by the evolution of the spiritual life of our time from the exponents of occult science.

It is the evolution of humanity, the expression of which in the astral world must form one of the most essential foundations of occult knowledge, as expressed in these seven seals. The Christian esotericist will recognize them in a certain way in the descriptions of the “Revelation of St. John”. But the form they presented in our festival hall corresponds to the secret-scientific spiritual current that has been the leading one in the West since the fourteenth century. The mysteries of existence, as depicted in these pictures, represent ancient wisdom; the clairvoyants of the various epochs of humanity see them from different points of view. Therefore, according to the necessary developmental needs of the times, the forms change somewhat. In the “Revelation of St. John” it is “set in signs” what is to happen “in brief”. He who is able to read a secret-scientific form of expression aright knows that this signifies nothing other than a reference to the secret-scientific signs for certain imaginations that can be experienced in the astral world and that are connected with the nature of man as it reveals itself in time. And the Rosicrucian seals also represent the same thing.

Only very sketchily, with a few words, shall the infinitely rich content of the seals be interpreted. Basically, everything – even the seemingly most insignificant – in these pictures means something important. – The first seal represents man's entire evolution on earth in the most general way. In the Book of Revelation, this is indicated in the words: “And having turned I saw seven golden lampstands; and in the midst of the seven lampstands one like unto the Son of Man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle. His head and hair, however, were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes like a flame of fire. His feet were like brass glowing in a furnace, and his voice like the sound of rushing waters. He had seven stars in his right hand, and out of his mouth came a sharp, two-edged sword; and his face shone like the bright sun.” In general terms, such words point to the most comprehensive secrets of human development. If one wanted to describe in detail what each of the deeply significant words contains, one would have to write a thick volume. Our seal depicts such a volume. Only a few hints are given: Among the physical organs and forms of expression of man, there are those that, in their present form, represent the downward stages of development of earlier forms, and which have thus already exceeded their degree of perfection. have already passed their peak of perfection; others, however, represent the initial stages of development; they are now, so to speak, the rudiments of what they are to become in the future. The esotericist must know these secrets of development. The organ of speech represents an organ that will be something much higher and more perfect in the future than it is at present. When pronouncing this, one touches on a great secret of existence, which is often also called the “mystery of the creative word”. This gives a hint of the future state of this human speech organ, which will one day, when the human being has spiritualized, become a spiritual organ of production (procreation). In myths and religions, this spiritual production is indicated by the appropriate image of a “sword” coming out of the mouth. Thus, each line and each point on the image means something that is connected with the mystery of human development. The fact that such pictures are made does not merely arise from a need for a sensualization of the supersensible processes, but it corresponds to the fact that living into these pictures – if they are the right ones – really means an arousal of forces that lie dormant in the human soul, and through the awakening of which the representations of the supersensible world emerge. It is not right for the supersensible worlds to be described only in schematic terms in Theosophy; the true way is to evoke such images as are given in these seals. (If the occultist does not have such images at hand, he should give a verbal description of the higher worlds in appropriate images.)

The second seal, with its corresponding accessories, represents one of the first stages of development of humanity on earth. In its primeval times, humanity on earth had not yet developed what is called the individual soul. What still exists in animals today is still present: the group soul. Anyone who can follow the old human group souls on the astral plane through imaginative clairvoyance will find the four types of group soul that are represented in the four apocalyptic animals of the second seal: the lion, the bull, the eagle, and the man. This touches on the truth of what is often so dryly allegorized in the four animals. The third seal represents the mysteries of the so-called harmony of the spheres. Man experiences these mysteries in the interval between death and a new birth (in the “spirit realm” or what is called “Devachan” in the usual theosophical literature). However, the presentation is not given as it is experienced in the “spirit realm” itself, but as the processes of this realm are reflected in the astral world, as it were. It must be emphasized that all seven seals are experiences of the astral world; but the other worlds can be seen in their reflections in the astral. The angels blowing trumpets in the picture represent the spiritual primal beings of the world phenomena; the book with the seven seals indicates that in the experiences illustrated in this picture, the riddles of existence are “unsealed”. The “Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse” represent the stages of human development through long earth cycles.

The fourth seal represents, among other things, two pillars, one rising from the sea and the other from the earth. These pillars hint at the secret of the role played by red (oxygen-rich) blood and blue-red (carbon-rich) blood in human evolution, and how this blood changes in line with human evolution from distant primeval times to distant future times. The letters on these pillars hint at this evolutionary secret in a way known only to the initiated. (All interpretations of the two letters given in public writings, or even in certain societies, remain only a superficial exotic interpretation.) The book in the cloud points to a future state of man in which all his knowledge will be internalized. In the “Revelation of St. John” we find the significant words: “And I took a little book out of the angel's hand and devoured it...” The sun in the picture points to a cosmic process that will take place at the same time as the marked future stage of humanity; the earth will enter into a completely different relationship with the sun than the present one in the cosmos. And everything is depicted in the picture in such a way that all the arrangements of the parts, all the details, etc., correspond exactly to specific real processes.

The fifth seal represents the further development of man in the future in a cosmos in which the conditions just indicated will have occurred. The future human being, who will have a different relationship to the sun than the present one, is represented by the “woman who gives birth to the sun”; and the power that he will then have over certain forces of the world, which today express themselves in his lower nature, is represented by the “sun woman” standing on the beast with the seven heads and ten horns. The woman has the moon under her feet: this points to a later cosmic relationship between the sun, earth and moon.

The sixth seal represents the evolved human being with even greater power over the lower forces of the universe. The way the image expresses this is reminiscent of Christian esotericism: Michael holds the dragon bound.

Finally, the seventh seal is that of the “Mystery of the Grail,” as it was in the esoteric current beginning in the fourteenth century. In the picture, there is a cube representing the spatial world, from which the world serpent rises on all sides, insofar as it represents the higher forces acting in the lower; from the snake's mouth comes the world line (as a spiral), the symbol of the purified and refined cosmic forces; and from it, the “holy grail”, which is faced by the “dove”: all this points - and quite appropriately - to the mystery of the world's creation, of which the earthly is a lower reflection. The deepest mysteries lie in the lines and figures, etc. of this seal.

Between each two seals, a column was inserted. These seven columns could not be executed in three dimensions; they had to be painted as a substitute. However, they are definitely intended as real architectural forms and correspond to the “seven columns” of the “true Rosicrucian Temple”. (Of course the arrangement in Munich does not correspond exactly to that in the “Rosicrucian Temple of Initiation,” for there are two of each column, so that if one walks from the back wall toward the front, one passes through fourteen columns, two of which are always facing each other. This is only a hint for those who know the true facts; we should only give a general idea of the meaning of this column secret.) The captains of these columns represent the planetary evolution of our solar system. Our Earth is, after all, the fourth embodiment in a planetary evolutionary system, and in the ways in which it is configured, it points to three future embodiments. (More exact details about this can be found in the articles in this journal that are headed “From the Akasha Chronicle”. The seven successive embodiments of the earth are designated by the Saturn, Sun, Moon, Earth, Jupiter, Venus and Vulcan conditions. In the usual esoteric descriptions, the Vulcan condition is omitted as being too far in the future. For reasons which it would take too long to explain here, the evolution of the earth is divided into a Mars and Mercury condition. (These reasons can also be found in the Essays on the “Akasha Chronicle”. These seven embodiments of the Earth: Saturn, Sun, Moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter and Venus are now expressed in esotericism by seven pillared capitals. The inner life of each of these stages of development is expressed in the forms of these capitals. Here too, the intention is that one should not study the forms of the capitals intellectually, but entirely through the feelings, in real artistic experience and in the imagination. For every line, every curve, everything about these forms is such that when you immerse yourself in them, you awaken dormant powers in your soul; and these powers lead to ideas about the great mysteries of the world, which underlie the cosmic and the related evolution of humanity on earth. Anyone who might criticize the design of such columns should consider that, for example, the Corinthian and the Ionic columns have also emerged from the embodiment of the secrets of existence, and that such facts are only unknown to the materialistic way of thinking of our time. From the way the motifs of world evolution are expressed in these column capitals, one can gauge how esotericism is to have a fruitful effect on art. The ancient columns, too, are born out of esotericism. And the architecture of the future will have to present to people what the esoteric world view of Theosophy can give as a hint today.

In Munich, for example, an attempt has been made to sketch out an interior in the spirit of the Theosophical worldview; of course, only some of the relevant information could be provided, and even that only in general terms, and above all not in the appropriate arrangement. But the aim was only to evoke something of what is essential. Among the esoteric devices in our meeting room were two columns standing at the front of the hall. What they suggest can be seen from the description of the fourth seal, on which the two columns can also be found. They point to the mystery of blood and contain the “mystery of the development of humanity”. The color of the pillars is connected with the blood secret. One is red; the other is a deep blue-red. Esoteric science writes four deeply significant sayings on these two pillars. When the human soul immerses itself in these four sayings, then whole secrets of the world and of humanity well up from their depths. Many books would have to be written to exhaust the full meaning of these sayings, for not only is every word significant, but so is the symmetry of the words, the way they are distributed among the four sayings, the intensifications that lie within them, and much more, so that only long, patient devotion to the matter can exhaust what lies within. The four proverbs of “Pillar Wisdom” in English are:

"In pure thought you find
the self that can sustain itself.

"If you turn your thoughts into images,
you experience the creative wisdom.

"Condense feeling into light,
you reveal the forming power.

"If you objectify the will to essence,
you create in the world's being.

We also tried to express the basic mood that we wanted to express in our “inner space” in the program book that was given to visitors. There is no need to say anything more about the red color of the cover of this book, after the significance of the red color in esoteric symbolism has been discussed above. On this cover (in the upper left corner) there is a black cross entwined with red roses in the blue oval field; to the right of it are the letters: E.D.N. - J.C.M. - P.S.S.R. — These are the first ten letters of the words by which true Rosicrucianism is summarized in a single sentence: “Ex deo nascimur, in Christo morimur, per spiritum sanctum reviviscimus.” The cross symbol, entwined with roses, expresses

exoterically expresses the meaning of Rosicrucianism. In view of the attitude of our Society to Rosicrucianism, it seems necessary to point out the serious misunderstandings which have been brought against it. Here and there, on the basis of historical tradition, an attempt has been made to form a conception of Rosicrucianism. Of those who have thus formed an opinion of it, some look upon it with a certain benevolence; but most regard it as charlatanry, enthusiasm, or something similar, perhaps even worse. It may readily be conceded that if Rosicrucianism were what it appears to those who know of it only from historical documents and traditions, it would certainly not be worthy of the attention of any rational man. But at present nobody knows anything at all about true Rosicrucianism who has not approached it through the means of occult science. Outside the circle of occult science there are no real documents about it, which is the name of the spiritual current mentioned here, that has set the tone in the West since the fourteenth century. Only now may we begin to share some of the secrets of Rosicrucianism with the public. By drawing from this source in Munich, we naturally did not want to present it as the only true source of the theosophical movement, but only as one of the paths by which spiritual knowledge can be sought. It cannot be said that we have given preference to this source in a one-sided way, while the theosophical movement should take into account all forms of religion and paths to truth equally. But it can never be the task of the theosophical movement to study the variety of religions as a pastime; it must use religious forms to arrive at their unity, at its essence; and we did not want to show what Rosicrucianism looks like, but through it we wanted to show the perspective to the one core of truth in all religions. And this is precisely the true mission of the Theosophical movement.

In the program book, there are five drawings. These are the motifs of the first five of the seven capitals mentioned above, converted into vignettes. In these five drawings, too, there is something of what is called “occult writing”. Those who immerse themselves in the line forms and figures with all their soul will inwardly perceive something of what are known as the important states for the knowledge of human development (Saturn, Sun, Moon, Mars and Mercury states).

This should describe the intentions of the conference organizers in preparing the framework within which the festivities were to take place. The venue for the event was the Tonhalle (Kaim-Säle), which seemed particularly suitable for this event.

The account of the proceedings of the congress must be preceded by the expression of the deepest dissatisfaction felt by all the participants at the presence of Mrs. Besant. The much-admired woman had just returned to Europe after spending two years in her Indian field of activity; and Munich was the first place where the European members were allowed to greet her again and hear her powerful speech. The German committee of the Congress had invited Mrs. Besant to preside over the honorary committee; and so the esteemed leader gave the assembly its consecration and imparted to it the mood that her whole being radiates to all those around her and to whom the magic of her words penetrates.

Our visit to the congress was a thoroughly satisfying one. We had the great pleasure of welcoming many members of the other European sections, as well as those of the Indian section. The members of the German section were present in large numbers. Officially the British Section was represented by its General Secretary, Miss Spink; the French Section by its General Secretary, Dr. Th. Pascal; the Dutch Section by its General Secretary, Mr. Fricke; the Italian Section by its General Secretary, Prof. Dr. Penzig; the Scandinavian Section by its General Secretary, A. Knös; and the Hungarian Section by its General Secretary, D. Nagy.

The opening of the congress took place on May 18, 1907 at 10 o'clock in the morning. It began with a musical introduction. Emanuel Nowotny played the Toccata in F major by Joh. Seb. Bach on the organ. — Thereupon the Secretary General of the German Section had to greet the participants on behalf of the German committee. He greeted Mrs. Besant and emphasized the significance of the fact that the Munich Congress enjoyed her visit. After greeting the representatives of the other sections and the German visitors, the speaker spoke words of love, appreciation and thanks to the founding president H. S. Olcott, who had passed away in February. In this opening address, reference was also made to the comprehensive mission of the Theosophical movement in the spiritual life of the present day, and the necessity was emphasized that the cultivation of spiritual life must form the basis of the Theosophical work. After that, the representatives of the European sections and the other fields of work spoke: from England (Mr. Wedgwood), from France (Dr. Th. Pascal), from the Netherlands (Mr. Fricke), from Italy (Prof. Penzig), from Scandinavia (Mr. A. Knös ), Hungary (Mr. D. Nagy), Bohemia (Mr. Bedrnizek), Russia (Miss Kamensky, Mrs. Forsch, Miss N. v. Gernet), Bulgaria, Belgium (and 2 others).

As at previous congresses, each speaker spoke in his or her national language.

Mrs. Besant then took the floor to greet the German section and to emphasize the essence of the Theosophical movement, as well as to point out in a few forceful sentences the spiritual life and its fundamental importance for society.

The Saturday afternoon was dedicated to lectures and talks by Mr. Alan Leo, Dr. Th. Pascal, Michael Bauer, Mr. James Wedgwood and Miss Kamensky. Mr. Alan Leo read his essay on 'Astrology and Personal Fate'. It dealt with the esoteric nature of astrology and spoke luminously of free will in relation to predetermined fate, showing the way in which planetary forces influence human life. Dr. Th. Pascal set out the results of his long inner research in the theosophical field in a thoughtful essay. It was fascinating to follow the subtle arguments of intimate trains of thought. Michael Bauer spoke about the relationship between nature and man. This very meritorious leader of our Nuremberg branch showed in his soulful and spirited way how the inner essence of nature and man's own inner being are interlinked in their depths. Mr. Wedgwood read his essay on “The Value of the Theosophical Society”. He explained how the study of occultism elevates man to an awareness of his higher destiny by giving him a knowledge of his place in the world process. What matters is the perspective that occultism gives the human soul. (No summary of the contents of the individual lectures and papers will be given here, as these will appear in detail in the “Congress Yearbook”. Miss Kamensky read her fascinating paper on “Theosophy in Russia” that same afternoon. Her brief but meaningful remarks showed how many Theosophical ideas are to be found in Russian literary and intellectual life. The work was a prime example of how to identify the seeds in a nation's intellectual life that only require spiritual light in order to grow into theosophy in the right way. The first day of the congress came to a close with the artistic performances of the evening. Joh. Seb. Bach's Prelude and Fugue in B minor, performed by Emanuel Nowotny on the organ, opened the evening. Marie von Sivers then recited the monologue from the beginning of the second part of Goethe's Faust, “Des Lebens Pulse schlagen frisch lebendig...” as an example of poetry arising from esoteric sources. The two members, Mrs. Alice v. Sonklar and Toni Völker, presented Robert Schumann's “Pictures from the East” on the piano, which seem quite suitable for promoting mystical moods. Miss Gertrud Garmatter then sang two songs by Schubert in her charmingly sensitive way: “To Music” and “You are the Peace”. And Miss Toni Völker concluded the evening with her beautiful artistic performance on the piano: Scarlatti's “Pastorale and Capriccio”.

On Sunday, May 19, the morning assembly was introduced by the atmospheric Trio in E-flat major by Joh. Brahms (1st movement), played by Miss Johanna Fritsch (violin), Marika v.Gumppenberg (piano) and Hermann Tukkermann (French horn). Mrs. Besant then gave her momentous lecture: “The Place of Phenomena in the Theosophical Society.” She explained the role played by phenomena through H.P. Blavatsky at the beginning of the Theosophical Society, and how important they were at a time of doubt about higher worlds. She emphasized how the observation of phenomena related to higher worlds can never be dangerous if approached with the same spirit of research that is applied to observations in the physical world. She emphasized how little good it would do for the Theosophical Society if, for fear of the danger posed by psychic powers, it left the pursuit of the goal of “studying those forces in the world and in man that are not accessible to sensory observation” to other societies. It would be quite impossible to convey the manifold content of this lecture within the framework of a short report. Therefore, as with all earlier and later lectures of the congress, reference must be made to the “Yearbook” of the “Federation of European Sections”, which will appear following this lecture.

The second lecture of the morning was Dr. Rudolf Steiner's lecture on “The Initiation of the Rosicrucian”, in which the method of attaining knowledge of supersensible worlds in the sense of esotericism, which has set the tone in the West since the fourteenth century, is discussed and at the same time the necessity of these methods for the present period of development of humanity is shown.

On Sunday afternoon (5 p.m.), Edouard Schuré's “Sacred Drama of Eleusis” was performed. The German organizers considered this performance to be an especially important part of the congress. After all, it was able to show in an impressive way how theosophical ideas and feelings come to life in true, high art. Edouard Schuré is the great French artist and writer who, through his works in so many directions, communicates the theosophical spirit to our contemporaries. Schuré's works 'Les Grands Inities' (the great initiates) and 'Sanctuaires d'Orient' (the sanctuaries of the Orient) are completely 'Theosophy in the noblest sense of the word'. And Schuré's theosophical way of looking at things is fully transformed into a vital creative power when he works as an artist. He has that relationship between imagination and fantasy that is the basic secret of all great art. Edouard Schuré's truly mystical drama “The Children of Lucifer” is a shining example of how a world view striving for the heights of knowledge is completely transformed into artistic figures. Only a mind of this kind could undertake what Schuré did, to resurrect the “sacred drama” of Eleusis before the soul and the eye of the present man. This drama leads us to the door of that ancient time, where knowledge, religion and art still lived in one, where imagination was the faithful witness of truth and the sacred guide to piety; and where the reflection of imagination fell on this imagination in a transfiguring and revealing way. In Edouard Schuré there lives a modern artistic soul, in which the light of that mystery time shines, and so he was able to recreate what the priestly sages showed the audience in the “Drama at Eleusis” in Greece's distant past: the deep mystery of the world, which is reflected in the meaningful events of Eros' seduction of Persephone and her abduction by Pluto; of Demeter's pain and the advice she from the “Goddess of Transformations”, from Hekate, to go to Eleusis; from Demeter's initiation of Triptolem to the priesthood in Eleusis; from Triptolem's daring journey into Pluto's realm to the liberation of Persephones and from the emergence of a “new Dionysos”, who arises from Zeus' fire and the light of Demeter through the sacrifice of Triptolemos.

The congress organizers tried to present the drama evoked by Schuré to the visitors in German. It was made possible by the dedicated work of a number of our members and by the beautiful, loving kindness of Bernhard Stavenhagen, who created a wonderful musical accompaniment to the Schuré drama. Stavenhagen sent a musical introduction to each of the four acts, which prepared the audience for the dramatic action in an atmospheric way. With true congeniality, this important composer has absorbed the basic motifs of the mystery and rendered them musically. This musical performance was received with great enthusiasm by the participants of the congress. The willingness to make sacrifices with which members of the German section worked on this performance can be judged from the fact that all the roles were played by members. Miss v. Sivers played the part of Demeter, Miss Sprengel was Persephone, Miss Garmatter Eros, Frau v. Vacano Hekate, Mr. Stahl Pluto; for the part of Triptolemus we were able to the participation of our member, the excellent actor Mr. Jürgas, who created an impressive figure; Baroness v. Gumppenberg played Metanira, Dr. Peipers played Zeus, and Miss Wollisch played Dionysos. These are only the main roles, however; the choruses that intervene in the plot were also composed of members. Special recognition must be given to our esteemed member, Mr. Linde, who took on the laborious task of creating the decorations.

The morning of Monday began with the recitation of Goethe's poems “Song of the Spirits over the Waters” and “Prometheus” by Richard Jürgas, whom the participants now got to know as an excellent reciter, just as they had become acquainted with his acting skills the night before. Then the participants had the great joy of hearing the second lecture by Mrs. Besant, in which she spoke about the relationship of the Masters to the Theosophical Society. From her rich spiritual experience, she described the relationship of great individuals to spiritual progress and the way such individuals participate in the progress of the Theosophical Society. It is also impossible to give a picture of the far-reaching content of this lecture in a few words. Again, we must refer you to the Yearbook for more information. After this lecture, our member Frau Hempel delighted the participants with an excellent performance of her vocal art. This was followed by a lecture by Dr. Carl Ungers, who spoke very interestingly about working methods in the theosophical branches and explained the relationship of the non-clairvoyant theosophist to the messages of the clairvoyants, showing how the writing “Theosophy” by Dr. Rudolf Steiner can provide a basis for shaping this relationship in the right way. Later that morning, Mrs. Elise Wolfram gave her lecture on the occult basis of the Siegfried saga. She showed subtly and vividly how the deeper spiritual development of Europe is expressed in the myth, how Germanic and even older mystery wisdom has taken shape in Siegfried. The speakers' insightful interpretations were suitable for allowing the audience to enter into the mysterious life of part of the Nibelungen saga.

In the afternoon, Mrs. v. Gumppenberg read Mr. Arvid Knös's essay, “Absolute and Relative Truths”; then Dr. Rudolf Steiner gave his lecture, “Planetary Evolution and Human Evolution”. He described the development of the earth through three planetary conditions that preceded its present form and then pointed to the connection between the development of the earth and that of man. He also showed how one could know something about the future of development.

The evening was again devoted to purely artistic performances. The Sonata in G minor by L. van Beethoven was performed by Chr. Döbereiner (cello) and Elfride Schunk (piano). Afterwards, Gertrud Garmatter's excellent singing performance could be heard again (two songs: Weylas Gesang by Hugo Wolf and Frühlingsglaube by Franz Schubert). This was followed by solos for viola da gamba with piano, namely ı. Adagio by Händel and 2. the Aria con variazioni composed by A. Kühnel in 1645. Both pieces were performed by Chr. Döbereiner (Viola da Gamba) and Fräulein Elfride Schunk (piano). A brilliant performance on the piano by the Italian member Mr. Kirby closed the evening.

On Tuesday morning, the program began with Johanna Fritsch and Pauline Frieß performing the “Adagio from the Violin Concerto” op. 26 by Max Bruch. Mr. Richard Jürgas then recited some poems full of intimate feeling and mystical moods by our dear member Mia Holm. -— The rest of the morning was filled with a free discussion on the topic: The necessity of cultivating occultism within society. Mr. Jules Agoston from Budapest, Bernhard Hubo, Ludwig Deinhard, Dr. Carl Unger, Michael Bauer, D.Nagy, Mr. Wedgwood, Miss Severs and Mrs. Elise Wolfram took part in the discussion. The discussion was introduced by Jules Agoston, who emphasized the necessity of maintaining the spiritualist experiment; following on from this, Bernhard Hubo developed a contrary point of view based on his many years of experience; Ludwig Deinhard discussed the necessity of acquainting theosophical circles with scientific attempts to penetrate into the deeper foundations of the soul. It is impossible to report here on the rich and varied addresses of the above-mentioned speakers. Nor is it possible to do so with regard to the stimulating points of view that Mr. Nerei from Budapest gave in the afternoon during the discussion on “educational issues”. Following these points of view, Dr. Rudolf Steiner also spoke about education. — Mrs. Douglas-Shield spoke about the relationship between “Theosophy and Christianity”.

The closing act of the congress took place on Tuesday at 9 p.m. It began with the spirited and heartfelt Adagio in D major by our dear member and head of the Stuttgart lodge I: Adolf Arenson, which was performed by Mr. Arenson himself (piano), Dr. Carl Unger (cello) and Johanna Fritsch (violin). This was followed by: Tröstung (Consolation) by Felix Mendelssohn-Bartholdy, performed by Hilde Stockmeyer, Ave verum by Mozart performed by Gertrud Garmatter, the recitation of a poem by Mrs. Ripper, solos for violin by J.S.Bach, by Johanna Fritsch and Pauline Frieß, and variations on the chorale Sei gegrüsst, Jesu gütig, for organ by J.S.Bach, by Emanuel Nowotny. The Congress then drew to a close with short closing addresses by the representatives of the individual sections: Mr. Wallace spoke for the British section, Mlle Aime Blech (representing Dr. Pascal, who had to leave earlier due to his state of health) for the French section, Mr. Fricke for the Dutch section, and Prof. Dr. Penzig for the Italian section. Mrs. Besant then addressed some deeply moving words to the participants, and finally Dr. Rudolf Steiner spoke the closing words, in which he thanked the participants, especially those from foreign sections, for coming, and also expressed his warmest thanks to all those whose selfless work had made the congress possible.

And these thanks must be expressed to many, especially to Miss Sofie Stinde, who, as secretary of the congress, has done tireless and important work; to Countess Pauline Kalckreuth, who has worked tirelessly on all the preparatory work and tasks. Above all, we have these two to thank for the fact that we were able to pursue the above-mentioned intentions at all, and that we were able to achieve what has been achieved. Adolf Arenson took care of the musical part of the program. Our dear member Clara Rettich devoted herself selflessly to the task of painting the seven apocalyptic seals according to the occult instructions given to her; in the same way, Karl Stahl took on the task of painting the seven pillars in the hall. It is impossible to mention all the numerous workers individually by name. But it should not go unmentioned that dear members had set up a buffet in an adjoining room and did the necessary work, which greatly enhanced the convivial get-together, through which members are to come together after all.

Dr. Rudolf Steiner was authorized, at his request, and indeed unanimously and out of the enthusiasm of the audience, to thank Monsieur Ed. Schuré, the poet of the “Drama of Eleusis”, and Bernhard Stavenhagen, the composer of the musical part, on behalf of the congress.

The sculptures by our highly talented member, the sculptor Dr. Ernst Wagner, who strives for the highest artistic goals, were an excellent artistic presentation for the congress. The sculptures he provided for our exhibition were placed in the area around the main hall, and, with the red wall of the hall providing an atmospheric background, they had an inwardness. The following works of art were present: Portrait bust, Woman praying, Portrait bust, Relief for a sepulchral chapel, Bust, Sepulchral relief, King's child, Dissolution, Sibyl, Relief for a sepulchral niche, Portrait bust, Pain, Christ mask, Mask “Death”, Bronze statuette. Except for these works of art, only the following could be accommodated in the main hall: the interesting symbolic painting “The Great Babylon” by our member Mr. Haß, which was placed above the boardroom, and a carpet by Ms. Lehmann, which fascinating utilization of mystical ideas in the applied arts, and finally a relief by M. Gailland depicting Colonel Olcott, and a sketch of H.P. Blavatsky by Julia Wesw-Hoffmann.

The exhibition of a series of artworks and reproductions of such artworks that have a particular connection to theosophical thought took place in the adjoining room. Here you could see: etchings by Hans Volkert; reproductions of two pictures by Moreau; reproductions of two pictures by Hermann Schmiechen; a statuette: The Master, by Heymann; a picture: From Deep Distress, by Stockmeyer; reproductions of various pictures by Watts; three reproductions of works by Lionardo; pictures by Kalckreuth the Elder, by Sophie Stinde (landscapes); by Haß (After the Storm, Fairy Tale: The King's Daughter, The Storm Cloud, Five Fir Tree Studies); a reproduction of Knopf, the painter. The next congress of the Federation will take place in Budapest in two years (1909), at the kind invitation of the Hungarian members.

I would prefer not to write any further comments on this matter in this journal, but to merely share what is of interest for the general theosophical cause. For it is, after all, a matter of internal Society business; and this journal is to be devoted to objective Theosophical work and administrative questions only insofar as these are related to that work.

However, under the present circumstances, I cannot fully implement this point of view. This election matter stirs up so many things, and has already caused so much discussion, that it would be badly received from many quarters if I were to remain completely silent on the subject.

The late President-Founder had the statutory right to nominate his successor. This nomination is subject to confirmation by the company. And for the nomination to be valid, two-thirds of the votes cast in the election act must be in favor of the nominated candidate. Now the late president-founder proposed Mrs. Besant. The current vice president, in accordance with the statutes, has asked the secretaries general to carry out the election in May. This will be done in the stated legal form within the German section. Thus, if nothing else had happened, no matter could be in better order than this.

Yes, certainly, if nothing else had happened. Unfortunately, however, various things have happened, and this has complicated what was once a simple matter. I will now explain what has happened. The late President Olcott did not simply announce that he was nominating Mrs. Besant as his successor, but he sent a message in the most diverse circulars to the general secretaries, which then found its way into the Theosophical press, and unfortunately not only into it, that those high individuals, who are referred to as the masters, and specifically those who have a special relationship to the Theosophical cause, appeared at his deathbed and instructed him to nominate Mrs. Besant as his successor. Not only that, but they also made an important announcement to him about Mr. Leadbeater, who recently resigned from the Society. Now, this addition to the nomination of Mrs. Besant could have been simply ignored. Because whether one believes in the authenticity of the appearance of the masters in this case or not, what business is it of the members voting in terms of the statutes, from which side Olcott was advised when he made the nomination? Whether he took counsel from masters or from any ordinary mortal is his own business. The electors are to keep to the statutes and to ask themselves only whether they consider Mrs. Besant the right person or not. But a difficulty arose immediately from the fact that Mrs. Besant made it known that she had been instructed by her master to accept the election, and that for this reason she was taking on the burden, that she was even interpreting the order of the masters as something decisive for the election. This results in a factual calamity. For Mrs. Besant enjoys the esoteric trust of many members. For them, a purely administrative matter has been made a matter of conscience by her actions. For if they were to base their feelings on the statutes, they would place themselves in opposition to the personality who must enjoy their esoteric trust. Some also said to themselves: can Mrs. Besant be elected if she confuses a mere administrative matter with an esoteric matter, such as a pronouncement of the masters, even before taking office? Is there not a danger that in the future we will receive Mahatma orders from Adyar instead of simple prestidigitations? The confusion that would ensue if that happened is unimaginable. Within our German Section, however, this danger was not great, because our work in recent years has succeeded in keeping out many of the storms that have swept through the Society. Even the Leadbeater case passed without unnecessary storm with us. There would have been time to talk about the revelations in Adyar later. That would have happened, and will happen, because anyone who, like the writer of these lines, is firmly convinced that the higher wisdom is only the expression of highly developed spiritual individuals, will never say anything in the teaching that he could not justify to these individuals; such a person will feel the necessity to speak openly at the right time about things like the revelations communicated by Adyar. But he must not choose an inopportune time for doing so.

And there is something else. If the discussions that have taken place in the Society outside Germany have led to discussions that amount to opposition to Mrs. Besant's election, the scope of these discussions has been further increased by an article written by Mrs. Besant in the March issue of The Theosophical Review on the Society's foundations. This article could be understood to contain nothing more than the following. The Theosophical Society requires its members to recognize the universal brotherhood of mankind. Anyone who recognizes that the Society has such work to do and is suited to bringing about such a brotherhood can be a member of the Society. And one should not say that a member can be expelled for actions that offend here and there, provided that they recognize the above rule of the Society. For the Theosophical Society has no moral code, and one finds among the greatest minds of humanity actions that might offend someone, depending on the circumstances of his time and country. The writer of these lines must confess that he regarded this essay as a correct, even self-evident expression of an occultist attitude, and that he assumed that other Theosophists also think so, until the April number of the Theosophical Review, in which it is said from many sides and repeated endlessly that such an attitude is the height of immorality and must undermine all good morals in society. And again and again the refrain, spoken or unspoken: can someone who preaches such immorality be president of a decent society? Now is not the time to modestly raise the question: Where is the transference of the doctrine of karma into life, which shows us that man is dependent on his karma in his present actions, but that he will depend on his thoughts in the present with regard to his future actions? As Theosophists, should we judge as people do who know nothing about karma, or should we see the actions of our fellow human beings as conditioned by their past lives? Do we still remember that thoughts are facts and that those who work for right thoughts in our ranks are laying the very foundation for overcoming what clings to people from past lives? What has Mrs. Besant done in this essay but expound an ancient occultist tenet, which is correctly expressed in the otherwise certainly disputable novel “Zanoni” with the following words: “Our opinions are the angel part of us, our deeds the earthly part.” In quieter times Mrs. Besant's essay would probably have been taken as the point that the occultist often has to emphasize in the face of popular morality. This shows that this presidential election threatens to remove the discussion from the calm, objective ground. The question of whether or not a purely administrative matter may be played out in the esoteric could easily become the question of principle as to how society should further relate to the occult. And if that should be the case, those who must maintain the occult basis of the Society cannot for a moment doubt that the choice of a personality who starts from the occult point of view is the right one, even if they believe that this personality is currently mistaken with regard to statutes and constitutions. Such an error could be remedied, but not if, for instance, the Society were to be estranged from occultism by the election of its present president. That is enough for today. We will discuss what else needs to be said about the election. Whether it will be in this journal or only among members will depend on the circumstances. It must be done.

These lines would also have been unnecessary if there had been no talk of the matter outside Germany. But readers of this journal can demand that there be not complete silence about something that is being discussed so much elsewhere.

[ 1 ] What is proclaimed today as Theosophy is by no means a new spiritual doctrine. What is new is that people are speaking and working publicly in its spirit, and that societies are being founded for its cultivation, to which anyone can have access. Previously, its work was done in societies that did not go public. Only those persons were admitted to them who had given a guarantee through their proven abilities that they were absolutely up to certain tasks that fell to them, and whose character offered the certainty that they would place their lives completely in the service of the school of thought that opened up to them.

[ 2 ] It was not arbitrary that the teachings and work of such societies were kept secret. This was only because the public would not only have been useless but also harmful. All higher goods and goals of life depend on these teachings and this work. The owners of such knowledge are promoters of the salvation of mankind, caretakers of true health and the noblest progress of humanity. But only those who have the necessary qualities and abilities can work in this sense. Those who do not have these qualities and abilities will not be entrusted with the corresponding knowledge by the keepers of this knowledge, just as one would not entrust the operation of a machine to an incompetent or inexperienced person, who would only cause harm to himself and his surroundings. The possession of the power to bring about the salvation and development of humanity is connected with the knowledge of it.

[ 3 ] Today many people smile at assertions of this kind. But they have no knowledge of what is really going on in the higher spiritual life. They only want to see life on the surface and close their minds to its secrets. Those who recognize their task as being to communicate a part of the higher knowledge of the world today will know how to bear being called visionaries and dreamers. That is what has always been done to those who had such tasks. They act in their own way only because they have to.

[ 4 ] Only a part of the “secret knowledge”, the elementary part, is made public as theosophy. For the other areas, the old way of working must continue. The Theosophical Society, founded thirty years ago, is one of the institutions for the publication of a part of higher knowledge, but by no means the only one.

[ 5 ] Those who work in the spirit of theosophy today are convinced that many of their fellow human beings justifiably desire the corresponding knowledge, because without it they would have to sink into spiritual desolation and poverty. Theosophy is directed at those who are searching for the truth about the highest and noblest goods of humanity with the deepest earnestness, and who cannot achieve this goal by the paths they have taken so far.

[ 6 ] It is not to be claimed that the fruits of higher knowledge were withheld from humanity in earlier times and were only the special property of those united in secret societies. The keepers of knowledge have always sought ways to make their power useful to the world. Those who engage in theosophy and accept what it has to offer will soon learn to think differently about many things in life than they have done so far. One of these things is religious striving. In this striving, the great masses of people have sought enlightenment about the fate of the soul, about the goals of life; and they have found what they needed. Now things have changed; the number of those who see themselves beset by the spirits of doubt at every turn is growing ever greater. In earlier times, the custodians of science were also the leaders of religious life. They embodied the full harmony of faith and knowledge, religion and insight. Today, a part of science has detached itself from faith. And the two have gone their separate ways. But this has brought discord into human souls. And in many cases it has done so precisely in those who take the truth most seriously.

[ 7 ] Of course, there are still a great many people today who have not been led astray by the newer spirits of doubt. For such people, the theosophist will probably continue to use a language that is incomprehensible and seems useless to them. But their number is decreasing daily. Countless people absorb the discordant note in their childhood. They have to take in one explanation of the world through religious teaching and another through natural science. Both stand in contradiction to them; and they take the break in their soul with them into later life as the source of a sad inner fate, or – which is probably even worse – as indifference towards the spiritual goods of life. Perhaps they do not even realize what they have lost in a higher sense.

[ 8 ] And not least are those seized by doubt and uncertainty who, by virtue of their abilities and training, are called to be leaders in spiritual life. This is only natural, for they are the ones least able to escape the triumphal march of scientific doubt. And so no strength or influence passes from them to the spiritual life of others. Anyone who today still lives in his village or otherwise in the closest circle, without being touched by a breath of contemporary thinking, may tomorrow be confronted by a freethinking speaker or get hold of a book that pulls the ground from under his feet, the ground of his convictions that constituted his salvation. The newer science has such a shattering effect because its results are based on the most gross testimony, that of the external senses. It can prove what it claims through these witnesses. The senses not only fail to provide evidence for religious truths about the spiritual world, but they even seem to contradict them. But mankind owes its external well-being and the great material goods of life to science, which is based on the facts of sensory perception. This science has armed the eye so that it can look into the farthest regions of the stars; it has made innumerable living beings visible in the smallest drop; it has conquered the globe with its natural forces and treasures. It is therefore understandable that it is able to exercise a tremendous power, and it is to be expected that this power will grow in the future. What seems to be in contradiction to it has been deprived of trust. And this happened to religious convictions that were unable to justify themselves before the judgment seat of this science.

[ 9 ] Those who relied on such science came to believe that the old traditions of spiritual life contained only the “fictions” of a childlike, unscientific imagination. Indeed, many of those who upheld these ancient traditions felt compelled to apply the standards of this science to religious teachings themselves; they examined the religious documents: and bit by bit, what had opened up a view of a higher world to mankind was lost; and what remains has not the power to truly give the soul the security it needs. For it must be realized that many so-called free directions in religion, which seek to make peace with modern science, will prove to be completely ineffective from a religious point of view.

[ 10 ] But all other attempts to create a substitute for the old traditions and to satisfy the irrepressible longing for the spiritual world have also failed. Until recently, it was still possible to believe that a substitute for the old traditions could be found in the new science. Many noble people built up a kind of scientific creed for themselves as “free thinkers”. They accepted the teachings of “natural” development in the sense of materialistic science, because they thought that these were “reasonable”, and that the so-called “supernatural” story of creation contradicted reason. They considered the soul to be a product of the brain, and they devoted themselves with a certain enthusiasm to the hope that when their bodies disintegrated, they would live as little as they had lived before their birth, according to their view. They replaced their devotion to any religious demands with a service to humanity in the sense of earthly well-being and progress. Nowadays, this “free-thinking” has been refuted by science itself. The ideas from which it arose were the results of a premature “scientific belief”. And anyone who still wants to profess such a belief today is not only sinning against religious traditions, but also against genuine advanced science itself. What science has brought to light in recent years cannot be reconciled with the freethinking that has been characterized. Only a few of the old materialists, who have blinded themselves with the power of prejudice, still cling to such views.

[ 11 ] A new path is necessary for the truth-seeking soul today. And this is the path that the theosophical spiritual movement has taken. It will show that the spiritual world, which has been the subject of faith for so long, is also accessible to knowledge. And it will achieve this by publishing a part of the higher knowledge. It is one of its most important realizations that the beliefs of faith are not creations of a childlike, unscientific imagination, but rather of the highest human wisdom. Religions were not created by children, but by wise leaders of humanity. But they gave their messages the form that suited the times and peoples to whom they were addressed. If the religious documents did not express wisdom in its most direct and original form, but clothed it in images and stories, it was because it was thus more accessible to people at a certain level of understanding than in the form of pure concepts. They had to speak to the emotions and the imagination, because these attain their perfection before reason. In the secret schools, however, the great teachers imparted to their intimate disciples in undisguised form what they had to say to humanity. And in these schools this undisguised form was passed on from century to century. From time to time, the initiates passed on to the outside world what they considered necessary, and in the manner that seemed to them to be the most appropriate and that would protect them from misuse and confusion. In this way, the world came to know as faith what the leaders possessed as knowledge. And it was right to leave it at that as long as it could not be shaken by knowledge of the external physical world. The last few centuries have seen this come to pass; and in recent times this knowledge has progressed to such an extent that it is now possible to lift the veil from part of the secret. Further silence would rob humanity of all prospects of a spiritual world. Even those who have climbed to the highest summits of physical science have not been able to find out for themselves how the highest truths are hidden behind the images of religious teachings. They had to take it on faith. Now Theosophy comes in and reveals from the treasure of secret knowledge as much as is necessary to satisfy the needs of the human soul. It shows religions and all traditions of a spiritual life in a completely new light. It is able to give them a form so that a theosophist can be a believer in science and religious teachings at the same time in the fullest sense of the word. For through theosophy, one acquires ideas about a spiritual life in such a way that one is in harmony with the strictest science. There can be nothing for this kind of thinking within the current thinking that could not be answered and accounted for.

[ 12 ] Thus, if properly understood, the theosophical spiritual tradition can fulfill the most necessary mission in today's spiritual life. Therefore, anyone who has sought peace of mind in vain through other paths may seek advice from it. But even those who are not yet plagued by doubts will find it beneficial, for it will bring clarity to the objects of their faith, it will deepen the life of the soul.

[ 1 ] The theosophical school of thought of the present day not only seeks to satisfy the thirst for knowledge, but also to bring security into the practice of life. This is the side of it that is most misunderstood by those who do not want to delve deeper into it. A theosophist is easily considered to be an unworldly person who, in his “fantasies” in the cloud regions of the spiritual, neglects the harsh, hard reality. It should not be denied that there are followers of this world view who make such ideas seem justified. But such people themselves fall prey to a serious misunderstanding. They are dissatisfied with the spiritless view of reality that they see around them, and with the life that comes from such a view. They want to turn to life in the spirit and be filled with a nobler aspiration than that of sensual, everyday well-being. But they confuse a disastrous conception of reality with reality itself. And instead of freeing themselves from that conception, they take flight from life.

[ 2 ] But it is precisely a matter of finding the spirit within the reality that surrounds man. It is not this reality that is spiritless, but man who cannot find the spirit. Just as one does not seek electricity, light and other natural forces outside the world, so too, with a true theosophical attitude, one does not do so with spiritual forces. Theosophy, properly understood, is the recognition of such spiritual forces and laws within the world. Not only that which the eyes can see and the hands can grasp is a world force, but also that which is accessible only to the eyes of the soul, and which no instrument can control, but which the power of the spirit can master and actually move, if it knows how. The technique is based on the fact that man subjects the perceptible forces of his senses to his insight; and 'theosophy can lead to a spiritual technique that brings the higher forces into the service of human salvation. From this point of view, the theosophical attitude will not lead to aloofness from the world, but to active participation in life, indeed to the noblest and most understanding practice. For its arena is not a workshop in which material products are delivered, but life itself, as it takes place between human beings.

[ 3 ] The true theosophist is convinced that countless spiritual threads connect one human soul to another. He learns to recognize that not only his outwardly visible actions, but also his innermost soul movements and his most hidden thoughts have an effect on the weal and woe, on the freedom or slavery of his fellow human beings. This means that man recognizes the spiritual forces, that he is aware that what takes place in his soul is just as much a fact as that which the eye can see. And what he thinks and feels is something that sends its effects outwards, just as a magnet or an electric battery has an outward effect. The theosophist does not see all this in the same superficial way as the sensualist, but in such a way that he attributes reality to the spirit just as he does to the table that he can touch with his hand.

[ 4 ] Those who become familiar with theosophy will gradually come to regard such an attitude as a matter of course. And from this attitude will then arise the right relationship to the life of the soul; and from this, in turn, the appropriate treatment of all the tasks of life.

[ 5 ] Only those who are able to set the forces stored in their souls in motion in the proper way will find the right position in life, just as only those who know the laws of the external forces of nature will be able to apply them for the good of humanity. An electric battery is used to good effect by anyone who knows the nature of electrical effects. But man himself is a spiritual-mental battery, and the laws that he should apply in life with his fellow human beings must be directed at himself.

[ 6 ] It was said in the previous essay that the guardians of higher knowledge bring a part of it to publication within the theosophical spiritual work, because only in this way is it possible for the soul that is earnestly seeking truth to find a way out of the doubt and uncertainty to which the newer science, which is directed towards sensory perception, leads.

[ 7 ] The practice of life is similar. It is different now than it was in the past. How all conditions have changed. Just compare the simplicity of life in earlier times with the demands on people today. People enter into new relationships with each other. The personality has emerged from relationships of dependence that gave their existence a narrow scope, and it has been granted incomparably greater freedom of movement. But with this, a greater responsibility also rests on it. Old fetters have loosened; the conditions of existence and the struggles for existence have become more diverse. The old forces that guided the forefathers of present-day humanity are no longer sufficient for the new demands.

[ 8 ] For such reasons, we see the emergence of aspirations and outlooks on life that were unknown in the past. How many questions are occupying the minds of people today. Such “questions” arise from all areas of life: the social question, the legal question, the women's question, the educational and school question, the health and nutrition question, etc. The underlying cause of all this is that certain conditions in life must be newly regulated. And a fundamental difference from earlier times is that such regulations must now be brought about with the participation of the individual. Compare this with the way things used to be done in the past. How apparently indeterminate forces guided the masses, without the individual personalities being predisposed to direct, active intervention.

[ 9 ] A superficial view is of the opinion that the institutions of past times were created by the instincts of the people or by the arbitrary will of individuals. But anyone who looks more deeply into the course of human development and follows the progress of history without materialistic superstition will realize that the regulation of practical life has proceeded no more from instincts or caprice than religions have their origin in “childlike popular imagination”. The beliefs originate from the wisdom of the great leaders of the human race, and the same is true of the institutions of practical life.

[ 10 ] The threads that have held and still hold the network of human social order together lead to the secret schools. Unconsciously, people were led to the goals of their lives. It was precisely this unconsciousness that gave existence the security that is associated with the instinctive character. However, the progress of humanity now requires that the personality be freed from this instinctive way of existence. Instead of being guided by hidden forces, the order of the whole must henceforth be ensured by the knowledge and judgment of the individual personality. From this it follows that man is in need of a knowledge of the forces of life practice, which was previously accessible only to the initiated of the secret schools. From these places, the spiritual forces were lawfully put into effect, which play from human soul to human soul and cause the harmony of life.

[ 11 ] At the present time, every individual needs a certain degree of insight into the great world aims if he is not to renounce the free mobility of the personal. Everyone is becoming more and more a co-worker in the building of society.

[ 12 ] The theosophical spiritual work is directed towards this goal. It alone can point the individual in the right direction for the above-mentioned “questions”. For the structure of humanity is a whole, and anyone who wants to contribute to it must, to a certain extent, have an overview of the whole. All the questions mentioned are interrelated, and anyone who wants to work on one of them without an overview of the whole is living without a plan. This does not mean, of course, that everyone should participate equally in all these “questions”. Certainly, an individual will find enough work in one. But the direction towards the comprehensive human goals gives the individual work its meaning and justification. He who wants to solve the “women's question” or the “educational question” etc. in complete isolation is like a worker who, without regard to an appropriate overall plan, begins to drill a hole at any point on a mountain and thinks that a proper tunnel will result. The theosophical way of thinking is not only not far removed from the practical questions of life when it is understood in the right light, but it rather strives for the only possible practice. Only those who do not want to look beyond the narrowest circle can deny the practical sense of such a direction in life.

[ 13 ] Of course, many of the things that theosophists strive for in terms of shaping their lives still seem impractical today; and the narrow-minded may often feel quite practical compared to such enthusiasts. But the latter, if they had to, could point to many a practical institution that was considered to be fantasy by those who thought themselves “practical” when it was first proposed. Or was the postage stamp a fantasy compared to the old systems? And yet the leading practical civil servant regarded the idea of this system, which came from a “non-practitioner”, as a fantasy, and among other things made the objection that London's “postal building” would not be large enough if traffic took on the volume that was predicted. And the General Postmaster of Berlin, when the first railway was to be built from the capital to Potsdam, said: if people want to waste their money like that, then they should just throw it out of the window, because he had two post coaches going to Potsdam every day, and there was nobody in them; who would then want to travel by train!

[ 14 ] True practice lies with those who have the bigger picture; and cultivating such practice as a mindset should be the task of the theosophical view of life.

[ 1 ] The Theosophical Society, which has existed for thirty years, has made it its first principle: “to form the nucleus of a general brotherhood of mankind, without distinction of race, creed, sex and class”. In its public activities, however, the Society has made it its task to disseminate certain teachings on reincarnation and human destiny (karma), on higher levels of life, world education, human development and the like. Many may say: does the cultivation of universal love, as expressed in the above principle, require a society that promotes such views? Is such comprehensive love not the ideal of every true friend of humanity; and are there not many societies and associations that strive for the same goal without professing the teachings mentioned? And many think that the pursuit of this beautiful goal can only be harmed by bringing it together with the spread of certain views. It is also sometimes claimed that those teachings can only be understood by a minority of people, while the goal mentioned must take root in every human soul.

[ 2 ] These objections to the work of the “Theosophical Society” have much that is attractive for those who do not look at the matter very closely. And it would indeed be a serious mistake for the Society to make the acceptance of certain doctrines obligatory for its members. But the workers within the Society also emphasize again and again that it is not views and opinions that should unite the members, but only that goal.

[ 3 ] However, one can make it one's duty to publicly advocate the teachings mentioned above, because one has recognized in them the right means to achieve the desired goal. — To make universal love of mankind the object of a society is undoubtedly a fine thing. And whoever demands and preaches it will be able to find full agreement in the widest circles. For this love is a fundamental force of human nature. It could not be implanted in the human heart if it were not originally predisposed to it.

[ 4 ] But if this is the case, why is this love not generally widespread in life? Why do we encounter so much fighting, quarrelling, hatred? — The theosophist gives the answer today, which he has received from the true core of the great teachings of humanity, those that have always led from strife to harmony, from hatred to love, from conflict to peace. The essence of the theosophical way of thinking is that it leads to the unshakable conviction that the true powers and causes of everything that happens in the world are in the soul and spirit, and not in what the external senses observe and desire. Once you have reached this conviction, it is also clear to you that true ideas and thoughts awaken the noblest powers in the soul, and that strife, hatred and conflict are the result of error and blindness. As long as you consider it unimportant what a person thinks, you may also place no particular value on the dissemination of certain teachings. But when it has become clear to us that the world owes its origin and its organization not to blind forces but to divine wisdom; that wisdom is the cause of all development and all progress in the world, then we shall also come to the realization that the goodness of the heart must arise from its harmony with this divine wisdom.

[ 5 ] If man could not err, he would not be man. He is man because he can accomplish his actions not as a slave to an infallible natural order, but through his own free choice. If his capacity for error gives him his human dignity, it also makes him the author of countless evils. The deeper one delves into theosophy, the more the connection between error and evil is revealed. Just as it is true that everything sensual and material arises from the spirit, so it is also true that all evil in the world of the senses arises from the aberrations of the spirit.

[ 6 ] In our time, however, such things are difficult to understand. What could seem more fantastic to contemporary thinking than someone claiming that physical illness has something to do with error, but that health has to do with true and correct ideas? The future will show that real superstition does not consist in the belief in this assertion, but in the denial of it. He who truly recognizes the soul and the spirit does not make them appendages of the material, but sees them as the rulers of the latter. And the essence of soul and spirit is truth and wisdom. Not only in an outward way do truth and wisdom create the good and the excellent, but as powers of the soul and the spirit they create the perfect in the external world. — It cannot be proved in a short discussion such as this, but it will become clear to everyone who delves into theosophy that the health of the body is the result of the wisdom and truth of the soul, while illness is the effect of error and unwise behavior. Anyone who takes a superficial view of this assertion must misunderstand it and can only find it fanciful. The cheap objection that there are very wise people with poor health and robust people with little wisdom can be made by anyone who makes the above claim. However, things are not that simple, and this objection does not say anything of significance. Cause and effect, error and evil are often far apart. And in order to penetrate the meaning of such a statement, one must delve deeper into the theosophical way of thinking.

[ 7 ] Moral and physical evils arise from error: and he who works his way up to truth and wisdom promotes the moral good and also the physical health of the world. This is the truth of the assertions of spiritual healing. And it is a matter of realizing that man promotes the good and the healthy when he allows the divine wisdom, from which the harmony of the universe has arisen, to flow into his soul. “Theo-Sophia” is “divine wisdom”. What it proclaims are the great, divine thoughts according to which the primordial spirit guides the world, according to which life is formed and man develops. They are the laws of the life of the soul in the body, of its destiny in the world. To live in harmony with these great truths is the condition of goodness and health; to oppose them results in evil and disease. The more one penetrates into them, the more they become effective forces in the soul. If one understands theosophy correctly, this is what is meant when one says that mere knowledge, theoretical understanding, is not what matters, but life. But anyone who wanted to claim that he therefore did not need to concern himself at all with the teachings of wisdom would be denying the effectiveness of the idea, of the thought, that is, of that which constitutes the life of the spirit and the soul. If a force is to become effective, it must first exist. If the divine thoughts, which are the creative forces in the depths of the world's existence, are also to become the moralizing and healing powers in the human soul, then they must first make their entrance into this soul. The theosophical spiritual movement does not spread certain teachings in order to satisfy a mere thirst for knowledge, but because it wants to bring about true moral progress for humanity and, no less, true health for life.

[ 8 ] The universal brotherhood of mankind will become an ideal goal, a comprehensive, creative feeling, a force that promotes progress, harmony and understanding, if genuine 'theosophy shows the way. Of course, someone may object: but who can guarantee that Theosophy really contains the healing truth; have not all possible spiritual teachings promised the best effects? The only answer to this question can be given by those who have familiarized themselves with the theosophical quest. They will then find that this school of thought seeks the path to truth precisely by not paying homage to any one-sided opinion or by trying to force such an opinion on anyone. It can have true tolerance towards every such opinion without lapsing into indifference. For a genuine quest for truth teaches one to appreciate the same in others. No opinion is so wrong that, with true honesty, the truth cannot be found in it. And whoever encounters a foreign opinion can either seek in it what distinguishes it from his own, or that in which it is, even remotely, similar to his own. The former will lead to an inner separation between man and man, but the latter will contribute to unification. Genuine theosophy seeks the grain of truth that is surely present even in the worst error, without insisting on the absolute correctness of its own opinion. And so, in the interaction of opinions, truth is gradually brought to light. But from this arises an inner brotherhood, a brotherhood of thought, of which all external things must be the image.

[ 9 ] But, it is objected, is all this really to be found among the theosophists? Undoubtedly not. But that is not the point: whether this or that person who calls himself a theosophist fulfills an ideal, but solely and exclusively whether the matter itself is suitable to promote this ideal. But to decide on this, one must acquaint oneself with the matter itself, and not merely with what comes to light here or there. One promotes the right thing much more by doing it oneself than by criticizing the wrong thing in others. One will soon recognize that one of the most beautiful fruits of one's own theosophical striving is that it has an inner power of conviction that is not dependent on momentary external successes. With such an attitude, one will soon realize that where bad fruits appear, the right theosophy is not the basis either.

[ 10 ] Another objection raised against the “Theosophical Society” is the difficulty of understanding its teachings, which are said to be accessible only to people with a certain level of education. Who, it is said, can find his way into the foreign expressions, into all the complicated theories, without special study? It should not be denied that much remains to be done in this direction to make it possible for theosophy to find the heart and mind of everyone. But this work must be done. What this school of thought has to proclaim can, if the right forms of expression are found, be understood by everyone. Indeed, nowhere is it possible to find the right form of expression for every level of education or life experience to the same extent as here. The most learned and the most unlearned can both find what they need for the salvation and peace of their souls. Those who want to achieve great things cannot remain within narrow circles; and where Theosophy has done so in the past, it has done so because it is only at the beginning of its career and must therefore first seek the right paths in the various fields of life. But the wider the circles in which it spreads, the more suitable will be the means it employs. The idea that it could lose depth and seriousness if it became more widespread is not one that anyone should entertain. For the dissemination of certain teachings that come into consideration here is a duty today; and if one recognizes this, one must ensure that the genuine teachings are preserved despite their dissemination, but not be deterred from this dissemination by the fear of distortion.

[ 1 ] Among the many accusations that have been made against Theosophy is that it is unscientific. And since science, or rather what is called science today, has an immense amount of authority, such an accusation can do great harm to the aspiring Theosophical movement. The “scholarly world” does not want to deal with it at all, because it does not know how to deal with the facts claimed by Theosophy due to its education in scientific ideas. This can be understood if one has familiarized oneself with the ideas and experiences that are currently taught to lawyers, doctors, teachers, chemists, engineers, etc. during their training. How far removed is all this from the content of theosophical literature. What other way of thinking prevails in a chemical lecture than in the teachings of the leading exponents of Theosophy. It is not going too far to say that there is currently no greater obstacle to understanding theosophical claims than the possession of a doctorate.

[ 2 ] This, however, is detrimental to the spread of Theosophy. For it is only too understandable that anyone who does not fully understand things will be taken aback by such a fact. And so it is not always out of malice that it is said: you theosophists only attract the uneducated classes; you are unable to win over people who are at the 'height of science'.

[ 3 ] From this it can easily be concluded that Theosophy is on the wrong track and that it should adapt itself more to the way of thinking of the scientific circles. If one could only see that the teachings of reincarnation and karma could be scientifically substantiated just as easily as the other laws of nature, then the matter would be settled; the learned world would be won over and theosophy would prevail.

[ 4 ] This is a well-meant belief; but it arises only from a fatal prejudice. This consists in the opinion that the scientific way of thinking, which is common today, could ever come to theosophy out of itself. But this is not the case at all; and only those who unconsciously carry the theosophical views they have received elsewhere into contemporary science can be deceived in this way. It is perfectly possible to carry all theosophical wisdom into science in this way, and one will not find the slightest contradiction between what is true in science and the assertions of the theosophists. But it is impossible to extract theosophy from what is officially taught as science today. One can be the greatest scholar in any field in the sense of the present; one does not become a theosophist through this scholarship.

[ 5 ] Anyone who has given the matter a little thought must realize this. What the theosophists claim are not conclusions based on any ideas or concepts, but supersensory facts. And facts can never be found through mere logic and deduction, but only through experience. Now, our official science is concerned only with the facts of sensory experience. All its ideas and concepts are based solely on this experience. Therefore, as long as it proceeds from this premise, it can never say anything about non-sensory facts. Facts are never proved by logic, but only by demonstrating them in reality. Let us assume that the whale is still an unknown animal today. Will anyone be able to prove its existence by drawing conclusions? Even if he is an expert on all other animals, he will not be able to do so. But the most uneducated person will prove the existence of the whale if he discovers it in reality. And how ridiculous a scholar would appear if he were to confront such an uneducated person and say: according to science, such animals as whales are not possible, so there are none; the discoverer must have been mistaken.

[ 6 ] No, mere scholarship is of no use against theosophy. Nothing can decide its facts except supersensible experience. People must be helped to this supersensible experience, not referred to barren scholarship.

[ 7 ] Now, of course, one will immediately have an objection at the ready. He is as cheap as possible. But if people do not have any extrasensory experiences, how can you expect them to believe what a few people say who claim to be clairvoyants and to have such experiences? You should at least refrain from teaching theosophical experiences to a non-clairvoyant audience and only present them to those whom you have first made clairvoyant.

[ 8 ] This sounds tolerable, but cannot be maintained in the face of the true facts. For, in the first place, those who speak thus would also have to find all popular scientific lectures and writings highly objectionable. Or do the numerous readers of Haeckel's “Natural History of Creation” or Carus Sterne's “Becoming and Passing Away” all have the opportunity to convince themselves of the reality of what is asserted there? No, here too, the faith of the public is appealed to, and it is assumed that they will trust those who are doing research in the laboratory or at the observatory. But secondly, the faith that is assumed for supersensory facts is quite different from that for sensory facts. When someone tells what he has seen through a microscope or telescope, he certainly presupposes that his listener can convince himself of the truth of what is told if he acquires the artifice that must be used in such research and if he procures the tools in question. But the mere telling of the story does not help at all to such verification. It is different with the supersensible facts. Whoever speaks of them does not relate anything that cannot be experienced in the human soul itself. And the narrative itself can be the stimulus to lure out the powers of one's own observation that are hidden in the soul. Speak to someone as many words as you like about small organisms that can be seen through a microscope: your words will never make the secrets of the microscope visible to him. He must procure the means for the verification from outside. But speak to him of that which can be found in the soul itself, and your word can as such make the beginning of conjuring up the slumbering powers of vision of his inner being. This is the great difference between the communication of supersensible and sensible facts, that in the former the means for confirmation lie in the soul of every human being himself, in the latter not. It is not the intention here to speak in favor of that superficial view of theosophy which always maintains that in order to fathom divine truth, each one need only sink into his own inner being, where he will find the “God-man,” who is the source of all wisdom. If a person delves into his soul at any stage of his existence and then imagines that the “higher self” is speaking within him, in most cases it will only be the ordinary “I” that brings forth what it has acquired from its environment, through education, etc. As true as it is that divine truth is enclosed in the soul itself, it is also true that it can best be brought out of it by having the paths shown to you by a more advanced person who has already found within himself what you yourself are seeking. What the healing teacher tells you that he has found within himself, you can find within yourself if you allow yourself to be guided by his instructions. The “higher self” is the same in all people, and it is found most surely when one does not shut oneself off in vanity, but allows this “higher self” to work on oneself from where it already speaks in a person. As in all other things, teachers are a necessity for the seeking soul.

[ 9 ] But with this reservation it is true that everyone can find the truth of the supersensible facts within themselves. Anyone who has only impartiality, perseverance, patience and good will will soon see a feeling of intuitive agreement arise within him when such facts are recounted. And if he follows this feeling, then he is on the right path. For this feeling is the first of those powers that awaken the slumbering powers of the soul. When truth presents itself to us as it has been seen by the clairvoyant soul, then it speaks to us through its own power. Of course, this is only the very first step on the path to higher knowledge, and to progress further requires careful training; but this beginning has certainly been laid by listening to the word of truth with an open mind.

[ 10 ] How is it that in our time so many people do not feel this way about the communication of supersensible facts? This is simply because the man of the present, and especially the scientifically trained man, has become accustomed to believing only in the testimony of the senses. And such a belief has a paralyzing effect on the unbiased feeling. One must first free oneself from it if one wants to understand the clairvoyant researcher. One must become free of the thought habits created by “science” and its common prejudices. That is, one cannot find the higher truths from this science, but independently of it on the inner paths of the soul. Once you have found access to higher knowledge in this way, you will find that it is confirmed by every true science. And our present-day science in particular will then prove to be the most wonderful proof of higher truth. Just as little as this science is suited to giving the supernatural to those who have not yet found it in any other way, so much can it offer to those who have.

[ 11 ] Therefore, the task of the theosophical movement can only be to break the authority and blind following of “scientific” prejudices. This is not to say anything against the achievements of contemporary science, but merely to emphasize the necessity of not blindly following those who interpret this science in the sense of denying supersensible facts.

[ 12 ] A scholar educated in the current zeitgeist will only be able to find the expression of the supersensible in his science if he has prepared himself for it through theosophical immersion. No chemistry, no zoology, geology or physiology, as they are now developed, can lead to theosophy in themselves; but they will all be able to serve as proof of supersensible knowledge once this has been gained through the theosophical view. Only when man has received the theosophical sense will he also apply it in science. The theosophical view of the world does not need present-day science to confirm its truth; but this science needs the theosophical deepening.

[ 13 ] The objections that can be raised against all this are, of course, numerous. For example, it can be pointed out how contemporary psychology, through the study of the facts of hypnotism, suggestion, etc., endeavors to approach the supersensible. In truth, however, the way in which these things are investigated does not bring one closer to higher knowledge, but only removes one from it. For one seeks to follow misleading paths also in relation to the supersensible. They endeavor to find the supersensible through the external senses. But it is not a matter of dragging the supersensible down to the external senses, but of developing the inner faculties of perception. He who wants to prove the supersensible by external means is like a man who wants to prove to me by all kinds of means in the room that it is nice weather outside, instead of simply opening the window and letting me see the nice weather. No matter how beautiful the experiments, they can only prove that man has more in his soul than what everyday consciousness knows: one will not be able to find more than an external reflection of what reveals itself in its full extent and in its own truth when one follows the inner paths of the soul. — Photograph spirits yourself: for those who do not find the spirit within themselves, you will not prove anything with it. For he will try to prove to you that your photograph was taken in a completely material way. But for the one who has found the spirit within himself, every flower, every stone will be an embodied spirit being, and that is all that you can achieve with the means of science, which is attached to the material. It would be a weakness to accommodate the materialistic consciousness of the time to such an extent that one would try to prove the supersensible to it with its means. Rather, one must make it clear to it that nothing truthful can be achieved with these means.

[ 14 ] The attempts at the supernatural undertaken by contemporary scholars are not a beginning of something new, but rather represent the last convulsions of materialism, which cannot rise above the sensual and therefore seeks to satisfy its supernatural needs from the sensual.

[ 15 ] One should not lull the higher powers of cognition by nourishing the belief that proof of the supernatural is possible even without their awakening. The theosophist cannot stand on the ground of current scientific prejudices; rather, he must first fertilize science through his higher insights. Once theosophy has found its way into the soul, it will automatically open the doors of science. Theosophy does not need to be made scientific, for it is much more scientific than current science; but science must be made theosophical.

[ 16 ] First, one must be led to the supersensible facts, then one can incorporate them into the edifice of science; but one cannot extract them from a science that does not recognize these facts, through logical or other conclusions. Until the sense for the superphysical is developed, no science can do anything with it. Those who repeatedly accuse Theosophy of being unscientific should understand this.

[ 17 ] Those who have grown up in the scientific way of thinking of our time may find it difficult to accept what has been said with an open mind. For the suggestion that emanates from this science is great. Its achievements, with their consequence, the present material culture, are overwhelming. But one does not have to be an enemy of this science to turn to theosophy. On the contrary, one becomes its true friend through it. The gold of this science can only be won through theosophy. In what glorious light do Haeckel's discoveries then shine, indeed what a sight do the results of our physiologists, anthropologists, cultural historians, etc. present when seen in the theosophical light, and not with the materialistically biased sense of their present bearers. No one should be reproached for this, not even the slightest. As it is said that great personalities often have the defects of their virtues, so it is also with the currents of the times. In order to make the wonderful discoveries in the field of the world of sense, the researchers had to put aside the paths of the soul for a time. And what one does not practise for a time, one gradually loses the sense of. Just as certain animals with keen eyesight lose their sight if they move into dark caves and continue to live there, or as the muscles of the hand become weak if they are not used to any hard work for a while, so the pathfinders lost their vision of the supersensible in the sensual. They must be appreciated for their positive achievements and there is no need to underestimate them for what they have sacrificed for the sake of these achievements. But what is real is not decided by those who have not seen it, but by those to whom it has revealed itself. Therefore, all the protest of natural scientists cannot be taken into consideration against those who have acquired the ability to see supersensory things. But one cannot gain information about the supersensible from the natural scientists of the present day either. That would be like asking the blind about color. The blind man has an intimate feeling for certain subtleties of the sense of touch; much can be learned from him about them. But to learn about colors, one must direct one's own eye to them. Natural science is important for the sense of touch in the sensual world; but it has nothing to offer for the sight in the supersensible world. The blind man must learn about light from the seeing person; in the same way, it is the task of natural science to learn about the spirit from the theosophist. And those who want to get evidence for the bright light of the spiritual world from the groping natural scientist are on a disastrous path.

[ 1 ] The creator of the “Philosophy of the Unconscious”, Eduard von Hartmann, died on June 6, 1906. The world view that emerged in this work must arouse the warm interest of anyone who is interested in the intellectual currents of our age. And the creation of Eduard von Hartmann is one of those that are born entirely out of the character of the soul life of the last third of the nineteenth century. And more than from any other achievement of the immediate past, important directions of this soul life will be able to be derived from Eduard von Hartmann in the future. For he has followed up the aforementioned “Philosophy of the Unconscious”, which appeared as early as 1869, with numerous other works in which he has expressed his views on the most diverse major questions of humanity and also on many of the endeavors and intellectual currents of his era. None of these writings has achieved anywhere near the success of the “Philosophy of the Unconscious”. In a short time, it made Eduard von Hartmann a famous man. And not only within the German-speaking areas, but far beyond them. The work was translated into a number of languages.

[ 2 ] The significance of this success is all the more impressive when viewed in the context of the character of the time in which the book was published, and when one considers how much the world view represented in it was actually opposed to all the inclinations of Eduard von Hartmann's contemporaries. In it, he advocated a point of view from which insight could be gained into the spiritual foundations behind sensual reality. Hartmann sought to explore and reveal this spiritual reality in a truly bold manner. And his contemporaries in the broadest circles were tired and even weary of such research. This was the case with both the learned and the unlearned. In many cases, people had lost all understanding of philosophical thought. The unlearned had realized that none of the great hopes that had been aroused by the brilliant philosophical views of the first half of the century had been fulfilled. Whether this realization was really justified or whether it was based on a delusion because one had never really come to a true understanding of the spirit of these world views is not to be further discussed here. To characterize Eduard von Hartmann's appearance, it is sufficient to consider that the belief had become general that there was actually nothing to this whole way of philosophizing; that it only led to idealistic airy creations that stand on no firm ground and therefore cannot help man when he seeks satisfaction for the great riddles of his existence. Only Schopenhauer's writings have had a certain effect since the 1850s, due to their easy comprehensibility and because they spoke with warmth about important, immediate questions of humanity in a way that was particularly contemporary at that time. It was precisely the retreat of idealistic confidence and spiritualized hope for life that permeated the creations of Fichte, Schelling and Hegel that led to Schopenhauer, the “philosopher of pessimism”, achieving a late impact. Many people despaired of any kind of spiritual uplift being able to bring true elevation in life. Therefore, they willingly submitted to the arguments of a philosopher who even tried to prove the insignificance of life in a very pleasing form. But by the time the “Philosophy of the Unconscious” appeared, the inclination towards Schopenhauer had already largely disappeared.

[ 3 ] But no particular inspiration could come from the official centers of work in the field of philosophy. For there, with the loss of understanding for the previous philosophers, a certain perplexity had set in. There was a lack of all mental acuity, indeed of all courage, to really face the great world problems. They labored endlessly to explore how far human cognitive powers could actually go, and in doing so, they never got to the point of seriously recognizing anything, because they were constantly asking the same question over and over again: whether it was even possible to recognize anything at all. Kant's ideas were endlessly raked over in order to “orient oneself by them”. Anyone who has looked into the whole business can understand that this official philosophy could not have any effect on wider circles. Hermann Lotze had indeed attempted to describe a large, comprehensive body of ideas in his “Mikrokosmos” (1856-1864). But he could not succeed in conquering the field against a spiritual power that was then trying to take over the lost posts of philosophy everywhere. Lotze's approach was too diffuse, too much like a feuilleton. Gustav Theodor Fechner had also made many attempts to recognize the spiritual connections of the world. In 1851, he published “Zend-Avesta, or on the Nature of Heaven and the Hereafter”, in 1864 “On the Physical and Philosophical Theory of Atoms”, and in 1861 “On the Question of the Soul, a Journey through the Visible World to Find the Invisible”. At the time, these writings also had no profound effect. And that is understandable, because they came at a time when the natural sciences had taken a significant upswing. In them, people believed they could find the only sure ground of “facts” that could be trusted. And Fechner's way of looking at things was not such that the powerful advance from that side could have been repulsed by it. Due to a peculiar chain of circumstances, Fechner's achievements have only found a few supporters in our time. And this 'fact' shows the decreasing influence of scientific materialism today. In the last half of the nineteenth century, it had indeed earned real merits in the advancement of the human spirit. (Compare what was said about this in the previous article: “Haeckel, The World's Mysteries and Theosophy.”) And Gustav Theodor Fechner's way of philosophizing certainly offers some beautiful points of view and some quite fruitful suggestions. But in the main it builds a fantastic edifice of ideas on the basis of rather arbitrary analogies. And anyone who today believes that Fechner's revival can overcome the decaying materialism has neither gained the right relationship to natural science nor to true spiritual research, which is so urgently needed at present.

[ 4 ] Hartmann's appearance therefore fell in a time that was averse to all philosophizing and had turned its interest entirely to natural science. From this, people sought to construct a world view that, given the circumstances, had to be quite materialistic. Matter and its forces were to be the only reality, and all spiritual phenomena were to be nothing more than an expression of material effects. Those who thought differently were simply assumed by large sections of society to have not yet overcome their old prejudices and to have not yet arrived at the “only reasonable” philosophy of reality.

[ 5 ] And into this fell a phenomenon like the “philosophy of the unconscious”. Eduard von Hartmann took a challenging position towards natural science. He did not ignore the facts of natural science. Rather, he showed his full acquaintance with them everywhere. Indeed, it was precisely by making a particular use of facts from the field of natural science that he sought to prove that the spirit rules behind all sensory phenomena. The results that he arrived at through his purely speculative thinking are indeed very different from the spiritual facts that are reached by the actual spiritual research given in occultism. But in an age that was very much inclined towards a materialistic attitude, they were nevertheless numerous and ingenious demonstrations in favor of a world view that takes the spiritual into account. How many people had believed that they had clearly proven that natural science had forever “driven out the spirit”. And now someone dared to prove the “spirit” as real, precisely on the basis of what natural science itself teaches in many cases.

[ 6 ] The manner in which Hartmann has attempted this can only be indicated here in a few lines. Only a few of the many facts Hartmann has used may be mentioned here. For example, consider the so-called reflex movements of animals and of man. The eye closes when it is confronted with an impression that threatens it. Rational, conscious thought does not have time to become active. We are not dealing here with a process that is guided by the consciousness of the animal or human being. Nevertheless, it proceeds in such a way that reason is in it, and if conscious reason had to organize a similar process, it could not turn out differently. It is guided by an unconscious reason that is active within it or behind it. But reason can only give rise to the phenomena of such a fact; it cannot carry out the process itself. A will is needed for this. But again, this will is not a power of the conscious soul. It is therefore present as an unconscious one. Thus, in addition to unconscious reason, there is also an unconscious will behind the sensory facts. Another fact is given by instinctive actions. One need only look at the rational way in which animals build their homes, how they carry out actions that bear the character of expediency. Eduard von Hartmann derives his view from the healing power of nature, indeed from the creative work of the artist and the genius in general, which flows from the source of unconsciousness. To characterize this view, it is permissible to quote the sentences that are found in my book Welt- und Lebensanschauungen im neunzehnten Jahrhundert (World and Life Views in the Nineteenth Century) (Volume II, pp. 164-165, Berlin, Siegfried Cronbach) for this purpose:

[ 7 ] "Man cannot - in the sense of Eduard von Hartmann - be content with the observation of facts. He must progress from facts to ideas. These ideas cannot be something that is arbitrarily added to the facts by thinking. There must be something corresponding to them in the things and events. These corresponding ideas cannot be conscious ideas, because such only come about through the material processes of the brain. Without a brain, there is no consciousness. We must therefore imagine that the conscious ideas of the human mind correspond to an unconscious ideal in reality. Like Hegel, Hartmann also regards the idea as the real thing in things, which exists in them beyond what is merely perceptible, accessible to sensory observation. However, the mere idea content of things could never bring about a real event in them. The idea of a sphere cannot push the idea of another sphere. The idea of a table cannot make an impression on the human eye either. A real event presupposes a real force. To gain an idea of such a force, Hartmann draws on Schopenhauer. In his own soul, man finds a force through which he gives reality to his own thoughts and decisions, the will. Just as the will expresses itself in the human soul, it presupposes the existence of the human organism. Through the organism, the will is a conscious one. If we want to think of a force in things, we can only imagine it as similar to the will, the only force that we know directly. But again, we must disregard consciousness. So, outside of us, there is an unconscious will in things, which gives ideas the possibility of becoming real. The content of ideas and will in the world, in their union, constitute the unconscious basis of the world. – Even though the world exhibits a thoroughly logical structure on account of its content of ideas, it owes its real existence to the illogical, irrational will. Its content is rational; that this content is a reality has its reason in the irrationality.»

[ 8 ] It is clear that Hartmann assumes a spiritual world as the basis of the one that reveals itself to man through his . external senses. This is what his view of the world has in common with occult knowledge. Only the way in which both arrive at this spiritual world is what distinguishes them. Occult knowledge shows that man does not need to stop at the outer senses in terms of his perceptive faculty. It says: There are dormant abilities in man; and if he develops these in the same way as he has developed his external senses up to now, then he will perceive the spiritual world directly, just as he perceives the ordinary sensual world with his eyes and ears. The philosophy of Eduard von Hartmann does not recognize such a development of man to a higher capacity for perception. For it, there is no perception other than that of the external senses. One can only combine the perceptions of these external senses, examine them with the intellect, dissect them, and reflect on their causes. Then one comes to realize that behind what one sees, hears, etc., there is something else that one does not perceive. This imperceptible spiritual reality is thus recognized through logical conclusions. It must remain a mere world of thought for man. — If occult knowledge advances on the basis of a higher human faculty of perception to a richly structured spiritual world, Hartmann's supersensible world of thought remains meager. It is composed only of the two elements, the unconscious will and the unconscious idea.

[ 9 ] If we realize this, it will be easy to see what is lacking in Eduard von Hartmann's view of the world to enable it to rise to the spiritual world. But such clarity will enable us to do justice to it within its limits. It is precisely because Hartmann does not go beyond sensory perception that he feels all the more compelled to look around him in this sensory world and to see exactly where it already requires thorough thinking to speak of a spiritual basis. This is Hartmann's strength in the face of scientific materialism. He can show how the conclusions of natural science are reached only by superficial observation of the facts. He can prove that the results of natural science itself urge us to seek spiritual causes in all phenomena. In this way he is able, for example, to give the materialistic natural scientists a picture of their own science which differs considerably from their own. This caused the materialistic-minded natural scientists to raise a vehement objection to the “philosophy of the unconscious”. They declared the creator of the same to be a dilettante in the field of natural science. With such a manner one usually has a very easy stand vis-à-vis a larger public. The public does not examine things closely. When the “experts”, who, according to the public, must know what they are talking about, say: “This philosophy is no good, because the philosopher does not understand the facts he is talking about”: the public will swear by such a statement. And the philosopher may then present the best reasons for his view: that does not help him at all.

[ 10 ] Hartmann recognized the futility of such a path. Therefore, he chose a much more clever one to refute the scientific materialists thoroughly. A path against which there was absolutely nothing to save the scientific superficiality. Allow me to present this path of Eduard von Hartmann's in such a way that I can reproduce what I have already said about it, namely in a lecture that I gave on February 20, 1893, at the Vienna Scientific Club and which was printed in the July 1893 issue of the Monatsblätter des wissenschaftlichen Klubs in Wien: “In one chapter of his book (the ‘Philosophy of the Unconscious’), Eduard von Hartmann attempted to deal with Darwinism from a philosophical perspective. He found that the prevailing view of the time could not withstand logical reasoning, and sought to deepen it. The result was that he was accused of dilettantism by natural scientists and condemned in the strongest possible terms. In numerous essays and writings, he was accused of lacking insight into scientific matters. Among the opposing writings was one by an unnamed author. The statements made in it were described by respected natural scientists as the best that could be said against Hartmann's views. The experts considered the philosopher to have been completely refuted. The famous zoologist Dr. Oskar Schmidt said that the work of the unknown author had “fully confirmed the conviction of all those who are not sworn to the unconscious that Darwinism – and Schmidt meant the view of it held by the natural scientists – is right”. And Ernst Haeckel, whom I also regard as the greatest German natural scientist of the present day, wrote: 'This excellent work says everything in essence that I myself could have said about the «philosophy of the unconscious ' — When a second edition of the work appeared later, the name of the author was on the title page: Eduard von Hartmann. The philosopher had wanted to show that it was not at all impossible for him to familiarize himself with the scientific way of thinking and to speak the language of natural scientists if he wanted to. Hartmann thus provided proof that it is not the philosophers who lack an understanding of natural science, but rather the representatives of the latter who lack insight into philosophy.” - That was indeed a harsh lesson that Eduard von Hartmann taught the materialistic natural scientists. Even if it cannot be said that the latter were driven to some thoroughness in relation to spiritual research by it: Hartmann's position towards them and probably also that of spiritual research in general has been put in a world-historically significant light by it.

[ 11 ] If the “philosophy of the unconscious” is thus vastly superior to materialistic natural science, then Eduard von Hartmann placed himself from the outset in an awkward position with regard to spiritual research, due to his epistemology, which, to a certain extent, follows Kantian lines. He characterized the common view of man as naïve realism. He said: “This common view sees real things in the perceptions of the senses. Now, however, it can easily be shown that this view is wrong. For the fact that man sees an object in a certain color, perceives it with a certain smell, etc., is due only to the fact that his eyes, his olfactory organ, etc., are built in a certain way. If he had other organs instead of eyes and olfactory organs, he would perceive something completely different. Thus, perceptions are not real things, but only phenomena that are caused by the sensory organs in their own way. The ordinary person who considers them real is therefore living in a delusion. Rather, one must assume that the true reality lies behind the perceptions of the senses as a cause. And it is precisely for this reason that Hartmann seeks to overcome the naive realism of the ordinary person. He seeks to fathom through thinking what lies behind the apparent true reality. In doing so, he admits in a certain limited sense that man can develop to a higher level of knowledge. He sees his own point of view as one that slumbers in every person, and to which the naive realist only does not rise.

[ 12 ] How close it would have been, now that Hartmann had already gone so far, to say to himself: Could one not rise to an even higher level of knowledge? Could there not be a higher capacity for knowledge, which would also make my point of view appear to be a delusion, just as the point of view of naive realism appears to me? Hartmann never wanted to draw this obvious conclusion. That is why occult knowledge has always remained completely incomprehensible to him. This was due to the limitations of his mind. He was simply unable to go beyond a certain point. He did, however, make every effort in a certain respect. When Sinnett's “Esoteric Teaching of Secret Buddhism” appeared in the 1880s, thus giving the theosophical trend of the times its first literary expression, Hartmann wrote a detailed essay on this book. Now, it can be said that in that Sinnett book, theosophy was presented in a much too dogmatic way to be of much help to a thorough thinker, and that the “secret Buddhism” contained too much stereotyped, even directly erroneous, which made access difficult; but one must nevertheless find that Hartmann fell victim to a certain type of his mind in this direction of research, as he also did with other phenomena of spiritual research. He had encapsulated himself at an early stage in the thought-forms he had once established, and thus lost any possibility of even understanding anything else. Therefore, for him, a relationship to other research was never possible other than a purely comparative one, in which he would simply compare every other thought with his own and then say: what agrees with me is right; what does not is wrong. In a certain sense, therefore, Eduard von Hartmann's critical attitude towards the achievements of others was such that in individual cases there was no need to wait to hear what he would say. Anyone who was familiar with his philosophy and then took up a different point of view could always know what Hartmann would say about the latter, even before he himself had spoken.

[ 13 ] Hartmann also dealt with minor contemporary phenomena of spiritual research, such as hypnotism and spiritualism, without arriving at anything other than a rather stereotyped registration in his thought forms. This is why many of Eduard von Hartmann's later books are far less inspiring than his first. Of course, he modified his original results in some points, and that is why it is wrong for the public to judge him mostly according to his first creation, the “Philosophy of the Unconscious”. He often complained bitterly about this one-sided assessment of his philosophy. But the reason for this is also that, with regard to his fundamental ideas, Hartmann has not provided anything in many of his later writings that any expert in his principles could not actually develop for themselves. There are few authors in relation to whom it can be said with as much justification as with Hartmann: in order to gain what they offer in their later works, one no longer actually needs them. A reasonably talented person can, for example, construct for himself the essentials of what is contained in the “Categories” or in the “History of Metaphysics” in the sense of Hartmann, if he knows and understands his previous writings.

[ 14 ] It is easy to misunderstand what constitutes Hartmann's pessimism. The fact that he was originally influenced by Schopenhauer's school of thought has given the “philosophy of the unconscious” a pessimistic slant. However, it should not be overlooked that Hegel and Schelling, with their by no means pessimistic way of thinking, also had an equally strong influence on Hartmann as Schopenhauer. It would go far beyond the scope of this article to discuss Hartmann's relationship to the three philosophers mentioned or to other thinkers. Therefore, without such an elaboration, Hartmann's relationship to pessimism will be briefly characterized.

[ 15 ] Since the “philosophy of the unconscious” sees the spirit of the world as composed of two elements, the unconscious will and the unconscious idea, it cannot regard the course of world development as entirely rational and good. For although the idea is rational and logical for it, the will is not. But the world can only have come into being through the will. It has already been said above that a force is necessary for real creation. The powerless idea can create nothing. Hartmann therefore comes to the conclusion that the world is there at all because of the irrational will, and the idea can do nothing but take possession of the will in order to annul creation again. The process of the world consists, then, in the idea feeling itself unsatisfied by the fact that it has been called into existence by the will; it thus feels creation as its suffering, and strives to free itself from this suffering. It is again permissible to quote a few sentences from my book “Welt- und Lebensanschauungen im neunzehnten Jahrhundert” (pp. 165f.) in this connection: “The reign of the irrational is expressed in the existence of pain, which torments all beings. Pain outweighs pleasure in the world. This fact, which can be explained philosophically from the illogical will element of existence, is sought by Eduard von Hartmann to be substantiated by careful consideration of the relationship between pleasure and pain in the world. Anyone who does not indulge in any illusions, but objectively considers the evils of the world, cannot come to any other conclusion than that pain is present to a far greater extent than pleasure. From this, however, it follows that non-existence is to be preferred to existence. But non-existence can only be achieved if the logical-rational idea destroys the will, existence. Hartmann therefore sees the world process as a gradual destruction of the irrational will by the rational world of ideas. The highest moral task of man should be to help overcome the will.” It is clear that the ‘philosophy of the unconscious’ is diametrically opposed to occult spiritual research. For the latter, in a nutshell, must see the world and thus also man in a developmental current that ultimately leads everything to the divine, that is, to the good original being.

[ 16 ] But in Hartmann's case, this comprehensive pessimism is combined with a strange subordinate optimism. For his pessimism is not intended to lead to a turning away from existence, but on the contrary, to a devoted participation in it. He believes that only this pessimism can lead to moral action.

[ 17 ] As long as man believes that pleasure and happiness can be attained, he will not - according to Eduard von Hartmann's assumption - give up the selfish pursuit of them. Only one thing can bring real healing from all egoism. That is the realization that all belief in pleasure and happiness is an illusion. If a person is clear about this, then he will give up all such striving. Now one could say, however, that under such conditions all existence is pointless; and the “philosophy of the unconscious” would therefore actually have to recommend to man the annihilation of his existence. Hartmann replies that absolutely nothing would be achieved if the individual wanted to extinguish his existence. For what ultimately suffers is not only the individual spirit, but the All-Spirit. If suffering is to cease, the existence of the All-Spirit itself must be extinguished. This cannot be achieved by the individual destroying himself, but rather by the individual placing his work in the service of the whole. All the work of humanity must work together to ultimately free the All-Spirit from its suffering. The whole development of civilization is nothing other than working towards this goal. The development of the world consists in the redemption of the Godhead from the suffering of existence through the work of humanity. The individual must renounce his own happiness and place all his efforts at the service of the redemption of the deity. It cannot be the task here to show how Hartmann, in a rather fantastic way, presupposes that humanity could be educated to this end, ultimately through a common decision, through a united striving to radically destroy existence and to redeem the deity.

[ 18 ] Even if one has to admit that in such extreme points of philosophical thought the “philosophy of the unconscious” loses itself in unfathomable depths, it cannot escape the discerning reader that Hartmann has made many beautiful statements in particular. One such must be seen in particular in the discussion of the various moral viewpoints in his “Phenomenology of the Moral Consciousness”. There he has listed all possible moral views of life, from crass egoism to religious selfless devotion to work in the service of humanity as a whole. And even though a touch of pessimism lies over all these statements, with the paradoxical goal of redeeming the world spirit from its suffering: anyone who is able to disregard this radical end point can still gain a great deal from Hartmann's individual works. The same can be said of the book: “The Religious Consciousness of Humanity in the Gradual Sequence of its Development”. Here Hartmann wants to show how, in the course of history, humanity gradually struggles through the various religious standpoints to the worship of that All-Spirit, as it is conceived of as “the Unconscious”. To him, all previous religions appear as a preliminary stage of the “religion of the spirit”. That the “spirit” lives in each individual, and that life must consist in the redemption of this suffering spirit: this is to be the content of such a future religion. Christianity, too, can only be a preliminary stage to this “religion of the spirit”. It gives itself over – Hartmann believes – to the illusion that the All-Spirit suffered in one person, the Son of God: but the sum of all persons must take the place of this one person. All must feel themselves to be suffering sons of the One Spirit, called to redemption. Hartmann is convinced that the scientific theology of the new age must lead to a “self-destruction of Christianity”. It must ultimately dissolve through the contradiction that arises from reflecting on the impossibility of the work of redemption being brought about by a single individual. If Hartmann's explanation once again reveals a complete misunderstanding of Christianity, the creator of the “Philosophy of the Unconscious” has nevertheless provided many important details in this area, and in this respect he is far superior to contemporary theologians and philosophers in terms of his acumen and independence of thought.

[ 19 ] It would be interesting to also explain how, despite the inadequacy of his basic principles, Hartmann also achieved much that was excellent in the individual in his “Aesthetics”. However, due to a lack of space, this must be left out of consideration here.

[ 20 ] Eduard von Hartmann offers much that is stimulating to anyone who studies him. And he cannot be without benefit to spiritual research. In him we have a personality who, on the one hand, shows an energetic struggle to free himself from the prejudices of the materialistic spirit of the age, but who, on the other hand, cannot rise to the realm of real spiritual insight. In his case, one can see how the way of thinking of the present takes away the freedom of the spirit to such real vision. — And there is one more thing that should not be overlooked about this personality. Hartmann not only dealt with the highest questions of life, but he also penetrated all the questions of the time: cultural questions, politics, social economics, legal questions, etc. And everywhere he proves himself to be a thinker who wants to remain firmly on the ground of reality, who does not want to lose himself in fantastic utopias and abstract future perspectives. Yes, his sense of reality in this respect is in a strange contrast to his radical, and really often bottomless, dreams in the highest questions and goals of humanity. His conservatism in politics and socialism sometimes has something philistine about it, but it is also very healthy. That is why he will also be valuable for the spiritual researcher in this respect. The latter has every reason to beware of fantasies and to remain firmly grounded in reality. Hartmann can provide an excellent example of this. Whether one wants to accept this or that from him is not so important; but it is important that one can always receive fruitful suggestions from him.

[ 1 ] For a long time, many people who are not familiar with the theosophical movement of our time have held the opinion that many followers of this philosophy allow themselves to be deprived of their sound judgment by blind faith in authority. It is imagined that there are a number of people within this movement who, by their behavior and certain characteristics, are regarded by others as “enlightened”, “more highly developed”, “knowing”, and that their assertions are accepted in good faith by a large number of the followers of Theosophy. It is precisely because of such opinions that many refuse to get involved with this movement. They say: we only want to hear what can be “proved” to our powers of judgment; a person who has awakened to mature thinking rejects blind faith in dogmas. And since the claims of the theosophists do not appeal to “common sense”, we will not get involved in them, even if individual “enlightened ones” claim that they can know such things.

[ 2 ] Recently, such an opinion has even gained ground among many personalities who are themselves part of the theosophical movement. There, too, one can hear much said about the fact that “common sense” should not blindly submit to any authority or dogma, but should examine everything for itself. Sometimes, something like concern is clearly evident that one may have gone too far in accepting certain “revelations” by this or that person, whom one has too much revered as a “knower”, as an “infallible authority”. And many would like to urge prudence and examination, so that one does not lose oneself in bottomless fantasies, and one day has to admit that this or that fact destroys the appearance of knowledge that this or that “enlightened” person has assumed.

[ 3 ] Who would deny that such admonitions have much to justify them. Have not enough facts occurred to make people, to whom many looked up as if to sure authorities, lose their reputation and their validity? And have not accusations been raised recently against the most important workers in the theosophical field, which must give many people food for thought? Is it any wonder that many people say to themselves: “I don't want to believe more than what I can see for myself”? Just now, another alarming case has occurred. One of the Theosophical workers who are leading many on the path to higher knowledge, C. W. Leadbeater, has been accused of serious misconduct by some members of the American section of the Theosophical Society. The matter appeared to be so serious that the president of the society, H.S. Olcott, summoned a committee to London, which consisted of the business committee of the British section and delegates from the American and French sections, and which was to examine the situation. Leadbeater would probably have been expelled from the society if he had not already announced his resignation. Thus a personality was removed from the Society who had done untold service for the spread of Theosophy for many years, whose books had been guides for many leaders in spiritual life, and who had acquired a large number of disciples. Immediately before the fateful event, Leadbeater had made a successful lecture tour of America and had made a deep impression in many places through his meaningful work. - Should such a case not make us suspicious of all authorities? (Since a discussion of this case is to follow shortly, ' only this hint' is given here.) Now, in the face of such a case, one can certainly say with full justification that the Theosophical cause is above all persons; and no matter how many representatives of this cause may 'fall': he who is able to separate the cause from the persons cannot be misled by such facts. It is also emphasized that true spiritual “higher development” does not necessarily have to be connected with the ability for a certain “clairvoyant” life. And Leadbeater would have to be considered first and foremost as someone who had developed certain clairvoyant abilities in himself. Theosophy should, however, be less concerned with this than with making the means available to its followers by which they can purify and cleanse their “lower nature” and awaken their “higher self” within themselves. The acquisition of clairvoyant powers is even dangerous as long as the purification and cleansing has not taken place. (The section of this booklet on “The Stages of Higher Realization” contains some information on this very question.) And one can also hear voices that, on such occasions, recommend limiting the cultivation of such insights that are based on clairvoyant abilities and instead advise limiting oneself to what ennobles spiritual life without such reference. It is not important, so it is said, to gain insights into higher worlds, into “spirits”, into the cycles of the world and of life, but rather to acquire a refined, purified view of life.

[ 4 ] There can be no doubt that those who advocate such a view are quite right in a certain respect. Nevertheless, the Theosophical movement will become entangled in fatal contradictions to its mission if such opinions gain the upper hand in the circles of its followers. - Now, an objection is certainly possible here. One can say: who is authorized to consider his opinion of the mission of the Theosophical Movement as somehow authoritative? One person may believe that the dissemination of “higher insights” is the right thing; another may believe that it is not the spread of the results of Herschel's research that matters, but the cultivation of “spiritual and moral life”.

[ 5 ] In itself, this objection is quite correct. And if a majority of the Theosophical Society were to disapprove of the dissemination of so-called secret teachings, then from a certain point of view there would be no objection to it. But basically, from a higher point of view, it is not a matter of discussing what the Theosophical Society should be. It can only be what its members want it to be. What is at stake is something quite different. It is important that the dissemination of esoteric teachings is necessary for the further progress of humanity. And those people who recognize this and are capable of it must do their part to spread them. They must regard this as a task set for them by the circumstances of the times. And therefore the question of what the Theosophical Society should be is not of primary importance to them. If it were to be found that a majority of the votes within this society were against the cultivation of esoteric knowledge, then they would have to seek access to their contemporaries by other means than through this society.

[ 6 ] But a quite different and weighty question arises. Does the Theosophical Society not shake its foundations if judgments like those just mentioned gain the upper hand? This question will become clear if one looks at how this society has gained recognition in the world so far. It owes this prestige not to general teachings that are readily accessible to “common sense”, but to the fact that the founders and members of this society were able to say something to people that is not readily accessible to “common sense”. Insights into the nature of man, into 'his imperishable spiritual essence, into higher worlds: these have been what people have sought through the society ever since. People wanted to satisfy their longing for knowledge of the “spiritual world” through theosophy. The leaders of the theosophical movement did not find the ear of their contemporaries through “generally provable” principles – which are certainly infinitely valuable in themselves – but through the revelation of truths that are only accessible to clairvoyant research. And although there is no one in the world who cannot come to such truths by developing his own dormant abilities, it is nevertheless in the nature of human development that only a few individuals have developed the necessary abilities. If one does not want to listen to what such people have to say about the spiritual world, one would have to renounce knowledge of it altogether. One can indeed say to these few: “We do not want you to tell us what you know; you can only satisfy us if you tell us how we ourselves can come to such knowledge. Do not tell us what is revealed to you through your clairvoyance, but tell us how we ourselves can become clairvoyant.” In this journal, more has been said about the question of how to attain knowledge of higher worlds than can be said publicly at the present time. From the information given, it will be seen to what extent every legitimate aspiration in this direction can find satisfaction. Although Theosophy can open the way for people to access real secret training, the public mission of esoteric research described above is something quite different. People need answers to certain questions that life poses for them. He needs them for the peace of mind that he needs, for inner peace, for security in life and work; only through such an answer can he be a useful member of human society, can he properly fulfill his place in the world. Of course, there are countless people who do not even raise such questions today, who do not feel any longing for their answers. But these people do not do so only because they are not given the opportunity to feel the necessity of it. The moment a person is confronted with certain spiritual matters in the right way, he also immediately feels what is missing in his life if he passes it by, and then every doubt about the necessity ceases. But it is a misunderstanding to believe that the answers to such questions about the higher world are only of value to those who themselves have clairvoyant insight into this world. This is absolutely not the case.

[ 7 ] If one takes in the answers with the right attitude and lives with them, then one will soon become convinced of the truth, even if one still has a long way to go before one becomes clairvoyant. The fact that so many people today are unable to experience this conviction is due solely to the fact that the materialistic spirit of the age places a heavy obstacle in the way of the soul. People believe themselves to be unprejudiced, and yet they have the greatest prejudice against the higher truth. Theosophy seeks to proclaim this higher truth in a way that is relevant to the needs of the present human being, and in a way that is necessary for true progress in the near future. But where else can it be received if not from those who have fathomed it through their own research? If one were to oppose this from the outset with “common sense”, then one would be declaring their entire research unnecessary. One should assume that those who have endeavored to develop higher possibilities of knowledge within themselves have not lost this common sense. It is certain that what the knowledgeable reveal can never contradict “common sense”, but it is equally certain that one can only understand this if one approaches their revelations with the right attitude. Without doubt, everyone can judge, and everyone should only trust their own judgment; but they must first know what they want to judge. Anyone who ponders these simple things for a moment will soon realize how little truth there is in much of what is said against the authorities in matters of the higher worlds. These authorities cannot be a danger to common sense, since they—if they are the right authorities—want to give this common sense precisely that which it is to judge. If the Theosophical Society does not want to cultivate only what its members already know, but to offer the path to higher knowledge, it will not be able to do without the inspiring authorities. It is quite different to judge and to be shown the way to judgment. Either the Theosophical Society will become something completely different from what it has been according to its foundations within the present, or it will have to be a scene for those who have not yet made higher experiences from it.

[ 8 ] Anyone who views the situation in this way will have to think and act differently from the way many members of the Society think today. At the Paris Congress of the “Federation of European Sections”, the danger of authorities in the name of “common sense” was also pointed out in many speeches and discussions. Even the Society's meritorious founder and president, H.S. Olcott, felt it necessary at the present time to emphasize the importance of “common sense” and to stress that no member of the Theosophical Society should rely on anything other than his own powers of judgment and should beware of falling prey to authorities. And to make this warning against authority particularly clear, he cited the authority of Buddha, who said: “Do not believe because it is written in a book, or because it is taught by a wise man, or because it is handed down by tradition, or because it is inspired by a god, etc., but believe only what is evident to you through your own reason and experience.” But these words of Buddha's can be taken as a guide in different ways. One person does so by considering the revelations of the wise to be worthless because they do not appeal to his understanding, while another seeks to develop his powers of perception so that he can form an independent judgment about such revelations.

[ 9 ] The conditions under which the Theosophical movement exists will be better understood than is often the case at present if we consider that the essence of it consists in the publication of some of those truths which were formerly regarded exclusively as so-called secret sciences. Such truths are those now proclaimed in writing and word about the nature of man, that is, his structure from the limbs of the physical, mental and spiritual world, his development and gradual perfection through a series of earthly lives; furthermore, about the law of the connection between cause and effect in the spiritual world, which is usually referred to as karma; and also about certain processes of the earth's development, which are revealed to the open eye of the seer and which must be known if one wants to understand man's higher destiny. In addition, there are certain insights into the higher spiritual worlds, without which one cannot have any understanding of the development of the world, and without which one cannot know anything about what lies hidden behind death, what is to be regarded as the invisible and immortal part of human nature.

[ 10 ] These insights have existed for a long time in the form in which they are disseminated by the Theosophical movement in books, essays and lectures. But they were not publicly announced in this form. They were only communicated to those who had first been carefully tested for their intellectual, spiritual and moral abilities. The purpose of testing for intellectual abilities was to ensure that the teachings only reached those people who were really able to understand them by virtue of their intellectual and rational powers. For the high spiritual truths are such that an imperfect mind can at first even find them nonsensical. If they are presented to such a person, they can only be misunderstood. And apart from the fact that such a communication would be completely useless, it must have a highly unsettling effect on the mind of the person to whom it is communicated. For while, if rightly understood, these teachings bring about the happiness and bliss of man, they must, misunderstood, bring about mischief in the soul. A small truth, if distorted by too little power of judgment, will not cause any particular mischief, for it brings about only slight agitations of the soul. A great truth is felt as something that interferes with the welfare and powers of the soul. If it is distorted or caricatured, it will have the opposite effect of what it should have. If it is properly understood, it will elevate man to a higher way of life; if it is misunderstood, it will lower him to a level below that which he would be without it. Furthermore, a misunderstanding of higher truths leads not only to a useless but also to a harmful discussion of them. Such a discussion confuses the soul, and because the truths are so momentous, it does not remain, as with the discussion of insignificant matters, a mere error of the intellect, but such an error can lead to the disruption of the whole structure of the soul, in other words, to the illness of the whole person. And if such insights are even communicated publicly, then the damage does not only affect individuals, but many.

[ 11 ] Therefore, in the secret schools, it was demanded that the right powers of understanding be present first, and then one imparted step by step what one thought it advisable to impart... The soul forces had to be prepared so that the pupil of the higher secrets could receive them in a worthy mood and frame of mind. For the feeling with which one approaches a truth gives it a certain spiritual coloration. And it is the case with higher truths that they have an incorrect effect if one does not approach them with the right feeling. A truth that relates to physical things is not particularly distorted if one receives it in an incorrect mood. With a higher truth, exactly the opposite is the case... The moral powers of the candidate for higher schooling had to be tested, because the corresponding realizations necessarily tear away the veil that is spread over certain hidden sides of his nature. These hidden sides of the human being are driven to the surface. In ordinary life they are veiled by acquired habits, by what is considered right according to the circumstances of life and by many other things. This is the case for the good of the individual and of all humanity. How many inclinations, drives, affects, passions, which, if they were released, would have a devastating effect, are purely held back by such things.

[ 12 ] One of the first effects of higher truths is that they completely free man from all such things. Everything that softens his nature from the outside falls away. It loses its hold over him, and from now on he can only be his own master. Man does not even need to realize immediately that this is the case. As soon as the higher knowledge approaches him, he will surrender himself. He must now be strong enough to take the guidance of his morals, his inclinations and habits, etc., into his own hands. He can only do this if he can, through his own strength, push back everything that previously brought the beneficial conditions of the outside world into the right track. Let us give just one example from this field. The tendency to vanity is particularly evident in the disciple of the higher mysteries. If he does not have the strength to suppress it, it will grow to an extreme and lead him to the most pernicious paths. It is possible that this vanity will disguise itself in all kinds of masks, even in those of its opposite. And while the person then believes that he is becoming particularly modest, this modesty is nothing but the mask of a terrible vanity... One can see why the old secret societies demanded such strict testing of their pupils.

[ 13 ] In the face of such facts, the question must immediately arise: if that is the case, why are these truths not treated in the same way as before; is it right at all that the theosophical movement should make some of them public? It should be said at once that a great number of those persons who are in possession of such truths are at present observing the principle of secrecy in regard to them, and many of them believe that the Theosophical Movement is really doing an injustice.

[ 14 ] But the matter is as follows: the higher part of spiritual knowledge will have to be kept secret in the manner indicated for a long time to come. What is published through the theosophical movement is the elementary part. But this cannot be kept secret any longer. For humanity has in many of its parts reached a stage of development at which it cannot do without it. It must be published because without it certain soul needs of humanity can no longer be satisfied. Without this publication, the life of the soul would have to become desolate.

[ 15 ] It must not be thought that the knowledge indicated has been withheld from mankind in every form. They have only been kept secret in the form in which they were taught in the secret schools and as they are now being communicated through the theosophical movement. But even people who lived in the most modest circumstances were able to receive them in a form that was appropriate for them. Fairy tales and myths contain these truths in the form of images, parables, etc. It is only out of a materialistic attitude that one does not want to recognize or acknowledge the profound wisdom contained in fairy tales, legends and myths. It cannot be the task here to show what could easily be shown, that legends and myths contain much, much greater wisdom about nature and the secrets of humanity than the explanations of our today's so advanced sciences. It is necessary to give people at certain cultural levels an idea of what must approach man in the form of ideas at a higher level of intellectual development. However, there are still many people today who believe that what the intellect has not grasped is not understood at all. In contrast to this, it must be emphasized that not only the intellect is a cognitive faculty, but that one can also understand things through feeling, through imagination and through other soul forces. And it was a real understanding for certain stages of development when people allowed the secrets of the world to work on them in fairy tales and myths. Indeed, for such stages of development, another form cannot even be considered. The form of higher truths that we find in theosophy today remains for such times the domain of secret teachings and their students. At other stages of development, it is the religions that proclaim the secrets of the invisible worlds to humanity. All religions contain the higher secrets in a form that is suited to the mind and to faith. Those who study religions without materialistic prejudice, but with an open mind and without preconceptions, will find all the secret teachings in them, so that each particular religion contains these teachings, adapted to the character, temperament and culture of the people and the time for whom they are intended.

[ 16 ] Myths, legends, religions are the various ways in which the highest truths have been conveyed to the majority of people. This must continue to happen if it were sufficient. But it is no longer sufficient. Mankind has now reached a stage of development at which a large proportion of it would lose all religion if the higher truths on which it is based were not also proclaimed in a form that would enable even the keenest reflection to recognize their validity. Religions are true, but for many people the time has passed when comprehension was possible through mere faith. And the number of people to whom this applies will increase at an unprecedented rate in the near future. Those who truly understand the laws of human development know this. If the wisdom underlying religious beliefs were not publicly proclaimed in a form that would stand up to perfect thinking, complete doubt and disbelief in the invisible world would soon break out. And a time in which that were the case would, despite all material culture, be a time worse than one of barbarism. Whoever knows the real conditions of human life knows that man cannot live without a relationship to the invisible, any more than a plant can live without nourishing juices.

[ 17 ] In the recently published essay on the education of children, it can be seen how only theosophical truths can have a real practical effect on life in the near future. The same could be shown for the most diverse areas of life.

[ 18 ] The truth is that we must convey to humanity the knowledge of the invisible worlds in the theosophical form, just as it has been conveyed to it in the form of parables and images. Theosophy, properly understood, is not a new religion, nor a religious sect, but the right means for the present time to show the wisdom of religion in a way that is necessary for the people of this time. Theosophy does not found a new religion, for it furnishes the very proofs of the validity of the old one, and thus becomes its firmest support... But Theosophy is not a matter for a few enthusiasts, for it makes man acquainted with the invisible world, from which he must draw the forces for the visible world.

[ 19 ] Thus, Theosophy arises from the realization of what humanity needs at the present time. And it is necessary for humanity to learn some of the truths of esoteric science. Because the facts are as they are, these truths have had such a powerful effect on many souls since they were first published a few decades ago, and that is why the true mission of the Theosophical Movement lies in the tactful publication of such truths. Just try to put the Theosophical Movement on a different basis, and it will have ceased to be of any interest to those who, from the very beginning, have turned to it out of a true present-day human need. Do not say that these truths about the higher mysteries are only valuable to those who can grasp them clairvoyantly. Nothing could be further from the truth. For clairvoyance is only necessary to find these truths. Once they have been found, they can be understood by anyone who really makes sufficient effort with his intellect. It is an empty phrase to say that these things must first be proved. They are proved as soon as one really wants to understand them. If someone finds them unproved, it is not because they must first be proved by special means, but simply because the person in question has not yet thought about them enough.

[ 20 ] Now, for more than thirty years, there has been a Theosophical Society, which is supposed to be a means of fostering the Theosophical movement. This society has three principles: the first is: “To form the nucleus of a universal brotherhood of humanity, without distinction of faith, nation, class, or sex.” The second principle is: “To reveal the kernel of truth in all religions.” Its third rule is: “To explore the deeper spiritual forces that slumber in human nature and in the rest of the world.”

[ 21 ] If we keep to what has been said in this essay about the actual mission of the Theosophical Movement, it will not be difficult to recognize that the Theosophical Society has a right to exist only because of the third goal.

[ 22 ] Let us look at it without prejudice. The establishment of the brotherhood must undoubtedly be the goal of every good person. And that is why there are countless associations and societies that recognize this goal as their ideal. You certainly don't have to become a theosophist to profess such an ideal. The Theosophical Society only makes sense if, within it, people express themselves about this ideal in the following way: Every good person recognizes the ideal of universal brotherhood. It is sought to be realized through various human fraternizations. The only thing that matters is that the right means are chosen for its realization. The most unsuitable means is certainly to talk about it in a sentimental way, to say that people should love each other as brothers, should form a unity and harmony, and whatever other fine phrases are used, which unfortunately are often just thrown around by theosophists. Such talk is not worth more than if someone were to stand in front of a stove and keep saying: Dear stove, you are a good stove when you heat the room at the right time. So just be nice and warm when it's necessary. If you want the stove to really heat up, don't talk about its task, but provide it with fuel. The theosophical movement can only regard the above-mentioned esoteric knowledge as the right “fuel” for human brotherhood. If the soul absorbs these insights, they will have the same effect on it as the heating material has on the stove when it is properly treated. It is in the spirit of theosophical insight to say: Of course, other people besides theosophists are currently pursuing this ideal, but they cannot achieve it because they do not apply the right means of esoteric knowledge. It is undoubtedly easier to keep saying “brotherhood, brotherhood” than to imbibe the knowledge of the occult sciences; but it is also easier for a Christian to keep saying “Lord, Lord” than to imbibe the true Christian content. Moreover, talking about brotherhood is not without danger, because it spreads a cloud of intellectual comfort around the speaker, which can suffocate the serious striving for real knowledge in a kind of mental voluptuousness. Many people are not even aware that it is a kind of intellectual comfort that drives them into the self-intoxication they feel when they repeatedly give themselves the pleasure that lies in the thoughts of brotherhood, unity and harmony. The best way to become an easy prey to certain dark forces is the intellectual intoxication that emanates from the phrases: unity, brotherhood, harmony... Good theosophists should make it their rule to avoid the words brotherhood, harmony, unity as far as possible, and to cultivate instead the real esoteric knowledge, which is the right means of attaining that for which one shows one's appreciation best by not vainly expressing it.

[ 23 ] But the “scientific” study of religious documents as such cannot be an independent goal of the theosophical movement. For that, one needs to be a scholar, not a theosophist. Even the comparative study of the documents: what does it have to do with the theosophical movement other than showing how the esoteric truths are contained in these documents? But that can only be shown by someone who really knows esotericism. A true example of a genuine esoteric examination of religion was given by Edouard Schuré in his “Great Initiates”. He revealed the esoteric core of the great founders of religion. In doing so, he naturally had to go beyond mere scholarly observation. It is only natural that mere scholars should object that he relied less on the documents than on his imagination. It is to be hoped that a 'theosophist' would not make such an objection, for in doing so he would be guilty of two errors: firstly, such an objection is naive, as naive as the objector himself does not even suspect, for to defend that scholarship , which is defended by it, would be a matter of course for a personality like Schuré if he would only stoop to his point of view, and secondly, the objector shows that he does not even suspect that there are really other sources of knowledge than those accessible to him.

[ 24 ] Thus, the fundamental goal of the Theosophical movement can only be recognized as the third principle of the Theosophical Society, the cultivation of the truths of the secret sciences, which are also called spiritual. If it should ever become unfaithful to this goal, then the mission inherent in it must be taken over by another movement, and the Theosophical Society will be one among many other well-meaning human associations that have fraternity, love, the cultivation of all kinds of science and other things on their banners.

[ 25 ] The cultivation of knowledge of the supersensible worlds has been designated as the essential task of the Theosophical Movement in the foregoing. Those who hold this view must not be unclear about the obstacles and difficulties that confront such work, especially in our time. However, it is soon clear that such knowledge is a strong need for an immense number of people in the present day. Many are more or less aware of their desire for it. But many are not. They feel only a deep dissatisfaction in life; they take up this or that which promises to give them a spiritual purpose in life, and then drop it again because after a while the dissatisfaction returns. Such people only feel their lack, but do not arrive at any fruitful thought about what they are actually missing. Those who know life know that insight into the higher worlds is longed for by a great many people, far more than is admitted by many. In the widest circles, what is sought is precisely what a theosophical movement that is walking in the right path can give. Those who understand these “right paths” will also soon realize that the effects of genuine cultivation of higher knowledge extend as far as human life itself. One can be a person whom fate has placed in the most modest position in life, who is occupied in the narrowest circle: through true Theosophy, one will be able to have healthy thinking and a happy, satisfied heart. The very existence in the apparently most commonplace, otherwise most unsatisfactory situation will acquire a deep meaning. And one can be a scientist, artist, businessman, civil servant, etc.: through Theosophy one will gain in every field creative power, joy in work, overview, security.

[ 26 ] It is, of course, only the result of a misunderstanding of the theosophical way of thinking when it becomes alienated from life. True theosophy cannot lead out of life, but only deeper into it. It is certainly true to emphasize that Theosophy is only of any use to a person if he does not stop at a few general thoughts or feelings, but does not shy away from really getting to know what can be known about the nature of man, about the processes and beings of the higher worlds, about the development of humanity and the world. But anyone who gets to know this also learns to understand life in its smallest details, and – what cannot be emphasized enough – to treat it.

[ 27 ] If theosophy is to have such an effect on a person, then a widespread aversion must be thoroughly combated. This is expressed in a certain contempt for what can be attained through theosophy in the way of real knowledge about the areas just mentioned. It is easy to say: “What do I need to know about the basic parts of man, about the development of the world and so on? All that is just intellectual stuff; it is something intellectual. But I want to deepen my mind. The divine foundations of existence cannot be grasped in such “dry concepts; they can only be reached through the living soul” ... If only those who speak in this way would have a little more patience to delve into the true facts of the matter. Through this patience they would be led to recognize that real knowledge in the sense meant here only appears to them as a matter of the intellect, as a mere intellectual matter, because they are afraid of bringing something else into motion than their intellect, their dry, sober thinking. Through such patience, they would realize that what their soul seeks must be found in what they reject as a “mere intellectual matter”. They shrink from the idea that they should devote themselves to the ideas of the higher worlds, and therefore never come to experience how warm and full of life the mind becomes through these very ideas. The immediate fate of such natures will be that their ardent longing for a content for their souls will consume itself within them, because they reject that which could bring them healing. The mere saying, “Man can delve into himself and he will find God in himself,” is really not enough. And it is not enough, either, no matter how many different ways it is repeated. Man has emerged from the world; he is a “small world” in which everything that is contained in the visible world and in a large part of the invisible world is concentrated in a certain way. And one cannot understand man if one does not understand the world. It is not by brooding over one's inner self that one comes to know oneself, but by grasping the true essence of the stones, plants and animals around us; for their essence is concentrated in one self. In the stars, their transformation and metamorphosis, man can read the secrets of his soul. In what happened in the most ancient times, the riddle of what the soul experiences today is solved; and from the way in which the most ancient has become the present, one understands what one is oneself: and from this understanding one can gain satisfaction of the mind and strength to act. True knowledge of the world is at the same time true knowledge of oneself; and it is the only fruitful knowledge of oneself. Those who feel compelled to repeat the saying: “Yes, what Theosophy tells us about the evolution of the world and of humanity is something for the intellect; but we want satisfaction for the emotions,” should delve into such facts.

[ 28 ] Only the energetic advance towards conceptions of higher worlds in this direction can create the necessary bridge for man between thinking, feeling and life.— And in this sense, the knowledge of the supersensible worlds should be cultivated within the theosophical movement. No point of view should be too high for us to adopt in order to gain knowledge. But we must also always seek every possibility of making the highest knowledge fruitful for the most everyday things in life. If the latter were disregarded, then theosophy would have to lead to things that it should lead to the least: to the formation of sects, to narrow-minded dogmatism, etc.

[ 29 ] And from the above indications the way can also be found to the deeper foundations of what has been touched upon in the preceding pages (page 276) regarding the effectiveness of the theosophical movement on ethical life. A true insight into the nature of the human soul reveals that moral behavior in the radical sense cannot be promoted by preaching even the most beautiful moral principles. Virtue does not arise from what one can learn as a moral principle, but rather has its source in noble feelings. There has been much debate among philosophers as to whether virtue can be taught. Now it certainly cannot be taught in the direct sense that one becomes virtuous by memorizing a system of virtues. One can indeed know such a system of virtues quite well, and therefore does not need to be a virtuous person. Yes, one can go even further and say – as has already been indicated in the foregoing – that within the theosophical movement, no matter how beautiful moral principles may be, no matter how many principles may be advocated, as general human love is constituted, nothing essential would be furthered by it. But even if it is absolutely true that virtue cannot be acquired in this way, it would still be quite wrong to think that knowledge cannot be a basis for virtue, and that higher knowledge cannot be a source of the most comprehensive love of humanity. What one takes in from the ideas of Theosophy are not moral principles at all, but, for example, ideas about the development of humanity and the earth. But those who are able to devote themselves to these ideas selflessly, not only with their intellect but with the warmth of their hearts, develop within themselves that source of feelings that by itself allows actions in the sense of universal love of humanity to emerge from within. The right understanding of the first principle of the Theosophical Society – the core of a universal brotherhood – is achieved when one cultivates the knowledge of the higher worlds without reservation, and in doing so lives in the unfailing hope that the corresponding virtues in the visible world will necessarily result from the knowledge of the invisible world. For the morally good follows from the spiritually true.

[ 30 ] What our time really needs, what is longed for by those whose state of soul has been indicated above, is the cultivation of knowledge of the supersensible. And the right effect of the theosophical movement in life can be achieved by the development of spiritual realities. The conditions of life in this society can only flow from two sides: one thing that matters is to cultivate the existing treasure of supersensible knowledge and, if possible, to increase and develop it; the other thing, however, is that those working in the field of theosophy have an open eye for the circumstances of life. They should observe wherever possible where life needs and can be deepened by the theosophical way of thinking. They should let the theosophical light fall on everything that touches the present human being. For example, that someone has insight into the laws of repeated earthly lives and into the karmic chain of fate is only one thing; that meaning and strength are given to life from this, that the person thereby becomes capable of the most everyday tasks and content in his mind: this is the other, the more essential.

[ 31 ] It is also very nice when the study of different religions is pursued in the society that calls itself theosophical, in order to find their core of truth. But the important thing is to find the kernel of truth, not to get to know the many religions; the latter is a matter of scholarship. The theosophical movement will also work most favorably in this direction if the cultivation of supersensible insights is its first concern, and its workers, according to their abilities, spread light from the point of view of supersensible knowledge of the world about what science is able to investigate about the various religious beliefs.

[ 32 ] Those who are convinced by the above arguments will have very definite feelings about the way of working that is necessary within the theosophical movement. For the dissemination of supersensible knowledge requires a different behavior than that of ordinary sensual knowledge. This is already evident from the fact that the bearers of supersensible truths in earlier periods behaved quite differently from the owners of any knowledge related to the sensory world in the present. The latter will usually hurry to share their knowledge with the public as quickly as possible. And in doing so, they are doing the right thing in their field. For what the individual investigates should bear fruit for the whole of humanity. The older 'bearers of supersensible knowledge' at first kept their knowledge secret from the public. They only imparted it to those who, on the basis of certain conditions, had proved that they were 'called'. In doing so, they did not sin against the principle that the knowledge of the individual must serve the whole. For they have found the ways in which this knowledge can bear fruit for humanity. It is not the place here to speak of these ways. But they were there. It has been said in the foregoing (page 272) that the possessor of supersensible knowledge is compelled by the present conditions of the time to make a certain part of this knowledge public. This is done through books, lectures, magazines and in all the ways in which, for example, the Theosophical Society seeks to work. But this gives rise to certain difficulties. On the one hand, those who have taken on the task of cultivating supersensible knowledge feel obliged to ensure that this knowledge is as accessible as possible to those who seek it. On the other hand, they feel a certain obligation to exercise restraint in the face of well-founded old methods. If they have truly penetrated the spirit of supersensible knowledge, they must have become completely familiar with a principle that goes something like this: “The fact that you have recognized some truth, or that you are convinced of it, must not be a reason for you to force this truth on other people. You should only share it with those who are entitled to demand it from you in the right spirit and in complete freedom.” Those who follow this last principle cannot have anything in common with a fanatic or a sectarian. For it is precisely this that characterizes fanaticism and the formation of sects, that people who fall prey to it live in the belief that what they consider to be right must become a conviction for as many people as possible. They consider their views to be the only true ones. This belief often leads them to use every conceivable means to win as many followers as possible. The bearer of supersensible knowledge would prefer to do as little as possible to win followers. The feelings of the fanatic, of the founder of a sect, are quite alien to him. And the more he can adhere to this fundamental attitude in the present, the more he will do so. But, as I said, the conditions of the present forbid him to adhere completely to this principle. He must go public. But he does maintain his convictions to the extent that he does not go public in any other sense than in that he says: “I have this or that to communicate from the realm of the supersensible worlds; I say it because it must be said before the world. Whoever wants to approach these things must do so solely because he wants to. I do not seek to win followers; but I do meet anyone who desires to learn something of the knowledge of higher worlds.” It is then the task of the cultivator of higher knowledge to find the right path between unreserved advocacy of his cause and that reserve which no one wishes to bestow on him with a ‘sole-saving wisdom’. He will do his work best if he has as little as possible of the “fanatical world-enlarger” in him, who sees his essential goal in transferring his convictions to others. One can say: the fanatic seeks followers; the bearer of supersensible knowledge waits quite calmly until they come of themselves. This appears quite simple in theory; in practice it is not at all easy. But it also shows how much value should be placed on certain feelings that the worker in the theosophical field must have; and how much it depends on him to chasten that enthusiasm that arises so naturally in the present man: to share with the world what he himself carries in his heart as his sacred conviction. With regard to certain higher regions of supersensible knowledge, for example, such a - perhaps noble - craving for communication could not have any useful purpose at the present time, for there would be very few people who would not consider these things to be foolishness, the unfortunate products of a sick mind. The bearer of the secret knowledge must be motivated to communicate nothing other than that the individual person, or the people in question, need the corresponding information for the salvation of their soul and their entire being.

[ 33 ] In the following essay on the “Life Issues of the Theosophical Movement”, we will discuss in more detail the difficulties that arise in particular for those who, in the light of current views of the world, understand the work of the “theosophical movement” in the sense indicated.

Theosophy and Contemporary Intellectual Currents

[ 1 ] Anyone who knows the essence of the theosophical school of thought and the reasons why it has become, in the present day, a subject of public lectures, magazines, literary works and so on, rather than a matter of concern for the souls of a few individuals, also knows to what extent it must prove itself in the spiritual life of humanity. What underlies it is necessary as an active force in this spiritual life; and it will not only be accepted by it, but even demanded. In this, however, it will not depend on names and designations, but on the matter itself. Whether the name “Theosophy” as a designation for this spiritual current will recede into the background for justified reasons or out of prejudice is of no importance for the way of thinking in question and for its work in life.

[ 2 ] What is important, however, is that those who profess this way of thinking should not be under any illusions as to the difficulties that stand in the way of the acceptance of their ideas and feelings, especially in the spiritual life of the present day. And there is much in our time that makes it difficult for a wider circle to understand the real nature of the theosophical way of thinking. It is in the nature of things that someone who does not delve deeper into this nature will judge the peculiarity of theosophy by what appears to him to be the characteristic of such spiritual activities, which he throws together with it. No matter how often it is pointed out that the theosophical way of thinking would be completely unfaithful to its foundations if it were to lapse into “sectarianism”, those who do not have the will to engage with it will not stop calling its adherents a “sect”. Who, for example, would think of calling a number of people who have acquired a certain amount of knowledge of nature a sect? And who would want to accuse a society that has set itself the task of cultivating a certain branch of natural knowledge of “sectarianism”? But those people who are striving to acquire certain truths about the soul and spirit in the same way will be dismissed by many as a “sect”. And those who do so will not want to recognize that people who join together to cultivate certain insights into the life of the soul and spirit need to do so with no different attitude than that which leads to the formation of a group of people who have the cultivation of scientific truths as their goal.

[ 3 ] A discussion will not be of much use against prejudices that arise from such foundations. However, it will be useful to become clear about the reasons for such prejudices.

[ 4 ] There are three main reasons why people today may be led to accept the theosophical way of thinking. The first is a certain healthy sense of the truth of this way of thinking. The second arises from entering the path that is outlined in these books as the path to “acquiring knowledge of the higher worlds”. The third is a thorough philosophy that goes to the very last consequences. The first path can be the way of many. Such people will not engage in much philosophy or speculation; they will not want to delve deeply into scientific explanations of the pros and cons. They will let their immediate feelings work on what is presented in Theosophy, and this healthy feeling, untainted by philosophy and scientific criticism, tells them that what is presented is correct. Many of those who have had no opportunity or reason to become acquainted with philosophical or scientific teachings in their lives will belong to this type of theosophical adherents, but who, due to their entire mental state, cannot possibly be satisfied with what the world has to offer in terms of satisfying the great riddles of existence. Those who become theosophists in this way are, in a certain sense, the most important and valuable. When the word “blind” is often used to describe such believers, who accept certain insights without thorough examination, it is precisely because they do not realize that this human “feeling” is not based on error, but on truth. A person whose sense of feeling has not been taken away by a clever intellect really does feel the truth. And if the theosophist is also a judge of character, he will have every reason to be deeply satisfied with such followers of his school of thought. For he will recognize in them persons of a genuine, healthy and original sense of truth. He will never fall into the error of speaking of lack of judgment where the feeling judges so correctly. And it must be said that it will be to the great benefit of the present and the near future if many of those who, for one reason or another, cannot enter the higher path of knowledge and are also unable to engage in deeper philosophical thought, will, out of their healthy sense of truth, profess the Theosophical truths.

[ 5 ] The second path consists in acquiring the higher faculties of knowledge. Much is said about this in the articles of this journal that deal with it. The situation at present is such that more and more possibilities will open up to lead the honest seeker at least to the first steps of this path. How far someone gets depends on many things. The first condition is that the source from which he draws his instructions for higher knowledge is a right and pure one. The seeker has hardly any other means at his disposal than the trust he can have in the one from whom such instructions proceed. Many may regard this trust as a questionable thing. One can only reply to them: if this trust is based on calm and serene feelings in the seeker, if nothing passionate in a certain sense, if no selfishness is at play, then the questionable disappears. Caution is certainly something that cannot be recommended strongly enough in this area. Anyone who is seized by wild desire and passion for higher knowledge can certainly be easily deceived. Anyone who seriously examines whether his striving arises from the duty that every person has to increase his abilities as much as possible will hardly need to be deceived. And in all such instructions, which rightly exist, the seeker will soon be able to acquire the feeling that there is something true and good in his instructions. And although this feeling is a much more intimate one than the direct one for the theosophical truths described above, it can nevertheless also be an infallible guide.

[ 6 ] A second factor to be taken into account is the spiritual level of development of the seeker. Because of this, one will progress faster and another slower. Some may soon see the first signs, which they can interpret as evidence of their penetration into the higher worlds; others may struggle for years without seeing anything of the kind. It would not be quite correct to say that the corresponding progress depends on the degree of development of the seeker. It also depends on whether the source from which the instructions come finds the right thing for the personality in question, and on what speed of progress a teacher can and will take responsibility for with the seeker. The latter depends on many circumstances. And in our present time there are many things that force the teacher not to go too far in some cases. For he, for his part, is subject to the strict law that he must not harm anyone. The outsider can only have a slight idea of the severity of this law. But it must be emphasized again and again: no one is harmed by a real teacher in this field.

[ 7 ] The more people from the circles of those who profess to be Theosophists who enter this path, the better it will be for many things in the present and the near future. But no one should be led to it by anything other than his own untroubled free will. For that which Theosophy must by its very nature desire can only be meaningful to those seekers whose search progresses in such a way that an ever-increasing, unwavering loyalty to spiritual knowledge and an increasing understanding of the nature of the spiritual worlds develops within them. If, on the other hand, impatience and a sense of disappointment arise because one believes that one is not making sufficient progress on the path one has chosen, this is harmful to the seeker and to humanity. And it is easy to understand why such a sense of disappointment arises in someone who finds that certain ideas he has formed about his progress are not at all applicable. And yet this progress need not be really lacking. It may be present in a certain way and remain unnoticed by the seeker for a long time. Without, therefore, certain elementary, disordered higher experiences being held in low esteem - this is certainly not done by the true teacher - it is nevertheless true that in many cases the secret teacher must prefer progress in other areas to progress in the elementary higher experiences. Development can often proceed all the more surely if such experiences are initially, and for a long time, completely absent. They will surely come at some point. And the seeker will then also realize that it was good that he had to wait so long for them.

[ 8 ] The third of the indicated paths is that through a thorough philosophy and scientific knowledge, a person is led to the theosophical way of thinking. Admittedly, discoveries cannot be made in this way in the higher worlds. To investigate what goes on in these worlds and what beings are there, the supersensible faculties of perception developed by the path of knowledge are needed. But when things have been investigated and communicated by an investigator, those who have been thoroughly trained in philosophy can see their possibility and correctness. He can find all that which one might call rational reasons for the truth of what has been researched in the higher worlds. However, this requires a truly thorough philosophy, not one that stops halfway. For just as a perfect philosophy and a thorough science lead to the recognition of the theosophical way of thinking, so do superficial science and incomplete philosophy offer the greatest obstacles to its understanding. It is precisely these that must declare the teachings of Theosophy to be fantasies, dreams, wild “mysticism,” etc. etc. It would be so beneficial if a great many people were to engage in such thorough training in philosophy, but this is not the case at present. A thorough philosophy requires a strong devotion to many things that can only arouse the slightest interest in many people. Even that such a thing is beneficial, few will readily understand. And many will soon drop the matter after the first steps in a corresponding study. Either he will find that he is not sufficiently trained, or he will not be able to muster the energy of renunciation. It may seem more tempting to arrive at direct insight on the path of knowledge; but it should not be forgotten that for the researcher in the higher realms of existence, serious thought work is by no means a superfluous addition, but rather the best conceivable support.

[ 9 ] If we now ask ourselves how, under present conditions, wider circles relate to these three paths, which lead to theosophy, we will soon become aware of many obstacles that stand in the way of unprejudiced understanding.

[ 10 ] The healthy sense of truth described above is lacking in many people because they are under the influence of what is so often presented as the result of “strictly scientific facts”. The way in which such facts are presented by leading personalities and circles is also a factor. And this cannot be easily seen through. Therefore, in the vast majority of cases, it is quite understandable when people who allow the scientific results to sink in come to the conclusion that, in the face of the certain facts of science, the “claims” of Theosophy are nothing but fantasies, wild 'dreams. And it is true that, from their point of view, such people are right. But it is no less true that theosophists would be madmen if they asserted things that contradict the established facts of science. No theosophical truth can seriously contradict the findings of sensual and rational science. But in the presentation of scientific results, it is not just the established facts that are communicated; rather, a very specific way of thinking is transferred to the reader or listener along with the facts. This is most strongly the case in the so-called “popular” presentations of scientific results; but the learned and “strictly scientific” achievements are by no means free from it. The presenters are usually not even aware of the extent to which this is the case. And the learners and readers are even less aware of it. Many people believe that they are only communicating facts, but their presentation is completely dominated by a world view that is transferred to the learner and reader. The latter receives an inspiration; and this fact is so far removed from his consciousness that he thinks he has formed a judgment purely from facts. What he has received with the facts through inspiration – suggestion is an unsuitable word, but one that is used a great deal today – is capable of depriving him of all possibility of recognizing anything real in the facts of the soul and spirit. If one were to think fully about what is said with these things, one would indeed look at the current teaching and literature with different eyes than is often the case. One would know that not only Haeckel's “Welträtsel” (World Riddle), but also many seemingly quite harmless representations of zoological, botanical, geological, astronomical facts, in truth inoculate a world view. And many would not be credulous “monists” etc. if they were not inoculated in such a way with the facts, at the same time in a way imperceptible to them.

[ 11 ] In addition, there are the feelings and emotions of the age. These also tend to recognize only that as real which is palpable and evident to the senses. If someone is even an “expert” in a particular field, then he must look down on the “amateur fantasist” and “enthusiast” as the theosophy devotee can only appear to him. (The following article, “Prejudices from Supposed Science,” illustrates the above truths with a few specific examples. This latter article is also included because it is intended to provide as complete a picture as possible of the obstacles that the theosophical worldview currently faces. ) Now, “expert” judgments are reaching the widest circles in a thousand and one ways. And when something goes under the flag of “science” today, then this catchword alone overwhelms all one's own ability to judge. Theosophy must clearly face this situation. It must understand the reasons for the objections against it. Those who have been inoculated with their world view in the manner described above will often criticize the “lack of judgment” of those who profess Theosophy simply because of their sense of truth, and say that they have no idea how ridiculous their “belief” is in the face of the established facts of science. It should certainly not be denied that there are those who profess Theosophy and who, when confronted with objections from the side of “science”, behave quite clumsily, even childishly. This is then a gift for those who want to ridicule the blind “superstition” of the Theosophists. But it remains true that, in the face of the healthy sense of truth of many people, the judgments of those who refer to their “scientifically based” world view are of no significance. Once we learn to present only the facts that can be perceived by the senses and their rational consequences, we will also recognize that true knowledge of nature can provide the perfect foundation for theosophy.

[ 12 ] For the time being, however, things are at their worst for the really learned circles and their followers. It is not the facts that they research and whose discovery is a blessing for humanity that envelop them in prejudice, but rather the way of thinking and world view that is customary in these circles. This is so to such an extent that it is not only compromising for a member of such circles to approach theosophy, but it is actually an absolute impossibility. One need not apply a harsh critical standard to such facts. It is better to try to understand them as a necessary phenomenon of the times. One will then know that many, because of the spiritual context in which they find themselves, cannot but strictly reject Theosophy. This is not at all said with reference to those who come to such a rejection out of external considerations. Rather, it is meant of those numerous, fundamentally honest souls who, with their judgments, are prisoners of their spiritual context.

[ 13 ] For the path that is called the path of knowledge, many people's understanding must necessarily be limited. For everything that is said in the present day about the “necessary limits” of human knowledge is directed against it. There is much talk of development: but when someone says that the powers of knowledge which man has at his present level are not a conclusion, but that they can be consciously developed to a higher degree, then such a statement meets either with complete doubt or with indifference. People will always try to determine what man is able to recognize according to the measure of his abilities; that he can penetrate into new worlds by increasing these abilities, many do not want to admit. The theosophist will certainly never claim that the faculties referred to by many of his opponents can penetrate into higher worlds; but he knows that it is possible for man to awaken such faculties in himself, which lead to these worlds. Many of our contemporaries consider it to be arrogance and self-conceit when someone speaks of the ability to penetrate into supersensible worlds. But is it arrogance to speak of what can be perceived under certain conditions; or should it not rather be called arrogance when someone considers it a matter of course that everything he does not know or does not want to know must be nonsense and fantasy? Theosophy can only take the standpoint that one should not decide about what one does not know.

[ 14 ] The third of the paths to theosophy also presents great difficulties in our time. These difficulties are the most difficult to speak about, because what needs to be said can all too easily be interpreted as presumption. One would prefer to remain silent about this point, if it were not useful, even necessary, to occasionally point out the facts in this direction. The philosophical education of our time is by no means a high or thorough one. There are many reasons why this is so. Our philosophy is barren in terms of free thinking, which could confront the facts of sensory experience with sovereign judgment. It is burdened by an anxiety, of which the philosophers are unaware, to lose the secure ground under their feet. It looks everywhere for supports and foundations for its statements, but not where they are to be found, in certain inner facts of self-producing thought that gives itself its certainty. It should not be denied that here and there one can find some pleasing beginnings. But the spirit of the times weighs most heavily on philosophical thinking. And this contemporary attitude has the weakness of not opening up the sources of certainty within the human being, but of allowing certainty to be given by something outside of the human being. In natural science this can be a blessing in many respects, because undisciplined philosophizing can easily lead to enthusiasm; but for philosophy this attitude is paralyzing. The matter is downright bad in the case of epistemological investigations. They are currently being pursued quite eagerly, and were even more so in the last few decades. But a healthy state of mind cannot arise in them as long as one does not get beyond the prejudice that man only lives in his representations, and that these do not absorb objective reality. It is something monstrous for many epistemologists, but it must be said: the judgment that nothing of reality enters into the idea is like that: nothing of the metal of the seal enters into the impression in the sealing wax. Certainly nothing of the matter of the seal enters into the seal impression; but that which matters can be seen completely in the impression. It is the same with the world of human ideas. The whole world, with all its secrets, can be found through them, if one does not allow oneself to be deceived from the outset by the fact, which is doubtless true but of no significance, that the “table in itself” does not enter into the “idea” of the table. (In my “Philosophy of Freedom” one can read exhaustive accounts of these things.) It is unfortunately only too true that the philosophy currently in vogue is not very suitable for leading to theosophy. And anyone who is under the authority of this philosophy has only an obstacle to understanding the higher worlds.

[ 15 ] The latter fact in particular is bad for Theosophy. For it is thereby placed in the position of appearing to want to rebel against all legitimate scientific phenomena of the time. But there could be nothing better for the Theosophists than to be able to point out everywhere where there is something for their full recognition and approval. Theosophy has no vocation at all for opposition; and it should avoid such as long as it possibly can. Those who look more closely will also easily recognize that genuine Theosophy only gives positive things and does not want to play the role of opponent anywhere. But it cannot close its eyes to the fact that its very nature means that certain opponents will arise from the moods of the times. And it must calmly characterize these opponents in their own way. If it did not do so, a large part of its work would remain fruitless. For the natural opponents would rightly come to believe that the Theosophists were unworldly people who understood nothing of the certain refutations of their “assertions”. Theosophy would not need to concern itself with this belief as such if it were only a matter of theoretical refutation. This could be left entirely to one's own devices. What matters, however, is to work with open eyes and to organize one's work in such a way that it does not rebound ineffectually from the resistance erected by the sensibilities and prejudices of the present day.