Occult Science
GA 13
III. Sleep and Death
[ 1 ] It is not possible to penetrate into the nature of waking consciousness without observing the state through which the human being passes during sleep, and it is impossible to solve the riddle of life without considering death. For a human being in whom there is no feeling for the significance of supersensible knowledge, doubts may arise in regard to such knowledge because of the way in which it carries on its considerations regarding sleep and death. Supersensible knowledge is able to understand the motives that give rise to such a distrust. For it is quite comprehensible when someone says that man is here for an active, purposeful life and his accomplishments are based upon his devotion to it; furthermore, that the occupation with states such as sleep and death can only result from an inclination to idle dreaming and can only lead to empty imaginings. The rejection of what is thus held to be “fantastic” may readily be looked upon as the expression of a healthy soul, and an inclination toward “idle dreaming” of this kind as something unhealthy, characteristic of persons lacking in vital energy and the joy of life, and who are incapable of “real accomplishment.” It is wrong to declare forthwith that such an opinion is false, for it contains a certain kernel of truth. It is a quarter-truth that must be supplemented by the other three-quarters belonging to it, and a person who sees the one-quarter very well, but who has no conception of the other three-quarters, will only be made distrustful by our combating the true one-quarter. It must, in fact, be acknowledged without question that a consideration of what lies concealed in sleep and death is unhealthy if it leads to a weakening, to an estrangement from real life, and we must admit that much that has called itself occult science in the world from time immemorial, and is practiced also today under that name, bears a character unhealthy and hostile to life. But this unsound element does not spring from true supersensible knowledge. On the contrary, the real fact is the following. Just as man cannot always be awake, he also cannot, in regard to the real conditions of life in its widest sense, get along without what the supersensible is able to offer. Life continues during sleep, and the forces that are active and creative during the waking state receive their strength and renewal from what is given to them by sleep. Thus it is with what can be observed in the manifest world. The domain of the world is greater than the field of this observation, and what is known about the visible universe must be supplemented and fructified by what can be known about the invisible. A human being who does not continually draw strength for his weakened forces from sleep must of necessity destroy his life. Likewise, a world concept that is not fructified by a knowledge of the hidden world must lead to desolation. It is similar with death. Living beings succumb to death in order that new life may arise. It is precisely the knowledge of the supersensible that can shed clear light upon the beautiful words of Goethe: “Nature has invented death that she might have abundant life.” Just as there could be no life in the ordinary sense of the word without death, so can there be no true knowledge of the visible world without insight into the supersensible. All knowledge of what is visible must plunge again and again into the invisible in order to evolve. Thus it is evident that the science of the supersensible alone makes the life of revealed knowledge possible. It never weakens life when it appears in its true form. When, having been left to itself, life becomes weak and sickly, supersensible knowledge strengthens it and makes it, ever and again, fresh and healthy.
[ 2 ] When man sinks into sleep, there is a change in the relationship of his members. That part of the sleeping man that lies in bed contains the physical and ether bodies, but not the astral body and not the ego. Because the ether body remains united with the physical body in sleep, the life-activities continue; for, the moment the physical body were left to itself, it would have to crumble to dust. What, however, is extinguished in sleep includes the mental images, pain and pleasure, joy and sorrow, the capacity to express a conscious will, and similar facts of existence. The astral body is the bearer of all this. An unbiased point of view can naturally never entertain the thought that in sleep the astral body is destroyed along with all pleasure and pain and the world of ideas and will. It simply exists in an other state. In order that the human ego and astral body not only be filled with joy and sorrow and all the other facts of existence mentioned above, but also have a conscious perception of them, it is necessary that the astral body be united with the physical and ether bodies. In the waking state, all three are united; in the sleeping state, the astral body withdraws from the physical and ether bodies. It assumes a different kind of existence from the one that falls to its lot during its union with the physical and ether bodies. It is the task of supersensible knowledge to consider this other kind of existence in the astral body. Observed from the standpoint of the outer world, the astral body disappears in sleep; supersensible perception must follow its life until it again takes possession of the physical and ether bodies on awakening. Just as in all cases where it is a matter of knowledge of the hidden things and events of the world, so supersensible observation is necessary for the discovery of the facts of the sleeping state in their particular form. If, however, what can be discovered by means of supersensible observation has once been uttered, it is comprehensible to truly unbiased thinking, for the processes of the hidden world reveal themselves in their effects in the manifest world. If it is seen how the revelations of supersensible perception make the sensory processes comprehensible, such a corroboration by means of life itself is the proof that can be required for such things. Anyone not desiring to employ the means for acquiring supersensible perception, indicated later on in this book, can have the following experience. He may at first accept the evidence of supersensible perception and then apply it to the manifest facts of his experience. He may, in this way, find that life has thereby become clear and comprehensible, and the more exact and thorough his observations of ordinary life are, the more readily will he come to this conviction.
[ 3 ] Although the astral body, during sleep, experiences no mental pictures and also no pleasure and pain, it does not remain inactive. On the contrary, it is just in the sleep state that a lively activity is incumbent upon it. It is an activity into which it must again and again enter in rhythmical succession, if it has been for a time active in connection with the physical and ether bodies. Just as the pendulum of a clock, after having swung to the left and returned again to the center, must swing to the right because of the momentum gathered in its left swing, so the astral body and the ego living within it, after having been active for a time in the physical and ether bodies must, as a result of this, unfold a subsequent activity, body-free, in a surrounding world of soul and spirit. For the ordinary conditions of human life, unconsciousness occurs during this body-free condition of the astral body and ego because it presents the antithesis of the state of consciousness developed in the waking state through union with the physical and ether bodies, just as the swing of the pendulum to the right is the antithesis of the swing to the left. The necessity of entering into this state of unconsciousness is experienced by the soul-spirit nature of man as fatigue. But this fatigue is the expression of the fact that the astral body and ego, during sleep, prepare themselves to transform, during the following waking state, what has arisen in the physical and ether bodies through purely organic formative activity when freed from the presence of the spirit and soul elements. This unconscious formative activity and what takes place in the human being during and by means of consciousness are antitheses that must alternate in rhythmic succession.—The physical body can retain the form and stature suitable for man only by means of the human ether body, which in turn receives its proper forces from the astral body. The ether body is the builder, the architect, of the physical body, but it can only build in the right way if it receives the impulse for this purpose from the astral body. In the astral body reside the prototypes according to which the ether body gives form to the physical body. During the waking state, the astral body is not filled with these prototypes of the physical body, or at least only to a certain degree, for, during the waking state, the soul puts its own images in the place of these prototypes. When man directs the senses toward his environment he forms, by means of perception, thought images that are likenesses of the world about him. These likenesses are at first disturbances for the images that stimulate the ether body to maintain the physical body. Were the human being able, through his own activity, to bring to his astral body the images that are required to give the right impulse to the ether body, then there would be no such disturbance. This very disturbance, however, plays an important role in human existence. It expresses itself in the fact that the prototypes for the ether body do not act to the full extent of their power during waking life. The astral body carries on its waking activity within the physical body. In sleep, it works upon the physical body from without.c3The connection between sleep and fatigue is, in most cases, not viewed in a manner demanded by the facts. Sleep is supposed to be a result of fatigue. That this thought is much too simple is shown by the fact that a man, not at all tired, may fall asleep while listening to an uninteresting lecture, or on some similar occasion. Whoever maintains that such an occasion tires the listener, tries to explain by a method that lacks a serious scientific attitude. Unprejudiced observation must lead to the conclusion that waking and sleeping present different relationships of the soul to the body, which must appear in the regular course of life in rhythmical sequence like the right and left swing of a pendulum. The result of such unprejudiced observation is that the filling of the soul with the impressions of the outer world awakes in it the desire, after experiencing this state, to enter another in which it is absorbed in the enjoyment of its own bodily nature. Two soul states alternate: the state of surrender to outer impressions and the state of surrender to one's own bodily nature. In the first state the desire for the second is unconsciously produced; the second state then takes its course in unconsciousness. The expression of the desire for the enjoyment of one's own bodily nature is fatigue. We must then actually say that we feel tired, because we wish to go to sleep, not that we wish to go to sleep because we feel tired. Since the human soul can, through habit, arbitrarily call forth in itself the states that of necessity appear in normal human life, it is possible that, when the soul makes itself insensitive to a given outer impression, it calls forth in itself the desire for enjoyment of its own bodily nature; that is to say, the soul goes to sleep, even though this state is not induced by the inner condition of the human being.
[ 4 ] Just as the physical body, for example, needs the outer world, which is of like nature to itself, to supply it with the means of subsistence, something similar is also the case with the astral body. Just imagine a physical human body removed from its surrounding world. It would have to perish. This demonstrates that without the whole physical environment it is not possible for the physical body to exist. In fact, the entire earth must be as it is, if human physical bodies are to exist upon it. The whole human body is, in reality, only a part of the earth; indeed, in a wider sense, a part of the whole physical universe. In this respect its relationship is similar, for example, to that of a finger to the entire human body. If the finger is severed from the hand, it can no longer continue to be a finger; it withers. This would also happen to the human body were it removed from the organism of which it is a member, from the life conditions offered it by the earth. If we were to lift it a sufficient number of miles above the earth's surface, it would perish just as the finger perishes that has been severed from the hand. If less consideration has been given to this fact in respect of the physical body and the earth than in respect of the finger and the body, it is simply because the finger cannot stroll about on the body in the way that the human being walks about on the earth, and because in the former case the dependence is more obvious.
[ 5 ] Just as the physical body belongs to the physical world in which it is embedded, so does the astral body belong to its own world; during waking life, however, it is torn out of this world of its own. What happens there may be illustrated by an analogy. Imagine a vessel filled with water. A drop within this whole mass of water is not something isolated. Let us, however, take a little sponge and with it absorb a drop from the whole. Something similar occurs with the human astral body on awaking. During sleep it is in a world like itself; in a certain sense it constitutes something that belongs to this world. On awaking, the physical and ether bodies suck it up; they fill themselves with it. They contain the organs through which the astral body perceives the outer world. But in order that it may acquire this perception, it must separate itself from its own world. From this world it can only receive the prototypes that it needs for the ether body.—Just as the physical body receives its food, for example, from its environment, so during the sleep state the astral body receives the images from the world about it. It lives there actually in the universe, separated from the physical and ether bodies, in the same universe out of which the entire human being is born. The source of the images through which the human being receives his form lies in this universe. During sleep he is harmoniously inserted into it, and during the waking state he lifts himself out of this all-encompassing harmony in order to gain external perception. In sleep, his astral body returns to this cosmic harmony and on awaking again brings back to his bodies sufficient strength from it to enable him to dispense with his dwelling within the cosmic harmony for a certain length of time. The astral body, during sleep, returns to its home and on awaking brings back with it renewed forces into life. These forces that the astral body brings with it on awaking find outer expression in the refreshment that healthy sleep affords. Further descriptions of occult science will show that this home of the astral body is more encompassing than that which belongs to the physical body of the physical environment in the narrower sense. Whereas the human being is physically a part of the earth, his astral body belongs to worlds in which still other cosmic bodies besides our earth are embedded. Therefore he enters, during sleep, into a world to which other worlds than the earth belong, a fact that will only become clear from later descriptions.
[ 6 ] It ought to be superfluous to call attention to a misunderstanding that can easily arise in regard to these facts, but to do so is not out of place in our age in which certain materialistic modes of thought are prevalent. Those who hold such thoughts can naturally say that it is only scientific to investigate the physical conditions of such a thing as sleep. They maintain that although scholars are not yet in agreement concerning the physical causes of sleep, yet one fact is certain: that definite physical processes must be assumed as lying at the foundation of this phenomenon. Oh! if people would only acknowledge the fact that supersensible knowledge in no way contradicts this assertion! It agrees with everything that is said from this point of view just as one agrees that in the physical erection of a house one brick must be laid upon another, and when it is finished, its form and cohesion can be explained by purely mechanical laws. In order that the house may be built at all, however, the thought of the builder is necessary. This thought is not to be discovered when merely the physical laws are investigated.—Thus, just as the thoughts of the builder of the house lie behind the physical laws that make the house comprehensible, so behind what physical science presents in an absolutely correct way lies the spiritual content of which supersensible knowledge speaks. It is true, this comparison is often presented when it is a matter of justification of a spiritual background of the world and it may be considered trivial. But in these things the point is not whether there is a familiarity with certain concepts, but rather whether they are properly evaluated in arguing the question. Opposing theories can have so great an effect on the power of judgment that the possibility of arriving at a proper evaluation is entirely excluded.
[ 7 ] Dreaming is an intermediate state between waking and sleeping. What dream experiences offer to thoughtful consideration is a multi-colored interweaving of a picture world that conceals within it certain rules and laws. This world of dreams seems to display an ebb and flow, often in confused succession. In his dream life, the human being is freed from the law of waking consciousness that fetters him to sense-perception and to the rules governing his power of reason. Yet dreams have certain mysterious laws that are fascinating and alluring to man's prescience, and that are the deeper reason why the beautiful play of fantasy underlying artistic feeling is readily likened to “dreaming.” It is only necessary to call to mind certain characteristic dreams to find this corroborated. Someone dreams, for example, that he drives away a dog that is rushing upon him. He awakens and finds himself in the act of unconsciously throwing off a part of the bedclothes that had pressed upon an unaccustomed part of his body and had, therefore, become burdensome. What does dreaming here make out of the sense-perceptible process? What the senses would perceive in the waking state, the life of sleep allows to remain in complete unconsciousness. It retains, however, something essential, namely the fact that the sleeping person wishes to ward off something. Around this fact sleep weaves a pictorial process. The images, as such, are echoes of waking-day life. The manner in which they are borrowed from it has something arbitrary about it. Every person has the feeling that under the same external provocation, the dream could conjure up different pictures in his soul, but they express symbolically the feeling that the person has something he wishes to ward off. Dreams create symbols; they are symbol-makers. Inner processes, too, can transform themselves into such dream symbols. A person dreams that a fire is crackling near him; in his dream he sees the flames. He awakens and finds that he has been too heavily covered and has become too warm. The feeling of too much warmth is symbolically expressed in the dream picture. Quite dramatic experiences can be enacted in dream. For example, a person dreams that he is standing at an abyss. He sees a child running toward it. In his dream he experiences all the agony of the thought: Oh! if the child would only take heed, would only pay attention and not fall into the abyss! He sees it falling and hears the dull thud of its body below. He awakens and becomes aware that an object hanging on the wall of his room had become loosened and, in falling, has made a dull sound. Dream life expresses this simple occurrence in an event that is enacted in exciting pictures.—For the present we do not need to enter into a consideration of why, in the last example, the moment of the dull thud of the falling object should spread out into a series of events that seem to extend over a certain period of time. We need only keep in mind how the dream transforms into a picture what sense-perception would offer were we awake.
[ 8 ] We see that as soon as the senses cease their activity, something creative asserts itself in man. This is the same creative element that is also present in completely dreamless sleep and there presents the soul state that appears as the antithesis of the soul's waking state. If this dreamless sleep is to take place, the astral body must be withdrawn from the ether and physical bodies. During the dream state, it is separated from the physical body in so far as it no longer has any connection with this body's sense organs, but it still retains a certain connection with the ether body. That the processes of the astral body can be perceived in pictures is due to this connection with the ether body. The moment this connection ceases, the pictures sink down into the darkness of unconsciousness, and we have dreamless sleep. The arbitrary and often absurd character of dream pictures rests upon the fact that the astral body, because of its separation from the sense organs of the physical body, cannot relate its pictures to the proper objects and events of the external environment. This fact becomes especially clear if we consider a dream in which the ego is, as it were, split up; when, for example, a person dreams that, as a pupil, he cannot answer a question put to him by his teacher, while directly afterwards the teacher, himself, answers the question. Because the dreamer cannot make use of the organs of perception of his physical body he is unable to relate the two occurrences to himself, as the same individual. Thus, in order to recognize himself as an enduring ego, he must be equipped with the external organs of perception. Only if a person had acquired the capacity of becoming conscious of his ego otherwise than through these organs of perception, would the enduring ego become perceptible to him outside his physical body. Supersensible consciousness must acquire these capacities, and the means of accomplishing this will be considered later on in this book.
[ 9 ] Even death occurs only because there is a change in the relationship of the members of man's being. What supersensible perception has to say about death can also be observed in its effects in the outer world, and by unbiased reason the communications of supersensible knowledge can be verified on this point also through observation of external life. The expression of the invisible within the visible is, however, less obvious in these facts. It is more difficult fully to feel the importance of what, in the events of external life, corroborates the communications of supersensible knowledge in this realm. Even more than in the case of many things already mentioned in this book it would be quite natural here to declare that these communications are simply figments of the imagination, if no heed is paid to the knowledge of how a clear indication of the supersensible is contained in the sensory.
[ 10 ] In passing over into sleep, the astral body only severs its connection with the ether and physical bodies, the latter remaining bound together; in death, the physical body, however, is severed from the ether body. The physical body is left to its own forces and must, for that reason, disintegrate as a corpse. When death occurs, the ether body enters into a state that it never experienced during the time between birth and death, except under rare conditions that will be spoken of later. It is now united with its astral body, without the presence of the physical body, for the ether body and astral body do not separate immediately after death. For a time they remain together by means of a force whose existence is easily to be understood. If it did not exist, the ether body could not sever itself from the physical body, for it is bound to it. This is seen in sleep when the astral body is unable to tear these two members of the human organism apart. This force begins its activity at death. It severs the ether body from the physical, with the result that the ether body is now united with the astral body. Supersensible observation shows that after death this union varies in different people. Its duration is measured by days. For the present this duration is only mentioned by way of information.—Later the astral body separates from its ether body also and continues on its way bereft of it. During the union of the two bodies man is in a condition that enables him to perceive the experiences of his astral body. As long as the physical body is present, the work of refreshing the worn out organs must begin from the moment the astral body is severed from it. With the severance of the physical body this work ceases. The force that is employed for this work when the human being sleeps remains after death and can now be used to make the astral body's own processes perceptible.
An observation that clings to the externals of life may say that these are statements that are clear to those endowed with supersensible perception, but there is no possibility of anyone else ascertaining the truth about them. This is not a fact. What supersensible perception observes in this realm, removed from ordinary perception, can be comprehended by ordinary thought power after it has once been discovered. This thought power must consider in the right way the relationships of life that are present in the manifested world. Thinking, feeling, and willing stand in such a relationship to each other and to the experiences of man in the outer world, that they remain incomprehensible if the manner of their revealed activity is not considered as the expression of an unrevealed activity. This manifest activity becomes clear to the judgment only when it can be looked upon, in its course within physical human life, as the result of what supersensible knowledge establishes for the non-physical. In regard to this activity we are, without supersensible knowledge, much like a man in a dark room without light. Just as the physical objects around us are perceived only in the light, so will what takes place through the soul-life of man be explicable only by means of supersensible knowledge.
During the union of the human being with his physical body, the outer world enters his consciousness in images; after casting off this body, what the astral body experiences when it is not bound to the outer world by means of physical sense organs becomes perceptible. It has at first no new experiences. Union with the ether body prevents it from experiencing anything new. What it does possess, however, is a memory of the past life. The still present ether body allows this memory to appear as a comprehensive, living picture. This is the first experience of the human being after death. He perceives the life between birth and death in a series of pictures spread out before him. During physical life, memory exists only during the waking state when man is united with his physical body. Memory is present only to the extent allowed by this body. Nothing is lost to the soul that makes an impression upon it during life. Were the physical body a perfect instrument for this, it would be possible at every moment of life to conjure up before the soul the whole of life's past. This hindrance disappears at death. As long as the human being retains the ether body, a certain perfection of memory exists, and it disappears to the degree that the ether body loses the form it had during its sojourn in the physical body, when it resembled the physical body. This is also the reason why the astral body after a time separates from the ether body. It can remain united with the latter only as long as the ether form, which corresponds to the physical body, endures. During life between birth and death, a separation of the ether body from the physical body takes place only in exceptional cases, and then only for a short time. If, for example, a person presses heavily upon one of his limbs, a part of the ether body may separate from the physical. When this occurs we may say that the limb has “gone to sleep.” The peculiar feeling one has at that time comes from the severance of the ether body. (Naturally, here also a materialistic mode of thought may deny the existence of the invisible within the visible and say that all this simply comes from the physical disturbance caused by the pressure.) In such a case, supersensible perception is able to observe how the corresponding part of the ether body passes out of the physical. If a person experiences an unusual shock, or something of the kind, a separation of the ether body from a large part of the physical body may result for a short time. This happens if a person for one reason or another sees himself suddenly near death; if, for example, he is on the verge of drowning, or if, on a mountaineering trip, he is in danger of a precipitous fall. What is told by people who have experienced such things comes very near the truth and may be corroborated by supersensible observation. They state that in such moments their entire life passed before the soul in a great memory-picture. Of the many examples that could be cited here, only one will be referred to because it originates with a person to whose mode of thinking all that has been said here about these experiences must appear as idle fancy. For anyone who takes a few steps in supersensible observation, it is always useful to become acquainted with the statements of those who consider this science as something fantastic. Such statements cannot be so lightly attributed to the prejudice of the observer of the supersensible. (Spiritual scientists may well learn a great deal from those who consider their endeavors nonsense, and they need not be disconcerted if there is no reciprocal “affection” in this respect on the part of the critics. To be sure, for supersensible perception itself there is no need of verification of its results through such experiences. It does not desire to prove anything by these references, but to elucidate its findings.) The eminent criminologist and well known researcher in many other fields of natural science, Moritz Benedict, relates a personal experience in his memoirs. Once, when he was near being drowned while bathing, he saw in memory his whole life before him as though in a single picture.—If others describe differently the pictures experienced under similar circumstances, even in a way that lets them appear to have little to do with the events of their past, this does not contradict what has been said. For the pictures that occur in the quite unusual condition of the separation of the ether body from the physical are often not readily explicable in regard to their relation to life. Proper consideration will always recognize this relationship. Neither is it an objection if someone, for example, once came near drowning and did not have the experience described. It must be remembered that this can only occur when the ether body is actually separated from the physical and at the same time remains united with the astral body. If through the shock a loosening of the ether and astral bodies also takes place, then the experience does not occur, because there exists complete unconsciousness, as in dreamless sleep.
[ 11 ] In the period immediately following death the experiences of the past appear summarized in a memory-picture. After the separation of the ether body and the astral body, the latter is left to itself in its further journey. It is not difficult to see that, within the astral body, everything remains that it has made its own through its own activity during its sojourn in the physical body. To a certain degree, the ego has developed spirit self, life spirit, and spirit man. As far as they are developed, they receive their existence, not from what exists as organs in the bodies, but from the ego. The ego is the very member that needs no external organs for self-perception; it also needs none in order to remain in possession of what it has united with itself. The objection can be made, “Why, then, is there no perception in sleep of this spirit self, life spirit, and spirit man, which have been developed?” There is none, because the ego is fettered to the physical body between birth and death. Even though in sleep the ego, united with the astral body, is outside the physical body, it remains, nevertheless, in close union with the latter, for the activity of the astral body is directed toward this physical body. Thus the ego with its perception is relegated to the external sense world and cannot therefore receive the revelations of the spirit in its direct form. Only at death does the ego receive these revelations because, at death, the ego is freed from its connection with the physical and ether bodies. Another world can flash up for the soul the moment it is withdrawn from the physical world that chains the soul's activity to itself during life. There are reasons why even at this moment all connections between man and the external sense world do not cease. Certain desires remain that maintain this connection. These are desires that the human being creates because he is conscious of his ego, the fourth member of his being. Those desires and wishes arising out of the nature of the three lower bodies can only be active within the external world, and when these bodies are laid aside the desires cease. Hunger is caused by the external body; it is silenced as soon as this outer body is no longer united with the ego. If the ego possessed no other desires than those arising from its own spiritual nature, it could at death draw complete satisfaction from the spiritual world into which it is translated. But life has given it still other desires. It has enkindled in the ego a longing for enjoyments that can only be satisfied through physical organs, although the desires do not have their origin in these organs themselves. Not only do the three bodies demand their satisfaction through the physical world, but the ego itself finds enjoyments within this world for which the spiritual world offers no means of satisfaction. For the ego there are two kinds of desires in life: the desires that have their source in the bodies, and therefore must be satisfied within these bodies, ceasing with the disintegration of these bodies, and the desires that have their source in the spiritual nature of the ego. As long as the ego is within the bodies, these desires also are satisfied by means of bodily organs, for in the manifestations of the bodily organs the hidden spirit is at work, and in all that the senses perceive they receive at the same time something spiritual. This spiritual element exists also after death, although in another form. All spiritual desires of the ego within the sense world exist also when the senses are no longer present. If a third kind of desire were not added to these two, death would signify merely a transition from desires that can be satisfied by means of the senses to those that find their realization in the revelation of the spiritual world. This third type of desire is produced by the ego during Its life in the sense world because it finds pleasure in this world also in so far as there is no spirit manifest in it.—The basest enjoyments can be a manifestation of the spirit. The gratification that the hungry being experiences in taking food is a manifestation of spirit because through the eating of food something is brought about without which, in a certain sense, the spirit could not evolve. The ego can, however, transcend the enjoyment that this fact of necessity offers. It may long for good tasting food, quite apart from the service rendered the spirit by eating. The same is true of other things in the sense world. Desires are created thereby that would never have come into being in the sense world had the human ego not been incorporated in it. But neither do these desires spring from the spiritual nature of the ego. The ego must have sense enjoyments as long as it lives in the body, also in so far as it is spiritual; for the spirit manifests in the sense world and the ego enjoys nothing but spirit when, in this world, it surrenders itself to that medium through which the light of the spirit radiates. It will continue to enjoy this light even when the sense world is no longer the medium through which the rays of the spirit pass. In the spirit world, however, there is no gratification for desires in which the spirit has not already manifested itself in the sense world. When death takes place, the possibility for the gratification of these desires is cut off. The enjoyment of appetizing food can come only through the physical organs that are used for taking in food: the palate, tongue, and so forth. After throwing off the physical body man no longer possesses these organs. But if the ego still has a longing for these pleasures, this longing must remain ungratified. In so far as this enjoyment is in accord with the spirit, it exists only as long as the physical organs are present. If it has been produced by the ego, without serving the spirit, it continues after death as desire, which thirsts in vain for satisfaction. We can only form an idea of what now takes place in the human being if we think of a person suffering from burning thirst in a region in which water is nowhere to be found. This, then, is the state of the ego, in so far as it harbors, after death, the unextinguished desires for the pleasures of the outer world and has no organs with which to satisfy them. Naturally, we must imagine the burning thirst that serves as an analogy for the conditions of the ego after death to be increased immeasurably, and imagine it spread out over all the other still existing desires for which all possibility of satisfaction is lacking. The next task of the ego consists in freeing itself from this bond of attraction to the outer world. In this respect the ego has to bring about a purification and emancipation within itself. All desires that have been created by it within the body and that have no inherent rights within the spiritual world must be rooted out.—Just as an object takes fire and is consumed, so is the world of desires, described above, consumed and destroyed after death. This affords us a glimpse into the world that supersensible knowledge designates as the “consuming fire of the spirit.” All desires of a sensual nature, in which the sensual is not an expression of the spirit, are seized upon by this “fire.” The ideas that supersensible knowledge must give in regard to these processes might be found to be hopeless and awful. It might appear terrifying that a hope, for whose realization sense organs are necessary, must change into hopelessness after death; that a desire, which only the physical world can satisfy, must turn into consuming deprivation. Such a point of view is possible only as long as one does not consider the fact that all wishes and desires, which after death are seized by the “consuming fire,” in a higher sense represent not beneficial but destroying forces in life. By means of such destructive forces, the ego tightens the bond with the sense world more strongly than is necessary in order to absorb from this very sense world what is beneficial to it. This sense world is a manifestation of the spirit hidden behind it. The ego would never be able to enjoy the spirit in the form in which it is able to manifest through bodily senses alone, did it not want to use these senses for the enjoyment of the spiritual within the sense world. Yet the ego deprives itself of the true spiritual reality in the world to the degree that it desires the sense world without the spirit. If the enjoyment of the senses, as an expression of the spirit, signifies an elevation and development of the ego, then an enjoyment that is not an expression of the spirit signifies the impoverishing, the desolation of the ego. If a desire of this kind is satisfied in the sense world, its desolating effect upon the ego nevertheless remains. Before death, however, this destructive effect upon the ego is not apparent. Therefore the satisfaction of such desires can produce similar desires during life, and man is not at all aware that he is enveloping himself, through himself, in a “consuming fire.” After death, what has surrounded him in life becomes visible, and by becoming visible it appears in its healing, beneficial consequences. A person who loves another is certainly not attracted only to that in him which can be experienced through the physical organs. But only of what can thus be experienced may it be said that it is withdrawn from perception at death; just that part of the loved one then becomes visible for the perception of which the physical organs were only the means. Moreover, the only thing that then hinders that part from becoming completely visible is the presence of the desire that can only be satisfied through physical organs. If this desire were not extirpated, the conscious perception of the beloved person could not arise after death. Considered in this way, the picture of frightfulness and despair that might arise in the human being concerning the events after death, as depicted by supersensible knowledge, must change into one of deep satisfaction and consolation.
[ 12 ] The first experiences after death are different in still another respect from those during life. During the time of purification man, as it were, lives his life in reverse order. He passes again through all that he has experienced in life since his birth. He begins with the events that immediately preceded death and experiences everything in reverse order back to childhood. During this process, everything that has not arisen out of the spiritual nature of the ego during life passes spiritually before his eyes, only he experiences all this now inversely. For example, a person who died in his sixtieth year and who in his fortieth year had done someone a bodily or soul injury in an outburst of anger will experience this event again when, in passing through his life's journey in reverse order after death, he reaches the place of his fortieth year. He now experiences, not the satisfaction he had in life from his attack upon the other person, however, but the pain he gave him. From what has been said above, it is at the same time also possible to see that only that part of such an event can be experienced painfully after death that has arisen from passions of the ego having their source only in the outer physical world. In reality, the ego not only damages the other person through the gratification of such a passion, but itself as well; only the damage to itself is not apparent to it during life. After death this whole, damaging world of passion becomes perceptible to the ego, and the ego then feels itself drawn to every being and every thing that has enkindled such a passion, in order that this passion may again be destroyed in the “consuming fire” in the same way it was created. Only when man in his backward journey has reached the point of his birth have all the passions of this kind passed through the fire of purification, and, from then on, nothing hinders him from a complete surrender to the spiritual world. He enters upon a new stage of existence. Just as, at death, he threw off the physical body, then, soon after, the ether body, so now that part of the astral body falls away that can live only in the consciousness of the outer physical world. For supersensible perception there are, thus, three corpses: the physical, the etheric, and the astral corpse. The point of time when the latter is thrown off by man is at the end of the period of purification, which lasts about a third of the time that passed between birth and death. The reason why this is so can only become clear later on, when we shall consider the course of human life from the standpoint of occult science. For supersensible observation, astral corpses are constantly present in the environment of man, which have been discarded by human beings who are passing over from the state of purification into a higher existence, just as for physical perception there are physical corpses in the world in which men dwell.
[ 13 ] After purification an entirely new state of consciousness begins for the ego. While before death the outer perceptions had to flow toward the ego in order that the light of consciousness might fall upon them, now, as it were, a world flows from within of which it acquires consciousness. The ego lives in this world also between birth and death. There, however, this world is clothed in the manifestations of the senses, and only there where the ego, taking no heed of all sense-perceptions, perceives itself in its innermost sanctuary is what otherwise appears veiled by the sense world revealed in its real form. Just as before death the self-perception of the ego takes place in its inner being, so after death and after purification the world of spirit in its plenitude is revealed from within. This revelation, in fact, takes place immediately after the stripping off of the ether body. But, like a darkening cloud, the world of desires, which are still turned toward the outer world, spreads out before it. It is as though dark demoniacal shadows, arising out of the passions “consuming themselves in fire,” intermingled with a blissful world of spiritual experience. Indeed, these passions are now not mere shadows, but actual entities. This becomes at once apparent when the physical organs are removed from the ego and it, therefore, can perceive what is of a spiritual nature. These creatures appear like distortions and caricatures of what the human being previously knew through sense-perception. Supersensible perception says about the world of the purifying fire that it is inhabited by beings whose appearance for the spiritual eye can be horrible and painful, whose pleasure seems to be destruction and whose passion is bent upon a spiritual evil, in comparison with which the evil of the sense world appears insignificant. The passions indicated, which human beings bring into this world, appear to these creatures as food by means of which their power receives constant strengthening. The picture thus drawn of a world imperceptible to the senses can appear less incredible if one for a moment observes a part of the animal world with unprejudiced eyes. For the spiritual gaze, what is a cruel, prowling wolf? What manifests itself in what the senses perceive in it? Nothing but a soul that lives in passions and acts through them. One can call the external form of the wolf an embodiment of these passions, and even if a person had no organs with which to perceive this form, he would still have to acknowledge the existence of the being in question, if its passions showed invisibly in their effects; that is, if a power, invisible to the eye, were prowling around by means of which everything could happen that occurs through the visible wolf. To be sure, the beings of the purifying fire do not exist for sensory, but for supersensible consciousness only; their effects, however, are clearly manifest: they consist in the destruction of the ego when it gives them nourishment. These effects become clearly visible when a well-founded pleasure increases to lack of moderation and excess, for what is perceptible to the senses would also attract the ego only in so far as the pleasure is founded in its own nature. The animal is impelled to desire only by means of that in the outer world for which its three bodies are craving. Man possesses nobler pleasures because a fourth member, the ego, is added to the three bodily members. But if the ego seeks for a gratification that serves to destroy its own nature, not to maintain and further it, then such craving can be neither the effect of its three bodies, nor that of its own nature. It can only be the effect of beings who, in their true form, remain hidden from the senses, beings who can set to work on the higher nature of the ego and arouse in it passions that have no relationship to sense existence, but can only be satisfied through it. Beings exist who are nourished by desires and passions that are worse than any animal passions, because they do not have their being in the sense world, but seize upon the spiritual and drag it down into the realm of the senses. For that reason the forms of such beings are, for supersensible perception, more hideous and gruesome than the forms of the wildest animals, in which only passions are embodied that originate in the sense world. The destructive forces of these beings exceed immeasurably all destructive fury existing in the visible animal world. Supersensible knowledge must, in this way, enlarge the human horizon to include a world of beings that, in a certain respect, stand lower than the visible world of destructive animals.
[ 14 ] When man, after death, has passed through this world, he finds himself confronted by a world that contains the spirit, producing a longing within him that finds its satisfaction only in the spirit. Now too, however, he distinguishes between what belongs to his ego and what forms the environment of this ego, that is, its spiritual outer world. Only, what he experiences of this environment streams toward him in the way the perception of his own ego streams toward him during his sojourn in the body. While in the life between birth and death his environment speaks to him through his bodily organs, after all bodies have been laid aside the language of the new environment penetrates directly into the “innermost sanctuary” of his ego. The entire environment of the human being is filled with beings of like nature with his ego, for only an ego has access to another ego. Just as minerals, plants, and animals surround him in the sense world and compose that world, so after death he is surrounded by a world that is composed of beings of a spiritual nature.—Yet he brings with him into this world something that does not belong to his environment there, namely, what the ego has experienced within the sense world. Immediately after death, and as long as the ether body was still united with the ego, the sum of these experiences appeared in the form of a comprehensive memory picture. The ether body itself is then, to be sure, cast off, but something from this memory picture remains as an imperishable possession of the ego. What has thus been retained appears as an extract, an essence made from all the experiences that the human being has passed through between birth and death. This is life's spiritual yield, its fruit. This yield contains everything of a spiritual character that has been revealed through the senses. Without life in the sense world, however, it could not have come into existence. After death the ego feels this spiritual fruit of the sense world as its own inner world with which it enters a world composed of beings who manifest themselves as only his ego can manifest itself in its innermost depths. Just as the plant seed, which is an extract of the entire plant, develops only when it is inserted into another world—the earth, so what the ego brings with it out of the sense world unfolds like a seed upon which the spiritual environment acts that has now received it. If the science of the supersensible is to describe what occurs in this “land of the spirits,” It can indeed only do so by portraying it in pictures. Still, these pictures appear as absolute reality to supersensible consciousness when it investigates the corresponding occurrences imperceptible to the physical eye. What is to be described here may be illustrated by means of comparisons with the sense world, for although it is wholly of a spiritual nature, it has, in a certain respect, a similarity to the sense world. For example, just as in the world of the senses a color appears when an object impresses the eye, in the “land of the spirits,” when a spiritual being acts upon the ego, an experience is produced similar to one made by a color. But this experience is produced in the way in which, in the life between birth and death, only the perception of the ego can be produced in the soul's inner being. It is not as though the light struck the human inner being from without, but as though another being were acting directly upon the ego, causing it to portray this activity in a colored picture. Thus all beings of the spiritual environment of the ego express themselves in a world of radiating colors. Since their origin is of a different kind, these color experiences of the spirit world are, naturally, of a character somewhat different from the experiences of physical color. The same thing can be said of other impressions that the human being receives from the sense world. The impressions that resemble most those of the sense world are the tones of the spiritual world, and the more the human being becomes familiar with this world, the more will it become for him an inwardly pulsating life that may be likened to tones and their harmonies in sensory reality. These tones, however, are not experienced as something reaching an organ from outside, but as a force streaming through the ego out into the world. The human being feels the tone as he feels his own speaking or singing in the sense world, but he knows that in the spiritual world these tones streaming out from him are at the same time manifestations of other beings poured out into the world through him. A still higher manifestation takes place in the land of spirit beings when the tone becomes “spiritual speech.” Then not only the pulsing life of another spirit being streams through the ego, but a being of this kind imparts its own inner nature to this ego. Without that separation which all companionship must experience in the physical world, two beings live in each other when the ego is thus permeated by “spiritual speech.” The companionship of the ego with other spirit beings after death is really of this kind.
Three realms of the land of spirits appear before supersensible consciousness that may be compared with three regions of the physical sense world. The first region is the “solid land” of the spiritual world, the second, the “region of oceans and rivers,” the third, the “atmospheric region.”—What assumes physical form on earth so that it may be perceived by means of physical organs is perceived in its spiritual nature in the first realm of the land of spirit beings. For example, the force that gives the crystal its form may be perceived there, but what thus appears is the antithesis of the form it assumes in the sense world. The space, which in the physical world is filled with the stone mass, appears to spiritual vision as a kind of cavity. Around this cavity, however, the force is visible that gives form to the stone. The color the stone possesses in the physical world is experienced in the spiritual world as the complementary color. Thus a red stone appears greenish in the spirit land and a green stone, reddish. The other characteristics also appear In their complementary forms. Just as stones, earth masses, and so forth, make up the solid land—the continental regions—of the physical world, so the structures described above compose “the solid land” of the spirit world.—Everything that is life within the sense world is the oceanic region in the spirit world. Life to the physical eye is manifest in its effects in plants, animals, and men. Life to spiritual vision is a flowing entity that permeates the land of spirits like seas and rivers. A still better analogy is that of the circulation of the blood in the body, for whereas oceans and rivers appear irregularly distributed within the physical world, there is a certain regularity, like that of the circulation of the blood, in the distribution of this streaming life of the land of spirit beings. This flowing life is heard simultaneously as a spiritual entoning.—The third realm of the spirit land is its “atmosphere.” What appears in the sense world as sensation exists in the spiritual realm as an all-pervading presence like the earth's air. Here we must imagine a sea of flowing feeling. Sorrow and pain, joy and delight flow through this realm like wind or a raging tempest in the atmosphere of the sense world. Imagine a battle raging upon earth. Not only human forms confront each other there, forms that can be seen with the physical eyes, but feelings stand forth opposing feelings, passions opposing passions. The battlefield is filled with pain as well as with human forms. Everything that is experienced there of the nature of passion, pain, joy of conquest, is present not alone in its effects perceptible to the senses, but the spiritual sense becomes conscious of it as atmospheric processes in the land of spirits. Such an event in the spirit is like a thunder storm in the physical world, and the perception of these events may be likened to the hearing of words in the physical world. Therefore it is said that just as the air surrounds and permeates the earth beings, so do “wafting spiritual words” enclose the beings and processes of the spirit land.
[ 15 ] There are still other perceptions possible in this spiritual world. What may be compared to warmth and light of the physical world is also present. What permeates everything in the spirit land, like warmth permeating earthly things, is the thought world itself, only here, thoughts must be imagined as living, independent entities. What is apprehended as thoughts in the physical world is like the shadow of what exists in the land of spirits as thought beings. If we imagine thought, as it exists in human beings, withdrawn from man and endowed as an active entity with its own inner life, then we have a feeble illustration of what permeates the fourth region of the spirit land. What man perceives as thoughts in his physical world between birth and death is only the manifestation of the thought world as it is able to express itself through the instrumentality of the bodies. But all such thoughts entertained by human beings, which signify an enrichment of the physical world, have their origin in this region. One need not think here merely of the ideas of the great inventors, of the geniuses. It can be seen how every person has sudden ideas that he does not owe merely to the outer world, but with which he transforms this outer world itself. Feelings and passions whose causes lie in the outer world have to be placed in the third region of the spirit land. But everything that can so live in the human soul as to make him a creator, causing him to transform and fructify his surroundings, is perceptible in its primeval, essential form in the fourth sphere of the spiritual world.—What exists in the fifth region may be compared with physical light. It is wisdom revealing itself in its innermost form. Beings belonging to this region shed wisdom upon their environment, just as the sun sheds light upon physical beings. What is illuminated by this wisdom appears in its true significance and meaning for the spiritual world, just as a physical object displays its color when it is shone upon by the light.—There exist still higher regions of the land of the spirits, descriptions of which will be found in a later part of this work.
After death, the ego is immersed in this world, together with the harvest that it brings with it from its life in the sense world. This harvest is still united with that part of the astral body that has not been thrown off at the end of the period of purification. Only that part falls away which after death was inclined with its desires and longings toward physical life. The immersion of the ego in the spiritual world, together with what it has acquired in the sense world, may be compared with the insertion of a seed into the ripening earth. Just as this seed draws substances and forces from its environment in order to develop into a new plant, so, too, unfolding and growth is the very essence of the ego being embedded in the world of spirit.—Within what an organ perceives lies hidden the force by means of which the organ itself is created. The eye perceives the light, but without the light there would be no eye. Beings that pass their lives in darkness develop no organs of sight. In this manner the whole bodily organism of the human being is created out of the hidden forces lying within what is perceived with these bodily members. The physical body is built up by the forces of the physical world, the ether body by those of the life world, and the astral body is formed out of the astral world. When the ego is now transplanted into the spirit land, it encounters those forces that remain hidden to physical perception. In the first region of the spirit land the spiritual beings are perceptible who always surround the human being and who have also fashioned his physical body. Thus in the physical world, man perceives nothing but the manifestations of those spiritual forces that have also formed his own physical body. After death, he is himself in the midst of these formative forces that now appear to him in their own, previously concealed, form. Likewise, in the second region he is in the midst of the forces composing his ether body. In the third region, forces stream toward him out of which his astral body has been organized. The higher regions of the spirit land also now impart to him what composes his form in his life between birth and death.
[ 16 ] These beings of the spirit world now co-operate with what man has brought with him as fruit from the former life and what now becomes a seed. By means of this cooperation man is built up anew as a spiritual being. In sleep the physical and ether bodies continue their existence; the astral body and ego are, to be sure, outside of these two bodies, but still united with them. Whatever influences the astral body and the ego receive in this state from the spiritual world can only serve to restore the forces exhausted during the waking period. When the physical and ether bodies have been laid aside, however, and when, after the period of purification, those parts of the astral body that are still connected with the physical world through their desires are also laid aside, all that streams toward the ego from the spirit world now becomes not only a perfector, but a recreator. After a certain length of time, which will be discussed in later parts of this work, an astral body has formed itself around the ego; the former can again dwell in ether and physical bodies befitting the human being between birth and death. He can again pass through birth and appear in a new earth existence into which the fruit of the previous life has been incorporated. Up to the time of re-forming a new astral body, man is a witness of his own re-creation. Since the powers of the spirit land do not reveal themselves to him by means of outer organs, but from within, like his own ego in self-consciousness, he is able to perceive this revelation as long as his mind is not yet directed to an outwardly perceptible world. The moment, however, the astral body is newly formed, his attention turns outward. The astral body once more requires an external ether and physical body. It therefore turns away from the revelations of the inner world. For this reason an intermediate state now begins, during which man sinks into unconsciousness. Consciousness can only reappear in the physical world when the necessary organs for physical perception have been formed. During this period in which consciousness, illuminated by inner perception, ceases, the new ether body begins to attach itself to the astral body and the human being can then again enter into a physical body. Only an ego that has of itself produced life spirit and spirit man, the hidden, creative forces in the ether and physical bodies, would be able to take part consciously in the attachment of these two members. As long as man is not developed to this point, beings who are further advanced than he in their evolution must direct the attachment of these members. The astral body is led by such beings to certain parents, so that he may be endowed with the proper ether and physical bodies.—Before the attachment of the ether body is completed, something extraordinarily significant occurs for the human being who is re-entering physical existence. He has, in his previous life, created destructive forces that became evident when he experienced his life in reverse order after death. Let us take again the example suggested above. A person had caused someone pain in an outburst of anger in the fortieth year of his previous life. After death, he met this pain of the other person in the form of a force destructive to the development of his own ego. So it is with all such occurrences of his previous life. On re-entering physical life, these hindrances to evolution confront the ego anew. Just as at death a kind of memory picture of the past life arose before the human ego, now a pre-vision of the coming life presents itself. Again he sees a tableau, which this time displays all the hindrances he must remove if his evolution is to make further progress. What he thus sees becomes the starting point of forces that he must carry with him into a new life. The picture of the pain that he has caused another person becomes the force impelling the ego, on re-entering life, to make reparation for this pain. Thus the previous life has a determining effect upon the new life. The actions of this new life are in a certain way caused by those of the previous life. This orderly connection between a former and a later existence must be considered as the law of destiny. It has become the custom to designate this law by the name karma, a term borrowed from oriental wisdom.
[ 17 ] The fashioning of a new corporeal organization is not the only activity that is required of the human being between death and a new birth. While this building up is taking place, man lives outside the physical world. But during this time the earth proceeds in its evolution. Within relatively short periods of time the earth changes its countenance. How did those regions, which at present are occupied by Germany, appear a few millennia ago? When man reappears in a new life, the earth as a rule presents quite a different appearance from the one it had in his previous life. While he was absent from the earth all sorts of changes have occurred. Hidden forces also are at work in this transformation of the face of the earth. Their activities proceed from the same world in which man dwells after death, and he himself must co-operate in this transformation of the earth. He can do so only under the guidance of higher beings, as long as he has not acquired, through the development of life spirit and spirit man, a clear consciousness concerning the relationship between the spirit and its expression in the physical. But he helps to transform the earthly conditions. It can be said that human beings, during the period between death and a new birth, transform the earth in such a way that its conditions harmonize with their own development. If we observe a particular spot on the earth at a definite point of time and observe it again after a long span, finding it in a fully changed condition, the forces that have wrought this change are the forces of the human dead. In this way men have a relationship with the earth also during the period between death and a new birth. Supersensible consciousness sees in all physical existence the manifestation of a hidden spirituality. For physical observation, it is the light of the sun, climatic changes, and similar phenomena that bring about the transformation of the earth. For supersensible observation, the forces of the human dead are active in the rays of light that fall upon the plants from the sun. By observing supersensibly one becomes aware of how human souls hover above the plants, how they change the surface of the earth, and so forth. The attention of the human being is not only turned upon himself and upon the preparation for his own new earth life; indeed, he is called upon to work spiritually upon the outer world, just as he is called upon to work physically in the life between birth and death.
[ 18 ] Not only from the land of spirit beings does human life affect the conditions of the physical world, however, but, vice versa, all activity in physical existence has its effects in the spiritual world. An example will illustrate what happens in this respect. A bond of love exists between mother and child. This love arises out of an attraction between the two that has its roots in the forces of the sense world. But it changes in the course of time; a spiritual bond is formed more and more out of the sensory, and this spiritual link is fashioned not merely for the physical world, but also for the land of spirits. This is also true for other relationships. What has been spun in the physical world through spiritual beings remains in the spiritual world. Friends who have become closely united in life belong together also in the land of spirits and, after laying aside their bodies, they are in much more intimate communion than in physical life. For as spirits they exist for each other through the manifestation of their inner nature in the same way that the higher spiritual beings manifest their existence to one another through their inner nature, as we have described above, and a tie that has been woven between two people brings them together again in a new life. Therefore, in the truest sense of the word, we must speak of people finding each other again after death.
[ 19 ] What has once taken place with a person, during the period from birth to death and then from death to a re-birth, repeats itself. Man returns to earth again and again when the fruit that he has acquired in one physical life has reached maturity in the land of the spirits. Yet, we must not think here of repetition without beginning and end, for the human being passed, at some time, from other forms of existence into those that take place in the manner described, and he will in the future pass on to others. A picture of these transitional stages will be presented when, subsequently, the evolution of the cosmos—in relation to man—is described from the standpoint of supersensible consciousness.
[ 20 ] The processes that occur between death and a new birth are, naturally, still more concealed for outer sensory observation than the spiritual element that underlies manifest existence between birth and death. This sensory observation can see the effects of this part of the concealed world only where they enter into physical existence. The question for sensory observation is, whether the human being who passes through birth into life brings with him something of the processes described by supersensible cognition as taking place between a previous death and birth. if someone finds a snail shell in which no trace of an animal is to be seen, he will nevertheless acknowledge that this snail shell has come into existence through the activity of some animal and will not believe that it has been constructed in its form purely by means of physical forces. Likewise, a person who observes a living human being and finds something that cannot have its origin in this life, can admit with reason that it originates in what the science of the supersensible described, if thereby a clarifying light is thrown upon what is otherwise inexplicable. Thus intelligent sensory observation would be able to find that the invisible causes are comprehensible through their visible effects, and to anyone who observes this physical life entirely without prejudice, the above will appear—with every new observation—more and more convincing. It is only a question of finding the right standpoint for observing the effects in outer life. For example, where are the effects of what supersensible cognition describes as processes of the time of purification? How do the effects of the experiences that man undergoes manifest themselves after this time of purification in the purely spiritual realm, according to the evidence of spiritual research?
[ 21 ] Problems enough force themselves into every earnest and deep consideration of life in this field. We see one person born in need and misery, equipped with only meager ability, and he appears to be predestined to a pitiable existence because of the conditions prevailing at his birth. Another will, from the first moment of his life, be cherished and cared for by solicitous hands and hearts; brilliant capacities unfold in him, he is cut out for a fruitful, satisfactory existence. Two contrasting points of view can be asserted in respect of such problems. The one adheres to what the senses perceive and what the intellect, bound to the senses, can grasp. This point of view sees no problem in the fact that one person is born to good fortune, the other to misfortune. Although such a point of view may not wish to use the word “chance,” still those who hold it are not ready to assume an interrelated web of laws that causes such diversities, and with respect to aptitudes and talents, this way of thinking adheres to what is said to be “inherited” from parents, grandparents, and other ancestors. It will refuse to seek the causes in spiritual events that man himself has experienced before his birth, and through which he has formed his capacities and talents, quite apart from the hereditary descent from his ancestors.—Another point of view will not feel satisfied with such an interpretation. It will hold that even in the outer world nothing occurs at a definite place or in definite surroundings without the necessity of presupposing a reason for the cause of it. Although in many instances these causes have not yet been investigated, yet they exist. An Alpine flower does not grow in the lowlands; there is something in its nature that unites it with the Alpine regions. Likewise, there must be something in a human being that causes him to be born in a definite environment. This is not to be explained by causes that lie merely in the physical world. To a serious thinker this must appear as though a blow dealt another should be explained not by the feelings of the aggressor, but rather by the physical mechanism of his hand.—Those who have this point of view must also be dissatisfied with all explanations of aptitude and talents as mere inheritance. Yet it may be said in this connection that obviously certain aptitudes continue to be inherited in families. During two and a half centuries musical aptitudes were inherited by the members of the Bach family. Eight mathematicians, some of whom in their childhood were destined for quite different professions, have appeared in the Bernoulli family. The “inherited” talents have always impelled them to take up the family profession. Furthermore, it can be shown through exact investigation of the line of ancestry of an individual that, in one way or another, the talents of this individual have appeared in the ancestors and that they present only a summation of inherited tendencies. The one having the second point of view mentioned will certainly not disregard such facts, but they cannot mean the same thing to him as to the other who rests his explanations solely upon the processes of the sense world. The former will point out that it is just as impossible for the inherited traits to sum themselves up into an entire personality as it is for the metal parts of a clock to form themselves into a clock. If the objection is made that the united activity of the parents can bring about the combination of traits and that this, as it were, takes the place of the clock-maker, he will reply, “Just look with impartiality at the completely new element in every child's personality; this cannot come from the parents for the simple reason that it does not exist in them.” c4The statement that, if the personal talents of a human being were subject only to the law of heredity, they would have to show themselves not at the end but at the beginning of a blood relationship, might easily be misunderstood. It might be said that talents cannot show themselves at the beginning, for they must first be developed. But this is not a valid objection. For, if we wish to prove that something is inherited from a forebear, we must show how there is to be found again in the descendant what existed already previously. If it were shown that something was present at the beginning of a blood relationship that would be found again in the further course of its evolution, we might then speak of heredity. We cannot do this, however, if at the end something appears that previously did not exist. The reversal of the above sentence was only to show that in this case the idea of heredity is an impossible one.
[ 22 ] Unclear thinking can cause great confusion in this realm. The worst is if those having the first point of view previously stated look on those having the second as opponents of what is based upon “sure facts.” But these latter may not even think of denying the truth or the value of these facts. They also see quite clearly, for example, that a definite spiritual predisposition, even a spiritual direction, is “inherited” in a family, and that certain capacities summarized and combined in one descendant result in a remarkable personality. They are ready to admit that the most illustrious name seldom stands at the beginning, but at the end of a blood relationship. But those holding this view should not be blamed if they are forced to draw conclusions from these findings quite different from those of the persons who merely hold to the facts of the senses. The latter may be countered by saying that the human being certainly displays the attributes of his ancestors, for the soul-spirit element, which enters into physical existence through birth, takes its physical form from what heredity gives it. But by this, nothing else is said than that a being bears the qualities of the medium in which it is immersed. The following is certainly a strange and trivial comparison, but the unprejudiced mind will not deny its justification when it is said that the fact that a human being appears clothed in the traits of his forebears gives no more evidence of the origin of his personal characteristics than the fact that he is wet because he fell into the water gives evidence of his inner nature. It can be said further that if the most illustrious name stands at the end of a blood relationship covering many generations, it shows that the bearer of this name needed this blood relationship in order to form the body required for the development of his entire personality. It is, however, no proof whatsoever of the “inheritance” of the personal element itself; in fact, for a healthy logic, this fact proves just the opposite. If indeed the personal gifts were inherited, they would have to stand at the beginning of this series of generations and be transmitted to the descendants. But the appearance of a great endowment at the end of a human series proves that it is not inherited.
[ 23 ] It is not to be denied that those who speak of spiritual causation in life often add to the confusion. They often speak too much in general, indefinite terms. When it is declared that the inherited attributes are summed up into the personality of a human being, this can certainly be compared with the statement that the metal parts of a clock have assembled themselves. But it must also be admitted that many statements about the spiritual world are similar to the declaration that the metal parts of a clock cannot assemble themselves so that the hands move forward; therefore something spiritual must be present that takes care of the forward movement of the hands. In respect of such an assertion, he builds on a firmer foundation who says, “Oh, I shall not trouble about such ‘mystical beings’ who advance the hands of the clock; I am trying to learn to understand the mechanical relationships that bring about this forward movement of the hands.” For it is not a question of merely knowing that behind such a mechanism as the clock, for example, there stands something spiritual—the clock-maker—but it is of significance only to learn to know the thoughts in the mind of the clock-maker that have preceded the construction of the clock. These thoughts can be found again in the mechanism.
[ 24 ] All mere dreaming and imagining about the supersensible brings only confusion for they are incapable of satisfying the opponents. The latter are right when they say that such general references to supersensible beings are not an aid to the understanding of the facts. These opponents, it is true, may say the same thing about the definite indications of spiritual science. In this case, however, it can be shown how the effects of hidden spiritual causes appear in outer life. The following can be maintained: Suppose that what spiritual research has established by means of observation is true, namely, that man after death has passed through a period of purification and that he has experienced psychically during that time how a definite act, which has been performed in a previous life, is a hindrance to further evolution. While he was experiencing this, the impulse developed in him to rectify the consequences of this act. He brings this impulse with him into a new life, and it then forms the trait of character that places him in a position where this rectification is possible. Consider the totality of such impulses, and you have a reason for the destined environment in which a person is born.—The same may apply to another supposition. Again assume that what spiritual science says is true, namely, that the fruits of a past life are incorporated in the spiritual human seed, and that the land of the spirits in which this seed exists between death and rebirth is the realm in which these fruits ripen in order to appear again in a new life changed into talents and capacities, and to form the personality in such a way that it appears as the effect of what has been gained in a former life.—Anyone who makes these assumptions and, with them, observes life without prejudice will see that through them all facts of the sense world can be acknowledged in their full significance and truth, while at the same time everything becomes comprehensible that must remain forever incomprehensible to the one who, while relying only on physical facts, directs his attitude of mind toward the spiritual world. Above all, every illogical assumption will disappear, for instance the one mentioned above, that because the most important name stands at the end of a blood relationship series, the bearer of that name must have inherited his talents. Life becomes logically comprehensible by means of the supersensible facts communicated by spiritual science.
[ 25 ] The conscientious truth-seeker who, without personal experiences in the supersensible world, wishes to find his way within the facts will, however, still be able to raise an important objection. For it can be asserted that it is inadmissible to assume the existence of any fact whatever simply for the reason that something that otherwise is inexplicable can thereby be explained. Such an objection is surely wholly without meaning for the one who knows the corresponding facts from supersensible experience. In the subsequent chapters of this work, the path will be indicated that can be traveled for the purpose of becoming acquainted, not only with other spiritual facts to be described here, but also with the law of spiritual causation as an individual experience. However, the above objection can, indeed, have significance for the person who is not willing to tread this path, but what can be said in refutation of this objection is also valuable for the one who has decided to take this path. For a person who accepts this in the right way has made the best initial step that can be taken on the path.—It is absolutely true that we should not accept something, the existence of which we do not otherwise know, simply because something, which otherwise remains incomprehensible, can be explained by it. In the case of the spiritual facts mentioned, however, the matter is quite different. If they are accepted, this has not only the intellectual consequence that life becomes comprehensible through them, but by the admission of these assumptions into our thoughts something else is experienced. Imagine the following case. Something happens to a person that arouses in him a feeling of distress. He can take this in two different ways. He can experience distress over the occurrence and yield himself to its disturbing aspects, even perhaps sink into grief. He can, however, take it in another way. He can say, “In reality, I have in a past life developed in myself the force that has confronted me with this event; I have, in fact, brought this thing upon myself,” and he can arouse in himself all the feelings that can result from such a thought. Naturally, the thought must be experienced with the utmost sincerity and all possible force if it is to have such a result for the life of feeling and sensation. Whoever achieves this will have an experience that can best be illustrated by a comparison. Let us suppose that two men get hold of a stick of sealing wax. One makes intellectual observations concerning its “inner nature.” These observations may be very clever; if there is nothing to show this “Inner nature,” one might easily reply that this is pure fantasy. The other, however, rubs the sealing wax with a cloth and then shows that it attracts small particles. There is a tremendous difference between the thoughts that have passed through the head of the first man, arousing his observations, and those of the second man. The thoughts of the first have no actual results; those of the second, however, have aroused a force, that is, something actual, from its concealment.—This is also the case with the thoughts of the human being who imagines that, through a former life, he has implanted into himself the power to encounter an event. This mere thought arouses in him a real force by means of which he can meet the event quite differently from the way he would have met it had he not entertained this thought. The inherent necessity of this event, which otherwise he might have considered merely due to chance, dawns upon him, and he will at once understand that he has had the right thought, for it had the force to disclose to him the facts. If a person repeats such inner processes, they become the means of an inner supply of strength and thus they prove their truth through their fruitfulness, and this truth becomes manifest gradually and powerfully. These processes have a healthy effect in regard to spirit, soul, and body; indeed, in every respect they act beneficially upon life. Man becomes aware that in this way he enters in the right manner into the relationships of life, whereas he is on the wrong path when he considers only the one life between birth and death. His soul becomes stronger because of this knowledge.—Such purely inner proof of spiritual causation can only be produced by each person himself in his own intimate soul life, but everyone can have such proof. Anyone who has not produced this proof cannot, of course, judge its power. Anyone who has produced it can no longer have any doubt about it. It is not surprising that this is so, for it is only natural that what is so intimately connected with man's innermost nature, his personality, can also be satisfactorily proved only by means of the most intimate experience.—The objection cannot be made, however, that each person must deal personally with such matters since they have to do with an inner experience of this kind, and that they cannot be the concern of spiritual science. It is true that each person must have the experience himself, just as each person must himself understand the proof of a mathematical problem. The means by which the experience can be attained, however, holds good for everyone, just as the method of proving a mathematical problem holds good for everyone.
[ 26 ] It should not be denied that—aside from supersensible observations, of course—the proof by means of the forceproducing power of the corresponding thoughts just referred to, is the only one that holds its own if viewed with impartial logic. All other considerations are certainly important, but they all will possess something that offers a point of attack. To be sure, anyone who has acquired a sufficiently unprejudiced point of view will find something in the possibility and actuality of the education of man that has logically effective power of proof for the fact that a spiritual being is struggling for existence within the bodily sheath. He will compare the animal with the human being and say to himself that in the former, its normal characteristics and capacities appear at birth as something definite, which shows clearly how it is predestined by heredity and how it will develop in the outer world. See how the tiny chick from birth carries out vital functions in a definite way. In the human being, however, something enters into relationship with his inner life, through education, that can exist without any connection whatsoever with heredity, and he can make the effects of such outer influences his own. Anyone who teaches knows that forces from the inner being must come to meet such influences. If this is not the case, then all schooling, all education is meaningless. For the unprejudiced educator, there exists a clear-cut boundary between inherited characteristics and those inner human forces that shine through these characteristics originating in former earth lives. True, it is impossible to adduce “weighty” proofs for these things in the same way that certain physical facts may be demonstrated by means of the scales. But then, these things are the intimacies of life, and for the person who has a sense for such things, these impalpable evidences are likewise conclusive, even more conclusive than the obvious reality. That animals can be trained, that is, that they acquire qualities and faculties through education, offers no objection for the one who is able to see the essential thing. Aside from the fact that everywhere in the world transitions are to be found, the results of animal training do not fuse in like manner with the animal's personal nature, as is the case with human beings. It is even emphasized that the abilities the domestic animal acquires through training during its life with man, are inheritable, that is, that they have their effects in the species, not in the individual. Darwin describes how dogs fetch and carry without having learned to do so or having seen it done. Who would assert a similar thing in regard to human education?
[ 27 ] There are thinkers who through their observation pass beyond the opinion that the human being is constructed from without purely through the forces of heredity. They rise to the idea that a spiritual being, an individuality, precedes physical existence and forms it. Many of them do not find it possible to comprehend that there are repeated earth lives, and that in the intervening existence between lives the fruits of the previous ones act cooperatively as formative forces. Let us mention one out of the list of such thinkers. Immanuel Hermann Fichte, son of the great Fichte, in his work Anthropology2Hermann Fichte, Anthropologie, p. 528. Brockhaus, Leipzig, 1860. cites his observations that bring him to the following comprehensive conclusion:
The parents are not the producers of the child in the fullest sense of the word. They offer the organic substance, and not alone that, but at the same time the median, sensory soul element that expresses itself in temperament, in special soul coloring, in definite specification of impulses, and the like, the general source of which is ‘fantasy’ in that broader sense already proved by us. In all these elements of personality the mixture and peculiar union of the parent souls is unmistakable; there are good reasons, therefore, to explain these as purely a product of procreation; all the more so, if procreation is understood to be an actual soul process. We had to come to this conclusion. But the actual conclusive central point of the personality is lacking just here. For by means of a deeper, more penetrating observation we see that even those characteristics of mind and soul are only vestures and instruments for embracing the real spiritual, ideal aptitudes of man, capable of furthering or retarding them in their development, but in no way capable of bringing them into existence out of themselves.
And we read further:
Each person existed previously in accordance with his spiritual fundamental form, for spiritually considered, no individual resembles another any more than one species of animal resembles another. (see Note #3)3Immanuel Hermann Fichte, Anthropologie
These thoughts only go so far as to permit a spiritual being to enter the physical corporeality of man. Since, however, this spiritual being's formative forces are not derived from the causes of a former life, each time that a personality comes into existence a spiritual being of this kind would have to emerge out of a divine primal fount. Assuming this to be true, there would be no possibility of explaining the relationship that exists between the aptitudes struggling forth out of the human inner being and what approaches this inner being in the course of life from the outer earthly environment. The human inner being, which in every individual would have to spring from a divine primal source, would have to stand as a complete stranger before what confronts it in earth life. Only then will this not be the case—and so it is indeed—if this human inner nature had already been united with the external world—in other words, if it is not living in this world for the first time. The unbiased educator can clearly make the observation, “I bring something to my pupil from the results of earth life that is indeed foreign to his merely inherited characteristics, yet is something that makes him feel as if he had already been connected with the work in which these results of earth life have their source.” Only repeated earth lives, in connection with the facts in the spiritual realm between these earth lives as presented by spiritual research, can give a satisfactory explanation of the life of present day humanity, considered from every point of view.—The expression, “present day” humanity, was intentionally used here, for spiritual research finds that there was a time when the cycle of earth lives began, and that at that time conditions different from those of the present existed for the spiritual being of man as it entered into the corporeal sheath. In the following chapters we shall go back to this primeval state of the human being. When it will have to be shown, from the results of spiritual science, how this human being has attained his present form in relation to the evolution of the earth, we shall then be able to point out still more exactly how the spiritual essential core of man penetrates into the physical body from supersensible worlds, and how the spiritual law of causation—“human destiny”—is developed.
Schlaf und Tod
[ 1 ] Man kann das Wesen des wachen Bewusstseins nicht durchdringen ohne die Beobachtung desjenigen Zustandes, welchen der Mensch während des Schlafens durchlebt; und man kann dem Rätsel des Lebens nicht beikommen, ohne den Tod zu betrachten. Für einen Menschen, in dem kein Gefühl lebt von der Bedeutung der übersinnlichen Erkenntnis, können sich schon daraus Bedenken gegen diese ergeben, wie sie ihre Betrachtungen des Schlafes und des Todes treibt. Diese Erkenntnis kann die Beweggründe würdigen, aus denen solche Bedenken entspringen. Denn es ist nichts Unbegreifliches, wenn jemand sagt, der Mensch sei für das tätige, wirksame Leben da und sein Schaffen beruhe auf der Hingabe an dieses. Und die Vertiefung in Zustände wie Schlaf und Tod könne nur aus dem Sinn für müßige Träumerei entspringen und zu nichts anderem als zu leerer Phantastik führen. Es können leicht Menschen in der Ablehnung einer solchen «Phantastik» den Ausdruck einer gesunden Seele sehen und in der Hingabe an derlei «müßige Träumereien» etwas Krankhaftes, das nur Personen eignen mag, denen es an Lebenskraft und Lebensfreude mangelt und die nicht zum «wahren Schaffen» befähigt sind. Man tut Unrecht, wenn man ein solches Urteil ohne weiteres als unrichtig hinstellt. Denn es hat einen gewissen wahren Kern in sich; es ist eine Viertelwahrheit, die durch die übrigen drei Viertel, welche zu ihr gehören, ergänzt werden muss. Und man macht denjenigen, der das eine Viertel ganz gut einsieht, von den andern drei Vierteln aber nichts ahnt, nur misstrauisch, wenn man das eine richtige Viertel bekämpft. Es muss nämlich unbedingt zugegeben werden, dass eine Betrachtung dessen, was Schlaf und Tod verhüllen, krankhaft ist, wenn sie zu einer Schwächung, zu einer Abkehr vom wahren Leben führt. Und nicht weniger kann man damit einverstanden sein, dass vieles, was sich von jeher in der Welt Geheimwissenschaft genannt hat und was auch gegenwärtig unter diesem Namen getrieben wird, ein ungesundes, lebensfeindliches Gepräge trägt. Aber dieses Ungesunde entspringt durchaus nicht aus wahrer übersinnlicher Erkenntnis. Der wahre Tatbestand ist vielmehr der folgende. Wie der Mensch nicht immer wachen kann, so kann er auch für die wirklichen Verhältnisse des Lebens in seinem ganzen Umfange nicht auskommen ohne das, was ihm das Übersinnliche zu geben vermag. Das Leben dauert fort im Schlafe, und die Kräfte, welche im Wachen arbeiten und schaffen, holen sich ihre Stärke und ihre Erfrischung aus dem, was ihnen der Schlaf gibt. So ist es mit dem, was der Mensch in der offenbaren Welt beobachten kann. Das Gebiet der Welt ist weiter als das Feld dieser Beobachtung. Und was der Mensch im Sichtbaren erkennt, das muss ergänzt und befruchtet werden durch dasjenige, was er über die unsichtbaren Welten zu wissen vermag. Ein Mensch, der sich nicht immer wieder die Stärkung der erschlafften Kräfte aus dem Schlafe holte, müsste sein Leben zur Vernichtung führen; ebenso muss eine Weltbetrachtung zur Verödung führen, die nicht durch die Erkenntnis des Verborgenen befruchtet wird. Und ähnlich ist es mit dem «Tode». Die lebenden Wesen verfallen dem Tode, damit neues Leben entstehen könne. Es ist eben die Erkenntnis des Übersinnlichen, welche klares Licht verbreitet über den schönen Satz Goethes: «Die Natur hat den Tod erfunden, um viel Leben zu haben.» 1«Der Tod ist ihr Kunstgriff, viel Leben zu haben» (Die Natur, Fragment) Wie es kein Leben im gewöhnlichen Sinne geben könnte ohne den Tod, so kann es keine wirkliche Erkenntnis der sichtbaren Welt geben ohne den Einblick in das Übersinnliche. Alles Erkennen des Sichtbaren muss immer wieder und wieder in das Unsichtbare untertauchen, um sich entwickeln zu können. So ist ersichtlich, dass die Wissenschaft vom Übersinnlichen erst das Leben des offenbaren Wissens möglich macht; sie schwächt niemals das Leben, wenn sie in ihrer wahren Gestalt auftaucht; sie stärkt es und macht es immer wieder frisch und gesund, wenn es sich, auf sich selbst angewiesen, schwach und krank gemacht hat.
[ 2 ] Wenn der Mensch in Schlaf versinkt, dann verändert sich der Zusammenhang in seinen Gliedern. Das, was vom schlafenden Menschen auf der Ruhestätte liegt, enthält den physischen Leib- und den Ätherleib, nicht aber den Astralleib und nicht das Ich. Weil der Ätherleib mit dem physischen Leibe im Schlafe verbunden bleibt, deshalb dauern die Lebenswirkungen fort. Denn in dem Augenblicke, wo der physische Leib sich selbst überlassen wäre, müsste er zerfallen. Was aber im Schlafe ausgelöscht ist, das sind die Vorstellungen, das ist Leid und Lust, Freude und Kummer, das ist die Fähigkeit, einen bewussten Willen zu äußern, und ähnliche Tatsachen des Daseins. Von alledem ist aber der Astralleib der Träger. Es kann für ein unbefangenes Urteilen natürlich die Meinung gar nicht in Betracht kommen, dass im Schlafe der Astralleib mit aller Lust und allem Leid, mit der ganzen Vorstellungsund Willenswelt vernichtet sei. Er ist eben in einem andern Zustande vorhanden. Dass das menschliche Ich und der Astralleib nicht nur mit Lust und Leid und all dem andern Genannten erfüllt sei, sondern davon auch eine bewusste Wahrnehmung habe, dazu ist notwendig, dass der Astralleib mit dem physischen Leib und Ätherleib verbunden sei. Im Wachen ist er dieses, im Schlafen ist er es nicht. Er hat sich aus ihm herausgezogen. Er hat eine andere Art des Daseins angenommen als diejenige ist, die ihm während seiner Verbindung mit physischem Leibe und Ätherleibe zukommt. Es ist nun die Aufgabe der Erkenntnis des Übersinnlichen, diese andere Art des Daseins im Astralleibe zu betrachten. Für die Beobachtung in der äußeren Welt entschwindet der Astralleib im Schlafe; die übersinnliche Anschauung hat ihn nun zu verfolgen in seinem Leben, bis er wieder Besitz vom physischen Leibe und Ätherleibe beim Erwachen ergreift. Wie in allen Fällen, in denen es sich um die Erkenntnis der verborgenen Dinge und Vorgänge der Welt handelt, gehört zum Auffinden der wirklichen Tatsachen des Schlafzustandes in ihrer eigenen Gestalt die übersinnliche Beobachtung; wenn aber einmal ausgesprochen ist, was durch diese gefunden werden kann, dann ist dieses für ein wahrhaft unbefangenes Denken ohne weiteres verständlich. Denn die Vorgänge der verborgenen Welt zeigen sich in ihren Wirkungen in der offenbaren. Ersieht man, wie das, was die übersinnliche Betrachtung angibt, die sinnenfälligen Vorgänge verständlich macht, so ist eine solche Bestätigung durch das Leben der Beweis, den man für diese Dinge verlangen kann. Wer nicht die später anzugebenden Mittel zur Erlangung der übersinnlichen Beobachtung gebrauchen will, der kann die folgende Erfahrung machen. Er kann zunächst die Angaben der übersinnlichen Erkenntnis hinnehmen und dann sie auf die offenbaren Dinge seiner Erfahrung anwenden. Er kann auf diese Art finden, dass das Leben dadurch klar und verständlich wird. Und er wird zu dieser Überzeugung um so mehr kommen, je genauer und eingehender er das gewöhnliche Leben betrachtet.
[ 3 ] Wenn auch der Astralleib während des Schlafes keine Vorstellungen erlebt, wenn er auch nicht Lust und Leid und ähnliches erfährt: er bleibt nicht untätig. Ihm obliegt vielmehr gerade im Schlafzustande eine rege Tätigkeit. Es ist eine Tätigkeit, in welche er in rhythmischer Folge immer wieder eintreten muss, wenn er eine Zeitlang in Gemeinschaft mit dem physischen und dem Ätherleib tätig war. Wie ein Uhrpendel, nachdem er nach links ausgeschlagen hat und wieder in die Mittellage zurückgekommen ist, durch die bei diesem Ausschlag gesammelte Kraft nach rechts ausschlagen muss: so müssen der Astralleib und das in seinem Schoße befindliche Ich, nachdem sie einige Zeit in dem physischen und dem Ätherleib tätig waren, durch die Ergebnisse dieser Tätigkeit eine folgende Zeit leibfrei in einer seelisch-geistigen Umwelt ihre Regsamkeit entfalten. Für die gewöhnliche Lebensverfassung des Menschen tritt innerhalb dieses leibfreien Zustandes des Astralleibes und des Ich Bewusstlosigkeit ein, weil diese eben den Gegensatz gegenüber dem im Wachzustande durch Zusammensein mit physischem und Ätherleib entwickelten Bewusstseinszustand darstellt: wie der rechte Pendelausschlag den Gegensatz des linken bildet. Die Notwendigkeit, in diese Bewusstlosigkeit einzutreten, wird von dem Geistig-Seelischen des Menschen als Ermattung empfunden. Aber diese Ermüdung ist der Ausdruck dafür, dass Astralleib und Ich während des Schlafes sich bereit machen, im folgenden Wachzustande am physischen und Ätherleibe wieder zurückzubilden, was in diesen, solange sie frei vom Geistig-Seelischen waren, durch rein organische — unbewusste — Bildetätigkeit entstanden ist. Diese unbewusste Bildetätigkeit und dasjenige, was im Menschenwesen während des Bewusstseins und durch dieses geschieht, sind Gegensätze. Solche Gegensätze, die in rhythmischer Folge sich abwechseln müssen. — Es kann dem physischen Leib die ihm für den Menschen zukommende Form und Gestalt nur durch den menschlichen Ätherleib erhalten werden. Aber diese menschliche Form des physischen Leibes kann nur durch einen solchen Ätherleib erhalten werden, dem seinerseits wieder von dem Astralleibe die entsprechenden Kräfte zugeführt werden. Der Ätherleib ist der Bildner, der Architekt des physischen Leibes. Er kann aber nur im richtigen Sinne bilden, wenn er die Anregung zu der Art, wie er zu bilden hat, von dem Astralleibe erhält. In diesem sind die Vorbilder, nach denen der Ätherleib dem physischen Leibe seine Gestalt gibt. Während des Wachens ist nun der Astralleib nicht mit diesen Vorbildern für den physischen Leib erfüllt oder wenigstens nur bis zu einem bestimmten Grade. Denn während des Wachens setzt die Seele ihre eigenen Bilder an die Stelle dieser Vorbilder. Wenn der Mensch die Sinne auf seine Umgebung richtet, so bildet er sich eben durch die Wahrnehmung in seinen Vorstellungen Bilder, welche die Abbilder der ihn umgebenden Welt sind. Diese Abbilder sind zunächst Störenfriede für diejenigen Bilder, welche den Ätherleib anregen zur Erhaltung des physischen Leibes. Nur dann, wenn der Mensch aus eigener Tätigkeit seinem Astralleibe diejenigen Bilder zuführen könnte, welche dem Ätherleibe die richtige Anregung geben können, dann wäre eine solche Störung nicht vorhanden. Im Menschendasein spielt aber gerade diese Störung eine wichtige Rolle. Und sie drückt sich dadurch aus, dass während des Wachens die Vorbilder für den Ätherleib nicht in ihrer vollen Kraft wirken. Seine Wachleistung vollbringt der Astralleib innerhalb des physischen Leibes; im Schlafe arbeitet er an diesem von außen. b3Der Zusammenhang von Schlaf und Ermüdung wird zumeist nicht in einer durch die Tatsachen geforderten Weise angesehen. Man denkt, der Schlaf trete ein infolge der Ermüdung. Dass diese Vorstellung viel zu einfach ist, kann jedes Einschlafen eines oft gar nicht ermüdeten Menschen beim Anhören einer ihn nicht interessierenden Rede oder bei ähnlicher Gelegenheit zeigen. Wer behaupten will, bei solcher Veranlassung ermüde eben der Mensch, der erklärt doch nach einer Methode, welcher der rechte Erkenntnisernst mangelt. Unbefangene Beobachtung muss denn doch darauf kommen, dass Wachen und Schlafen verschiedene Verhältnisse der Seele zum Leibe darstellen, die im regelmäßigen Lebensverlaufe in rhythmischer Folge wie linker und rechter Pendelausschlag auftreten müssen. Es ergibt sich bei solch unbefangener Beobachtung, dass das Erfülltsein der Seele mit den Eindrücken der Außenwelt in dieser die Begierde erweckt, nach diesem Zustand in einen andern einzutreten, indem sie im Genus der eigenen Leiblichkeit aufgeht. Es wechseln zwei Seelenzustände: Hingegebensein an die Außeneindrücke und Hingegebensein an die eigene Leiblichkeit. In dem ersten Zustande wird unbewusst die Begierde nach dem zweiten erzeugt, der selbst dann im Unbewussten verläuft. Der Ausdruck der Begierde nach dem Genusse der eigenen Leiblichkeit ist die Ermüdung. Man muss also eigentlich sagen: man fühle sich ermüdet, weil man schlafen will, nicht man wolle schlafen, weil man sich ermüdet fühle. Da nun die Menschenseele durch Gewöhnung die im normalen Leben notwendig auftretenden Zustände auch willkürlich in sich hervorrufen kann, so ist es möglich, dass sie, wenn sie sich für einen gegebenen äußeren Eindruck abstumpft, in sich die Begierde hervorruft nach dem Genus der eigenen Leiblichkeit; das heißt, dass sie einschläft, wenn durch die innere Verfassung des Menschen keine Veranlassung dazu ist.
[ 4 ] Wie der physische Leib zum Beispiel in der Zufuhr der Nahrungsmittel die Außenwelt braucht, mit der er gleicher Art ist, so ist etwas Ähnliches auch für den Astralleib der Fall. Man denke sich einen physischen Menschenleib aus der ihn umgebenden Welt entfernt. Er müsste zugrunde gehen. Das zeigt, dass er ohne die ganze physische Umgebung nicht möglich ist. In der Tat muss die ganze Erde eben so sein, wie sie ist, wenn auf ihr physische Menschenleiber vorhanden sein sollen. In Wahrheit ist nämlich dieser ganze Menschenleib nur ein Teil der Erde, ja in weiterem Sinne des ganzen physischen Weltalls. Er verhält sich in dieser Beziehung wie zum Beispiel der Finger einer Hand zu dem ganzen menschlichen Körper. Man trenne den Finger von der Hand, und er kann kein Finger bleiben. Er verdorrt. So auch müsste es dem menschlichen Leibe ergehen, wenn er von demjenigen Leibe entfernt würde, von dem er ein Glied ist; von den Lebensbedingungen, welche ihm die Erde liefert. Man erhebe ihn eine genügende Anzahl von Meilen über die Oberfläche der Erde, und er wird verderben, wie der Finger verdirbt, den man von der Hand abschneidet. Wenn der Mensch gegenüber seinem physischen Leibe diese Tatsache weniger beachtet als gegenüber Finger und Körper, so beruht das lediglich darauf, dass der Finger nicht am Leibe herumspazieren kann wie der Mensch auf der Erde, und dass für jenen daher die Abhängigkeit leichter in die Augen springt.
[ 5 ] Wie nun der physische Leib in die physische Welt eingebettet ist, zu der er gehört, so ist der Astralleib zu der seinigen gehörig. Nur wird er durch das Wachleben aus dieser seiner Welt herausgerissen. Man kann das, was da vorgeht, mit einem Vergleiche sich veranschaulichen. Man denke sich ein Gefäß mit Wasser. Ein Tropfen ist innerhalb dieser ganzen Wassermasse nichts für sich Abgesondertes. Man nehme aber ein kleines Schwämmchen und sauge damit einen Tropfen aus der ganzen Wassermasse heraus. So etwas geht mit dem menschlichen Astralleibe beim Erwachen vor sich. Während des Schlafes ist er in einer mit ihm gleichen Welt. Er bildet etwas in einer gewissen Weise zu dieser Gehöriges. Beim Erwachen saugen ihn der physische Leib und der Ätherleib auf. Sie erfüllen sich mit ihm. Sie enthalten die Organe, durch die er die äußere Welt wahrnimmt. Er aber muss, um zu dieser Wahrnehmung zu kommen, aus seiner Welt sich herausscheiden. Aus dieser seiner Welt aber kann er nur die Vorbilder erhalten, welche er für den Ätherleib braucht. — Wie dem physischen Leibe zum Beispiel die Nahrungsmittel aus seiner Umgebung zukommen, so kommen dem Astralleib während des Schlafzustandes die Bilder der ihn umgebenden Welt zu. Er lebt da in der Tat außerhalb des physischen und des Ätherleibes im Weltall. In demselben Weltall, aus dem heraus der ganze Mensch geboren ist. In diesem Weltall ist die Quelle der Bilder, durch die der Mensch seine Gestalt erhält. Er ist harmonisch diesem Weltall eingegliedert. Und er hebt sich während des Wachens heraus aus dieser umfassenden Harmonie, um zu der äußeren Wahrnehmung zu kommen. Im Schlaf kehrt sein Astralleib in diese Harmonie des Weltalls zurück. Er führt beim Erwachen aus dieser so viel Kraft in seine Leiber ein, dass er das Verweilen in der Harmonie wieder für einige Zeit entbehren kann. Der Astralleib kehrt während des Schlafes in seine Heimat zurück und bringt sich beim Erwachen neugestärkte Kräfte in das Leben mit. Den äußeren Ausdruck findet der Besitz, den der Astralleib beim Erwachen mitbringt, in der Erquickung, welche ein gesunder Schlaf verleiht. Die weiteren Darlegungen der Geheimwissenschaft werden ergeben, dass diese Heimat des Astralleibes umfassender ist als dasjenige, was zum physischen Körper im engeren Sinne von der physischen Umgebung gehört. Während nämlich der Mensch als physisches Wesen ein Glied der Erde ist, gehört sein Astralleib Welten an, in welche noch andere Weltkörper eingebettet sind als unsere Erde. Er tritt dadurch — was, wie gesagt, erst in den weiteren Ausführungen klar werden kann — während des Schlafes in eine Welt ein, zu der andere Welten als die Erde gehören.
[ 6 ] Es sollte überflüssig sein, auf ein leicht sich einstellendes Missverständnis in bezug auf diese Tatsachen hinzuweisen. Es ist aber nicht unnötig in unserer Zeit, in der gewisse materialistische Vorstellungsarten vorhanden sind. Von Seiten, auf denen solche herrschen, kann natürlich gesagt werden, es sei einzig wissenschaftlich, so etwas wie den Schlaf nach seinen physischen Bedingungen zu erforschen. Wenn auch die Gelehrten über die physische Ursache des Schlafes noch nicht einig seien: das eine stehe doch fest, dass man bestimmte physische Vorgänge annehmen müsse, welche dieser Erscheinung zugrunde liegen. Wenn man aber doch anerkennen wollte, dass die übersinnliche Erkenntnis durchaus nicht mit dieser Behauptung im Widerspruch steht! Sie gibt alles zu, was von dieser Seite gesagt wird, wie man zugibt, dass für die physische Entstehung eines Hauses ein Ziegel auf den andern gelegt werden muss, und dass, wenn das Haus fertig ist, aus rein mechanischen Gesetzen seine Form und sein Zusammenhang erklärt werden könne. Aber dass das Haus entsteht, dazu ist der Gedanke des Baumeisters notwendig. Ihn findet man nicht, wenn man lediglich die physischen Gesetze untersucht. — So wie hinter den physischen Gesetzen, welche das Haus erklärlich machen, die Gedanken seines Schöpfers stehen, so hinter dem, was die physische Wissenschaft in durchaus richtiger Weise vorbringt, dasjenige, wovon durch die übersinnliche Erkenntnis gesprochen wird. Gewiss, dieser Vergleich wird oft vorgebracht, wenn von der Rechtfertigung eines geistigen Hintergrundes der Welt die Rede ist. Und man kann ihn trivial finden. Aber in solchen Dingen handelt es sich nicht darum, dass man mit gewissen Begriffen bekannt ist, sondern darum, dass man ihnen zur Begründung einer Sache das richtige Gewicht beilegt. Daran kann man einfach dadurch verhindert sein, dass entgegengesetzte Vorstellungen eine zu große Macht über die Urteilskraft haben, um dieses Gewicht in der richtigen Weise zu empfinden.
[ 7 ] Ein Zwischenzustand zwischen Wachen und Schlafen ist das Träumen. Was die Traumerlebnisse einer sinnigen Betrachtung darbieten, ist das bunte Durcheinanderwogen einer Bilderwelt, das aber doch auch etwas von Regel und Gesetz in sich birgt. Aufsteigen und Abfluten, oft in wirrer Folge, scheint zunächst diese Welt zu zeigen. Losgebunden ist der Mensch in seinem Traumleben von dem Gesetz des wachen Bewusstseins, das ihn kettet an die Wahrnehmung der Sinne und an die Regeln seiner Urteilskraft. Und doch hat der Traum etwas von geheimnisvollen Gesetzen, welche der menschlichen Ahnung reizvoll und anziehend sind und welche die tiefere Ursache davon sind, dass man das schöne Spiel der Phantasie, wie es künstlerischem Empfinden zugrunde liegt, immer gern mit dem «Träumen» vergleicht. Man braucht sich nur an einige kennzeichnende Träume zu erinnern, und man wird das bestätigt finden. Ein Mensch träumt zum Beispiel, dass er einen auf ihn losstürzenden Hund verjage. Er wacht auf und findet sich eben noch dabei, wie er unbewusst einen Teil der Bettdecke von sich abschiebt, die sich an eine ungewohnte Stelle seines Körpers gelegt hat und die ihm deshalb lästig geworden ist. Was macht da das Traumleben aus dem sinnlich wahrnehmbaren Vorgang? Was die Sinne im wachen Zustande wahrnehmen würden, lässt das Schlafleben zunächst völlig im Unbewussten liegen. Es hält aber etwas Wesentliches fest, nämlich die Tatsache, dass der Mensch etwas von sich abwehren will. Und um dieses herum spinnt es einen bildhaften Vorgang. Die Bilder als solche sind Nachklänge aus dem wachen Tagesleben. Die Art, wie sie diesem entnommen sind, hat etwas Willkürliches. Ein jeder hat die Empfindung, dass ihm der Traum bei derselben äußeren Veranlassung auch andere Bilder vorgaukeln könnte. Aber die Empfindung, dass der Mensch etwas abzuwehren hat, drücken sie sinnbildlich aus. Der Traum schafft Sinnbilder; er ist ein Symboliker. Auch innere Vorgänge können sich in solche Traumsymbole wandeln. Ein Mensch träumt, dass ein Feuer neben ihm prasselt; er sieht im Traume die Flammen. Er wacht auf und fühlt, dass er sich zu stark zugedeckt hat und ihm zu warm geworden ist. Das Gefühl zu großer Wärme drückt sich sinnbildlich in dem Bilde aus. Ganz dramatische Erlebnisse können sich im Traume abspielen. Jemand träumt zum Beispiel, er stehe an einem Abgrunde. Er sieht, wie ein Kind heranläuft. Der Traum lässt ihn alle Qualen des Gedankens erleben: wenn das Kind nur nicht unaufmerksam sein möge und in die Tiefe stürze. Er sieht es fallen und hört den dumpfen Aufschlag des Körpers unten. Er wacht auf und vernimmt, dass ein Gegenstand, der an der Wand des Zimmers hing, sich losgelöst hat und bei seinem Auffallen einen dumpfen Ton gegeben hat. Diesen einfachen Vorgang drückt das Traumleben in einem Vorgange aus, der sich in spannenden Bildern abspielt. — Man braucht sich vorläufig gar nicht in Nachdenken darüber einzulassen, wie es komme, dass in dem letzten Beispiele sich der Augenblick des dumpfen Aufschlagens eines Gegenstandes in eine Reihe von Vorgängen auseinanderlegt, die sich durch eine gewisse Zeit auszudehnen scheinen; man braucht nur ins Auge zu fassen, wie der Traum das, was die wache Sinneswahmehmung darbieten würde, in ein Bild verwandelt.
[ 8 ] Man sieht: sofort, wenn die Sinne ihre Tätigkeit einstellen, so macht sich für den Menschen ein Schöpferisches geltend. Es ist dies dasselbe Schöpferische, welches im vollen traumlosen Schlafe auch vorhanden ist und welches da jenen Seelenzustand darstellt, der als Gegensatz der wachen Seelenverfassung erscheint. Soll dieser traumlose Schlaf eintreten, so muss der Astralleib vom Ätherleib und vom physischen Leibe herausgezogen sein. Er ist während des Träumens vom physischen Leibe insofern getrennt, als er keinen Zusammenhang mehr hat mit dessen Sinnesorganen; er hält aber mit dem Ätherleibe noch einen gewissen Zusammenhang aufrecht. Dass die Vorgänge des Astralleibes in Bildern wahrgenommen werden können, das kommt von diesem seinem Zusammenhang mit dem Ätherleibe. In dem Augenblicke, in dem auch dieser Zusammenhang aufhört, versinken die Bilder in das Dunkel der Bewusstlosigkeit, und der traumlose Schlaf ist da. Das Willkürliche und oft Widersinnige der Traumbilder rührt aber davon her, dass der Astralleib wegen seiner Trennung von den Sinnesorganen des physischen Leibes seine Bilder nicht auf die richtigen Gegenstände und Vorgänge der äußeren Umgebung beziehen kann. Besonders klärend ist für diesen Tatbestand die Betrachtung eines solchen Traumes, in dem sich das Ich gewissermaßen spaltet. Wenn jemandem zum Beispiel träumt, er könne als Schüler eine ihm vom Lehrer vorgelegte Frage nicht beantworten, während sie gleich darauf der Lehrer selbst beantwortet. Weil der Träumende sich der Wahmehmungsorgane seines physischen Leibes nicht bedienen kann, ist er nicht imstande, die beiden Vorgänge auf sich, als denselben Menschen, zu beziehen. Also auch um sich selbst als ein bleibendes Ich zu erkennen, gehört für den Menschen zunächst die Ausrüstung mit äußeren Wahrnehmungsorganen. Nur dann, wenn sich der Mensch die Fähigkeit erworben hätte, auf andere Art als durch solche Wahrnehmungsorgane sich seines Ich bewusst zu werden, wäre auch außer seinem physischen Leibe das bleibende Ich für ihn wahrnehmbar. Solche Fähigkeiten hat das übersinnliche Bewusstsein zu erwerben, und es wird in dieser Schrift von den Mitteln dazu im weiteren die Rede sein.
[ 9 ] Auch der Tod tritt durch nichts anderes ein als durch eine Änderung im Zusammenhange der Glieder des Menschenwesens. Auch dasjenige, was in bezug darauf die übersinnliche Beobachtung ergibt, kann in seinen Wirkungen in der offenbaren Welt gesehen werden; und die unbefangene Urteilskraft wird durch die Betrachtung des äußeren Lebens auch hier die Mitteilungen der übersinnlichen Erkenntnis bestätigt finden. Doch ist für diese Tatsachen der Ausdruck des Unsichtbaren im Sichtbaren weniger offenliegend, und man hat größere Schwierigkeiten, um das Gewicht dessen voll zu empfinden, was in den Vorgängen des äußeren Lebens bestätigend für die Mitteilungen der übersinnlichen Erkenntnis auf diesem Gebiete spricht. Noch näher als für manches in dieser Schrift bereits Besprochene liegt es hier, diese Mitteilungen einfach für Phantasiegebilde zu erklären, wenn man sich der Erkenntnis verschließen will, wie im Sinnenfälligen der deutliche Hinweis auf das Übersinnliche enthalten ist.
[ 10 ] Während sich beim Übergang in den Schlaf der Astralleib nur aus seiner Verbindung mit dem Ätherleib und dem physischen Leibe löst, die letzteren jedoch verbunden bleiben, tritt mit dem Tode die Abtrennung des physischen Leibes vom Ätherleib ein. Der physische Leib bleibt seinen eigenen Kräften überlassen und muss deshalb als Leichnam zerfallen. Für den Ätherleib ist aber nunmehr mit dem Tode ein Zustand eingetreten, in dem er während der Zeit zwischen Geburt und Tod niemals war, bestimmte Ausnahmezustände abgerechnet, von denen noch gesprochen werden soll. Er ist nämlich jetzt mit seinem Astralleib vereinigt, ohne dass der physische Leib dabei ist. Denn nicht unmittelbar nach dem Eintritt des Todes trennen sich Ätherleib und Astralleib. Sie halten eine Zeitlang durch eine Kraft zusammen, von der leicht verständlich ist, dass sie vorhanden sein muss. Wäre sie nämlich nicht vorhanden, so könnte sich der Ätherleib gar nicht aus dem physischen Leibe herauslösen. Denn er wird mit diesem zusammengehalten: das zeigt der Schlaf, wo der Astralleib nicht imstande ist, diese beiden Glieder des Menschen auseinanderzureißen. Diese Kraft tritt beim Tode in Wirksamkeit. Sie löst den Ätherleib aus dem physischen heraus, so dass der erstere jetzt mit dem Astralleib verbunden ist. Die übersinnliche Beobachtung zeigt, dass diese Verbindung für verschiedene Menschen nach dem Tode verschieden ist. Die Dauer bemisst sich nach Tagen. Von dieser Zeitdauer soll hier vorläufig nur mitteilungsweise die Rede sein. — Später löst sich dann der Astralleib auch von seinem Ätherleib heraus und geht ohne diesen seine Wege weiter. Während der Verbindung der beiden Leiber ist der Mensch in einem Zustande, durch den er die Erlebnisse seines Astralleibes wahrnehmen kann. Solange der physische Leib da ist, muss mit der Loslösung des Astralleibes von ihm sogleich die Arbeit von außen beginnen, um die abgenutzten Organe zu erfrischen. Ist der physische Leib abgetrennt, so fällt diese Arbeit weg. Doch die Kraft, welche auf sie verwendet wird, wenn der Mensch schläft, bleibt nach dem Tode, und sie kann jetzt zu anderem verwendet werden. Sie wird nun dazu gebraucht, um die eigenen Vorgänge des Astralleibes wahrnehmbar zu machen. Eine am Äußeren des Lebens haftende Beobachtung mag immerhin sagen: das sind alles Behauptungen, die dem mit übersinnlicher Anschauung Begabten einleuchten; für einen andern Menschen sei aber keine Möglichkeit vorhanden, an ihre Wahrheit heranzudringen. Die Sache ist doch nicht so. Was die übersinnliche Erkenntnis auch auf diesem dem gewöhnlichen Anschauen entlegenen Gebiete beobachtet: es kann von der gewöhnlichen Urteilskraft, nachdem es gefunden ist, erfasst werden. Es muss diese Urteilskraft nur die Lebenszusammenhänge, die im Offenbaren vorliegen, in der rechten Art vor sich hinstellen. Vorstellen, Fühlen und Wollen stehen unter sich und mit den an der Außenwelt von dem Menschen gemachten Erlebnissen in einem solchen Verhältnis, dass sie unverständlich bleiben, wenn die Art ihrer offenbaren Wirksamkeit nicht als Ausdruck einer unoffenbaren genommen wird. Diese offenbare Wirksamkeit hellt sich für das Urteil erst auf, wenn sie in ihrem Verlauf im physischen Menschenleben als Ergebnis dessen angesehen werden kann, was die übersinnliche Erkenntnis für das nicht-physische feststellt. Man befindet sich dieser Wirksamkeit gegenüber ohne die übersinnliche Erkenntnis wie in einem finsteren Zimmer ohne Licht. Wie man die physischen Gegenstände der Umgebung erst im Lichte sieht, so wird, was durch das Seelenleben des Menschen sich abspielt, erst erklärbar durch die übersinnliche Erkenntnis. Während der Verbindung des Menschen mit seinem physischen Leibe tritt die äußere Welt in Abbildern ins Bewusstsein; nach der Ablegung dieses Leibes wird wahrnehmbar, was der Astralleib erlebt, wenn er durch keine physischen Sinnesorgane mit dieser Außenwelt verbunden ist. Neue Erlebnisse hat er zunächst nicht. Die Verbindung mit dem Ätherleibe hindert ihn daran, etwas Neues zu erleben. Was er aber besitzt, das ist die Erinnerung an das vergangene Leben. Diese lässt der noch vorhandene Ätherleib als ein umfassendes, lebensvolles Gemälde erscheinen. Das ist das erste Erlebnis des Menschen nach dem Tode. Er nimmt das Leben zwischen Geburt und Tod als eine vor ihm ausgebreitete Reihe von Bildern wahr. Während dieses Lebens ist die Erinnerung nur im Wachzustand vorhanden, wenn der Mensch mit seinem physischen Leib verbunden ist. Sie ist nur insoweit vorhanden, als dieser Leib dies zulässt. Der Seele geht nichts verloren von dem, was im Leben auf sie Eindruck macht. Wäre der physische Leib dazu ein vollkommenes Werkzeug: es müsste in jedem Augenblicke des Lebens möglich sein, dessen ganze Vergangenheit vor die Seele zu zaubern. Mit dem Tode hört dieses Hindernis auf. Solange der Ätherleib dem Menschen erhalten bleibt, besteht eine gewisse Vollkommenheit der Erinnerung. Sie schwindet aber in dem Maße dahin, in dem der Ätherleib die Form verliert, welche er während seines Aufenthaltes im physischen Leibe gehabt hat und welche dem physischen Leib ähnlich ist. Das ist ja auch der Grund, warum sich der Astralleib vom Ätherleib nach einiger Zeit trennt. Er kann nur so lange mit diesem vereint bleiben, als dessen dem physischen Leib entsprechende Form andauert. — Während des Lebens zwischen Geburt und Tod tritt eine Trennung des Ätherleibes nur in Ausnahmefällen und nur für kurze Zeit ein. Wenn der Mensch zum Beispiel eines seiner Glieder belastet, so kann ein Teil des Ätherleibes aus dem physischen sich abtrennen. Von einem Gliede, bei dem dies der Fall ist, sagt man, es sei «eingeschlafen». Und das eigentümliche Gefühl, das man dann empfindet, rührt von dem Abtrennen des Ätherleibes her. (Natürlich kann eine materialistische Vorstellungsart auch hier wieder das Unsichtbare in dem Sichtbaren leugnen und sagen: das alles rühre nur von der durch den Druck bewirkten physischen Störung her.) Die übersinnliche Beobachtung kann in einem solchen Falle sehen, wie der entsprechende Teil des Ätherleibes aus dem physischen herausrückt. Wenn nun der Mensch einen ganz ungewohnten Schreck oder dergleichen erlebt, so kann für einen großen Teil des Leibes für eine ganz kurze Zeit eine solche Abtrennung des Ätherleibes erfolgen. Es ist das dann der Fall, wenn der Mensch sich durch irgend etwas plötzlich dem Tode nahe sieht, wenn er zum Beispiel am Ertrinken ist oder bei einer Bergpartie ihm ein Absturz droht. Was Leute, die solches erlebt haben, erzählen, das kommt in der Tat der Wahrheit nahe und kann durch übersinnliche Beobachtung bestätigt werden. Sie geben an, dass ihnen in solchen Augenblicken ihr ganzes Leben wie in einem großen Erinnerungsbilde vor die Seele getreten ist. Es mag von vielen Beispielen, die hier angeführt werden könnten, nur auf eines hingewiesen werden, weil es von einem Manne herrührt, für dessen Vorstellungsart alles, was hier über solche Dinge gesagt wird, als eitel Phantasterei erscheinen muss. Es ist nämlich für den, welcher einige Schritte in die übersinnliche Beobachtung tut, immer sehr nützlich, wenn er sich mit den Angaben derjenigen bekannt macht, welche diese Wissenschaft für Phantasterei halten. Solchen Angaben kann nicht so leicht Befangenheit des Beobachters nachgesagt werden. (Die Geheimwissenschafter mögen nur recht viel von denen lernen, welche ihre Bestrebungen für Unsinn halten. Es braucht sie nicht irre zu machen, wenn ihnen von den letzteren in solcher Beziehung keine Gegenliebe entgegengebracht wird. Für die übersinnliche Beobachtung selbst bedarf es allerdings solcher Dinge nicht zur Bewahrheitung ihrer Ergebnisse. Sie will mit diesen Hinweisen auch nicht beweisen, sondern erläutern.) Der ausgezeichnete Kriminalanthropologe und auf vielen anderen Gebieten der Naturforschung bedeutsame Forscher Moritz Benedict erzählt in seinen Lebenserinnerungen den von ihm selbst erlebten Fall, dass er einmal, als er dem Ertrinken in einem Bade nahe war, wie in einem einzigen Bilde sein ganzes Leben in der Erinnerung vor sich gesehen habe. — Wenn andere die bei ähnlicher Gelegenheit erlebten Bilder anders beschreiben, ja sogar so, dass sie mit den Vorgängen ihrer Vergangenheit scheinbar wenig zu tun haben, so widerspricht das dem Gesagten nicht, denn die Bilder, welche in dem ganz ungewohnten Zustande der Abtrennung von dem physischen Leibe entstehen, sind manchmal in ihrer Beziehung zum Leben nicht ohne weiteres erklärlich. Eine richtige Betrachtung wird diese Beziehung aber immer erkennen. Auch ist es kein Einwand, wenn jemand zum Beispiel dem Ertrinken einmal nahe war und das geschilderte Erlebnis nicht gehabt hat. Man muss eben bedenken, dass dieses nur dann eintreten kann, wenn wirklich der Ätherleib von dem physischen getrennt ist und dabei der erstere mit dem Astralleib verbunden bleibt. Wenn durch den Schreck auch eine Lockerung des Ätherleibes und Astralleibes eintritt, dann bleibt das Erlebnis aus, weil dann wie im traumlosen Schlaf völlige Bewusstlosigkeit vorhanden ist.
[ 11 ] In einem Erinnerungsgemälde zusammengefasst erscheint in der ersten Zeit nach dem Tode die erlebte Vergangenheit. Nach der Trennung von dem Ätherleib ist nun der Astralleib für sich allein auf seiner weiteren Wanderung. Es ist unschwer einzusehen, dass in dem Astralleib alles das vorhanden bleibt, was dieser durch seine eigene Tätigkeit während seines Aufenthaltes im physischen Leibe zu seinem Besitz gemacht hat. Das Ich hat bis zu einem gewissen Grade das Geistselbst, den Lebensgeist und den Geistesmenschen herausgearbeitet. Soweit diese entwickelt sind, erhalten sie ihr Dasein nicht von dem, was als Organe in den Leibern vorhanden ist, sondern vom Ich. Und dieses Ich ist ja gerade dasjenige Wesen, welches keiner äußeren Organe zu seiner Wahrnehmung bedarf. Und es braucht auch keine solchen, um im Besitze dessen zu bleiben, was es mit sich selbst vereint hat. Man könnte einwenden: ja warum ist im Schlafe keine Wahrnehmung von diesem entwickelten Geistselbst, Lebensgeist und Geistesmenschen vorhanden? Sie ist deswegen nicht vorhanden, weil das Ich zwischen Geburt und Tod an den physischen Leib gekettet ist. Wenn es auch im Schlafe mit dem Astralleibe sich außerhalb dieses physischen Leibes befindet, so bleibt es doch mit diesem eng verbunden. Denn die Tätigkeit seines Astralleibes ist diesem physischen Leibe zugewandt. Dadurch ist das Ich mit seiner Wahrnehmung an die äußere Sinnenwelt verwiesen, kann somit die Offenbarungen des Geistigen in seiner unmittelbaren Gestalt nicht empfangen. Erst durch den Tod tritt diese Offenbarung an das Ich heran, weil dieses durch ihn frei wird von seiner Verbindung mit physischem und Ätherleib. In dem Augenblicke kann für die Seele eine andere Welt aufleuchten, in dem sie herausgezogen ist aus der physischen Welt, die im Leben ihre Tätigkeit an sich fesselt. — Nun gibt es Gründe, warum auch in diesem Zeitpunkte für den Menschen nicht alle Verbindung mit der äußeren Sinnenwelt aufhört. Es bleiben nämlich gewisse Begierden vorhanden, welche diese Verbindung aufrechterhalten. Es sind Begierden, welche sich der Mensch eben dadurch schafft, dass er sich seines Ich als des vierten Gliedes seiner Wesenheit bewusst ist. Diejenigen Begierden und Wünsche, welche aus der Wesenheit der drei niedrigen Leiber entspringen, können auch nur innerhalb der äußeren Welt wirken; und wenn diese Leiber abgelegt sind, dann hören sie auf. Hunger wird durch den äußeren Leib bewirkt; er schweigt, sobald dieser äußere Leib nicht mehr mit dem Ich verbunden ist. Hätte das Ich nun keine weiteren Begierden als diejenigen, welche seiner eigenen geistigen Wesenheit entstammen, so könnte es mit dem Eintritt des Todes volle Befriedigung aus der geistigen Welt schöpfen, in die es versetzt ist. Aber das Leben hat ihm noch andere Begierden gegeben. Es hat ein Verlangen in ihm entzündet nach Genüssen, die nur durch physische Organe befriedigt werden können, trotzdem sie selbst gar nicht aus dem Wesen dieser Organe selbst herkommen. Nicht nur die drei Leiber verlangen durch die physische Welt ihre Befriedigung, sondern das Ich selbst findet Genüsse innerhalb dieser Welt, für welche in der geistigen Welt überhaupt kein Gegenstand zur Befriedigung vorhanden ist. Zweierlei Wünsche gibt es für das Ich im Leben. Solche, die aus den Leibern herstammen, die also innerhalb der Leiber befriedigt werden müssen, die aber auch mit dem Zerfall der Leiber ihr Ende finden. Dann solche, die aus der geistigen Natur des Ich stammen. Solange das Ich in den Leibern ist, werden auch diese durch die leiblichen Organe befriedigt. Denn in den Offenbarungen der Organe des Leibes wirkt das verborgene Geistige. Und in allem, was die Sinne wahrnehmen, empfangen sie zugleich ein Geistiges. Dieses Geistige ist, wenn auch in anderer Form, auch nach dem Tode vorhanden. Alles, was das Ich von Geistigem innerhalb der Sinnenwelt begehrt, das hat es auch, wenn die Sinne nicht mehr da sind. Käme nun zu diesen zwei Arten von Wünschen nicht noch eine dritte hinzu, es würde der Tod nur einen Übergang bedeuten von Begierden, die durch Sinne befriedigt werden können, zu solchen, welche in der Offenbarung der geistigen Welt ihre Erfüllung finden. Diese dritte Art von Wünschen sind diejenigen, welche sich das Ich während seines Lebens in der Sinnenwelt erzeugt, weil es an ihr Gefallen findet auch insofern, als sich in ihr nicht das Geistige offenbart. — Die niedrigsten Genüsse können Offenbarungen des Geistes sein. Die Befriedigung, welche die Nahrungsaufnahme dem hungernden Wesen gewährt, ist eine Offenbarung des Geistes. Denn durch die Aufnahme von Nahrung wird das zustande gebracht, ohne welches das Geistige in einer gewissen Beziehung nicht seine Entwicklung finden könnte. Das Ich aber kann hinausgehen über den Genus, der durch diese Tatsache notwendig geboten ist. Es kann nach der wohlschmeckenden Speise Verlangen tragen, auch ganz abgesehen von dem Dienste, welcher durch die Nahrungsaufnahme dem Geiste geleistet wird. Dasselbe tritt für andere Dinge der Sinnenwelt ein. Es werden dadurch diejenigen Wünsche erzeugt, die in der Sinnenwelt niemals zum Vorschein gekommen wären, wenn nicht das menschliche Ich in diese eingegliedert worden wäre. Aber auch aus dem geistigen Wesen des Ich entspringen solche Wünsche nicht. Sinnliche Genüsse muss das Ich haben, solange es im Leibe lebt, auch insofern es geistig ist. Denn im Sinnlichen offenbart sich der Geist; und nichts anderes genießt das Ich als den Geist, wenn es sich in der Sinnenwelt dem hingibt, durch das des Geistes Licht hindurchleuchtet. Und es wird im Genusse dieses Lichtes bleiben, auch wenn die Sinnlichkeit nicht mehr das Mittel ist, durch das die Strahlen des Geistes hindurchgehen. Für solche Wünsche aber gibt es keine Erfüllung in der geistigen Welt, für die nicht schon im Sinnlichen der Geist lebt. Tritt der Tod ein, dann ist für diese Wünsche die Möglichkeit des Genusses abgeschnitten. Der Genus an einer wohlschmeckenden Speise kann nur dadurch herbeigeführt werden, dass die physischen Organe da sind, welche bei der Zuführung der Speise gebraucht werden: Gaumen, Zunge usw. Diese hat der Mensch nach Ablegung des physischen Leibes nicht mehr. Wenn aber das Ich noch Bedürfnis nach solchem Genus hat, so muss solches Bedürfnis unbefriedigt bleiben. Sofern dieser Genus dem Geiste entspricht, ist er nur so lange vorhanden, als die physischen Organe da sind. Sofern ihn aber das Ich erzeugt hat, ohne damit dem Geiste zu dienen, bleibt er nach dem Tode als Wunsch, der vergeblich nach Befriedigung dürstet. Was jetzt im Menschen vorgeht, davon lässt sich nur ein Begriff bilden, wenn man sich vorstellt, jemand leide brennenden Durst in einer Gegend, in der weit und breit kein Wasser zu finden ist. So geht es dem Ich, insofern es nach dem Tode die nicht ausgelöschten Begierden nach Genüssen der äußeren Welt hegt und keine Organe hat, sie zu befriedigen. Natürlich muss man den brennenden Durst, der als Vergleich mit dem Zustande des Ich nach dem Tode dient, sich ins Maßlose gesteigert denken und sich vorstellen, dass er ausgedehnt sei auf alle dann noch vorhandenen Begierden, für die jede Möglichkeit der Erfüllung fehlt. Der nächste Zustand des Ich besteht darin, sich frei zu machen von diesem Anziehungsband an die äußere Welt. Das Ich hat in sich eine Läuterung und Befreiung in dieser Beziehung herbeizuführen. Aus ihm muss alles herausgetilgt werden, was an Wünschen von ihm innerhalb des Leibes erzeugt worden ist und was in der geistigen Welt kein Heimatrecht hat. — Wie ein Gegenstand vom Feuer erfasst und verbrannt wird, so wird die geschilderte Begierdenwelt nach dem Tode aufgelöst und zerstört. Es eröffnet sich damit der Ausblick in jene Welt, welche die übersinnliche Erkenntnis als das «verzehrende Feuer des Geistes» bezeichnen kann. Von diesem «Feuer» wird eine Begierde erfasst, welche sinnlicher Art ist, aber dieses so ist, dass das Sinnliche nicht Ausdruck des Geistes ist. Man könnte solche Vorstellungen, wie sie in bezug auf diese Vorgänge die übersinnliche Erkenntnis geben muss, trostlos und furchtbar finden. Erschreckend könnte es erscheinen, dass eine Hoffnung, zu deren Befriedigung sinnliche Organe nötig sind, nach dem Tode sich in Hoffnungslosigkeit, dass ein Wunsch, den nur die physische Welt erfüllen kann, dann in brennende Entbehrung sich wandeln muss. Man kann eine solche Meinung nur so lange haben, als man nicht bedenkt, dass alle Wünsche und Begierden, die nach dem Tode von dem «verzehrenden Feuer» erfasst werden, im höheren Sinne nicht wohltätige, sondern zerstörende Kräfte im Leben darstellen. Durch solche Kräfte knüpft das Ich mit der Sinnenwelt ein festeres Band, als notwendig ist, um aus dieser selben Sinnenwelt alles dasjenige in sich aufzunehmen, was ihm frommt. Diese Sinnenwelt ist eine Offenbarung des hinter ihr verborgenen Geistigen. Das Ich könnte den Geist niemals in der Form genießen, in der er sich nur durch leibliche Sinne offenbaren kann, wenn es diese Sinne nicht benutzen wollte zum Genusse des Geistigen im Sinnlichen. Doch entzieht sich das Ich auch so viel von dem wahren geistigen Wirklichen in der Welt, als es von der Sinnenwelt begehrt, ohne dass der Geist dabei spricht. Wenn der sinnliche Genuss als Ausdruck des Geistes Erhöhung, Entwicklung des Ich bedeutet, so derjenige, der ein solcher Ausdruck nicht ist, Verarmung, Verödung desselben. Wird eine derartige Begierde in der Sinnenwelt befriedigt, so bleibt ihre verödende Wirkung auf das Ich deshalb doch vorhanden. Nur wird vor dem Tode diese zerstörende Wirkung für das Ich nicht sichtbar. Deshalb kann im Leben der Genuss nach solcher Begierde neue gleichartige Wünsche erzeugen. Und der Mensch wird gar nicht gewahr, dass er durch sich selbst sich in ein «verzehrendes Feuer» hüllt. Nach dem Tode wird nur sichtbar, was ihn auch schon im Leben umgibt; und durch das Sichtbarwerden erscheint dieses zugleich in seiner heilsamen, wohltätigen Folge. Wer einen Menschen lieb hat, wird doch nicht allein zu dem an ihm hingezogen, was durch die physischen Organe empfunden werden kann. Nur von diesem aber darf gesagt werden, dass es mit dem Tode der Wahrnehmung entzogen wird. Gerade das aber wird dann sichtbar an dem geliebten Menschen, zu dessen Wahrnehmung die physischen Organe nur das Mittel waren. Ja das einzige, was diese volle Sichtbarkeit hindert, ist dann das Vorhandensein derjenigen Begierde, die nur durch physische Organe befriedigt werden kann. Würde diese Begierde aber nicht ausgetilgt, so könnte die bewusste Wahrnehmung des geliebten Menschen nach dem Tode gar nicht eintreten. So betrachtet, verwandelt sich die Vorstellung des Furchtbaren und Trostlosen, das für den Menschen die Ereignisse nach dem Tode haben könnten, wie sie die übersinnliche Erkenntnis schildern muss, in diejenige des tief Befriedigenden und Trostreichen.
[ 12 ] Die nächsten Erlebnisse nach dem Tode sind nun in noch einer Beziehung durchaus verschieden von denen während des Lebens. Während der Läuterung lebt der Mensch gewissermaßen nach rückwärts. Er macht alles dasjenige noch einmal durch, was er im Leben seit der Geburt erfahren hat. Von den Vorgängen, die dem Tode unmittelbar vorausgingen, beginnt er und erlebt alles nochmals bis zur Kindheit in rückwärtiger Reihenfolge. Und dabei tritt ihm alles geistig vor Augen, was nicht aus der geistigen Natur des Ich während des Lebens entsprungen ist. Nur erlebt er auch dieses alles jetzt in umgekehrter Art. Ein Mensch, der zum Beispiel im sechzigsten Jahre gestorben ist und der aus einer zornigen Aufwallung heraus in seinem vierzigsten Jahre jemand körperlichen oder seelischen Schmerz zugefügt hat, wird dieses Ereignis noch einmal erleben, wenn er bei seiner rückgängigen Daseinswanderung nach dem Tod an der Stelle seines vierzigsten Jahres angelangt ist. Nur erlebt er da nicht die Befriedigung, die ihm im Leben geworden ist durch den Angriff auf den andern, sondern dafür den Schmerz, der durch ihn diesem andern zugefügt worden ist. Aus dem Obigen kann man aber auch zugleich ersehen, dass nur dasjenige von einem solchen Vorgange nach dem Tode als peinvoll wahrgenommen werden kann, was aus einer Begierde des Ich entsprungen ist, die nur der äußeren physischen Welt entstammt. In Wahrheit schädigt das Ich nämlich nicht nur den andern durch die Befriedigung einer solchen Begierde, sondern sich selbst; nur bleibt ihm diese eigene Schädigung während des Lebens unsichtbar. Nach dem Tode aber wird diese ganze schädigende Begierdenwelt dem Ich sichtbar. Und zu jedem Wesen und jedem Dinge fühlt sich dann das Ich hingezogen, an dem solch eine Begierde entzündet worden ist, damit sie im «verzehrenden Feuer» ebenso wieder ausgetilgt werden kann, wie sie entstanden ist. Erst wenn der Mensch bei seiner Rückwärtswanderung in dem Zeitpunkte seiner Geburt angelangt ist, sind alle derartigen Begierden durch das Läuterungsfeuer hindurchgegangen, und nichts hindert ihn von jetzt ab an der vollen Hingabe an die geistige Welt. Er betritt eine neue Daseinsstufe. Wie er im Tode den physischen Leib, bald danach den Ätherleib abgelegt hat, so zerfällt jetzt derjenige Teil des astralischen Leibes, der nur im Bewusstsein der äußeren physischen Welt leben kann. Für die übersinnliche Erkenntnis gibt es somit drei Leichname, den physischen, den ätherischen und den astralischen. Der Zeitpunkt, in dem der letztere von dem Menschen abgeworfen wird, ist dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Zeit der Läuterung etwa das Drittel von derjenigen beträgt, welche zwischen Geburt und Tod verflossen ist. Später, wenn auf Grund der Geheimwissenschaft der menschliche Lebenslauf betrachtet werden wird, kann erst die Ursache deutlich werden, warum dies so ist. Für die übersinnliche Beobachtung sind in der menschlichen Umwelt fortwährend Astralleichname vorhanden, die abgeworfen sind von Menschen, welche aus dem Läuterungszustande in ein höheres Dasein übergehen. Es ist dies genau so, wie für die physische Wahrnehmung dort physische Leichname entstehen, wo Menschen wohnen.
[ 13 ] Nach der Läuterung tritt für das Ich ein völlig neuer Bewusstseinszustand ein. Während ihm vor dem Tode die äußeren Wahrnehmungen zufließen mussten, damit auf sie das Licht des Bewusstseins fallen könne, strömt jetzt gleichsam von innen eine Welt, die zum Bewusstsein gelangt. Auch zwischen Geburt und Tod lebt das Ich in dieser Welt. Nur kleidet sich letztere da in die Offenbarungen der Sinne; und nur da, wo das Ich mit Außerachtlassung aller Sinneswahrnehmung sich selbst in seinem «innersten Allerheiligsten» wahrnimmt, kündigt sich das in unmittelbarer Gestalt an, was sonst nur in dem Schleier des Sinnlichen erscheint. So wie die Wahrnehmung des Ich im Innern vor dem Tode vor sich geht, so von innen heraus offenbart sich die geistige Welt in ihrer Fülle nach dem Tode und nach der Läuterung. Eigentlich ist diese Offenbarung schon sogleich nach dem Ablegen des Ätherleibes da; doch legt sich vor sie hin wie eine verfinsternde Wolke die Welt der Begierden, welche noch der äußeren Welt zugekehrt sind. Es ist da, wie wenn sich in eine selige Welt geistigen Erlebens die schwarzen dämonischen Schatten mischten, welche aus den im «Feuer sich verzehrenden» Begierden entstehen. Ja nicht bloß Schatten, sondern wirkliche Wesenheiten sind jetzt diese Begierden; das zeigt sich sofort, wenn die physischen Organe vom Ich entfernt sind und dieses dadurch wahrnehmen kann, was geistiger Art ist. Als Zerrbilder und Karikaturen dessen erscheinen diese Wesen, was dem Menschen vorher durch die sinnliche Wahrnehmung bekannt geworden ist. Die übersinnliche Beobachtung hat von dieser Welt des Läuterungsfeuers zu sagen, dass sie bewohnt ist von Wesen, deren Aussehen dem geistigen Auge grauenhaft und schmerzerregend sein kann, deren Lust die Vernichtung zu sein scheint und deren Leidenschaft auf ein Böses sich richtet, gegen welches das Böse der Sinnenwelt unbedeutend wirkt. Was der Mensch an den gekennzeichneten Begierden in diese Welt mitbringt, das erscheint für diese Wesenheiten wie eine Nahrung, durch welche ihre Gewalten stets aufs neue Kräftigung und Stärkung erhalten. Das Bild, das so von einer für die Sinne unwahrnehmbaren Welt entworfen wird, kann dem Menschen weniger unglaublich erscheinen, wenn er einmal mit einem unbefangenen Blicke einen Teil der Tierwelt betrachtet. Was ist für den geistigen Blick ein grausam herumziehender Wolf? Was offenbart sich indem, was die Sinne an ihm wahrnehmen? Nichts anderes als eine Seele, die in Begierden lebt und sich durch diese betätigt. Man kann die äußere Gestalt des Wolf es eine Verkörperung dieser Begierden nennen. Und hätte der Mensch keine Organe, um diese Gestalt wahrzunehmen, er müsste das Dasein des entsprechenden Wesens doch anerkennen, wenn sich dessen Begierden unsichtbar in ihren Wirkungen zeigten, wenn also eine für das Auge unsichtbare Gewalt herumschliche, durch welche alles das geschehen könnte, was durch den sichtbaren Wolf geschieht. Nun, die Wesen des Läuterungsfeuers sind zwar nicht für das sinnliche, sondern nur für das übersinnliche Bewusstsein vorhanden; ihre Wirkungen liegen aber offenkundig da: sie bestehen in der Zerstörung des Ich, wenn ihnen dieses Nahrung gibt. Diese Wirkungen werden deutlich sichtbar, wenn sich der begründete Genus zu Unmäßigkeit und Ausschweifung steigert. Denn was den Sinnen wahrnehmbar ist, würde auch das Ich nur insoweit reizen, als der Genus in seiner Wesenheit begründet ist. Das Tier wird nur durch dasjenige in der Außenwelt zum Verlangen getrieben, wonach seine drei Leiber begehren. Der Mensch hat höhere Genüsse, weil zu den drei Leibesgliedern noch das vierte, das Ich, hinzukommt. Wenn aber nun das Ich nach einer solchen Befriedigung verlangt, die seinem Wesen nicht zur Erhaltung und Förderung, sondern zur Zerstörung dient, so kann ein solches Verlangen weder die Wirkung seiner drei Leiber noch diejenige seiner eigenen Natur sein, sondern nur diejenige von Wesenheiten, welche den Sinnen verborgen bleiben ihrer wahren Gestalt nach, die aber gerade an die höhere Natur des Ich sich heranmachen können und es zu Begierden zu reizen vermögen, die nicht mit der Sinnlichkeit zusammenhängen, doch aber nur durch diese befriedigt werden können. Es sind eben Wesen vorhanden, welche Leidenschaften und Begierden zu ihrer Nahrung haben, die von schlimmerer Art als alle tierischen sind, weil sie nicht im Sinnlichen sich ausleben, sondern das Geistige ergreifen und dieses in das sinnliche Feld herunterziehen. Die Gestalten solcher Wesen sind deshalb für den geistigen Blick hässlicher, grauenhafter als die Gestalten der wildesten Tiere, in denen sich doch nur Leidenschaften verkörpern, welche im Sinnlichen begründet sind; und die zerstörenden Kräfte dieser Wesen überragen maßlos alle Zerstörungswut, welche in der sinnlich wahrnehmbaren Tierwelt vorhanden ist. Die übersinnliche Erkenntnis muss auf diese Art den Blick des Menschen weiten als auf eine Welt von Wesen, die in gewisser Beziehung niedriger steht als die sichtbare zerstörungbringende Tierwelt.
[ 14 ] Wenn der Mensch nach dem Tode durch diese Welt hindurchgegangen ist, dann findet er sich einer Welt gegenüber, welche Geistiges enthält und die auch nur ein Verlangen in ihm erzeugt, das im Geistigen seine Befriedigung findet. Aber auch jetzt unterscheidet der Mensch zwischen dem, was zu seinem Ich gehört, und dem, was die Umgebung dieses Ich — man kann auch sagen dessen geistige Außenwelt — bildet. Nur strömt ihm das, was er von dieser Umgebung erlebt, so zu, wie während seines Aufenthaltes im Leibe ihm die Wahrnehmung seines eigenen Ich zuströmt. Während also die Umgebung des Menschen im Leben zwischen Geburt und Tod durch die Organe seiner Leiber zu ihm spricht, dringt nach Ablegung aller Leiber die Sprache der neuen Umgebung unmittelbar in das «innerste Heiligtum» des Ich. Die ganze Umgebung des Menschen ist jetzt erfüllt von Wesenheiten, welche gleicher Art sind mit seinem Ich, denn nur ein Ich hat zu einem Ich den Zutritt. So wie Mineralien, Pflanzen und Tiere den Menschen in der Sinnenwelt umgeben und diese zusammensetzen, so ist er nach dem Tode von einer Welt umgeben, die aus Wesenheiten geistiger Art zusammengesetzt ist. Doch bringt der Mensch etwas, was in ihr nicht seine Umgebung ist, in diese Welt mit; es ist dasjenige, was das Ich innerhalb der Sinnenwelt erlebt hat. Zunächst trat die Summe dieser Erlebnisse unmittelbar nach dem Tode, solange der Ätherleib noch mit dem Ich verbunden war, als ein umfassendes Erinnerungsgemälde auf. Der Ätherleib selbst wird dann zwar abgelegt, aber von dem Erinnerungsgemälde bleibt etwas als unvergänglicher Besitz des Ich zurück. Wie wenn man aus allen Erlebnissen und Erfahrungen, die zwischen Geburt und Tod an den Menschen herangetreten sind, einen Extrakt, einen Auszug machen würde, so nimmt sich das aus, was da zurückbleibt. Es ist dies das geistige Erträgnis des Lebens, die Frucht desselben. Dieses Erträgnis ist geistiger Art. Es enthält alles, was sich Geistiges durch die Sinne offenbart. Aber ohne das Leben in der Sinnenwelt hätte es nicht zustande kommen können. Diese geistige Frucht der Sinnenwelt empfindet nach dem Tode das Ich als das, was jetzt seine eigene, seine Innenwelt ist und womit es die Welt betritt, die aus Wesen besteht, die sich offenbaren, wie nur sein Ich sich selbst in seinem tiefsten Innern offenbaren kann. Wie ein Pflanzenkeim, der ein Extrakt der ganzen Pflanze ist, sich aber nur entfaltet, wenn er in eine andere Welt, in die Erde, versenkt wird, so entfaltet sich jetzt dasjenige, was das Ich aus der Sinnenwelt mitbringt, wie ein Keim, auf den die geistige Umgebung wirkt, die ihn nunmehr aufgenommen hat. Die Wissenschaft des Übersinnlichen kann allerdings nur Bilder geben, wenn sie schildern soll, was in diesem «Geisterland» vorgeht; doch können diese Bilder solche sein, welche dem übersinnlichen Bewusstsein sich als wahre Wirklichkeit darstellen, wenn es die entsprechenden, dem sinnlichen Auge unsichtbaren Ereignisse verfolgt. Was da zu schildern ist, kann durch Vergleiche mit der Sinnenwelt anschaulich gemacht werden. Denn trotzdem es ganz geistiger Art ist, hat es Ähnlichkeit in gewisser Beziehung mit der sinnlichen Welt. Wie zum Beispiel in dieser eine Farbe erscheint, wenn dieser oder jener Gegenstand auf das Auge wirkt, so stellt sich vor das Ich im «Geisterlande» ein Erlebnis wie das durch eine Farbe hin, wenn auf dasselbe ein Wesen wirkt. Nur wird dieses Erlebnis so hervorgebracht, wie innerhalb des Lebens zwischen Geburt und Tod nur die Wahrnehmung des Ich im Innern bewirkt werden kann. Es ist nicht, wie wenn das Licht von außen herein in den Menschen fiele, sondern so, wie wenn ein anderes Wesen unmittelbar auf das Ich wirkte und dieses veranlasste, sich diese Wirkung in einem Farbenbilde vorzustellen. So finden alle Wesen der geistigen Umgebung des Ich in einer farbenstrahlenden Welt ihren Ausdruck. Da sie eine andere Art der Entstehung haben, sind selbstverständlich diese Farbenerlebnisse der geistigen Welt auch von etwas anderem Charakter als die an den sinnlichen Farben. Auch für andere Eindrücke, welche der Mensch von der Sinnenwelt empfängt, muss Ähnliches gesagt werden. Am ähnlichsten den Eindrücken dieser Sinnenwelt sind nun aber die Töne der geistigen Welt. Und je mehr sich der Mensch einlebt in diese Welt, desto mehr wird sie für ihn ein in sich bewegtes Leben, das sich mit den Tönen und ihrer Harmonie in der sinnlichen Wirklichkeit vergleichen lässt. Nun fühlt er die Töne nicht als etwas, das von außen an ein Organ herankommt, sondern wie eine Macht, die durch sein Ich in die Welt hinausströmt. Er fühlt den Ton, wie in der Sinnenwelt sein eigenes Sprechen oder Singen; nur weiß er in der geistigen Welt, dass diese Töne, die aus ihm strömen, zugleich die Kundgebungen anderer Wesenheiten sind, die durch ihn sich in die Welt ergießen. Eine noch höhere Kundgebung im «Geisterland» findet statt, wenn der Ton zum «geistigen Wort» wird. Dann strömt durch das Ich nicht nur das bewegte Leben eines andern geistigen Wesens, sondern ein solches Wesen selbst teilt sein Inneres diesem Ich mit. Und ohne das Trennende, das ein jedes Beisammensein in der Sinnenwelt haben muss, leben dann, wenn das Ich von dem «geistigen Wort» durchströmt wird, zwei Wesen ineinander. Und in dieser Art ist wirklich das Beisammensein von dem Ich mit andern geistigen Wesen nach dem Tode. Vor das übersinnliche Bewusstsein treten drei Gebiete des Geisterlandes, welche sich vergleichen lassen mit drei Teilen der physischen Sinnenwelt. Das erste Gebiet ist gewissermaßen das «feste Land» der geistigen Welt, das zweite das «Meeresund Flussgebiet» und das dritte der «Luftkreis». — Was auf der Erde physische Formen annimmt, so dass es durch physische Organe wahrgenommen werden kann, das wird seiner geistigen Wesenheit nach in dem ersten Gebiet des «Geisterlandes» wahrgenommen. Von einem Kristall zum Beispiel kann da die Kraft wahrgenommen werden, welche seine Form bildet. Nur verhält sich dasjenige, was sich da offenbart, wie ein Gegensatz dessen, was in der Sinnenwelt auftritt. Der Raum, welcher in der letzteren Welt von der Gesteinsmasse ausgefüllt ist, erscheint für den geistigen Blick wie eine Art Hohlraum; aber rings um diesen Hohlraum wird die Kraft gesehen, welche die Form des Steines bildet. Eine Farbe, welche der Stein in der Sinnenwelt hat, erscheint in der geistigen wie das Erlebnis der Gegenfarbe; also ein rot gefärbter Stein ist vom Geisterland aus gesehen wie grünlich, ein grüner wie rötlich erlebt usw. Auch die anderen Eigenschaften erscheinen in ihrem Gegensatze. Wie Steine, Erdmassen und dergleichen das feste Land — das Kontinentalgebiet — der sinnlichen Welt bilden, so setzen die dargestellten Gebilde das «feste Land» der geistigen zusammen. — Alles, was innerhalb der Sinnenwelt Leben ist, das ist Meeresgebiet im Geistigen. Dem sinnlichen Blick erscheint das Leben in seinen Wirkungen bei Pflanzen, Tieren und Menschen. Dem geistigen Auge ist das Leben ein strömendes Wesen, das wie Meere und Flüsse das Geisterland durchsetzt. Besser noch ist der Vergleich mit dem Kreislauf des Blutes im Leibe. Denn während sich die Meere und Flüsse in der Sinnenwelt als unregelmäßig verteilt darstellen, herrscht in der Verteilung des strömenden Lebens im Geisterland eine gewisse Regelmäßigkeit, wie im Blutkreislauf. Eben dieses «strömende Leben» wird gleichzeitig wie ein geistiges Tönen wahrgenommen. — Das dritte Gebiet des Geisterlandes ist dessen «Luftkreis». Was in der Sinnenwelt als Empfindung auftritt, das ist im Geistgebiet so alles durchdringend vorhanden, wie die Luft auf der Erde vorhanden ist. Ein Meer von strömender Empfindung hat man sich da vorzustellen. Leid und Schmerz, Freude und Entzücken strömen in diesem Gebiete wie Wind und Sturm im Luftkreis der sinnlichen Welt. Man denke an eine Schlacht, die auf Erden geschlagen wird. Da stehen einander nicht bloß Gestalten der Menschen gegenüber, die das sinnliche Auge sehen kann, sondern Gefühle stehen gegen Gefühle, Leidenschaften gegen Leidenschaften; Schmerzen erfüllen das Schlachtfeld ebenso wie Menschengestalten. Alles, was da lebt an Leidenschaft, an Schmerz, an Siegesfreude, das ist nicht nur vorhanden, insofern es sich in sinnlich-wahrnehmbaren Wirkungen offenbart; es kommt dem geistigen Sinne zum Bewusstsein als Vorgang des Luftkreises im Geisterland. Ein solches Ereignis ist im Geistigen wie ein Gewitter in der physischen Welt. Und die Wahrnehmung dieser Ereignisse lässt sich vergleichen mit dem Hören der Worte in der physischen Welt. Deshalb sagt man: wie die Luft die Erdenwesen einhüllt und durchdringt, so die «wehenden geistigen Worte» die Wesen und Vorgänge des Geisterlandes.
[ 15 ] Und weitere Wahrnehmungen sind noch möglich in dieser geistigen Welt. Auch das ist hier vorhanden, was sich mit der Wärme und mit dem Lichte der physischen Welt vergleichen lässt. Was wie die Wärme die irdischen Dinge und Wesen alles im Geisterlande durchdringt, das ist die Gedankenwelt selbst. Nur sind die Gedanken da als lebende, selbständige Wesen vorzustellen. Was der Mensch in der offenbaren Welt als Gedanken erfasst, das ist wie ein Schatten dessen, was als Gedankenwesen im Geisterlande lebt. Man denke sich den Gedanken, wie er im Menschen vorhanden ist, herausgehoben aus diesem Menschen und als tätiges, handelndes Wesen mit einem eigenen Innenleben begabt, so hat man eine schwache Verbildlichung dessen, was das vierte Gebiet des Geisterlandes erfüllt. Was der Mensch als Gedanken in seiner physischen Welt zwischen Geburt und Tod wahrnimmt, das ist nur die Offenbarung der Gedankenwelt, so wie sie durch die Werkzeuge der Leiber sich bilden kann. Aber alles, was der Mensch an solchen Gedanken hegt, die eine Bereicherung in der physischen Welt bedeuten, das hat aus diesem Gebiete heraus seinen Ursprung. Man braucht bei solchen Gedanken nicht bloß an die Ideen der großen Erfinder, der genialen Personen. zu denken, sondern man kann bei jedem Menschen sehen, wie er «Einfälle» hat, die er nicht bloß der Außenwelt verdankt, sondern durch die er diese Außenwelt selbst umgestaltet. Soweit Gefühle, Leidenschaften in Betracht kommen, zu denen die Veranlassung in der äußeren Welt liegt, so weit sind diese Gefühle usw. in das dritte Gebiet des Geisterlandes zu versetzen; alles das aber, was in der Menschenseele so leben kann, dass der Mensch ein Schaffender wird, dass er umgestaltend und befruchtend auf seine Umwelt wirkt: das wird in seiner ureigenen, wesenhaften Gestalt offenbar im vierten Felde der geistigen Welt. — Was in der fünften Region vorhanden ist, darf mit dem physischen Licht verglichen werden. Es ist in seiner ureigenen Gestalt sich offenbarende Weisheit. Wesen, welche Weisheit in ihre Umgebung ergießen, wie die Sonne Licht auf physische Wesen, gehören diesem Gebiete an. Was beschienen wird von dieser Weisheit, das zeigt sich in seinem wahren Sinn und seiner Bedeutung für die geistige Welt, wie ein physisches Wesen seine Farbe zeigt, wenn es vom Lichte beschienen wird. — Es gibt noch höhere Gebiete des Geisterlandes; sie werden ihre Darstellung an einer späteren Stelle dieser Schrift finden. In diese Welt wird nach dem Tode das Ich eingesenkt mit dem Erträgnis, das es aus dem sinnlichen Leben mitbringt. Und dieses Erträgnis ist noch vereinigt mit jenem Teile des Astralleibes, der am Ende der Läuterungszeit nicht abgeworfen wird. Es fällt ja nur jener Teil ab, welcher nach dem Tode mit seinen Begierden und Wünschen dem physischen Leben zugewandt war. Die Einsenkung des Ich mit dem, was es aus der sinnlichen Welt sich zugeeignet hat, in die geistige Welt, lässt sich mit dem Einbetten eines Samenkorns in die reifende Erde vergleichen. Wie dieses Samenkorn die Stoffe und Kräfte aus seiner Umgebung heranzieht, um sich zu einer neuen Pflanze zu entfalten, so ist Entfaltung und Wachstum das Wesen des in die geistige Welt eingesenkten Ich. — In demjenigen, was ein Organ wahrnimmt, liegt auch die Kraft verborgen, durch welche dieses Organ selbst gebildet wird. Das Auge nimmt das Licht wahr. Aber ohne das Licht gäbe es kein Auge. Wesen, welche ihr Leben im Finstern zubringen, bilden an sich keine Werkzeuge zum Sehen aus. So aber ist der ganze leibliche Mensch herausgeschaffen aus den verborgenen Kräften dessen, was durch die Glieder der Leiber wahrgenommen wird. Der physische Leib ist durch die Kräfte der physischen Welt, der Ätherleib durch diejenigen der Lebenswelt auferbaut, und der Astralleib ist aus der astralen Welt herausgestaltet. Wenn nun das Ich in das Geisterland versetzt ist, so treten ihm eben jene Kräfte entgegen, die für die physische Wahrnehmung verborgen bleiben. Was im ersten Gebiet des Geisterlandes sichtbar wird, das sind die geistigen Wesenheiten, welche den Menschen immer umgeben und die seinen physischen Leib auch aufgebaut haben. In der physischen Welt nimmt der Mensch also nichts anderes wahr als die Offenbarungen derjenigen geistigen Kräfte, welche seinen eigenen physischen Leib auch gestaltet haben. Nach dem Tode ist er eben mitten unter diesen gestaltenden Kräften selbst, die sich ihm jetzt in ihrer eigenen, vorher verborgenen Gestalt zeigen. Ebenso ist er durch die zweite Region inmitten der Kräfte, aus denen sein Ätherleib besteht; in der dritten Region strömen ihm die Mächte zu, aus denen sein Astralleib herausgegliedert ist. Auch die höheren Gebiete des Geisterlandes lassen ihm jetzt das zufließen, aus dem er im Leben zwischen Geburt und Tod aufgebaut ist.
[ 16 ] Diese Wesenheiten der geistigen Welt wirken nunmehr zusammen mit dem, was der Mensch als Frucht aus dem vorigen Leben mitgebracht hat und was jetzt zum Keime wird. Und durch dieses Zusammenwirken wird der Mensch zunächst als geistiges Wesen aufs neue aufgebaut. Im Schlafe bleiben der physische Leib und der Ätherleib bestehen; der Astralleib und das Ich sind zwar außerhalb dieser beiden, aber noch mit ihnen verbunden. Was diese in solchem Zustande an Einflüssen aus der geistigen Welt empfangen, kann nur dienen, die während des Wachens erschöpften Kräfte wiederherzustellen. Nachdem aber der physische Leib und der Ätherleib abgelegt sind und nach der Läuterungszeit auch jene Teile des Astralleibes, die noch durch ihre Begierden mit der physischen Welt zusammenhängen, wird nun alles, was aus der geistigen Welt dem Ich zuströmt, nicht nur zum Verbesserer, sondern zum Neugestalter. Und nach einer, gewissen Zeit, über welche in späteren Teilen dieser Schrift zu sprechen ist, hat sich um das Ich herum ein Astralleib gegliedert, der wieder in einem solchen Ätherleib und physischen Leib wohnen kann, wie sie dem Menschen zwischen Geburt und Tod eigen sind. Der Mensch kann wieder durch eine Geburt gehen und in einem erneuten Erdendasein erscheinen, das nun in sich eingegliedert hat die Frucht des früheren Lebens. Bis zu der Neugestaltung eines Astralleibes ist der Mensch Zeuge seines Wiederaufbaues. Da sich ihm die Mächte des Geisterlandes nicht durch äußere Organe, sondern von innen aus offenbaren, wie das eigene Ich im Selbstbewusstsein, so kann er diese Offenbarung wahrnehmen, solange sein Sinn noch nicht auf eine äußere Wahrnehmungswelt gerichtet ist. Von dem Augenblicke an, wo der Astralleib neugestaltet ist, kehrt sich dieser Sinn aber nach außen. Der Astralleib verlangt nunmehr wieder einen äußeren Ätherleib und physischen Körper. Er wendet sich damit ab von den Offenbarungen des Innern. Deshalb gibt es jetzt einen Zwischenzustand, in dem der Mensch in Bewusstlosigkeit versinkt. Das Bewusstsein kann erst wieder in der physischen Welt auftauchen, wenn die zur physischen Wahrnehmung notwendigen Organe gebildet sind. In dieser Zeit, in welcher das durch innere Wahrnehmung erleuchtete Bewusstsein aufhört, beginnt sich nun der neue Ätherleib an den Astralleib anzugliedern, und der Mensch kann dann auch wieder in einen physischen Leib einziehen. An diesen beiden Angliederungen könnte sich mit Bewusstsein nur ein solches Ich beteiligen, welches von sich aus die im Ätherleib und physischen Leib verborgen schaffenden Kräfte, den Lebensgeist und den Geistesmenschen, erzeugt hat. Solange der Mensch nicht soweit ist, müssen Wesenheiten, die weiter in ihrer Entwicklung sind als er selbst, diese Angliederung leiten. Der Astralleib wird von solchen Wesenheiten zu einem Elternpaare geleitet, so dass er mit dem entsprechenden Ätherleib und physischen Leibe begabt werden kann. — Bevor die Angliederung des Ätherleibes sich vollzieht, ereignet sich nun etwas außerordentlich Bedeutsames für den wieder ins physische Dasein tretenden Menschen. Dieser hat ja in seinem vorigen Leben störende Mächte geschaffen, die sich bei der Rückwärtswanderung nach dem Tode gezeigt haben. Man nehme das früher erwähnte Beispiel wieder auf. Der Mensch habe aus einer Zornaufwallung heraus in dem vierzigsten Jahre seines vorigen Lebens jemand Schmerz zugefügt. Nach dem Tode trat ihm dieser Schmerz des andern als eine störende Kraft für die Entwicklung des eigenen Ich entgegen. Und so ist es mit allen solchen Vorfällen des vorigen Lebens. Beim Wiedereintritt in das physische Leben stehen nun diese Hindernisse der Entwicklung wieder vor dem Ich. Wie mit dem Eintritte des Todes eine Art Erinnerungsgemälde vor dem menschlichen Ich gestanden hat, so jetzt ein Vorblick auf das kommende Leben. Wieder sieht der Mensch ein solches Gemälde, das jetzt all die Hindernisse zeigt, welche der Mensch hinwegzuräumen hat, wenn seine Entwicklung weitergehen soll. Und das, was er so sieht, wird der Ausgangspunkt von Kräften, welche der Mensch ins neue Leben mitnehmen muss. Das Bild des Schmerzes, den er dem andern zugefügt hat, wird zur Kraft, die das Ich, wenn es nun wieder ins Leben eintritt, antreibt, diesen Schmerz wieder gutzumachen. So wirkt also das vorgängige Leben bestimmend auf das neue. Die Taten dieses neuen Lebens sind durch jene des vorigen in einer gewissen Weise verursacht. Diesen gesetzmäßigen Zusammenhang eines früheren Daseins mit einem späteren hat man als das Gesetz des Schicksals anzusehen; man ist gewohnt geworden, es mit dem aus der morgenländischen Weisheit entlehnten Ausdruck «Karma» zu bezeichnen.
[ 17 ] Der Aufbau eines neuen Leibeszusammenhanges ist jedoch nicht die einzige Tätigkeit, welche dem Menschen zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt obliegt. Während dieser Aufbau geschieht, lebt der Mensch außerhalb der physischen Welt. Diese schreitet aber während dieser Zeit in ihrer Entwicklung weiter. In verhältnismäßig kurzen Zeiträumen ändert die Erde ihr Antlitz. Wie hat es vor einigen Jahrtausenden in den Gebieten ausgesehen, welche gegenwärtig von Deutschland eingenommen werden? Wenn der Mensch in einem neuen Dasein auf der Erde erscheint, sieht diese in der Regel niemals wieder so aus, wie sie zur Zeit seines letzten Lebens ausgesehen hat. Während er von der Erde abwesend war, hat alles mögliche sich geändert. In dieser Änderung des Antlitzes der Erde wirken nun auch verborgene Kräfte. Sie wirken aus derselben Welt heraus, in welcher sich der Mensch nach dem Tode befindet. Und er selbst muss an dieser Umgestaltung der Erde mitwirken. Er kann es nur unter der Anführung von höheren Wesenheiten, solange er sich nicht durch die Erzeugung von Lebensgeist und Geistesmenschen ein klares Bewusstsein über den Zusammenhang zwischen dem Geistigen und dessen Ausdruck im Physischen angeeignet hat. Aber er schafft mit an der Umwandlung der irdischen Verhältnisse. Man kann sagen, die Menschen gestalten während der Zeit vom Tode bis zu einer neuen Geburt die Erde so um, dass deren Verhältnisse zu dem passen, was sich in ihnen selbst entwickelt hat. Wenn wir einen Erdenfleck betrachten in einem bestimmten Zeitpunkt und dann nach langer Zeit wieder in einem völlig veränderten Zustande, so sind die Kräfte, welche diese Veränderung herbeigeführt haben, bei den toten Menschen. In solcher Art stehen diese auch zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt mit der Erde in Verbindung. Das übersinnliche Bewusstsein sieht in allem physischen Dasein die Offenbarung eines verborgenen Geistigen. Für die physische Beobachtung wirkt auf die Umgestaltung der Erde das Licht der Sonne, die Wandelungen des Klimas usw. Für die übersinnliche Beobachtung waltet in dem Lichtstrahl, der von der Sonne auf die Pflanze fällt, die Kraft der toten Menschen. Dieser Beobachtung kommt zum Bewusstsein, wie Menschenseelen die Pflanzen umschweben, wie sie den Erdboden wandeln und ähnliches. Nicht bloß sich selbst, nicht allein der Vorbereitung zu seinem eigenen neuen Erdendasein ist der Mensch nach dem Tode zugewandt. Nein, er ist da berufen, an der äußeren Welt geistig zu schaffen, wie er im Leben zwischen Geburt und Tod physisch zu schaffen berufen ist.
[ 18 ] Es wirkt aber nicht nur das Leben des Menschen vom Geisterlande aus auf die Verhältnisse der physischen Welt ein, sondern umgekehrt auch die Tätigkeit im .physischen Dasein hat ihre Wirkungen in der geistigen Welt. Ein Beispiel kann veranschaulichen, was in dieser Beziehung geschieht. Es besteht ein Band der Liebe zwischen Mutter und Kind. Von der Anziehung zwischen beiden, die in Kräften der Sinnenwelt wurzelt, geht diese Liebe aus. Aber sie wandelt sich im Laufe der Zeiten. Aus dem sinnlichen Bande wird immer mehr ein geistiges. Und dieses geistige Band wird nicht nur für die physische Welt gewoben, sondern auch für das Geisterland. Auch mit andern Verhältnissen ist es so. Was in der physischen Welt durch Geistwesen gesponnen wird, das bleibt in der geistigen Welt bestehen. Freunde, die sich im Leben innig verbunden haben, gehören auch im Geisterlande zusammen; und nach Ablegung der Leiber sind sie noch in einer viel innigeren Gemeinschaft als im physischen Leben. Denn als Geister sind sie so füreinander da, wie das oben bei den Offenbarungen geistiger Wesen an andere durch das Innere beschrieben worden ist. Und ein Band, das zwischen zwei Menschen gewoben worden ist, führt sie auch in einem neuen Leben wieder zusammen. Im wahrsten Sinne des Wortes muss daher von einem Wiederfinden der Menschen nach dem Tode gesprochen werden.
[ 19 ] Was sich einmal mit dem Menschen vollzogen hat, von der Geburt bis zum Tode und von da bis zu einer neuen Geburt, das wiederholt sich. Der Mensch kehrt immer wieder auf die Erde zurück, wenn die Frucht, die er in einem physischen Leben erworben hat, im Geisterlande zur Reife gekommen ist. Doch besteht nicht eine Wiederholung ohne Anfang und Ende, sondern der Mensch ist einmal aus anderen Daseinsformen in solche übergetreten, welche in der gekennzeichneten Art verlaufen, und er wird in der Zukunft zu andern übergehen. Der Ausblick auf diese Übergangsstufen wird sich ergeben, wenn im Sinne des übersinnlichen Bewusstseins im folgenden die Entwicklung des Weltalls im Zusammenhang mit dem Menschen geschildert wird.
[ 20 ] Die Vorgänge zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt sind für die äußere sinnliche Beobachtung natürlich noch verborgener als dasjenige, was dem offenbaren Dasein zwischen Geburt und Tod als Geistiges zugrunde liegt. Diese sinnliche Beobachtung kann für diesen Teil der verborgenen Welt die Wirkungen nur da sehen, wo sie ins physische Dasein eintreten. Es muss für sie die Frage sein, ob der Mensch, der durch die Geburt ins Dasein tritt, etwas mitbringt von dem, was die übersinnliche Erkenntnis von Vorgängen zwischen einem vorigen Tode und der Geburt beschreibt. Wenn jemand ein Schneckenhaus findet, in dem nichts von einem Tiere zu merken ist, so wird er doch nur anerkennen, dass dieses Schneckenhaus durch die Tätigkeit eines Tieres entstanden ist, und kann nicht glauben, dass es sich durch bloße physische Kräfte in seiner Form zusammengefügt hat. Ebenso kann jemand, der den Menschen im Leben betrachtet und etwas findet, was aus diesem Leben nicht stammen kann, vernünftigerweise zugeben, dass es von dem stammt, was die Wissenschaft des Übersinnlichen beschreibt, wenn dadurch ein erklärendes Licht auf das sonst Unerklärliche fällt. So könnte auch da die sinnlich-verständige Beobachtung aus den sichtbaren Wirkungen die unsichtbaren Ursachen begreiflich finden. Und wer dies Leben völlig unbefangen betrachtet, dem wird sich auch das mit jeder neuen Beobachtung immer mehr als das Richtige ergeben. Nur handelt es sich darum, den richtigen Gesichtspunkt zu finden, um die Wirkungen im Leben zu beobachten. Wo liegen zum Beispiel die Wirkungen dessen, was die übersinnliche Erkenntnis als Vorgänge der Läuterungszeit schildert? Wie tritt die Wirkung dessen zutage, was der Mensch nach dieser Läuterungszeit im rein geistigen Gebiete, nach den Angaben der geistigen Forschung, erleben soll?
[ 21 ] Rätsel drängen sich jeder ernsten, tiefen Lebensbetrachtung auf diesem Felde genug auf. Man sieht den einen Menschen in Not und Elend geboren, mit nur geringen Begabungen ausgestattet, so dass er durch diese mit seiner Geburt gegebenen Tatsachen zu einem erbärmlichen Dasein vorherbestimmt erscheint. Der andere wird von dem ersten Augenblicke seines Daseins an von sorgenden Händen und Herzen gehegt und gepflegt; es entfalten sich bei ihm glänzende Fähigkeiten; er ist zu einem fruchtbaren, befriedigenden Dasein veranlagt. Zwei entgegengesetzte Gesinnungen können sich gegenüber solchen Fragen geltend machen. Die eine wird an dem haften wollen, was die Sinne wahrnehmen und der an diese Sinne sich haltende Verstand begreifen kann. Darin, dass ein Mensch in das Glück, der andere ins Unglück hineingeboren wird, wird diese Gesinnung keine Frage sehen. Sie wird, wenn sie auch nicht das Wort «Zufall» gebrauchen will, doch nicht daran denken, irgendeinen gesetzmäßigen Zusammenhang anzunehmen, der solches bewirkt. Und in bezug auf die Anlagen, die Begabungen wird eine solche Vorstellungsart sich an das halten, was von Eltern, Voreltern und sonstigen Ahnen «vererbt» ist. Sie wird es ablehnen, die Ursachen in geistigen Vorgängen zu suchen, welche der Mensch selbst vor seiner Geburt — abseits von der Vererbungslinie seiner Ahnen — durchgemacht hat und durch die er sich seine Anlagen und Begabungen gestaltet hat. — Eine andere Gesinnung wird sich durch eine solche Auffassung unbefriedigt fühlen. Sie wird sagen: es geschieht doch auch in der offenbaren Welt nichts an einem bestimmten Orte oder in einer bestimmten Umgebung, ohne dass man Ursachen voraussetzen müsste, warum dies der Fall ist. Mag auch in vielen Fällen der Mensch diese Ursachen noch nicht erforscht haben, vorhanden sind sie. Eine Alpenblume wächst nicht in der Tiefebene. Ihre Natur hat etwas, was sie mit der Alpengegend zusammenbringt. Ebenso muss es in einem Menschen etwas geben, was ihn in eine bestimmte Umgebung hineingeboren werden lässt. Mit Ursachen, die bloß in der physischen Welt liegen, ist es dabei nicht getan. Sie nehmen sich für den tiefer Denkenden so aus, als wenn die Tatsache, dass jemand einem andern einen Schlag versetzt habe, nicht mit den Gefühlen des ersteren, sondern mit dem physischen Mechanismus seiner Hand erklärt werden sollte. — Ebenso unbefriedigt muss sich diese Gesinnung mit aller Erklärung aus der bloßen «Vererbung» bei Anlagen und Begabungen zeigen. Man mag von ihr immerhin sagen: sehet, wie sich bestimmte Anlagen in Familien forterben. In zwei und einem halben Jahrhundert haben sich die musikalischen Anlagen in den Gliedern der Familie Bach vererbt. Aus der Familie Bernoulli sind acht Mathematiker hervorgegangen, die zum Teil in ihrer Kindheit zu ganz anderen Berufen bestimmt waren. Aber die «vererbten» Begabungen haben sie immer zu dem Familienberuf hingetrieben. Man mag ferner darauf verweisen, wie man durch eine genaue Erforschung der Vorfahrenreihe einer Persönlichkeit zeigen könne, dass in der einen oder der anderen Weise sich die Begabung dieser Persönlichkeit bei den Ahnen gezeigt habe und dass sie sich nur als eine Summierung vererbter Anlagen darstellt. — Wer die angedeutete zweite Art der Gesinnung hat, wird solche Tatsachen gewiss nicht außer acht lassen; sie können ihm aber nicht sein, was sie dem sind, der sich nur auf die Vorgänge in der Sinnenwelt bei seinen Erklärungen stützen will. Der erstere wird darauf hinweisen, dass sich ebensowenig die vererbten Anlagen von selbst zur Gesamtpersönlichkeit summieren können, wie sich die Metallteile der Uhr zu dieser von selbst formieren. Und wenn man ihm einwendet, dass ja doch das Zusammenwirken der Eltern die Kombination der Anlagen bewirken könne, also dieses gleichsam an die Stelle des Uhrmachers trete, so wird er erwidern: Sehet mit Unbefangenheit auf das völlig Neue hin, das mit jeder Kindes-Persönlichkeit gegeben ist; dieses kann nicht von den Eltern kommen, einfach deshalb nicht, weil es in diesen nicht vorhanden ist.c4Dass die persönlichen Gaben des Menschen, wenn sie dem Gesetz der bloßen «Vererbung» unterlägen, sich nicht am Ende, sondern am Anfange einer Blutsgemeinschaft zeigen müssten, könnte als Ausspruch natürlich leicht missverstanden werden. Man könnte sagen, ja, sie können sich da doch nicht zeigen, denn sie müssen sich ja eben erst entwickeln. Aber dies ist kein Einwand; denn wenn man beweisen will, dass etwas von einem vorhergehenden vererbt ist, so muss man zeigen, wie sich an dem Nachkommen das wiederfindet, was vorher schon da war. Zeigte sich nun, dass etwas am Anfange einer Blutsgenossenschaft da wäre, was im weiteren Verlaufe wiedergefunden würde, so könnte man von Vererbung sprechen. Man kann es aber nicht, wenn am Ende etwas auftritt, was vorher nicht da war. Die Umkehrung des Satzes oben sollte nur zeigen, dass der Vererbungsgedanke ein unmöglicher ist.
[ 22 ] Ein unklares Denken kann auf diesem Gebiet viel Verwirrung stiften. Am schlimmsten ist es, wenn von den Trägern der ersten Gesinnung diejenigen der letzteren als Gegner dessen hingestellt werden, was doch auf «sichere Tatsachen» sich stützt. Aber es braucht diesen letzteren gar nicht in den Sinn zu kommen, diesen Tatsachen ihre Wahrheit oder ihren Wert abzusprechen. Sie sehen zum Beispiel durchaus auch, dass sich eine bestimmte Geistesanlage, ja Geistesrichtung in einer Familie «forterbt» und dass gewisse Anlagen, in einem Nachkommen summiert und kombiniert, eine bedeutende Persönlichkeit ergeben. Sie vermögen durchaus zuzugeben, wenn man ihnen sagt, dass der bedeutendste Name selten an der Spitze, sondern am Ende einer Blutsgenossenschaft steht. Man sollte es ihnen aber nicht übel vermerken, wenn sie gezwungen sind, daraus ganz andere Gedanken zu bilden als diejenigen, welche nur beim SinnlichTatsächlichen stehenbleiben wollen. Den letzteren kann eben erwidert werden: Gewiss zeigt ein Mensch die Merkmale seiner Vorfahren, denn das Geistig-Seelische, welches durch die Geburt in das physische Dasein tritt, entnimmt seine Leiblichkeit dem, was ihm die Vererbung gibt. Damit ist aber noch nichts gesagt, als dass ein Wesen die Eigentümlichkeiten des Mittels trägt, in das es untergetaucht ist. Es ist gewiss ein sonderbarer — trivialer — Vergleich, aber der Unbefangene wird ihm seine Berechtigung nicht absprechen, wenn gesagt wird: dass ein Menschenwesen sich in die Eigenschaften seiner Vorfahren eingehüllt zeigt, beweist für die Herkunft der persönlichen Eigenschaften dieses Wesens ebensowenig, wie es für die innere Natur eines Menschen etwas beweist, wenn er nass ist, weil er ins Wasser gefallen ist. Und weiter kann gesagt werden: wenn der bedeutendste Name am Ende einer Blutsgenossenschaft steht, so zeigt dies, dass der Träger dieses Namens jene Blutsgenossenschaft brauchte, um sich den Leib zu gestalten, den er für die Entfaltung seiner Gesamtpersönlichkeit notwendig hatte. Es beweist aber gar nichts für die «Vererbung» des Persönlichen selbst: ja es beweist für eine gesunde Logik diese Tatsache das gerade Gegenteil. Wenn sich nämlich die persönlichen Gaben vererbten, so müssten sie am Anfange einer Blutsgenossenschaft stehen und sich dann von hier ausgehend auf die Nachkommen vererben. Da sie aber am Ende stehen, so ist das gerade ein Zeugnis dafür, dass sie sich nicht vererben.
[ 23 ] Nun soll nicht in Abrede gestellt werden, dass auf Seite derjenigen, welche von einer geistigen Verursachung im Leben sprechen, nicht minder zur Verwirrung beigetragen wird. Von ihnen wird oft viel zu sehr im allgemeinen, im unbestimmten geredet. Es ist gewiss mit der Behauptung zu vergleichen: die Metallteile einer Uhr haben sich selbst zu dieser zusammengestellt, wenn gesagt wird: aus den vererbten Merkmalen summiere sich die Persönlichkeit eines Menschen. Aber es muss auch zugegeben werden, dass es mit vielen Behauptungen in bezug auf eine geistige Welt sich nicht anders verhält, als wenn jemand sagte: die Metallteile der Uhr können sich selbst nicht so zusammenfügen, dass durch die Zusammenfügung die Zeiger vorwärtsgeschoben werden, also muss irgend etwas Geistiges da sein, welches dieses Vorwärtsschieben besorgt. Gegenüber einer solchen Behauptung baut allerdings der auf einen weit besseren Grund, welcher sagt: Ach, ich kümmere mich nicht weiter um solche «mystische» Wesen, welche die Zeiger vorwärtsschieben; ich suche die mechanischen Zusammenhänge kennenzulernen, durch welche das Vorwärtsschieben der Zeiger bewirkt wird. Es handelt sich eben gar nicht darum, nur zu wissen, hinter einem Mechanischen, zum Beispiel der Uhr, stehe ein Geistiges (der Uhrmacher), sondern bedeutungsvoll kann es allein sein, die Gedanken kennenzulernen, die im Geiste des Uhrmachers der Verfertigung der Uhr vorangegangen sind. Man kann diese Gedanken im Mechanismus wiederfinden.
[ 24 ] Alles bloße Träumen und Phantasieren von dem Übersinnlichen bringt nur Verwirrung. Denn es ist ungeeignet, die Gegner zu befriedigen. Diese sind ja im Recht, wenn sie sagen, solches Hinweisen auf übersinnliche Wesen im allgemeinen fördert in nichts das Verständnis der Tatsachen. Gewiss, solche Gegner mögen auch gegenüber den bestimmten Angaben der Geisteswissenschaft das gleiche sagen. Dann aber kann hingewiesen werden darauf, wie sich im offenbaren Leben die Wirkungen der verborgenen geistigen Ursachen zeigen. Es kann gesagt werden: man nehme einmal an, es sei richtig, was die Geistesforschung durch Beobachtung festgestellt haben will, dass der Mensch nach seinem Tode eine Läuterungszeit durchgemacht habe und dass er während derselben seelisch erlebt habe, welches Hemmnis in der fortschreitenden Entwicklung eine bestimmte Tat sei, die er in einem vorhergegangenen Leben vollführt hat. Während er dieses erlebt hat, bildete sich in ihm der Trieb, die Folgen dieser Tat zu verbessern. Diesen Trieb bringt er sich für ein neues Leben mit. Und das Vorhandensein dieses Triebes bildet jenen Zug in seinem Wesen, der ihn an einen Platz stellt, von dem aus die Verbesserung möglich ist. Man beachte eine Gesamtheit solcher Triebe, und man hat eine Ursache für die schicksalsgemäße Umgebung, in welche ein Mensch hineingeboren wird. — Ebenso kann es mit einer anderen Annahme gehen. Man setze wieder voraus, es sei richtig, was von der Geisteswissenschaft gesagt wird, die Früchte eines verflossenen Lebens werden dem geistigen Keim des Menschen einverleibt, und das Geisterland, in dem sich dieser zwischen Tod und neuem Leben befindet, sei das Gebiet, in dem diese Früchte reifen, um, zu Anlagen und Fähigkeiten umgestaltet, in einem neuen Leben zu erscheinen und die Persönlichkeit so zu gestalten, dass sie als die Wirkung dessen erscheint, was in einem vorigen Leben gewonnen worden ist. — Wer diese Voraussetzungen macht und mit ihnen unbefangen das Leben betrachtet, dem wird sich zeigen, dass durch sie alles Sinnlich-Tatsächliche in seiner vollen Bedeutung und Wahrheit anerkannt werden kann, dass aber zugleich alles das begreiflich wird, was bei einem bloßen Bauen auf die sinnlichen Tatsachen für denjenigen immer unbegreiflich bleiben muss, dessen Gesinnung nach der geistigen Welt hin gerichtet ist. Und vor allem, es wird jede Unlogik von der Art verschwinden, wie die früher angedeutete eine ist: weil der bedeutendste Name am Ende einer Blutsgenossenschaft steht, müsse der Träger seine Begabung ererbt haben. Das Leben wird logisch begreiflich durch die von der Geisteswissenschaft ermittelten übersinnlichen Tatsachen.
[ 25 ] Der gewissenhafte Wahrheitsucher, der ohne eigene Erfahrung in der übersinnlichen Welt sich zurechtfinden will in den Tatsachen, wird aber auch noch einen gewichtigen Einwand erheben können. Es kann nämlich geltend gemacht werden, dass es unzulässig sei, einfach aus dem Grunde das Dasein irgendwelcher Tatsachen anzunehmen, weil man sich dadurch etwas erklären könne, was sonst unerklärlich ist. Solch ein Einwand ist sicherlich für denjenigen ganz bedeutungslos, welcher die entsprechenden Tatsachen aus der übersinnlichen Erfahrung kennt. Und in den folgenden Teilen dieser Schrift wird der Weg angegeben, der gegangen werden kann, um nicht nur andere geistige Tatsachen, die hier beschrieben werden, sondern auch das Gesetz der geistigen Verursachung als eigenes Erlebnis kennenzulernen. Aber für jeden, welcher diesen Weg nicht antreten will, kann der obige Einwand eine Bedeutung haben. Und dasjenige, was wider ihn gesagt werden kann, ist auch für einen solchen wertvoll, der den angedeuteten Weg selbst zu gehen entschlossen ist. Denn wenn es jemand in der richtigen Art aufnimmt, dann ist es selbst der beste erste Schritt, der auf diesem Wege gemacht werden kann. — Es ist nämlich durchaus wahr; bloß weil man sich etwas dadurch erklären kann, was sonst unerklärlich bleibt, soll man etwas nicht annehmen, von dessen Dasein man sonst kein Wissen hat. Aber in dem Falle mit den angeführten geistigen Tatsachen liegt die Sache doch noch anders. Wenn man sie annimmt, so hat das nicht nur die intellektuelle Folge, dass man durch sie das Leben begreiflich findet, sondern man erlebt durch die Aufnahme dieser Voraussetzungen in seine Gedanken noch etwas ganz anderes. Man denke sich den folgenden Fall: Es widerfährt jemand etwas, das in ihm recht peinliche Empfindungen hervorruft. Er kann sich nun in zweifacher Art dazu stellen. Er kann den Vorfall als etwas erleben, was ihn peinlich berührt, und sich der peinlichen Empfindung hingeben, vielleicht sogar in Schmerz versinken. Er kann sich aber auch anders dazu stellen. Er kann sagen: In Wahrheit habe ich selbst in einem vergangenen Leben in mir die Kraft gebildet, welche mich vor diesen Vorfall gestellt hat; ich habe in Wirklichkeit mir selbst die Sache zugefügt. Und er kann nun alle die Empfindungen in sich erregen, welche ein solcher Gedanke zur Folge haben kann. Selbstverständlich muss der Gedanke mit dem allervollkommensten Ernste und mit aller möglichen Kraft erlebt werden, wenn er eine solche Folge für das Empfindungsund Gefühlsleben haben soll. Wer solches zustande bringt, für den wird sich eine Erfahrung einstellen, welche sich am besten durch einen Vergleich veranschaulichen lässt. Zwei Menschen — so wolle man annehmen — bekämen eine Siegellackstange in die Hand. Der eine stelle intellektuelle Betrachtungen an über die «innere Natur» der Stange. Diese Betrachtungen mögen sehr klug sein; wenn sich diese «innere Natur» durch nichts zeigt, mag ihm ruhig jemand erwidern: das sei Träumerei. Der andere aber reibt den Siegellack mit einem Tuchlappen, und er zeigt dann, dass die Stange kleine Körperchen anzieht. Es ist ein gewichtiger Unterschied zwischen den Gedanken, die durch des ersten Menschen Kopf gegangen sind und ihn zu den Betrachtungen angeregt haben, und denen des zweiten. Des ersten Gedanken haben keine tatsächliche Folge; diejenigen des zweiten aber haben eine Kraft, also etwas Tatsächliches, aus seiner Verborgenheit hervorgelockt. — So ist es nun auch mit den Gedanken eines Menschen, der sich vorstellt, er habe die Kraft, mit einem Ereignis zusammenzukommen, durch ein früheres Leben selbst in sich gepflanzt. Diese bloße Vorstellung regt in ihm eine wirkliche Kraft an, durch die er in einer ganz andern Art dem Ereignis begegnen kann, als wenn er diese Vorstellung nicht hegt. Es geht ihm dadurch ein Licht auf über die notwendige Wesenheit dieses Ereignisses, das er sonst nur als einen Zufall anerkennen könnte. Und er wird unmittelbar einsehen: ich habe den rechten Gedanken gehabt, denn dieser Gedanke hatte die Kraft, die Tatsache mir zu enthüllen. Wiederholt jemand solche innere Vorgänge, so werden sie fortgesetzt zu einem Mittel innerer Kraftzufuhr, und sie erweisen so ihre Richtigkeit durch ihre Fruchtbarkeit. Und diese Richtigkeit zeigt sich, nach und nach, kräftig genug. In geistiger, seelischer und auch physischer Beziehung wirken solche Vorgänge gesundend, ja in jeder Beziehung fördernd auf das Leben ein. Der Mensch wird gewahr, dass er sich dadurch in einer richtigen Art in den Lebenszusammenhang hineinstellt, während er bei Beachtung nur des einen Lebens zwischen Geburt und Tod sich einem Irrwahn hingibt. Der Mensch wird seelisch stärker durch das gekennzeichnete Wissen. — Einen solchen rein inneren Beweis von der geistigen Verursachung kann sich ein jeder allerdings nur selbst in seinem Innenleben verschaffen. Aber es kann ihn auch ein jeder haben. Wer ihn sich nicht verschafft hat, kann seine Beweiskraft allerdings nicht beurteilen. Wer ihn sich verschafft hat, der kann ihn aber auch kaum mehr anzweifeln. Man braucht sich auch gar nicht zu verwundern, dass dies so ist. Denn was so ganz und gar mit demjenigen zusammenhängt, was des Menschen innerste Wesenheit, seine Persönlichkeit ausmacht, von dem ist es nur natürlich, dass es auch nur im innersten Erleben genügend bewiesen werden kann. — Vorbringen kann man dagegen allerdings nicht, dass eine solche Angelegenheit, weil sie solchem inneren Erlebnis entspricht, ein jeder mit sich selbst abmachen müsse, und dass sie nicht Sache einer Geisteswissenschaft sein könne. Gewiss ist, dass ein jeder selbst das Erlebnis haben muss, wie ein jeder selbst den Beweis eines mathematischen Satzes einsehen muss. Aber der Weg, auf dem das Erlebnis erreicht werden kann, ist für alle Menschen gültig, wie die Methode, einen mathematischen Satz zu beweisen, für alle gültig ist.
[ 26 ] Nicht in Abrede soll gestellt werden, dass — von den übersinnlichen Beobachtungen natürlich abgesehen — der eben angeführte Beweis durch die krafthervorbringende Gewalt der entsprechenden Gedanken der einzige ist, der jeder unbefangenen Logik standhält. Alle anderen Erwägungen sind gewiss sehr bedeutsam; aber sie werden doch alle etwas haben, an dem ein Gegner Angriffspunkte finden kann. Wer allerdings sich genug unbefangenen Blick angeeignet hat, der wird schon in der Möglichkeit und Tatsächlichkeit der Erziehung bei dem Menschen etwas finden, was logisch wirkende Beweiskraft dafür hat, dass ein geistiges Wesen sich in der leiblichen Hülle zum Dasein ringt. Er wird das Tier mit dem Menschen vergleichen und sich sagen: bei dem ersteren treten die für dasselbe maßgebenden Eigenschaften und Befähigungen mit der Geburt als etwas in sich Bestimmtes auf, das deutlich zeigt, wie es durch die Vererbung vorgezeichnet ist und sich an der Außenwelt entfaltet. Man sehe, wie das junge Küchlein Lebensverrichtungen von Geburt an in bestimmter Art vollzieht. An den Menschen aber tritt durch die Erziehung mit seinem Innenleben etwas in ein Verhältnis, was ohne alle Beziehung zu einer Vererbung stehen kann. Und er kann in der Lage sein, die Wirkungen solcher äußeren Einflüsse sich anzueignen. Wer erzieht, der weiß, dass solchen Einflüssen vom Innern des Menschen Kräfte entgegenkommen müssen; ist das nicht der Fall, dann ist alle Schulung und Erziehung bedeutungslos. Für den unbefangenen Erzieher stellt sich sogar ganz scharf die Grenze hin zwischen den vererbten Anlagen und jenen inneren Kräften des Menschen, welche durch diese Anlagen hindurchleuchten und welche aus früheren Lebensläufen herrühren. Sicherlich kann man für solche Dinge nicht so «gewichtige» Beweise anführen, wie für gewisse physikalische Tatsachen durch die Waage. Aber dafür sind diese Dinge eben die Intimitäten des Lebens. Und für den, der Sinn dafür hat, sind auch solche nicht handgreifliche Belege beweisend; sogar beweisender als die handgreifliche Wirklichkeit. Dass man ja auch Tiere dressieren kann, sie also gewissermaßen durch Erziehung Eigenschaften und Fähigkeiten annehmen, ist für den, der auf das Wesentliche zu schauen vermag, kein Einwand. Denn abgesehen davon, dass sich in der Welt allerorten Übergänge finden, verschmelzen die Ergebnisse der Dressur bei einem Tiere keineswegs in gleicher Art mit seinem persönlichen Wesen wie beim Menschen. Man betont ja sogar, wie die Fähigkeiten, welche den Haustieren im Zusammenleben mit dem Menschen andressiert werden, sich vererben, das heißt sofort gattungsmäßig, nicht persönlich wirken. Darwin beschreibt, wie Hunde apportieren, ohne dazu angelernt zu sein oder es gesehen zu haben. Wer wollte ein gleiches von der menschlichen Erziehung behaupten?
[ 27 ] Nun gibt es Denker, welche durch ihre Beobachtungen über die Meinung hinauskommen, dass der Mensch durch die rein vererbten Kräfte von außen zusammengefügt sei. Sie erheben sich bis zu dem Gedanken, dass ein geistiges Wesen, eine Individualität, dem leiblichen Dasein vorangehe und dieses gestalte. Aber viele von ihnen finden doch nicht die Möglichkeit, zu begreifen, dass es wiederholte Erdenleben gibt, und dass in dem Zwischendasein zwischen den Leben die Früchte der vorigen mitgestaltende Kräfte sind. Es sei aus der Reihe solcher Denker einer angeführt. Immanuel Hermann Fichte, der Sohn des großen Fichte, führt in seiner «Anthropologie» seine Beobachtungen an, die ihn (Seite 528) zu folgendem zusammenfassenden Urteil bringen: 3Brockhaus, Leipzig 1860 «Die Eltern sind nicht die Erzeuger in vollständigem Sinne: den organischen Stoff bieten sie dar, und nicht bloß diesen, sondern zugleich jenes Mittlere, Sinnlich-Gemütliche, welches sich in Temperament, in eigentümlicher Gemütsfärbung, in bestimmter Spezifikation der Triebe und dergleichen zeigt, als deren gemeinschaftliche Quelle die ‹Phantasie› in jenem weitern, von uns nachgewiesenen Sinn sich ergeben hat. In allen diesen Elementen der Persönlichkeit ist die Mischung und eigentümliche Verbindung der Elternseelen unverkennbar; diese daher für ein bloßes Produkt der Zeugung zu erklären, ist vollkommen begründet, noch dazu, wenn, wofür wir uns entscheiden mussten, die Zeugung als wirklicher Seelenvorgang aufgefasst wird. Aber der eigentliche, schließende Mittelpunkt der Persönlichkeit fehlt hier gerade; denn bei tiefer eindringender Beobachtung ergibt sich, dass auch jene gemütlichen Eigentümlichkeiten nur eine Hülle und ein Werkzeugliches sind, um die eigentlich geistigen idealen Anlagen des Menschen in sich zu fassen, geeignet, sie zu fördern in ihrer Entwicklung oder zu hemmen, keineswegs aber fähig, sie aus sich entstehen zu lassen.» Und weiter wird da gesagt: «Jeder präexistiert nach seiner geistigen Grundgestalt; denn geistig betrachtet gleicht kein Individuum dem andern, sowenig als die eine Tierspezies einer der übrigen» (Seite 532). Diese Gedanken greifen nur so weit, dass sie in die physische Leiblichkeit des Menschen eintreten lassen eine geistige Wesenheit. Da deren gestaltende Kräfte aber nicht aus Ursachen früherer Leben hergeleitet werden, so müsste jedesmal, wenn eine Persönlichkeit ersteht, eine solche geistige Wesenheit aus einem göttlichen Urgrunde hervorgehen. Unter dieser Voraussetzung bestände aber keine Möglichkeit, die Verwandtschaft zu erklären, die ja besteht zwischen den sich aus dem menschlichen Innern herausringenden Anlagen und dem, was von der äußeren irdischen Umgebung im Laufe des Lebens an dieses Innere herandringt. Das menschliche Innere, das für jeden einzelnen Menschen aus einem göttlichen Urgrunde stammte, müsste ganz fremd gegenüberstehen dem, was ihm im irdischen Leben gegenübertritt. Nur dann wird das — wie es ja tatsächlich ist — nicht der Fall sein, wenn dieses menschliche Innere mit dem Äußern bereits verbunden war, wenn es nicht zum ersten Male in diesem lebt. Der unbefangene Erzieher kann klar die Wahrnehmung machen: ich bringe aus den Ergebnissen des Erdenlebens an meinen Zögling etwas heran, was zwar seinen bloß vererbten Eigenschaften fremd ist, was ihn aber doch so anmutet, als ob er bei der Arbeit, aus welcher diese Ergebnisse stammen, schon dabei gewesen wäre. Nur die wiederholten Erdenleben im Zusammenhang mit den von der Geistesforschung dargelegten Tatsachen im geistigen Gebiet zwischen den Erdenleben: nur dies alles kann eine befriedigende Erklärung des allseitig betrachteten Lebens der gegenwärtigen Menschheit geben. — Ausdrücklich wird hier gesagt: der «gegenwärtigen» Menschheit. Denn die geistige Forschung ergibt, dass allerdings einmal der Kreislauf der Erdenleben begonnen hat und dass damals andere Verhältnisse als gegenwärtig für das in die leibliche Hülle eintretende geistige Wesen des Menschen bestanden haben. In den folgenden Kapiteln wird auf diesen urzeitlichen Zustand des Menschenwesens zurückgegangen. Wenn dadurch aus den Ergebnissen der Geisteswissenschaft heraus wird gezeigt worden sein, wie dieses Menschenwesen seine gegenwärtige Gestalt im Zusammenhang mit der Erdentwicklung erhalten hat, wird auch noch genauer darauf hingedeutet werden können, wie der geistige Wesenskern des Menschen aus übersinnlichen Welten in die leiblichen Hüllen eindringt, und wie das geistige Verursachungsgesetz, das «menschliche Schicksal», sich heranbildet.
Sleep and death
[ 1 ] One cannot penetrate the essence of waking consciousness without observing the state through which man passes during sleep; and one cannot come to grips with the riddle of life without considering death. For a man in whom there is no feeling of the importance of supersensible knowledge, objections to it may arise from the way in which it conducts its contemplations of sleep and death. This knowledge can appreciate the motives from which such misgivings arise. For it is nothing incomprehensible when someone says that man exists for the active, effective life and that his work is based on devotion to it. And immersion in states such as sleep and death can only arise from a sense of idle reverie and lead to nothing other than empty fantasy. People can easily see in the rejection of such "fantasy" the expression of a healthy soul and in the devotion to such "idle reveries" something morbid, which may only be suitable for people who lack vitality and joie de vivre and who are not capable of "true creation". It would be wrong to dismiss such a judgment out of hand as incorrect. For it has a certain kernel of truth in it; it is a quarter truth that must be supplemented by the other three quarters that belong to it. And you only make someone who understands one quarter quite well but has no idea about the other three quarters suspicious if you fight against the one correct quarter. It must be admitted that contemplating what sleep and death conceal is pathological if it leads to a weakening, to a turning away from true life. And it is no less true that much of what has always been called secret science in the world and what is currently practiced under this name has an unhealthy, anti-life character. But this unhealthy character does not arise from true supersensible knowledge. The true facts are rather as follows. Just as man cannot always be awake, so he cannot get along with the real conditions of life in its entirety without what the supersensible is able to give him. Life continues in sleep, and the forces that work and create in waking life draw their strength and refreshment from what sleep gives them. So it is with what man can observe in the manifest world. The realm of the world is wider than the field of this observation. And what man recognizes in the visible must be supplemented and fertilized by what he is able to know about the invisible worlds. A person who does not repeatedly draw strength from the slack forces of sleep must lead his life to destruction; likewise, an observation of the world that is not fertilized by the knowledge of the hidden must lead to desolation. And it is similar with "death". Living beings are subject to death so that new life can arise. It is precisely the knowledge of the supersensible that sheds clear light on Goethe's beautiful sentence: "Nature invented death in order to have plenty of life." 1"Death is her artifice to have much life" (Die Natur, Fragment) Just as there could be no life in the ordinary sense without death, so there can be no real knowledge of the visible world without insight into the supersensible. All cognition of the visible must be immersed again and again in the invisible in order to develop. Thus it is evident that the science of the supersensible makes the life of revealed knowledge possible in the first place; it never weakens life when it emerges in its true form; it strengthens it and makes it fresh and healthy again and again when it, dependent on itself, has made itself weak and ill.
[ 2 ] When man sinks into sleep, the context in his limbs changes. That which lies in the sleeping person's resting place contains the physical body and the etheric body, but not the astral body and not the ego. Because the etheric body remains connected with the physical body in sleep, the life effects continue. For at the moment when the physical body would be left to itself, it would have to disintegrate. But what is extinguished in sleep is the imagination, suffering and pleasure, joy and sorrow, the ability to express a conscious will, and similar facts of existence. But the astral body is the carrier of all this. For an unbiased judgment, the opinion that in sleep the astral body is destroyed with all pleasure and suffering, with the whole world of imagination and will, is of course out of the question. It is present in a different state. For the human ego and the astral body not only to be filled with pleasure and suffering and all the other things mentioned, but also to have a conscious perception of them, it is necessary for the astral body to be connected with the physical body and the etheric body. In waking it is this, in sleeping it is not. It has pulled itself out of it. It has taken on a different kind of existence than the one it has during its connection with the physical body and etheric body. It is now the task of cognition of the supersensible to observe this other kind of existence in the astral body. For observation in the outer world, the astral body disappears in sleep; the supersensible view now has to follow it in its life until it again takes possession of the physical body and etheric body on awakening. As in all cases in which it is a question of recognizing the hidden things and processes of the world, supersensible observation is necessary in order to find the real facts of the sleep state in their own form; but once it has been expressed what can be found through this, then it is readily comprehensible to a truly unbiased mind. For the processes of the hidden world show themselves in their effects in the revealed world. If one sees how that which is indicated by supersensible observation makes the sensible processes intelligible, then such a confirmation through life is the proof that one can demand for these things. Whoever does not wish to use the means to be indicated later for the attainment of supersensible observation can make the following experience. He can first accept the indications of supersensible knowledge and then apply them to the manifest things of his experience. In this way he can find that life becomes clear and understandable. And he will come to this conviction all the more, the more closely and thoroughly he observes ordinary life.
[ 3 ] Although the astral body does not experience ideas during sleep, even if it does not experience pleasure and suffering and the like, it does not remain inactive. Rather, it is responsible for a lively activity precisely in the state of sleep. It is an activity into which it must enter again and again in rhythmic succession when it has been active for a time in communion with the physical and the etheric body. Just as a clock pendulum, after having swung to the left and returned to its central position, must swing to the right through the force gathered during this swing: so the astral body and the ego in its womb, after having been active for some time in the physical and etheric bodies, must, through the results of this activity, develop their activity for a subsequent time in a soul-spiritual environment without a body. In the ordinary state of human life, unconsciousness occurs within this body-free state of the astral body and the ego, because this represents the opposite of the state of consciousness developed in the waking state through being together with the physical and etheric body: just as the right pendulum swing forms the opposite of the left. The necessity to enter this unconsciousness is felt by the spiritual-soul of the human being as fatigue. But this fatigue is the expression of the fact that during sleep the astral body and the ego prepare themselves, in the following waking state, to re-form in the physical and etheric body what, as long as they were free from the spiritual-soul, has arisen in them through purely organic - unconscious - formative activity. This unconscious formative activity and what happens in the human being during and through consciousness are opposites. Such opposites that must alternate in rhythmic sequence. - The physical body can only be given the form and shape it deserves for the human being through the human etheric body. But this human form of the physical body can only be maintained by such an etheric body, which in turn is supplied with the corresponding forces by the astral body. The etheric body is the molder, the architect of the physical body. However, it can only form in the right sense if it receives the stimulus for the way it has to form from the astral body. In this are the models according to which the etheric body gives its form to the physical body. During waking, the astral body is not filled with these models for the physical body, or at least only to a certain degree. For during waking the soul puts its own images in the place of these models. When man directs his senses towards his surroundings, he forms images in his imagination through perception, which are images of the world around him. These images are initially disturbances for those images that stimulate the etheric body to maintain the physical body. Only if the human being could, through his own activity, supply his astral body with those images that can give the etheric body the right stimulation, then such a disturbance would not exist. But it is precisely this disturbance that plays an important role in human existence. And it expresses itself in the fact that during waking hours the etheric body does not receive the full power of the images. The astral body accomplishes its waking work within the physical body; during sleep it works on the physical body from outside. b3The connection between sleep and fatigue is not usually regarded in the way required by the facts. Sleep is thought to occur as a result of fatigue. The fact that this idea is far too simple can be seen every time a person who is often not tired at all falls asleep while listening to a speech that does not interest him or on a similar occasion. Anyone who wants to claim that a person becomes tired on such occasions is using a method that lacks the proper seriousness of knowledge. Unbiased observation must come to the conclusion that waking and sleeping represent different relations of the soul to the body, which in the regular course of life must occur in rhythmic succession like the left and right swing of a pendulum. Such unbiased observation reveals that the soul's being filled with the impressions of the outside world awakens in it the desire to enter into another state after this one by being absorbed in the genus of its own corporeality. Two states of the soul alternate: Surrender to external impressions and surrender to one's own corporeality. In the first state, the desire for the second is unconsciously generated, which itself then runs in the unconscious. The expression of the desire for the enjoyment of one's own corporeality is fatigue. We must therefore actually say that we feel tired because we want to sleep, not that we want to sleep because we feel tired. Now, since the human soul can, through habituation, also arbitrarily evoke in itself the states that necessarily occur in normal life, it is possible that, when it becomes numb to a given external impression, it evokes in itself the desire for the pleasure of its own corporeality; that is, it falls asleep when there is no reason to do so due to the person's inner constitution.
[ 4 ] For example, just as the physical body needs the outside world, with which it is of the same kind, for the supply of food, something similar is also the case for the astral body. Imagine a physical human body removed from the world around it. It would have to perish. This shows that it is not possible without the whole physical environment. In fact, the whole earth must be just as it is if there are to be physical human bodies on it. In truth, this whole human body is only a part of the earth, indeed in a broader sense of the whole physical universe. In this respect it behaves like, for example, the finger of a hand in relation to the whole human body. Separate the finger from the hand and it cannot remain a finger. It withers away. The same would happen to the human body if it were removed from the body of which it is a part, from the conditions of life which the earth provides. Raise it a sufficient number of miles above the surface of the earth, and it will perish as a finger spoils when it is cut off from the hand. If man pays less attention to this fact in relation to his physical body than to his finger and body, it is merely because the finger cannot walk around on the body as man can on the earth, and for the latter the dependence is therefore more easily apparent.
[ 5 ] Just as the physical body is embedded in the physical world to which it belongs, so the astral body belongs to its own. Only it is torn out of this world through waking life. You can visualize what is going on there with a comparison. Imagine a vessel of water. A drop is nothing separate within this whole mass of water. But take a small sponge and use it to suck a drop out of the whole mass of water. This is what happens to the human astral body on awakening. During sleep it is in a world that is the same as itself. It forms something that belongs to it in a certain way. On awakening, the physical body and the etheric body absorb it. They fill themselves with him. They contain the organs through which he perceives the outer world. But in order to come to this perception, he must separate himself from his world. From this world, however, it can only receive the models it needs for the etheric body. - For example, just as the physical body receives food from its surroundings, so the astral body receives the images of the world around it during the state of sleep. It actually lives outside the physical and etheric body in the universe. In the same universe from which the whole human being is born. In this universe is the source of the images through which man receives his form. He is harmoniously integrated into this universe. And during waking he lifts himself out of this comprehensive harmony in order to come to external perception. During sleep his astral body returns to this harmony of the universe. On awakening from this harmony, it introduces so much power into its bodies that it can again do without dwelling in the harmony for some time. During sleep, the astral body returns to its home and, on awakening, brings newly strengthened forces with it into life. The possession that the astral body brings with it on awakening finds its outward expression in the refreshment that a healthy sleep gives. The further explanations of the secret science will show that this home of the astral body is more comprehensive than that which belongs to the physical body in the narrower sense of the physical environment. While man as a physical being is a member of the earth, his astral body belongs to worlds in which still other world bodies are embedded than our earth. As a result - which, as mentioned, can only become clear in the further explanations - during sleep he enters a world to which worlds other than the earth belong.
[ 6 ] It should be superfluous to point out an easily occurring misunderstanding with regard to these facts. But it is not unnecessary in our time, in which certain materialistic conceptions are present. On the part of those who hold such views, it can of course be said that it is only scientific to investigate something like sleep according to its physical conditions. Even if scholars are not yet agreed on the physical cause of sleep, one thing is certain, namely that certain physical processes must be assumed to underlie this phenomenon. But if only one would recognize that supersensible knowledge does not contradict this assertion! It admits everything that is said from this side, just as one admits that for the physical formation of a house one brick must be laid on top of another, and that when the house is finished, its form and its connection can be explained from purely mechanical laws. But the idea of the master builder is necessary for the house to come into being. It cannot be found by merely examining the physical laws. - Just as behind the physical laws which make the house explainable are the thoughts of its creator, so behind what physical science quite correctly puts forward is that which is spoken of through supersensible knowledge. Certainly, this comparison is often made when we speak of the justification of a spiritual background to the world. And one can find it trivial. But in such matters it is not a question of being familiar with certain concepts, but of attaching the right weight to them to justify something. One can be prevented from doing so simply because opposing ideas have too great a power over the power of judgment to feel this weight in the right way.
[ 7 ] Dreaming is an intermediate state between waking and sleeping. What dream experiences offer to a sensible contemplation is the colorful confusion of a world of images, which nevertheless also contains something of rule and law. Rising and falling, often in a confused sequence, seems at first to show this world. In his dream life, man is unbound by the law of waking consciousness, which chains him to the perception of the senses and to the rules of his power of judgment. And yet the dream has something of mysterious laws which are attractive and appealing to the human imagination and which are the deeper cause of the fact that one always likes to compare the beautiful play of the imagination, as it underlies artistic feeling, with "dreaming". You only have to remember a few characteristic dreams and you will find this confirmed. A person dreams, for example, that he chases away a dog rushing at him. He wakes up and finds himself unconsciously pushing off a part of the comforter that has settled on an unfamiliar part of his body and has therefore become a nuisance. What does dream life make of this sensually perceptible process? What the senses would perceive in the waking state, the sleeping life initially leaves completely unconscious. However, it retains something essential, namely the fact that the person wants to ward something off. And it spins a pictorial process around this. The images as such are echoes from waking daily life. The way in which they are taken from this has something arbitrary about it. Everyone has the feeling that the dream could also conjure up other images for him on the same external occasion. But they express the feeling that man has something to ward off symbolically. The dream creates symbols; it is a symbolizer. Inner processes can also be transformed into such dream symbols. A person dreams that a fire is roaring next to him; he sees the flames in his dream. He wakes up and feels that he has covered himself up too much and has become too warm. The feeling of too much warmth is expressed symbolically in the picture. Very dramatic experiences can take place in dreams. For example, someone dreams that he is standing on a precipice. He sees a child running towards him. The dream makes him experience all the agony of the thought: if only the child would not be inattentive and fall into the depths. He sees it fall and hears the muffled thud of the body below. He wakes up and hears that an object hanging on the wall of the room has come loose and made a muffled sound when it fell. Dream life expresses this simple process in a process that takes place in exciting images. - For the time being, there is no need to ponder how it is that in the last example the moment of the dull impact of an object is broken down into a series of processes that seem to extend over a certain period of time; one need only consider how the dream transforms what the waking sensory perception would present into an image.
[ 8 ] You see: as soon as the senses cease their activity, a creative quality asserts itself for the human being. This is the same creative quality that is also present in full dreamless sleep and which represents that state of the soul that appears as the opposite of the waking state of the soul. If this dreamless sleep is to occur, the astral body must be withdrawn from the etheric body and the physical body. During dreaming it is separated from the physical body in so far as it no longer has any connection with its sense organs; however, it still maintains a certain connection with the etheric body. The fact that the processes of the astral body can be perceived in images comes from its connection with the etheric body. The moment this connection ceases, the images sink into the darkness of unconsciousness, and dreamless sleep is there. However, the arbitrary and often absurd nature of the dream images stems from the fact that the astral body cannot relate its images to the correct objects and processes of the external environment due to its separation from the sensory organs of the physical body. The observation of such a dream, in which the ego splits to a certain extent, is particularly clarifying for this fact. For example, if someone dreams that as a pupil he cannot answer a question put to him by the teacher, while the teacher himself answers it immediately afterwards. Because the dreamer cannot use the organs of perception of his physical body, he is unable to relate the two processes to himself as the same person. Therefore, in order to recognize himself as a permanent self, man must first be equipped with external organs of perception. Only then, if man had acquired the ability to become aware of his ego in a way other than through such organs of perception, would the permanent ego also be perceptible to him outside his physical body. The supersensible consciousness has to acquire such abilities, and the means for this will be discussed further in this paper.
[ 9 ] Death, too, occurs through nothing other than a change in the coherence of the members of the human being. That which is revealed by supersensible observation can also be seen in its effects in the manifest world; and the impartial power of judgment will find the communications of supersensible knowledge confirmed by the observation of external life. But for these facts the expression of the invisible in the visible is less obvious, and one has greater difficulty in fully feeling the weight of what in the processes of external life speaks in confirmation of the communications of supersensible knowledge in this field. It is even more obvious here than for some of the things already discussed in this paper to simply declare these communications to be figments of the imagination, if one wants to close oneself off to the realization of how the sensible contains the clear indication of the supersensible.
[ 10 ] While the astral body only separates from its connection with the etheric body and the physical body during the transition to sleep, but the latter remain connected, the separation of the physical body from the etheric body occurs at death. The physical body is left to its own forces and must therefore disintegrate as a corpse. For the etheric body, however, a state has now occurred at death in which it was never during the time between birth and death, apart from certain exceptional states which will be discussed later. It is now united with its astral body without the physical body being present. For the etheric body and the astral body do not separate immediately after death. They are held together for a time by a force which it is easy to understand must be present. If it were not present, the etheric body could not separate from the physical body. For it is held together with the physical body: this is shown by sleep, where the astral body is unable to tear these two parts of the human being apart. This power comes into effect at death. It separates the etheric body from the physical, so that the former is now connected with the astral body. Psychic observation shows that this connection is different for different people after death. The duration is measured in days. For the time being, this duration will only be mentioned here in passing. - Later, the astral body also separates from its etheric body and goes on its way without it. During the connection of the two bodies, the human being is in a state through which he can perceive the experiences of his astral body. As long as the physical body is there, the work from outside must begin as soon as the astral body is detached from it in order to refresh the worn-out organs. If the physical body is detached, this work ceases. But the power that is used on it when the person is asleep remains after death, and it can now be used for other purposes. It is now used to make the astral body's own processes perceptible. An observer who is attached to the external aspects of life may say that these are all assertions which are plausible to those gifted with supersensible perception, but that there is no possibility for another person to penetrate their truth. This is not the case. Whatever supersensible knowledge observes in this field, which is remote from ordinary vision, can be grasped by ordinary judgment once it has been found. This power of judgment must only place before it in the right way the connections of life which are present in the manifest. Imagination, feeling and volition stand among themselves and with the experiences made by man in the external world in such a relationship that they remain incomprehensible if the nature of their revealed activity is not taken as the expression of an unrevealed one. This revelatory effectiveness only becomes clearer for judgment when it can be seen in its course in physical human life as the result of what supersensible knowledge establishes for the non-physical. Without supersensible knowledge, one finds oneself in the face of this activity as in a dark room without light. Just as the physical objects of the environment can only be seen in the light, so what takes place through the soul life of man can only be explained through supersensible knowledge. While the human being is connected with his physical body, the outer world comes into consciousness in images; after the shedding of this body, what the astral body experiences becomes perceptible when it is not connected with this outer world through any physical sense organs. At first it has no new experiences. The connection with the etheric body prevents it from experiencing anything new. What he does have, however, is the memory of the past life. The etheric body, which is still present, makes this memory appear as a comprehensive, vivid painting. This is man's first experience after death. He perceives life between birth and death as a series of pictures spread out before him. During this life, memory is only present in the waking state, when the human being is connected to his physical body. It is only present to the extent that this body allows it. The soul loses nothing of what makes an impression on it in life. If the physical body were a perfect tool for this purpose, it should be possible at every moment of life to conjure up its entire past before the soul. This obstacle ceases with death. As long as the etheric body remains with the human being, there is a certain perfection of memory. But it disappears to the extent that the etheric body loses the form it had during its stay in the physical body and which is similar to the physical body. This is also the reason why the astral body separates from the etheric body after some time. It can only remain united with it as long as its form corresponding to the physical body lasts. - During life between birth and death, separation of the etheric body only occurs in exceptional cases and only for a short time. For example, if a person strains one of his limbs, a part of the etheric body can separate from the physical body. A limb in which this is the case is said to have "fallen asleep". And the peculiar feeling that one then experiences stems from the separation of the etheric body. (Of course, a materialistic way of thinking can again deny the invisible in the visible and say that all this only comes from the physical disturbance caused by the pressure). In such a case, supersensible observation can see how the corresponding part of the etheric body moves out of the physical body. If a person experiences a very unusual fright or something similar, the etheric body can be separated for a very short time for a large part of the body. This is the case when a person suddenly feels close to death as a result of something, for example when he is drowning or is in danger of falling down a mountain. What people who have experienced such things say is indeed close to the truth and can be confirmed by psychic observation. They say that in such moments their whole life has appeared before their souls as if in a large memory picture. Of the many examples that could be cited here, only one may be referred to, because it comes from a man for whose way of thinking everything that is said here about such things must appear to be vain fantasy. For it is always very useful for those who take a few steps into supersensible observation to acquaint themselves with the statements of those who regard this science as fantasy. Such information cannot so easily be accused of bias on the part of the observer. (The secret scientists may only learn a great deal from those who regard their endeavors as nonsense. They need not be misled if the latter do not show them any sympathy in this respect. Supersensible observation itself, however, does not need such things to prove its results. Nor does it seek to prove, but to explain, with these indications). In his memoirs, Moritz Benedict, an excellent criminal anthropologist and important researcher in many other fields of natural research, recounts a case he himself experienced: once, when he was close to drowning in a bath, he saw his whole life before him in his memory as if in a single image. - If others describe the images experienced on a similar occasion differently, even in such a way that they seem to have little to do with the events of their past, this does not contradict what has been said, for the images that arise in the quite unfamiliar state of separation from the physical body are sometimes not readily explicable in their relationship to life. However, a correct observation will always recognize this relationship. Nor is it an objection if, for example, someone was once close to drowning and did not have the experience described. It must be remembered that this can only occur when the etheric body is really separated from the physical body and the former remains connected to the astral body. If the shock also causes a loosening of the etheric body and astral body, then the experience does not occur, because then there is complete unconsciousness, as in dreamless sleep.
[ 11 ] In the first time after death, the experienced past appears summarized in a memory painting. After the separation from the etheric body, the astral body is now on its own on its further journey. It is not difficult to see that everything remains in the astral body that it has acquired through its own activity during its stay in the physical body. The ego has to a certain extent worked out the spirit self, the life spirit and the spirit man. As far as these are developed, they do not receive their existence from what is present as organs in the bodies, but from the ego. And this ego is precisely the being that does not need any external organs for its perception. Nor does it need such organs in order to remain in possession of what it has united with itself. One could object: why is there no perception of this developed spirit self, life spirit and spirit man in sleep? It is not there because the ego is chained to the physical body between birth and death. Even if it is outside this physical body in sleep with the astral body, it still remains closely connected to it. For the activity of its astral body is turned towards this physical body. This means that the ego's perception is limited to the outer world of the senses and it cannot receive the revelations of the spiritual in its immediate form. Only through death does this revelation come to the ego, because it is freed from its connection with the physical and etheric body. At that moment another world can light up for the soul, in which it is drawn out of the physical world, which in life binds its activity to itself. - Now there are reasons why not all connection with the outer sense world ceases for the human being at this time either. Certain desires remain which maintain this connection. These are desires which man creates for himself precisely because he is aware of his ego as the fourth member of his being. Those cravings and desires which spring from the being of the three lower bodies can also only work within the outer world; and when these bodies are discarded, they cease. Hunger is caused by the outer body; it is silent as soon as this outer body is no longer connected with the ego. If the ego had no other desires than those which originate from its own spiritual being, it could, at the onset of death, draw full satisfaction from the spiritual world into which it has been transferred. But life has given it other desires. It has kindled in it a desire for pleasures that can only be satisfied by physical organs, even though they do not come from the nature of these organs themselves. Not only do the three bodies demand their satisfaction through the physical world, but the ego itself finds pleasures within this world for which there is no object for satisfaction at all in the spiritual world. There are two kinds of desires for the ego in life. Those that stem from the bodies, which must therefore be satisfied within the bodies, but which also come to an end with the disintegration of the bodies. Then there are those that stem from the spiritual nature of the ego. As long as the I is in the bodies, these too will be satisfied by the bodily organs. For the hidden spiritual is at work in the manifestations of the organs of the body. And in everything that the senses perceive, they simultaneously receive a spiritual. This spiritual is also present after death, albeit in a different form. Everything that the ego desires from the spiritual within the sense world, it also has when the senses are no longer there. If these two kinds of desires were not joined by a third, death would only mean a transition from desires that can be satisfied by the senses to those that find their fulfillment in the revelation of the spiritual world. This third kind of desires are those which the ego generates during its life in the sense world, because it finds pleasure in it even in so far as the spiritual is not revealed in it. - The lowest pleasures can be revelations of the spirit. The satisfaction which the intake of food affords the hungry being is a revelation of the spirit. For through the intake of food that is brought about without which the spiritual could not find its development in a certain respect. The ego, however, can go beyond the genus that is necessarily required by this fact. It can crave tasty food, quite apart from the service rendered to the spirit by the intake of food. The same is true of other things in the world of the senses. Desires are thereby generated which would never have appeared in the sense world if the human ego had not been incorporated into it. But such desires do not arise from the spiritual nature of the ego either. The ego must have sensual pleasures as long as it lives in the body, even insofar as it is spiritual. For the spirit reveals itself in the sensual; and the ego enjoys nothing other than the spirit when it surrenders itself in the world of the senses to that through which the light of the spirit shines. And it will remain in the enjoyment of this light, even if sensuality is no longer the means through which the rays of the spirit pass. For such desires, however, there is no fulfillment in the spiritual world for which the spirit does not already live in the sensual. When death occurs, the possibility of enjoyment is cut off for these desires. The enjoyment of tasty food can only be brought about by the presence of the physical organs that are used in the intake of the food: Palate, tongue, etc. The human being no longer has these after discarding the physical body. But if the ego still has a need for such genus, then this need must remain unsatisfied. If this genus corresponds to the spirit, it is only present as long as the physical organs are there. But if the ego has produced it without serving the spirit, it remains after death as a desire that thirsts in vain for satisfaction. We can only form an idea of what is going on in the human being if we imagine someone suffering a burning thirst in an area where there is no water to be found for miles around. This is what happens to the ego when, after death, it harbors unquenched desires for the pleasures of the outer world and has no organs to satisfy them. Of course, the burning thirst, which serves as a comparison with the state of the ego after death, must be thought of as being increased to the extreme and imagined as being extended to all the desires still present at that time, for which there is no possibility of fulfillment. The next state of the ego consists in freeing itself from this bond of attraction to the outer world. The ego must bring about a purification and liberation within itself in this respect. Everything must be eradicated from it that has been generated by it within the body and that has no right of residence in the spiritual world. - Just as an object is seized by fire and burnt, so the world of desires described above is dissolved and destroyed after death. This opens up a view into that world which supersensible knowledge can describe as the "consuming fire of the spirit". This "fire" captures a desire that is sensual in nature, but it is such that the sensual is not an expression of the spirit. One might find such ideas, as supersensible knowledge must give in relation to these processes, bleak and terrible. It might seem frightening that a hope, for the satisfaction of which sensual organs are necessary, must after death turn into hopelessness, that a wish which only the physical world can fulfill must then turn into burning deprivation. One can only hold such an opinion as long as one does not consider that all desires and cravings that are seized by the "consuming fire" after death do not represent benevolent but destructive forces in life in the higher sense. Through such forces, the ego forges a stronger bond with the world of the senses than is necessary in order to absorb from this same world of the senses everything that it desires. This world of the senses is a revelation of the spiritual hidden behind it. The ego could never enjoy the spirit in the form in which it can only reveal itself through bodily senses if it did not want to use these senses for the enjoyment of the spiritual in the sensual. But the ego also withdraws as much of the true spiritual reality in the world as it desires from the world of the senses without the spirit speaking. If sensual pleasure as an expression of the spirit means elevation, development of the ego, then that which is not such an expression means impoverishment, desolation of it. If such a desire is satisfied in the world of the senses, its destructive effect on the ego remains. But this destructive effect is not visible to the ego before death. That is why the indulgence of such desires can generate new desires of the same kind in life. And the person does not even realize that he is wrapping himself in a "consuming fire". After death, only that which already surrounds him in life becomes visible; and by becoming visible, this also appears in its salutary, beneficial consequence. Whoever loves a person is not only drawn to what can be felt through the physical organs. But it can only be said of this that it is withdrawn from perception at death. But this is precisely what becomes visible in the loved one, for whose perception the physical organs were only the means. Indeed, the only thing that prevents this full visibility is the presence of the desire that can only be satisfied by physical organs. But if this desire were not eradicated, the conscious perception of the loved one after death could not occur at all. Seen in this way, the idea of the dreadful and comfortless that events after death could have for man, as they must be described by supersensible knowledge, is transformed into that of the deeply satisfying and comforting.
[ 12 ] The next experiences after death are quite different from those during life in yet another respect. During purification, the human being lives backwards, so to speak. He goes through everything again that he has experienced in life since birth. From the processes that immediately preceded death, he begins and experiences everything again backwards to childhood. And in doing so, everything that did not arise from the spiritual nature of the ego during life comes spiritually before his eyes. Only now he also experiences all this in reverse. For example, a person who has died in his sixtieth year and who has inflicted physical or spiritual pain on someone in his fortieth year out of a surge of anger will experience this event again when he has reached the point of his fortieth year in his return journey through existence after death. The only difference is that he will not experience the satisfaction that he received in life from the attack on the other person, but rather the pain that he inflicted on this other person. From the above, however, it can also be seen at the same time that only that part of such a process can be perceived as painful after death which has arisen from a desire of the ego that originates only in the external physical world. In truth, the ego not only harms the other through the satisfaction of such a desire, but also itself; only this harm remains invisible to it during life. After death, however, this whole world of harmful desires becomes visible to the ego. And the ego then feels drawn to every being and every thing in which such a desire has been kindled, so that it can be extinguished again in the "consuming fire" just as it has arisen. Only when the human being has arrived at the time of his birth during his backward journey have all such desires passed through the purifying fire, and from now on nothing prevents him from fully surrendering to the spiritual world. He enters a new stage of existence. Just as in death he shed the physical body, and soon afterwards the etheric body, so now that part of the astral body which can only live in the consciousness of the outer physical world disintegrates. For supersensible cognition there are thus three corpses, the physical, the etheric and the astral. The time at which the latter is cast off from man is characterized by the fact that the time of purification is about a third of that which elapsed between birth and death. Later, when the course of human life is examined on the basis of the secret science, the reason why this is so will become clear. For supersensible observation, astral corpses are continually present in the human environment, which are cast off by people who pass from the state of purification into a higher existence. This is exactly the same as physical corpses arise for physical perception where people live.
[ 13 ] After purification, the ego enters a completely new state of consciousness. Whereas before death external perceptions had to flow to it so that the light of consciousness could fall on them, now a world flows from within, as it were, which reaches consciousness. The ego also lives in this world between birth and death. Only then does the latter clothe itself in the revelations of the senses; and only where the ego perceives itself in its "innermost sanctum", disregarding all sensory perception, does that which otherwise only appears in the veil of the sensory announce itself in immediate form. Just as the perception of the ego takes place inwardly before death, the spiritual world reveals itself in its fullness from within after death and after purification. Actually, this revelation is already there immediately after the etheric body has been laid aside; but the world of desires, which are still turned towards the outer world, lies before it like a darkening cloud. It is as if the black demonic shadows, which arise from the desires consuming themselves in the "fire", were mixed into a blissful world of spiritual experience. Indeed, these desires are now not mere shadows, but real entities; this becomes immediately apparent when the physical organs are removed from the ego and it can thus perceive what is of a spiritual nature. These beings appear as distorted images and caricatures of what was previously known to man through sensory perception. Supersensible observation has to say of this world of purifying fire that it is inhabited by beings whose appearance can be gruesome and painful to the spiritual eye, whose desire seems to be destruction and whose passion is directed towards an evil against which the evil of the sense world seems insignificant. What man brings into this world in the way of marked desires appears to these entities like nourishment, through which their powers constantly receive new strength and reinforcement. The picture thus formed of a world imperceptible to the senses can appear less incredible to man if he looks at a part of the animal world with an unbiased eye. What is a cruelly prowling wolf to the spiritual gaze? What is revealed by what the senses perceive in it? Nothing other than a soul that lives in desires and acts through them. You can call the wolf's outer form an embodiment of these desires. And if man had no organs to perceive this form, he would still have to recognize the existence of the corresponding being if its desires were invisible in their effects, if a force invisible to the eye were lurking around, through which everything that happens through the visible wolf could happen. Now, the beings of the purifying fire are not present for the sensual, but only for the supersensible consciousness; but their effects are obvious: they consist in the destruction of the ego when this gives them nourishment. These effects become clearly visible when the well-founded pleasure increases to intemperance and debauchery. For what is perceptible to the senses would also only stimulate the ego to the extent that the genus is founded in its essence. The animal is driven to desire only by that in the external world which its three bodies crave. Man has higher pleasures because the fourth, the ego, is added to the three bodily members. If, however, the ego desires such a satisfaction, which does not serve to preserve and further its nature, but to destroy it, then such a desire can be neither the effect of its three bodies nor of its own nature, but only that of entities which remain hidden from the senses according to their true form, but which can approach the higher nature of the ego and stimulate it to desires which are not connected with sensuality, but which can only be satisfied through it. There are beings who have passions and desires as their nourishment which are of a worse kind than all animal ones, because they do not live out their lives in the sensual, but seize the spiritual and drag it down into the sensual field. The forms of such beings are therefore uglier and more horrible to the spiritual eye than the forms of the wildest animals, in which only passions are embodied that are rooted in the sensual; and the destructive powers of these beings far surpass all the destructive rage that exists in the sensually perceptible animal world. In this way, supersensible knowledge must broaden man's view as to a world of beings that is in a certain respect lower than the visible destructive animal world.
[ 14 ] When man has passed through this world after death, then he finds himself facing a world which contains spiritual things and which also only produces a desire in him which finds its satisfaction in the spiritual. But even now man distinguishes between that which belongs to his ego and that which forms the environment of this ego - one can also say its spiritual outer world. Only that which he experiences from this environment flows to him in the same way as the perception of his own ego flows to him during his stay in the body. Thus, while man's environment speaks to him through the organs of his bodies in the life between birth and death, the language of the new environment penetrates directly into the "innermost sanctuary" of the ego after all bodies have been laid aside. The entire environment of the human being is now filled with entities that are of the same kind as his ego, for only an ego has access to an ego. Just as minerals, plants and animals surround man in the world of the senses and compose it, so after death he is surrounded by a world composed of entities of a spiritual nature. But man brings something into this world which is not his environment; it is that which the ego has experienced within the sense world. At first the sum of these experiences appeared immediately after death, as long as the etheric body was still connected with the ego, as a comprehensive memory picture. The etheric body itself is then discarded, but something of the memory painting remains as an imperishable possession of the ego. As if one were to make an extract, an excerpt, from all the experiences that have come to the human being between birth and death, so that which remains behind stands out. This is the spiritual endurance of life, the fruit of it. This experience is of a spiritual nature. It contains everything that reveals itself spiritually through the senses. But without life in the sense world it could not have come about. After death, the ego perceives this spiritual fruit of the sense world as that which is now its own, its inner world and with which it enters the world that consists of beings that reveal themselves, as only its ego can reveal itself in its deepest inner being. Just as a plant seed, which is an extract of the whole plant, only unfolds when it is immersed in another world, in the earth, so now that which the ego brings with it from the sense world unfolds like a seed which is acted upon by the spiritual environment which has now received it. The science of the supersensible can, however, only give pictures if it is to describe what is going on in this "spirit-land"; but these pictures can be such as present themselves to the supersensible consciousness as true reality when it follows the corresponding events invisible to the sensuous eye. What is to be described there can be made vivid by comparison with the world of the senses. For although it is entirely spiritual, it has a certain resemblance to the sensory world. Just as, for example, a color appears in the sensory world when this or that object acts on the eye, so an experience like that of a color appears before the ego in the "spirit world" when a being acts on it. Only this experience is brought about in the same way that only the perception of the ego within can be brought about in the life between birth and death. It is not as if the light fell into the human being from outside, but as if another being had a direct effect on the ego and caused it to imagine this effect in a color picture. Thus all beings in the spiritual environment of the ego find their expression in a color-radiating world. Since they have a different kind of origin, these color experiences of the spiritual world are naturally also of a somewhat different character than those of the sensual colors. Similar things must also be said for other impressions which man receives from the sense world. However, the sounds of the spiritual world are most similar to the impressions of the sense world. And the more the human being settles into this world, the more it becomes for him a life moving in itself, which can be compared with the sounds and their harmony in sensory reality. Now he does not feel the sounds as something that comes to an organ from outside, but as a power that flows out into the world through his ego. He feels the sound as he feels his own speaking or singing in the sense world; only in the spiritual world he knows that these sounds that flow out of him are at the same time the manifestations of other entities that pour out into the world through him. An even higher manifestation in the "spirit land" takes place when the sound becomes the "spiritual word". Then not only does the moving life of another spiritual being flow through the ego, but such a being itself communicates its inner being to this ego. And without the separating factor that every togetherness in the sense world must have, two beings live in each other when the "spiritual word" flows through the ego. And this is really the kind of togetherness of the ego with other spiritual beings after death. Before the supersensible consciousness three areas of the spirit world appear, which can be compared with three parts of the physical sense world. The first area is, so to speak, the "solid land" of the spiritual world, the second the "sea and river area" and the third the "circle of air". - What takes on physical form on earth, so that it can be perceived by physical organs, is perceived according to its spiritual essence in the first area of the "spirit land". A crystal, for example, can perceive the force that forms its shape. But what is revealed there behaves like a contrast to what appears in the sense world. The space which in the latter world is filled by the mass of stone appears to the spiritual eye like a kind of cavity; but all around this cavity is seen the force which forms the shape of the stone. A color that the stone has in the sense world appears in the spiritual world as the experience of the opposite color; thus a red-colored stone is seen from the spirit world as greenish, a green one as reddish, and so on. The other qualities also appear in their opposites. Just as stones, earth masses and the like form the solid land - the continental area - of the sensory world, so do the objects depicted compose the "solid land" of the spiritual world. - Everything that is life within the world of the senses is ocean territory in the spiritual. To the sensual eye, life appears in its effects in plants, animals and humans. To the spiritual eye, life is a flowing being that permeates the spirit land like seas and rivers. Better still is the comparison with the circulation of blood in the body. For while the seas and rivers in the world of the senses are irregularly distributed, there is a certain regularity in the distribution of the flowing life in the spirit land, as in the circulation of blood. At the same time, this "flowing life" is perceived as a spiritual sound. - The third area of the spirit land is its "circle of air". What occurs in the sense world as sensation is present in the spirit realm as pervasively as air is present on earth. Imagine a sea of flowing sensation. Sorrow and pain, joy and delight flow in this realm like wind and storm in the air of the sensual world. Think of a battle being fought on earth. There are not only human figures facing each other that the sensual eye can see, but feelings stand against feelings, passions against passions; pain fills the battlefield just as much as human figures. Everything that lives there in passion, in pain, in the joy of victory, is not only present insofar as it manifests itself in sensually perceptible effects; it comes to the consciousness of the spiritual sense as a process of the circle of air in the spirit land. Such an event in the spiritual is like a thunderstorm in the physical world. And the perception of these events can be compared to the hearing of words in the physical world. This is why it is said that just as the air envelops and permeates earthly beings, so the "wafting spiritual words" envelop and permeate the beings and processes of the spirit land.
[ 15 ] And further perceptions are still possible in this spiritual world. That which can be compared to the warmth and light of the physical world is also present here. That which, like warmth, permeates all earthly things and beings in the spirit world is the world of thought itself. Only the thoughts there are to be imagined as living, independent beings. What man grasps as thoughts in the revealed world is like a shadow of what lives as thought beings in the spirit world. Imagine the thought as it exists in man, lifted out of this man and endowed with its own inner life as an active, acting being, and you have a faint visualization of what fills the fourth region of the spirit land. What man perceives as thoughts in his physical world between birth and death is only the revelation of the world of thoughts as it can be formed through the tools of the body. But everything that man harbors in such thoughts that signify an enrichment in the physical world has its origin in this realm. With such thoughts one need not only think of the ideas of the great inventors, the geniuses, but one can see in every human being how he has "ideas" which he does not merely owe to the external world, but through which he transforms this external world himself. As far as feelings and passions come into consideration, to which the cause lies in the outer world, these feelings etc. are to be placed in the third region of the spirit world; but everything that can live in the human soul in such a way that man becomes a creator, that he has a transforming and fertilizing effect on his environment: this is revealed in its very own, essential form in the fourth field of the spiritual world. - What is present in the fifth region can be compared to physical light. It is wisdom revealing itself in its very own form. Beings who pour wisdom into their surroundings, like the sun pours light onto physical beings, belong to this region. What is illuminated by this wisdom shows itself in its true meaning and significance for the spiritual world, just as a physical being shows its color when illuminated by light. - There are still higher regions of the spirit world; they will be described later in this book. After death the ego is immersed in this world with the experience it brings with it from sensual life. And this experience is still united with that part of the astral body which is not cast off at the end of the purification period. Only that part falls away which, with its desires and wishes, was turned towards physical life after death. The sinking of the ego with what it has acquired from the sensual world into the spiritual world can be compared to the embedding of a seed in the ripening earth. Just as this seed draws the substances and forces from its surroundings in order to develop into a new plant, so development and growth is the essence of the ego embedded in the spiritual world. - What an organ perceives also contains the power by which this organ itself is formed. The eye perceives light. But without light there would be no eye. Beings who spend their lives in darkness do not in themselves develop any tools for seeing. Thus, however, the whole physical human being is created out of the hidden powers of what is perceived through the limbs of the bodies. The physical body is built up by the forces of the physical world, the etheric body by those of the living world, and the astral body is formed out of the astral world. When the ego is transported into the spirit world, it is confronted by precisely those forces that remain hidden to physical perception. What becomes visible in the first region of the spirit land are the spiritual entities that always surround the human being and which have also built up his physical body. In the physical world, therefore, man perceives nothing other than the revelations of those spiritual forces which have also formed his own physical body. After death he is in the midst of these formative forces themselves, which now show themselves to him in their own, previously hidden form. Likewise, through the second region he is in the midst of the forces of which his etheric body is composed; in the third region the powers flow towards him from which his astral body is structured. The higher regions of the spirit land now also let flow to him that from which he is built up in life between birth and death.
[ 16 ] These entities of the spiritual world now work together with that which the human being has brought with him as fruit from the previous life and which now becomes a seed. And through this interaction the human being is initially built up anew as a spiritual being. In sleep the physical body and the etheric body remain in existence; the astral body and the ego are indeed outside these two, but still connected with them. The influences they receive from the spiritual world in such a state can only serve to restore the powers that were exhausted during waking. But after the physical body and the etheric body have been discarded, and after the period of purification also those parts of the astral body which are still connected with the physical world through their desires, everything that flows into the ego from the spiritual world now becomes not only an improver but a reshaper. And after a certain time, which will be discussed in later parts of this writing, an astral body has formed around the ego, which can again dwell in an etheric body and a physical body such as are characteristic of the human being between birth and death. The human being can again go through a birth and appear in a renewed earthly existence, which has now incorporated into itself the fruit of the former life. Until the new formation of an astral body, man is witness to his reconstruction. Since the powers of the spirit world do not reveal themselves to him through external organs, but from within, like his own self in self-consciousness, he can perceive this revelation as long as his mind is not yet directed towards an external world of perception. From the moment the astral body is newly formed, however, this sense turns outwards. The astral body now demands an outer etheric body and physical body again. It thus turns away from the revelations of the inner. This is why there is now an intermediate state in which the human being sinks into unconsciousness. Consciousness can only reappear in the physical world when the organs necessary for physical perception have been formed. During this time, when the consciousness enlightened by inner perception ceases, the new etheric body begins to attach itself to the astral body, and the human being can then also move back into a physical body. Only such an ego could participate with consciousness in these two attachments, which has of its own accord generated the creative forces hidden in the etheric body and physical body, the life spirit and the spirit man. As long as the human being is not ready, entities that are further along in their development than he himself must guide this incorporation. The astral body is guided by such beings to a pair of parents so that it can be endowed with the corresponding etheric body and physical body. - Before the incorporation of the etheric body takes place, something extraordinarily significant happens for the human being re-entering physical existence. In his previous life he has created disturbing powers which have manifested themselves during the return journey after death. Take the example mentioned earlier. In the fortieth year of his previous life, out of a surge of anger, man inflicted pain on someone. After death, this pain of the other person confronted him as a disturbing force for the development of his own ego. And so it is with all such incidents of the previous life. On re-entering physical life, these obstacles to development again stand before the ego. Just as with the entrance of death a kind of memory painting stood before the human ego, so now a preview of the life to come. Again the human being sees such a painting, which now shows all the obstacles that the human being has to clear away if his development is to continue. And what he sees in this way becomes the starting point of forces that man must take with him into the new life. The image of the pain that he has inflicted on the other becomes the force that drives the ego, when it re-enters life, to make up for this pain. Thus the previous life has a determining effect on the new one. The deeds of this new life are caused in a certain way by those of the previous one. This lawful connection between a previous existence and a later one is regarded as the law of fate; it has become customary to refer to it with the term "karma", borrowed from Oriental wisdom.
[ 17 ] Building up a new bodily connection is not, however, the only activity incumbent on man between death and a new birth. While this construction is taking place, the human being lives outside the physical world. During this time, however, the physical world continues to develop. The earth changes its face in relatively short periods of time. What did it look like a few millennia ago in the areas currently occupied by Germany? When man appears on earth in a new existence, it generally never looks the same as it did at the time of his last life. While he was absent from the earth, everything possible has changed. Hidden forces are now also at work in this change in the face of the earth. They work from the same world in which the human being finds himself after death. And he himself must participate in this transformation of the earth. He can only do so under the guidance of higher beings as long as he has not acquired a clear awareness of the connection between the spiritual and its expression in the physical through the creation of the spirit of life and spiritual man. But he is involved in the transformation of earthly conditions. It can be said that during the time from death to a new birth, people reshape the earth so that its conditions match what has developed within themselves. If we look at a patch of earth at a certain point in time and then again after a long time in a completely changed state, the forces that have brought about this change are in the dead human beings. They are also in contact with the earth in this way between death and a new birth. The supersensible consciousness sees in all physical existence the revelation of a hidden spiritual. For physical observation, the light of the sun, the changes in the climate, etc. have an effect on the transformation of the earth. For supersensible observation, the ray of light that falls from the sun on the plant is the power of dead people. This observation becomes aware of how human souls hover around the plants, how they walk the earth and the like. Man is not merely turned towards himself, not only towards the preparation for his own new earthly existence after death. No, he is called to create spiritually in the outer world, just as he is called to create physically in the life between birth and death.
[ 18 ] However, it is not only the life of man from the spirit world that affects the conditions of the physical world, but conversely, the activity in the physical existence also has its effects in the spiritual world. An example can illustrate what happens in this relationship. There is a bond of love between mother and child. This love emanates from the attraction between the two, which is rooted in the forces of the sensory world. But it changes over the course of time. The sensual bond becomes more and more spiritual. And this spiritual bond is woven not only for the physical world, but also for the spirit world. It is the same with other relationships. What is woven in the physical world by spiritual beings remains in the spiritual world. Friends who have bonded closely together in life also belong together in the spirit world; and after they have shed their bodies they are in a much closer union than in physical life. For as spirits they are there for each other in the same way as described above in the revelations of spiritual beings to others through the inner being. And a bond that has been woven between two people also brings them together again in a new life. In the truest sense of the word, we must therefore speak of people finding each other again after death.
[ 19 ] What has once taken place with man, from birth to death and from there to a new birth, repeats itself. Man always returns to earth when the fruit he has acquired in a physical life has reached maturity in the spirit world. But there is not a repetition without beginning and end, but man has once passed from other forms of existence into those which proceed in the manner indicated, and he will pass to others in the future. The outlook on these transitional stages will emerge when the development of the universe in connection with man is described below in the sense of supersensible consciousness.
[ 20 ] The processes between death and a new birth are of course even more hidden to external sensory observation than that which underlies the revealed existence between birth and death as spiritual. This sensory observation can only see the effects of this part of the hidden world where they enter physical existence. The question for it must be whether the person who enters into existence through birth brings with him something of what the supersensible knowledge of processes between a previous death and birth describes. If someone finds a snail shell in which nothing of an animal is noticeable, he will only recognize that this snail shell has come into being through the activity of an animal and cannot believe that it has come together in its form through mere physical forces. Likewise, someone who observes man in life and finds something that cannot originate from this life can reasonably admit that it comes from what the science of the supersensible describes, if this sheds an explanatory light on what is otherwise inexplicable. In this way, sensory observation could also find the invisible causes comprehensible from the visible effects. And whoever observes this life with complete impartiality will find that with each new observation it becomes more and more correct. It is only a matter of finding the right point of view to observe the effects in life. Where, for example, are the effects of what supersensible knowledge describes as the processes of the time of purification? How does the effect of what man is supposed to experience after this period of purification in the purely spiritual realm, according to the indications of spiritual research, come to light?
[ 21 ] Enigmas are enough for any serious, profound consideration of life in this field. One person is born in need and misery, endowed with few talents, so that he seems predestined to a miserable existence by the facts of his birth. The other is nurtured and cared for from the first moment of his existence by caring hands and hearts; brilliant abilities develop in him; he is predisposed to a fruitful, satisfying existence. Two opposing attitudes can assert themselves in the face of such questions. The one will want to cling to what the senses can perceive and what the mind, clinging to these senses, can comprehend. This attitude will not see any question in the fact that one person is born into happiness and the other into misfortune. Even if it does not want to use the word "coincidence", it will not think of assuming any lawful connection that causes this. And with regard to dispositions and talents, such a way of thinking will stick to what is "inherited" from parents, foreparents and other ancestors. It will refuse to look for the causes in spiritual processes which the person himself has gone through before his birth - apart from the hereditary line of his ancestors - and through which he has formed his dispositions and talents. - Another mindset will feel unsatisfied by such a view. It will say that nothing happens in a certain place or in a certain environment, even in the revealed world, without having to presuppose causes as to why this is the case. Even if in many cases man has not yet investigated these causes, they do exist. An alpine flower does not grow in the lowlands. There is something in its nature that links it to the Alpine region. In the same way, there must be something in a person that causes him to be born into a certain environment. Causes that merely lie in the physical world are not enough. To the deeper thinker, they appear as if the fact that someone has struck another person a blow should not be explained by the feelings of the former, but by the physical mechanism of his hand. - This attitude must be equally unsatisfied with all explanations based on the mere "heredity" of dispositions and talents. One may at least say of it: see how certain dispositions are passed on in families. In two and a half centuries, musical talents have been passed down through the members of the Bach family. The Bernoulli family produced eight mathematicians, some of whom were destined for completely different professions in their childhood. But their "inherited" talents always drove them towards the family profession. One might also point out how one can show, through precise research into the ancestral line of a personality, that in one way or another the talent of this personality was shown by the ancestors and that it is only a summation of inherited talents. - He who has the second kind of mind indicated will certainly not disregard such facts; but they cannot be to him what they are to him who wants to base his explanations only on the processes in the world of the senses. The former will point out that the inherited dispositions can no more add up to the personality as a whole by themselves than the metal parts of the watch form themselves into the personality. And if it is objected to him that it is after all the interaction of the parents that can bring about the combination of the dispositions, i.e. that this takes the place of the watchmaker, so to speak, he will reply: Look with impartiality at the completely new thing that is given with every child's personality; this cannot come from the parents, simply because it is not present in them. c4That the personal gifts of man, if they were subject to the law of mere "heredity", would have to show themselves not at the end but at the beginning of a blood community, could of course easily be misunderstood as a statement. One could say, yes, they cannot manifest themselves there, because they must first develop. But this is no objection; for if one wants to prove that something is inherited from a previous one, one must show how that which was already there before can be found in the descendant. If it were now shown that something was there at the beginning of a consanguinity which would be found again in the further course, one could speak of inheritance. But it is not possible if something appears at the end that was not there before. The reversal of the sentence above should only show that the idea of inheritance is an impossible one.
[ 22 ] Unclear thinking can cause a lot of confusion in this area. The worst thing is when those of the former mindset portray those of the latter as opponents of what is based on "certain facts". But it need not even occur to the latter to deny the truth or value of these facts. For example, they can certainly see that a certain mental disposition, or even a certain school of thought, is "passed on" in a family and that certain dispositions, when summed up and combined in a descendant, result in a significant personality. They are quite capable of admitting when they are told that the most important name is rarely at the top, but at the bottom of a bloodline. But it should not be held against them if they are forced to form quite different ideas from those who only want to stick to the sensual and factual. The latter can be replied to: Certainly a human being shows the characteristics of his ancestors, for the spiritual-soul, which enters physical existence through birth, takes its corporeality from what heredity gives it. This, however, says nothing more than that a being bears the characteristics of the medium in which it is immersed. It is certainly a strange - trivial - comparison, but the unbiased person will not deny its justification if it is said that the fact that a human being shows itself wrapped in the characteristics of its ancestors proves nothing for the origin of the personal characteristics of this being, just as it proves nothing for the inner nature of a person if he is wet because he has fallen into water. And it can also be said that if the most significant name is at the end of a blood union, this shows that the bearer of this name needed this blood union in order to form the body that he needed for the development of his overall personality. But it proves nothing for the "inheritance" of the personal itself: indeed, for sound logic this fact proves the very opposite. For if the personal gifts were inherited, they would have to stand at the beginning of a consanguinity and then be passed on from there to the descendants. But since they are at the end, this is precisely a testimony to the fact that they are not inherited.
[ 23 ] Now it should not be denied that those who speak of spiritual causation in life contribute no less to confusion. They are often spoken of in far too general, vague terms. It can certainly be compared with the assertion that the metal parts of a watch have assembled themselves to form it, when it is said that a person's personality is made up of inherited characteristics. But it must also be admitted that with many assertions in relation to a spiritual world it is no different than if someone said: the metal parts of the clock cannot assemble themselves in such a way that the hands are pushed forward by the assembly, so there must be something spiritual that takes care of this pushing forward. Compared to such an assertion, however, the person who says: "Oh, I don't care any more about such "mystical" beings that push the hands forward; I am trying to get to know the mechanical connections that cause the hands to move forward. It is not just a matter of knowing that there is a spiritual being (the watchmaker) behind something mechanical, for example the watch, but it can only be meaningful to get to know the thoughts that preceded the production of the watch in the mind of the watchmaker. These thoughts can be found in the mechanism.
[ 24 ] All mere dreaming and fantasizing about the supernatural only leads to confusion. For it is unsuitable to satisfy the opponents. They are right when they say that such references to supernatural beings in general do nothing to promote an understanding of the facts. Certainly, such opponents may also say the same about the specific statements of spiritual science. But then it can be pointed out how the effects of hidden spiritual causes show themselves in manifest life. It can be said that it is true, as spiritual science claims to have established through observation, that a person has undergone a period of purification after death and that during this period he has experienced in his soul the obstacle to his progressive development that was a certain deed he performed in a previous life. While he was experiencing this, the urge to improve the consequences of this act formed in him. He brings this drive with him into a new life. And the presence of this drive forms the trait in his being that places him in a position from which improvement is possible. Consider a totality of such drives, and one has a cause for the fated environment into which a person is born. - The same can be done with another assumption. Let it again be assumed that what is said by spiritual science is correct, that the fruits of a past life are incorporated into the spiritual germ of man, and that the spirit-land in which he finds himself between death and a new life is the region in which these fruits ripen in order to appear in a new life, transformed into dispositions and faculties, and to form the personality in such a way that it appears as the effect of what has been gained in a previous life. - Whoever makes these assumptions and looks at life with them impartially will see that through them everything that is sensual and factual can be recognized in its full meaning and truth, but that at the same time everything becomes comprehensible that must always remain incomprehensible to those whose attitude is directed towards the spiritual world if they rely solely on sensual facts. And above all, every illogicality of the kind indicated earlier will disappear: because the most important name is at the end of a bloodline, the bearer must have inherited his gift. Life becomes logically comprehensible through the supersensible facts ascertained by spiritual science.
[ 25 ] The conscientious seeker of truth, who wants to find his way around the facts without his own experience in the supersensible world, will also be able to raise a weighty objection. It can be argued that it is inadmissible to assume the existence of any facts simply because they can explain something that is otherwise inexplicable. Such an objection is certainly completely meaningless for those who know the relevant facts from supersensible experience. And in the following parts of this writing the path is indicated which can be followed in order to become acquainted not only with other spiritual facts described here, but also with the law of spiritual causation as a personal experience. But for anyone who does not want to take this path, the above objection can have a meaning. And what can be said against it is also valuable for someone who is determined to follow the indicated path himself. For if someone takes it in the right way, then it is itself the best first step that can be taken on this path. - For it is quite true that merely because one can explain by it something which otherwise remains inexplicable, one should not assume something of whose existence one otherwise has no knowledge. But in the case of the spiritual facts mentioned, the matter is still different. If one accepts them, this not only has the intellectual consequence that one finds life comprehensible through them, but one also experiences something quite different through the inclusion of these premises in one's thoughts. Consider the following case: something happens to someone that causes quite embarrassing feelings in him. He can now relate to it in two ways. He can experience the incident as something that embarrasses him and surrender to the embarrassing feeling, perhaps even sink into pain. But he can also face it differently. He can say: In truth, in a past life I myself formed the force within me that put me in front of this incident; I actually inflicted the thing on myself. And he can now arouse all the feelings in himself that such a thought can cause. Naturally, the thought must be experienced with the utmost seriousness and with all possible strength if it is to have such an effect on the emotional and sentimental life. Whoever achieves this will have an experience that can best be illustrated by a comparison. Let us assume that two people are given a sealing wax stick. One of them makes intellectual observations about the "inner nature" of the rod. These reflections may be very clever; if this "inner nature" is not revealed by anything, someone may say to him: that is dreaming. The other, however, rubs the sealing wax with a cloth and then shows that the rod attracts small bodies. There is an important difference between the thoughts that passed through the first man's head and inspired him to make these observations, and those of the second. The thoughts of the first have no actual result; but those of the second have a power, that is, something actual, drawn out of their concealment. - So it is with the thoughts of a man who imagines that he has planted the power to come together with an event in himself through a previous life. This mere imagination stimulates a real power in him, through which he can encounter the event in a completely different way than if he did not harbor this imagination. It sheds light on the necessary nature of this event, which he could otherwise only recognize as a coincidence. And he will immediately realize: I have had the right thought, because this thought had the power to reveal the fact to me. If someone repeats such inner processes, they will continue to become a means of inner power supply, and thus prove their correctness through their fruitfulness. And this rightness shows itself, little by little, strongly enough. In spiritual, mental and also physical terms, such processes have a healthy, indeed in every respect beneficial effect on life. The human being becomes aware that he is thereby placing himself in a correct way in the context of life, whereas if he only pays attention to the one life between birth and death, he is indulging in delusion. The human being becomes stronger in soul through the marked knowledge. - However, everyone can only obtain such purely inner proof of spiritual causation for himself in his inner life. But everyone can have it. However, anyone who has not obtained it cannot judge its probative value. But anyone who has obtained it can hardly doubt it. And there is no need to be surprised that this is the case. For what is so completely connected with that which constitutes man's innermost being, his personality, it is only natural that it can only be sufficiently proven in the innermost experience. - It cannot, however, be argued that such a matter, because it corresponds to such an inner experience, must be settled by each person for himself, and that it cannot be a matter for spiritual science. It is certain that everyone must have the experience himself, just as everyone must realize the proof of a mathematical theorem. But the way in which the experience can be achieved is valid for all people, just as the method of proving a mathematical theorem is valid for all.
[ 26 ] It is not to be denied that - apart from supersensible observations, of course - the proof just given by the power of the corresponding thoughts is the only one that stands up to any unbiased logic. All other considerations are certainly very significant; but they will all have something that an opponent can find points of attack on. However, anyone who has acquired a sufficiently impartial view will find something in the possibility and actuality of man's upbringing that has the logical power to prove that a spiritual being struggles to exist in the bodily shell. He will compare the animal with the human being and say to himself: in the former, the characteristics and abilities that are decisive for it appear at birth as something determined in itself, which clearly shows how it is predetermined by heredity and unfolds in the outside world. We can see how the young chick carries out life's activities in a certain way from birth. Through education, however, the human being enters into a relationship with his inner life that can stand without any relation to heredity. And he can be in a position to appropriate the effects of such external influences. Those who educate know that such influences must be met by forces from within the human being; if this is not the case, then all training and education is meaningless. For the unbiased educator, the boundary between the inherited dispositions and those inner forces of the human being which shine through these dispositions and which stem from earlier life courses is very clear. Certainly, it is not possible to cite such "weighty" evidence for such things as one can for certain physical facts through the scales. But these things are the intimacies of life. And for those who have a sense for them, even such intangible evidence is proof; even more proof than tangible reality. The fact that animals can also be trained, i.e. that they take on characteristics and abilities through education, is no objection for those who are able to look at the essentials. For apart from the fact that transitions can be found everywhere in the world, the results of training do not merge with an animal's personal nature in the same way as they do with humans. It is even emphasized how the abilities that are imparted to domestic animals in living together with humans are inherited, i.e. have an immediate generic, not a personal effect. Darwin describes how dogs retrieve without having been trained or seen to do so. Who would say the same about human education?
[ 27 ] Now there are thinkers who, through their observations, go beyond the opinion that man is put together by purely inherited forces from outside. They rise to the idea that a spiritual being, an individuality, precedes the bodily existence and shapes it. But many of them do not find the possibility to understand that there are repeated earth lives and that in the intermediate existence between the lives the fruits of the previous lives are co-forming forces. One such thinker may be cited from the series. Immanuel Hermann Fichte, the son of the great Fichte, cites his observations in his "Anthropology", which lead him (page 528) to the following summarizing judgment: 3Brockhaus, Leipzig 1860 "The parents are not the producers in a complete sense: they provide the organic material, and not merely this, but at the same time that intermediate, sensual-comfortable, which shows itself in temperament, in peculiar coloring of the mind, in definite specification of the instincts, and the like, as the common source of which the 'imagination' has arisen in that wider sense which we have proved. In all these elements of the personality the mixture and peculiar connection of the parental souls is unmistakable; to declare them therefore to be a mere product of procreation is perfectly justified, still more so if, as we had to decide, procreation is conceived as a real process of the soul. But the actual, concluding center of the personality is missing here; for on deeper observation it becomes apparent that even those comfortable peculiarities are only a shell and a tool to contain the actual spiritual ideal dispositions of man, suitable to promote or hinder them in their development, but by no means capable of letting them arise from themselves." And it goes on to say: "Everyone pre-exists according to his basic spiritual form; for spiritually speaking, no two individuals are alike, any more than one animal species is like another" (page 532). These thoughts only go so far as to allow a spiritual entity to enter into the physical corporeality of the human being. But since its formative powers are not derived from the causes of previous lives, every time a personality arises, such a spiritual entity would have to emerge from a divine origin. Under this assumption, however, there would be no possibility of explaining the relationship that exists between the dispositions that emerge from the human inner being and that which penetrates this inner being from the external earthly environment in the course of life. The human inner being, which for each individual human being originated from a divine source, would have to be completely alien to what it encounters in earthly life. Only then - as is indeed the case - will this not be the case if this human inner being was already connected with the outer world, if it is not living in it for the first time. The unbiased educator can clearly perceive that I am bringing something to my pupil from the results of his life on earth which is alien to his merely inherited qualities, but which nevertheless appears to him as if he had already been present during the work from which these results originate. Only the repeated earth lives in connection with the facts presented by spiritual research in the spiritual realm between the earth lives: only all this can give a satisfactory explanation of the all-round life of present humanity. - It is expressly said here: the "present" humanity. For spiritual research shows that the cycle of earthly lives did indeed once begin and that different conditions existed then than at present for the spiritual being of man entering the bodily shell. In the following chapters we will go back to this primeval state of the human being. When the results of spiritual science will have shown how this human being received its present form in connection with the development of the earth, it will also be possible to indicate more precisely how the spiritual essence of man penetrates from supersensible worlds into the bodily shells, and how the spiritual law of causation, the "human destiny", is formed.